Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1
Author

Topic: Please, Mr. Jensen, or any of his colleagues...

(2 messages)
Dia-Dia
...what about a sequel to Topolino e il terribile Kala-Mit, I TL 610-AP (http://coa.inducks.org/story.php?c=I+TL++610-AP)? That story really begs for a sequel since 1967. Remember how it ends: Kala-Mit (and his accomplice and most probably lover) are sent to prison, and the villain swears he'll try to create a new explosive from potatoes rather than from tomatoes. I've always wondered what would happen during Kala-Mit's stay in prison, and after his release; or evasion, maybe? He was really one of the interesting one-shot villains, the basic idea of his menace/scam was brilliant and he had a distinguishable aspect. Mr. Jensen, Mr. Jensen's colleagues: create a sequel. Please.
Lars Jensen
Quote from user: Dia-Dia...what about a sequel to Topolino e il terribile Kala-Mit, I TL 610-AP (http://coa.inducks.org/story.php?c=I+TL++610-AP)? That story really begs for a sequel since 1967. Remember how it ends: Kala-Mit (and his accomplice and most probably lover) are sent to prison, and the villain swears he'll try to create a new explosive from potatoes rather than from tomatoes. I've always wondered what would happen during Kala-Mit's stay in prison, and after his release; or evasion, maybe? He was really one of the interesting one-shot villains, the basic idea of his menace/scam was brilliant and he had a distinguishable aspect. Mr. Jensen, Mr. Jensen's colleagues: create a sequel. Please.
I strongly doubt Martina and Scarpa intended a homosexual subtext to this story. But that's just me...

I have a few problems with your request for a sequel:

1. I prefer not making sequels to other people's stories.

2. If Kala-Mit was brought back, it should be in a very good and very different story. Having him run around with a potato bomb instead of a tomato bomb would in itself not be interesting enough to deserve a story. And a new story should be at least as good as the original from Martina and Scarpa. Those are high standards to strive for.

3. Egmont no longer produces Mickey stories for the pocketbooks, so any sequel would have to be made for the weekly. And Egmont most likely wouldn't want to publish a pocketbook sequel in the Micky Maus weekly. So they most likely wouldn't want to produce such a story.

4. I'm not writing Mickey Mouse stories these days, so I couldn't sell a sequel to Egmont even if I wrote one.

But maybe there's another writer out there who wants to give it a try?
Pages: 1