Quote from user: Lars JensenQuote from user: Mcduck_EnterprisesGood for you. For the benefit of the crowd, it was a joke that you didn't get.
Sorry. I interpreted your remark as coming from a hysterical fanboy. Glad to know I was completely mistaken.
Really.......You must know more about hysterical fanboys than I do. It's nice to know that there are some who don't mind getting their purchases, no matter what they are, bent up or damaged when they obtain them.
Glad to know you were completely mistaken. Thanks.
Pages:
1
2
Author
Topic: Quality of Boom-Comics
(19 messages)
Mcduck_Enterprises
Quality of Boom-Comics
Message 16 -
2010-10-07 at 17:44:20
Roger North
Quality of Boom-Comics
Message 17 -
2010-10-07 at 19:36:05
Well that is so cool sirredknee. I wonder if the Daan Jippes version is the same as the Tony Strobl version.
Robb_K
Quality of Boom-Comics
Message 18 -
2010-10-08 at 01:19:11
Quote from user: Roger NorthWell that is so cool sirredknee. I wonder if the Daan Jippes version is the same as the Tony Strobl version.
No, it is not the same. Daan Jippes did more "interpreting" of the backgrounds and staging. Barks often left details out of his scribbles, that he put in later. Strobl didn't add anything where Barks left the background sparse. Jippes did. Jippes' penciling and inking is better than the stiff inker's work on Strobl's pencils (which, although reasonably decent, are also much less dynamic than Daan's lines).
No, it is not the same. Daan Jippes did more "interpreting" of the backgrounds and staging. Barks often left details out of his scribbles, that he put in later. Strobl didn't add anything where Barks left the background sparse. Jippes did. Jippes' penciling and inking is better than the stiff inker's work on Strobl's pencils (which, although reasonably decent, are also much less dynamic than Daan's lines).
Roger North
Quality of Boom-Comics
Message 19 -
2010-10-08 at 12:14:42
That sounds cool Robb.
Pages:
1
2