Keskustelujen arkisto

Hi in my previous email title is added the following label:

SPG,Suspected,pattern=3.70

what does this mean? is it a problem with my email?
please let me know what is this.

Thank you
Nikos

On 08/04/2012 01:24 AM, ELAINE RAMSHAW wrote:

> Another request for store info: a friend is going to Copenhagen for a
> few weeks and is willing to look for some old issues of Anders And for
> me. What's the best store for second-hand Anders And comics in Copenhagen?

I believe these two deserve a visit:

http://www.faraos.dk/Webshop/Information/koebenhavnComic
Skindergade 27

http://pegasus.dk/
Nr. Farimagsgade 53

S?ren

On a slightly related note it would be nice if this mailing list
put [NAFSK.SE] or what have you in the subject line so I could pick
out these emails much easier when scanning through my 100+ emails
in the morning.

Now I do realize I could use mail filtering of some sorta to put them
in a folder but I tend not to do that as I would end up with folders
of unread email that I do not check very often. Plus I am lazy.

Just my two bits on this. Thank you.

matt

On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Per Starb?ck wrote:

>> what does this mean? is it a problem with my email?
>> please let me know what is this.
>
> It was a spam checker that thought your mail looked somewhat
> suspicious. I don't know exactly what triggered it, but there was
> really no problem. These things don't work perfectly.
> _______________________________________________
> http://nafsk.se/mailman/listinfo/dcml
>

Hi to all,
In my previous mail I gave you the link of my webcomic.
?This ?comic ?is created as a hobby, in this summer, and it is my first try.
Maybe next summer I draw a second webcomic.
Now I want your opinions about it.

Would it be better to add frames in reverse time sequence??
I mean the newer frame should be above all other frames,?
and the older frame should be in the bottom?

In some webcomics the new frames are added in first page and all the older frames
appear in another page which is called webcomic history.

But if I do this approach to my web comic I 'm afraid that the story will not be very
easy for readers to understand it. Should I change the order?
of my frames ?
Thank you.
Also if you want any simple cartoon I can draw it and send?
it to your email for free.

Nikos

I recall watching this several times when I was younger. It has
been years since I have seen it. The disney channel was pretty nice
back then. They actually showed a lot of the old cartoons and movies
instead of live actor shows. Maybe they still do. Dunno.

But anyway... I guess with Goofy being in the movie, if I recall
correctly, really broke up any suspense/horror in my mind. I never
really cared for Goofy as his character seemed shallow and dull.
His jokes and clumsiness were rarely funny.

Donald was always throwing fits so it was "expected". It was his claim
to fame. So going after a cow because he was hungry seems right in
character. Now if the cow actually talked and was "like a disney
character" it might have been different. But it was just a cow that
did not talk.

And Mickey.. typical Mickey. Always the calm one who settles things
down and rights the rocky boat. I rank him just above Goofy on my
Disney character likability chart. With him around you knew that
cow was safe.

So no. I do not think it was a scary moment. Even for a child as
long as they were used to other Donald antics. Maybe that is the key.
Not having seen every Donald cartoon in existence already.

matt

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Cato Elder wrote:

> Greetings!
>
> This website offers "50 Scariest Moments in Non-Horror Movies."
>
> http://www.totalfilm.com/features/50-scariest-moments-in-non-horror-movies/oliver-1968
>
> Note that #45 is the animated cartoon Mickey and the Beanstalk!
>
> An excerpt from the commentary:
>
> Why So Scary: There's a reason why this is the only Disney cartoon to feature a crazed Donald attempting to butcher
> his pet cow in a hunger-inspired freak-out. It's bloody scary.
>
> Any thoughts from members here?
>
> Best Wishes!
>
> L. Schulte
>
> --
>
> rock.com
>
>
>