Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Author

Topic: Sexy Disney characters topic

(86 messages)
Rodney
I don't have a problem with Donald thinking these girls are sexy. But I can't make myself think anything along those lines about anything with a duck bill.
Hedberg
Been spending my last vacationday looking through the Chronologic Donald-tin boxes and through the 40'ties (DDII) several glances of breastfeatures are seen.
If one look at Donald as the "average man" there's nothing to it - of coarse Daisy has breasts.

In "Straight shooters" from 1947 Hewie and Dewie (I guess) even trick Donald to think they are a sexy Egyptian fortuneteller, to get to the prizes in his shooting gallery!
Morequack
Agreed, Rodney.
It just looks wrong.
If a female duck has breasts, then she has other female parts. A male duck has his. But Disney ducks, with very few exceptions, do not wear anything below the waist??what's wrong with that picture! The point is that cartoon sexuality to this extent is not "designed" for the world of Disney ducks, in my opinion. One could project duck sensuality without drawing human breasts and human thighs on a fowl a la these calendar girls. See Daisy, Goldie, Brigitta, Magica.
It's a matter of context. It's a matter of intent. It's a matter of degree. It's a matter of taste (even if these images are not distasteful per se). For Disney ducks these girls are portrayed in an over the top manner. I'm not being a prude, for if we were talking about human females I would have no problem whatsoever.
Mcduck_Enterprises
Quote from user: MorequackAgreed, Rodney.

It just looks wrong.

If a female duck has breasts, then she has other female parts. A male duck has his. But Disney ducks, with very few exceptions, do not wear anything below the waist??what's wrong with that picture! The point is, that cartoon sexuality to this extent is not "designed" for the world of Disney ducks, in my opinion. One could project duck sensuality without drawing human breasts and human thighs on a fowl a la these calendar girls. See Daisy, Goldie, Brigitta, Magica.

It's a matter of context. It's a matter of intent. It's a matter of degree. It's a matter of taste (even if these images are not distasteful per se). For Disney ducks these girls are portrayed in an over the top manner. I'm not being a prude, for if we were talking about human females I would have no problem whatsoever.

While there are many traits of Donald and Scrooge that readers relate to, I estimate that some duck artists illustrate this way to continue that direction. While yes, it can be translated as ludicris and silly - seems it's all in fun. I sincerely doubt any of it is literal, unless the reader is a slobbering mess wrapped up in a mental home. (or should be,)
GeoX
I don't have any problem with some moderate sexiness in duck comics. I mean, as we're all aware, the characters aren't REALLY ducks except on the most superficial level. If they actually ACTED like ducks, that would be another story (and the entire field would be utterly different), but as it is, they're people, and one aspect of people is sex. In any case, I agree with McDuck Enterprises--it's all in good fun and not to be taken particularly seriously. I don't think anyone is actually getting off on sexy ducks.
Morequack
Quote from user: GeoXit's all in good fun and not to be taken particularly seriously. I don't think anyone is actually getting off on sexy ducks.
I don't believe anyone is taking these drawings particularly seriously. That's the point. And if no one is 'getting off on sexy ducks,' why bother with them?
GeoX
Okay, I meant "getting off" there in a slightly less figurative sense. But my point is, if the ducks are people--and they are--then I don't think there's any particularly reason why they should be self-limiting to the extent that you do.
Mcduck_Enterprises
Quote from user: MorequackQuote from user: GeoXit's all in good fun and not to be taken particularly seriously. I don't think anyone is actually getting off on sexy ducks.
I don't believe anyone is taking these drawings particularly seriously. That's the point. And if no one is 'getting off on sexy ducks,' why bother with them?

because it shows a common relation of traits between the fictional characters and the real-life readers. That is the whole concept of comics in general. None of it is real, so why bother?, well, because it can be done and because comics are a loved and enjoyed past time.
Dutch Duckfan Down Under
Quote from user: KneonErm... Lyla... LAY? Do they realize that in English, "lay" is often used as a slang term for sex?

... hmm... they probably do. ;)

You think that they realised that Zondag, an Evronian general, is the Dutch name for Sunday?
Morequack
Quote from user: Mcduck_EnterprisesQuote from user: MorequackQuote from user: GeoXit's all in good fun and not to be taken particularly seriously. I don't think anyone is actually getting off on sexy ducks.
I don't believe anyone is taking these drawings particularly seriously. That's the point. And if no one is 'getting off on sexy ducks,' why bother with them?

because it shows a common relation of traits between the fictional characters and the real-life readers. That is the whole concept of comics in general. None of it is real, so why bother?, well, because it can be done and because comics are a loved and enjoyed past time.

I'm not talking about comics in general. I'm talking about ducks a la MAXIM.
Mcduck_Enterprises
I honestly don't see any difference in seeing a femme fatale duck than say,.....Elastigirl from the Incredibles done out to be sexy..(even though she's supposed to depict a human,)...To me, it's all the same realm of fantasy that I don't mix up with reality. I sincerely beleive disney artists make female ducks out to have curvy female human looks because that is what is some readers, or the artists themselves, relate to.
Morequack
I find it ludicrous to draw Hefner-caliber bodacious breasts and curves on a woman only to affix a duck-bill on the face.
Mcduck_Enterprises
Well, it's either that or they all look like bowling pins.... :)
Kneon
All this "sexy" duck art reminds me of this (creepy) old LP album cover from the 1970s...
http://img.maniadb.com/images/album/177/177445_1_f.jpg
GeoX
Quote from user: MorequackI find it ludicrous to draw Hefner-caliber bodacious breasts and curves on a woman only to affix a duck-bill on the face.
Hope you're not implying that centerfolds aren't ALREADY ludicrous in their own way. It's all fantasy, after all.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6