US #376, C&S #691, and SPRING FEVER VOL 2 are all coming out 11 June 2008.
LL
Pages:
1
2
Author
Topic: Uncle Scrooge #376
(16 messages)
Louis Lane
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 1 -
2008-06-05 at 11:11:17
RancidDuck
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 2 -
2008-06-05 at 12:27:46
Thanks for the info. I was wondering if we were going to see the Spring Fever issue this year.
JeffT
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 3 -
2008-06-05 at 17:38:32
$9.50? Sheesh. (I'll still buy it. :))
Morequack
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 4 -
2008-06-05 at 17:48:07
Nah, looks like a chick-volume...
Roger North
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 5 -
2008-06-05 at 19:32:04
Thanks for the info.
Ramapith
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 6 -
2008-06-06 at 00:02:25
Quote from user: MorequackNah, looks like a chick-volume...
Springtime is for romance. We've got a romance cover. Deal with it. (-:
Inside are Barks' feature-length "Too Many Pets"; a 1932 Gottfredson two-pager never before reprinted in North America; a new Byron Erickson Mickey/Donald adventure featuring the Phantom Blot; a new Noel Van Horn Goofy story; a new Heymans Scrooge short; and a new Barks/Jippes Woodchuck recreation.
$9.50 gets you 80 pages, 76 of which contain comics. Square-bound and on the thicker paper we use for our heavier TPBs. I'm not sure what's not to like!
Springtime is for romance. We've got a romance cover. Deal with it. (-:
Inside are Barks' feature-length "Too Many Pets"; a 1932 Gottfredson two-pager never before reprinted in North America; a new Byron Erickson Mickey/Donald adventure featuring the Phantom Blot; a new Noel Van Horn Goofy story; a new Heymans Scrooge short; and a new Barks/Jippes Woodchuck recreation.
$9.50 gets you 80 pages, 76 of which contain comics. Square-bound and on the thicker paper we use for our heavier TPBs. I'm not sure what's not to like!
Morequack
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 7 -
2008-06-06 at 00:34:28
I'm sorry, content notwithstanding I just wish the cover was something more... grander in scale or substance. I have nothing against romance but nothing about that cover art appeals to me. Just my lonely opinion. http://www.amazon.com/Walt-Disneys-Spring-Fever/dp/1603600302
Louis Lane
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 8 -
2008-06-06 at 05:56:03
>$9.50 gets you 80 pages...on the thicker paper
David, has Gemstone investigated the possibility of using newsprint? DC has been using newsprint for some of their trades recently, and they look quite nice.
LL
David, has Gemstone investigated the possibility of using newsprint? DC has been using newsprint for some of their trades recently, and they look quite nice.
LL
JeffT
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 9 -
2008-06-09 at 13:36:18
Gemstone's quality is unmatched, but I'd happily continue buying on lower-grade paper if it meant the books could be 2-3 dollars cheaper. If it was a difference of pennies or a buck, I'd rather no changes be made. Since I've decided I'm going to support Gemstone by buying their books to share with my kids no matter what (within reason!) my opinion probably counts for little though. :)
Robb_K
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 10 -
2008-06-09 at 14:47:20
Quote from user: JeffTGemstone's quality is unmatched, but I'd happily continue buying on lower-grade paper if it meant the books could be 2-3 dollars cheaper. If it was a difference of pennies or a buck, I'd rather no changes be made. Since I've decided I'm going to support Gemstone by buying their books to share with my kids no matter what (within reason!) my opinion probably counts for little though. :)
I want the books to last a long time (all my grandparents lived well into their 90s (one over 100), and my parents are in their mid 80s and still very healthy)). Therefore, I'd rather pay more for the better paper (assuming it is longer-lasting).
I want the books to last a long time (all my grandparents lived well into their 90s (one over 100), and my parents are in their mid 80s and still very healthy)). Therefore, I'd rather pay more for the better paper (assuming it is longer-lasting).
Mcduck_Enterprises
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 11 -
2008-06-09 at 15:52:34
I'm with Morequack on this one. I'll pass. Great paper or not, recent gas prices and food cost hikes have led me cutting back to just getting Uncle Scrooge thru my subscription. (I have a full run to date,) I might be possibly ebaying off my other runs of DD Adventures for extra dough? With a 7 year old son and the overinflation of this horrid economy, it's getting rougher and rougher to purchase extra items for myself once bills are tended to. Like many of the other one-offs, I can do without. I'm more of a focus guy anyhow. Cheers.
JeffT
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 12 -
2008-06-10 at 14:32:45
I have books from the 70s on newsprint that are still in fine shape and quite readable, not fragile at all. My local comic shop owner has books older than that in similar condition. I also have some that literally fall to pieces in your hand if you open them! It really depends on how you store them (the environment being dry and relatively low in humidity is key, far more than bags and boards). Of course nothing lasts forever. I have no idea whether the "better" paper is longer lasting or not though. I'd be more worried about the glue binding the Gemstone books cracking, something you don't have to worry about with older standard size stapled comics.
Robb_K
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 13 -
2008-06-11 at 06:51:06
A lot of my newsprint comics from the 1940s and 1950s have pages yellowing, paper drying out (thinning) and edges crackling and pieces breaking off. This is despite keeping them in plastic covers (alternating the plastic), and keeping them in dark, cool places. Limiting the oxygen to them, not limiting it, etc. has only a minor effect. In the long run, the pages will oxidise and dry and fall apart. I just don't want that to happen sooner than it needs to (e.g. in my lifetime).
JAlbertsen
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 14 -
2008-06-26 at 12:54:55
I just noticed the number in the topic. Does anyone know why #373 is still the latest number on inducks? It would appear that nobody has been indexing for quite some time!
Morequack
Uncle Scrooge #376
Message 15 -
2008-06-26 at 16:16:25
Quote from user: JAlbertsenDoes anyone know why #373 is still the latest number on inducks? It would appear that nobody has been indexing for quite some time!
That would appear to be correct.
That would appear to be correct.
Pages:
1
2