Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Author

Topic: 199308

(72 messages)
Gadducci
George wrote:

>Continuing from Fredrick's comments. Uncensored Mouse #2 (I don't
>know the title of the second story) ends in a cliff hanger.
>Disney did attempt to sue Eternity on the grounds of a trademark
>violation and I think Eternity dropped the title and recalled
>UM #2 because it wasn't worth fighting about (this is why UM #2
>is harder to find). Just as interesting as Gottfredson's
>excellent intial two MM stories (ca. 1930) are the essays in UM
>1 and 2 which rag on Disney for not giving Gottfredson (and Barks)
>more recognition and $$ for their work and lament the
>transformation of Mickey into a yuppie corporate spokesman.

I think the title of the second story was "MM in the death valley", and in
the first strips there is the first appareance of Horace and Clarabelle. If
I remember right (I'm moving, and I've not the references pronto), the
first story started at the end of 1930 (n November, I think...), and I'm
sure that the authors of that one were Iwerks and Disney himself.

>I've been meaning to go to the local library and try to
>find the MM serial in an old newspaper on microfiche (Eternity
>found them in the Oakland Tribune). I highly recommend these
>two comics to you guys (they used go for $10 each but I now
>sometimes see them in "quarter" bins).
>-George

Ehm, well... all Gottfredson stories have been reprinted several times here
in Italy, and if you can read Italian, I can send you a copy ;-D.

If not, you can buy "MM in colour", a wonderful collection of Gottfredson
earlier works which is available from Bear Mountain Enterprise for 160$
(Hardcover, big sized, with a record, signed by Gottfredson and Barks...
gosh, you cannot lose it) or a paperback edition (w/o all the Barks related
stuff) directly from Russ Cochran for 20$.
I'll send the addresses if someone is interested (and not before two or
three days: I'm still moving!!)

Fabio
================================================================
Fabio Gadducci Dip. di Informatica
Universita` di Pisa
Tel. +39-50-510268 Corso Italia 40, 56100 PISA (ITALY)
FAX: +39-50-510226 E-mail:gadducci at di.unipi.it
================================================================
Gadducci
Don wrote

> And that CALISOTA HANDBOOK OF THE WORKS OF BARKS AND ROSA... I
>wouldn't recommend that too quickly. It's a tiny, tiny pamphlet which
>should cost about 35 cents, not $3.50 But if you wish to pay $3.50 for
>what you can get for free out of your computer-file library here, go to
>it.

Well, it is quite useful for cross references, and expecially to get
exactly all your earlier works on Disney characters.
(This are the first ehr, second time I connect myself, so I assume YOU are
THAT guy).
(Again, I've not still consulted your library there, and so I cannot make a
comparison...)
Anyway, maybe that handbook could be an easy way to earn some quick buck:
there is a shop where it already sells for 9$!! (And it is an american
shop, obviously...)

Fabio
================================================================
Fabio Gadducci Dip. di Informatica
Universita` di Pisa
Tel. +39-50-510268 Corso Italia 40, 56100 PISA (ITALY)
FAX: +39-50-510226 E-mail:gadducci at di.unipi.it
================================================================
Harry Fluks
> From: gadducci at di.unipi.it
(welcome, Fabio!)

> I think the title of the second story was "MM in the death valley", and in
> the first strips there is the first appareance of Horace and Clarabelle. If
> I remember right (I'm moving, and I've not the references pronto), the
> first story started at the end of 1930 (n November, I think...), and I'm
> sure that the authors of that one were Iwerks and Disney himself.

On "our" ftp site we have a list of MM newspaper strips. It starts like this:

nr start - end date wri pen ink reprints title
1 30- 1-13 30- 2- 8 WD UI WS MM 244 (part) lost on a desert island
30- 2-10 30- 3-31 WD WS WS
2 30- 4- 1 30- 5- 3 WD WS WS death valley
30- 5- 5 30- 5-17 WD FG FG
30- 5-19 30- 6- 7 FG FG G+H
30- 6- 9 30- 6-21 FG HG? HG
30- 6-23 30- 9-20 FG FG G+H
3 30- 9-22 30-11-15 FG FG G+H mr. slicker and the egg robbers
30-11-17 30-12-26 FG FG ED
4 30-12-27 FG FG ED gags
30-12-29 31- 1- 3 FG ED ED
31- 1- 5 31- 1-10 FG FG ED
31- 1-12 31- 1-15 FG ED ED
31- 1-16 31- 1-17 FG FG ED

The artist's abbreviations are explained in another file. WD = Disney,
UI = Iwerks, WS = Smith, FG = Gottfredson, HG = Gramatky, ED = Duvall.

The information is from that same book "MM in color" that you are referring
to.

--Harry.

Harry Fluks ()_() Dutch Disney comics freak
PTT Research, Leidschendam (NL) (_) H.W.Fluks at research.ptt.nl
"Yeah... I've _heard_ of coral barques!"
Don Rosa
Fabio:

You say that there is a shop in Italy where that lil' INDEX TO
BARKS AND ROSA thing sells for $9? I guess $8.75 of that is for the
Barks portion?
Were you on here once before? Did I ever ask you, egotistically,
whether any of my stories have ever shown up in any Italian editions???
If so, I would dearly love to get copies of my stories in the language
of my own people. I'm a first-generation American whose father came from
a small town at the foot of the Alps (northern Italy, obviously) which
he calls something like "Moniago" or "Montiago". I can never see it on
maps. Maybe up near Mt.Rosa? My grandmother came from Venice and her
name was Cilistina Titiano (direct descendant of the painter)(she said).
(My father's name is Ugo and my grandfather's name was Giaochino
Gostaldo Rosa. (As if someone cared...)
Per Starback
New stuff available from ftp.lysator.liu.se:/pub/comics/disney:

[] characters/interlingual:

New version of Fredrik's file of character names in lots of
languages. This version (3.0) uses Latin-1 instead of plain old
ASCII as it was before, so the names in most languages will now be
rendered correctly.

Corrections and additions welcome as always! If you're interested
in the last 7-bit version, ask Fredrik <d91fe at ide.ide.hk-r.se> about
it!

[] archive/

A new subdirectory where old mail (everything!) to the list is
collected one month in each file. I just put it there temporarily
as there was some interest in it, but maybe I'd better keep it
there.

[] oils

A list of Barks's oil paintings with Disney motifs.

[] fanzines.

I thought it useful to collect addresses to interesting fanzines, and
this is what I came up with:

> Fanzines in English with Disney comics as their main focus.
>
> * The Barks Collector
> Published by Bear Mountain Enterprises, Box 616, Victoria VA 23974.
> Presently on hiatus, but some back issues or available. [Which ones?
> At what cost?]
> [The last issue I can find now is #42, but I think there are at
> least one more which I have mislaid somewhere. Which issue is the
> last one?]
> Devoted to the works of Carl Barks.
>
> * The Duckburg Times
> Published by Dana Gabbard, 3010 Wilshire Bl. #362, Los Angeles CA
> 90010. Irregularly published, sample copy $3. Back issues available.
> Emphasis on Disney comics with news, articles, interviews and reviews.
> The latest issue is #24/25 with a focus on DuckTales. #26 will
> include a profile on Italian artist Marco Rota, an article by Ken
> Bausert titles "The World According to Carl Barks" and an installment
> of Andy Lendacky's series on Barks's use of language, among other
> things.
> Issue #27 will probably be a special issue devoted to the Carl Barks
> Library.
>
> That's it, I think. There are of course also general Disney fanzines
> and general comics fanzines with occassional items on Disney comics.

Anything else? Harry thought that Funnyworld should be included as
well. What's the status on Funnyworld nowadays?
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at student.docs.uu.se
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Torsten Wesley Adair
Disney comics may not sell well here in the U.S., but they have entered
the cultural mythology.

Here in the U.S., the Government Printing Office has a program where a
library can become a depository of government information.

As you can probably guess, this program never runs as well as it should.
Sometimes we don't receive what we asked for. Sometimes we get packages
that should have gone to another depository.

Torsten Adair torsten at cwis.unomaha.edu Omaha, NE, USA

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Friday, 27 Aug 1993 19:49:55 CDT
From: "Margaret S. Walker" <WALKER at FAUVAX.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list GOVDOC-L <GOVDOC-L at PSUVM.BITNET>
Subject: Humor
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Well, I guess it's finally happened. We've gone quackers in our
department. We call the GPO Scrooge McDoc when we can't claim.
We tell other librarians that there is no such thing as an ugly
docling. And whenever we get a particular peculiar contractor
microfiche shipment, we call them Daffy Docs.

The Mighty Documents Department needs this humor.

Peggy Walker

Margaret S. Walker INTERNET: Walker at Acc.Fau.Edu
Documents Dept.-Library BITNET: Walker at FAUVAX
P.O. Box 3092 Ph. (407)367-3788
Florida Atlantic University
Boca Raton, Fl. 33431
Per Starback
Thanks for your combined efforts at answering my question on what was
in "The Uncensored Mouse". I later found out that it was already
answered in David Gerstein's file "gottfredson" at the ftp archive.
As said, the first Mickey story is in #1-2, and the beginning of the
second story is in #2 (only the first three weeks).

I still don't know if to believe the frequent proposition that some
parts in #2 weren't in the public domain or not. Maybe it was "just"
a trademark issue as some have said. I would like to see someone not
giving in to Disney and actually meet them in court some day. There
was a Swedish comic book with comics using Disney characters for
satirical means some years ago (Elitserien 1/85). The author of the
duck story in it was prepared to go to court to see what would happen
after Disney reacted as expected, but unfortunately the artist wasn't
prepared for that, so something was agreed upon outside of court as
usual. Too bad!

George Kesidis:
> I highly recommend these two comics to you guys (they used go for
> $10 each but I now sometimes see them in "quarter" bins).

I wish I could find such a quarter bin... Well, everything comes to
him who sits and waits as I've said before, so I guess they eventually
will fall in my hat if I just wish for them.
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at student.docs.uu.se
"But wishing is a form of work!"
Gilbert Milburn
Per said:
> Your message was empty. Did you notice that?

NOPE!.. opps!+

Here it is NOW...

--

Dear Don,

I have a few questions to ask you... predominately about
your reprints of: "DON ROSA'S COMICS AND STORIES" (The
Pertwillaby Papers!). At the end of the first book: "Sub-Zero"
(Episodes #128-133) -- you gave a brief introduction of the cast
and had a welcome to new and old readers alike. You then went on
to say... "If all goes well, there are enough adventures to
immediately fill THREE MORE VOLUMES, after which I'll carry on
with tales (and finally finish "Knighttime"... remember that'n,
old friends?). It's up to you... thanx! --Keno Don Rosa April
21, 1983". Then in preface of book two: "Vortex!" (Episodes
#134-138) you said: "Yet over the years many others have
expressed some measure of delight at my tales of Lance
Pertwillaby, and have likened his adventures to a mixture of a
full-length Barks issue of Uncle $crooge, a bit of Tintin, a dash
Kurtzman and Elder, and a hint of "Sarky Watts" ...more in the
spirit of some European comic albums than anything on this side
of the briney. But whatever you feel Pertwillaby may be
derivative of, just ignore the sloppy lettering and the
appalling lack of super-beings and barbarians and enjoy yourself
for a while with this different sort of comic strip. Or you'll
hear from my lawyers in the morning. Don Rosa Sept. 23, 1983".
Also at the end of "Vortex!" you said: "Lance Pertwillaby, if not
James Bond will be BACK... at "Knighttime"." This would make it
seem like people were enjoying the tales of Lancelot and
company... so, what happened??? And since you don't get to put:
"Knighttime" in print (at least, as far as I know... ) would that
be a suitable adventure for $crooge, Donald and the boys?!?
While I am asking about: "P.P." let me ask YOU a question I've
ALWAYS WANTED to... I have read a few times that Lance's earlier
dailies (Episodes #1-66) were reprinted in Collect's Dream and
(Episodes #67-127) appeared in Rocket's Blast. Do you have any
idea how to track these stories down (telephone number?..
address?.. etc.), how much they would cost or even if any prints
(BESIDES YOUR OWN COPIES!) *STILL* exist???? There that will
give you something to kick around for the next digest!..

THANKS,

Gil Milburn

(I WILL NOT BE COMPLETE UNTIL I HAVE ALL OF THE MASTER'S WORKS! =)


Torsten Wesley Adair
This is from the comics-l distribution list.

For those of you who do not know, the San Diego Comic Convention is one of the
largest comic book conventions in the United States (and probably the
world). Each year, the Eisner Awards are presented (named for Will Eisner,
the creator of the Spirit, and one of the best comic book talents on this
planet).

Torsten Adair

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1993 20:55:53 CDT
From: Bill Hayes <IANR012 at UNLVM.UNL.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list COMICS-L <COMICS-L at UNLVM.UNL.EDU>
Subject: Volume 3 Issue 34 Part 11

August 27, 1993 The Comics List Weekly Vol. 3 No. 34
This Week:
San Diego Con : Eisner Awards Winners
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: drizzan at genie.geis.com
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 22:01:00 BST
Subject: Eisner Awards Winners
WILL EISNER COMIC INDUSTRY AWARDS
=================================

Each year, publishers are solicited to submit outstanding examples in each
category published during the previous year (in this case 1992). A
committee screens all entries. Their list of nominated publications is sent
to members of the industry for voting; over 700 ballots were returned.

The following lists the categories and nominees; the winner of each category
is marked with an asterisk.

[...]

BEST ARCHIVAL COLLECTION
* Carl Barks Library album series (Gladstone)
Complete Crumb Comics #8 by Robert Crumb (Fantagraphics)
Batman: Dark Knight Archives, vol. 1 (DC)
Hey Look! by Harvey Kurtzman (Kitchen Sink)
The MAD Softcover by Harvey Kurtzman and others (Russ Cochran)
The SHAZAM! Archives, vol. 1 by C. C. Beck (DC)

[...]

This is an impressive list!

Now if we could only get Neil Gaiman to write some Uncle Scrooge stories....

Torsten Adair torsten at cwis.unomaha.edu Omaha, NE, USA
Don Rosa
Gil and whoever else:
I can't explain that remark that there were enough Pertwillaby
Papers left AFTER issue #1 of DRC&S to fill "three more volumes". There
was clearly only enough to fill ONE more volume. Perhaps I wanted them
to reprint the daily strips at that time. Yeah -- maybe I vaguely recall
that they balked at that because they had been reprinted in COLLECTOR'S
DREAM and RBCC already? Who knows after 10 years (and that's just since
the REPRINTS). But I did attempt to finish "Knighttime", doing one more
10 page episode back in '83, which no human eyes have ever seen except
maybe mine. But the time it took me just wasn't worth the total lack of
interest from "comicdom" in the sort of stuff I liked. It only paid $5
per page for the total job. Even "Captain Kentucky" paid $25 per page!
That didn't matter when it was the only thing I had to fill my leisure
time, but eventually there were more things that needed doing and
American comics were just too depressing a mess to have an active part
in (and they're 100 times worse NOW). After doing that next "Knighttime"
installment and deciding it wasn't worth it, I retired from cartooning
for 4 years until Gladstone appeared. Then I found that the same plots
featuring Lance that people cared nothing for became VERY popular when I
put the Ducks in them. That's the sort of knowledge that will always
help me remember "my place". It's the DUCKS that make me popular.
Anyway, I have no advice for you to help find old RBCCs or
COLLECTOR'S DREAMs. I plan on turning ALL those stories into Duck
stories eventually at which time they'll be improved with slightly (but
not much) better art and NO ROSA LETTERING. So I suggest you just wait.

In the meantime, folks can help me not be paranoid. You recall
how Barks snubbed me in Atlanta. There's something afoot now that he has
some "agents" managing his affairs now that his wife is no longer around
to control him. You saw how he's decided to write a new story and have
Van Horn draw it. Now, a few weeks after a large article appeared in CBG
which told, in part, of my popularity in Scandanavia, his agent has
contacted Egmont and told them that Barks wants to visit Scandanavia for
a tour (and wants to be paid, etc.). This on top of the things he's said
about me to foreign magazines.
All I've ever tried to do is honor the guy, and here he's
becoming the "evil genius" of my life. Why's he got it in for me of all
people?
I guess it's time to remove the "D.U.C.K." dedication from my
stories and covers, eh?
Wilmer Rivers
Don Rosa writes:
> In the meantime, folks can help me not be paranoid.
>
Well, I can **try**, but probably at least some paranoia on your part is
justifiable. Maybe the balance is misinterpretation (to give Barks the
benefit of the doubt).

> You recall how Barks snubbed me in Atlanta.
>
Boorish behavior on his part, even if he doesn't like your work. Still,
maybe he's just a crank in general, so perhaps you shouldn't take his
rudeness as being directed exclusively at you. If it seems to be
directed **primarily** at you, this is probably because he does see
you as something of a rival. If this is true, and if he does snub his
perceived "rivals" in this manner, then it is Barks who is paranoid.

> There's something afoot now that he has some "agents" managing his
> affairs now that his wife is no longer around to control him. You saw
> how he's decided to write a new story and have Van Horn draw it.
>
This should present no problem for you, any more than do the duck
stories created by other writer/artist teams, unless he uses the
opportunity to undermine some of your own stories. Even then, however,
you have made the point that the "modern" stories are not meant to have
continuity with one another, so that possibility too ought not give
you grounds for concern. (But if he does go out of his way to slam
you in the new story, for instance by having Scrooge want to return to
Tra La La because he has been there only once, then your concern about
Barks would certainly be proven.)

> Now, a few weeks after a large article appeared in CBG which told, in
> part, of my popularity in Scandanavia, his agent has contacted Egmont
> and told them that Barks wants to visit Scandanavia for a tour (and
> wants to be paid, etc.).
>
In the article, you very graciously pointed out that the Scandanavians
have a great fondness for the Barks ducks, as distinct from the Disney
ducks. Maybe Barks just wants to cash in on his own popularity now
that you have pointed out to him the extent of the market there. Of
course, he does so by exploiting you to some extent, since certainly
your own stories have helped keep the duck market alive there. Still,
his motives in scheduling this tour are more likely greed than hostility
towards you.

> This on top of the things he's said about me to foreign magazines.
>
I don't know what these things are, so I can't comment on whether you
should be paranoid about them. If he really just doesn't like your
work, then it is certainly understandable that he should say so. Have
you never dismissed other duck artists' work in interviews? Or are his
comments more nearly ad hominem attacks rather than artistic differ-
ences? (It should also be noted that in some interviews you have
**praised** the work of certain other duck artists - has Barks ever
done that? Does he actually like Van Horn's work, or is he merely
tolerating it for the sake of producing the new story?) If he does
single you out for criticism, is it because he considers your work to
be too derivative of his own? Is it because your attention to detail
is an example of "underground" (i.e., "new") comics art to which the
old-timers can't relate? Or is it because he does in fact perceive
your popularity to be a threat to his reputation as "**the** good
artist" who created all the best duck stories?

> All I've ever tried to do is honor the guy, and here he's becoming
> the "evil genius" of my life.
>
I doubt that he's dedicating the rest of his life to being your bete
noire. More likely, he's dedicating it to firming up his own claims
to comics immortality and to raking in all the loot he can get. If
he does seem to be out to get you, then it's maybe just because your
popularity gets in the way of this grand scheme.

> Why's he got it in for me of all people?
>
Maybe he doesn't have it in for you in particular, but just for anyone
who might siphon off some of the glory and/or cash which would otherwise
come his way. For all I know, maybe he has it in for Stan Lee, Jack
Kirby, Todd McFarland, Neil Gaiman,... Has he said anything about
other comics artists in general in the interviews in which he comes
down on your work?

> I guess it's time to remove the "D.U.C.K." dedication from my stories
> and covers, eh?
>
Probably not, since the fact that these are duck stories, rather than
stories featuring your original characters, is in fact a dedication to
Barks' work. Of course, there's always a fine line between homage and
rip-off, and maybe Barks sees your work as being on the wrong side of
that line. (Again, this would be paranoia on his part rather than
yours.) The "D.U.C.K." dedication shows what your intentions are, and
I think it's proper to make them clear in that manner.

Wilmer Rivers
rivers at seismo.css.gov
Fredrik Ekman
Just a few comments that may or may not be of interest...

Wilmer Rivers wrote, in reply to Don:
>Maybe Barks just wants to cash in on his own popularity now that you
>have pointed out to him the extent of the market [in Scandinavia].
>Of course, he does so by exploiting you to some extent, since certainly
>your own stories have helped keep the duck market alive there.

Firstly, I'm quite sure that Barks is, and has been for a long time,
aware of his great popularity "over here". He is, after all, an honorary
member of the Swedish donaldist association NAFS(k) and has received
their club-fanzine and birthday greetings for several years.

Secondly, about Don keeping the Scandinavian market alive, that's not
quite true. The market here was very much "alive" even before Don's
stories started to appear, and has been so for several decades. It is
quite possible that Don's stories has attracted quite a few older readers
but they are just a very minor part of the market. The average reader is,
I would guess, between ten and fourteen years of age, perhaps even
younger, and even though there is no reason that they should dislike
Don's work I think that most of them find Vicar and others just as
exciting.

>Has [Barks] said anything about other comics artists in general in the
>interviews in which he comes down on your work?

That makes me think about a letter from Barks to Disney's Duck Tales book
soon after Disney's take-over (could have been #6 or something like that).
In the letter, Barks commented on the fact that they had used a character
looking very much like himself in one of the previous issues (#2 or 3?).
He also had some comments of the new Disney stories (which in the case of
Duck Tales would have had art by Jamie Diaz' studios and story by Marv
Wolfman (or am I mixing up things?)) and although he didn't say anything
straight out, it was quite clear that he wasn't very fond of the "Disney"
style. So far as I can remember that is the only time that I have read
about Barks commenting on someone elses work (except for second-hand
references from Don). Unfortunately, I have given away the comics in
question, so I can't look up the details.

For whatever it's worth

/Fredrik Ekman
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5