Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Author

Topic: 199705

(174 messages)
M. Mitchell Marmel
At 7:26 PM +0200 5/8/97, Marco Barlotti wrote:
>I can't stand it any more...
>Will someone please explain who/what Quack Pack is?
>Becattini's "red book" lists more than 700 characters, and none with this
>name!!!

We COULD tell you...

But then we'd have to kill you. :)

Seriously, it's the latest Disney Afternoon Duck series, featuring Donald,
Daisy and teenaged HD&L. Pretty poor stuff, although there are the
occasional moments...

-MMM-

--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V97 Issue #96
*****************************************
HoyMurphy
HARALD:
<< So, never fear! Rosa is read and liked by the future generations! >>

I have two 11 year old boys and a 9 year old daughter, and I read comics to
them most every night. Our favorites are Akiko, Ninjak, Untold Tales of
Spider-Man, Pakkin's Land, Patty Cake, and the ducks. Of course, they really
like the Barks stories, but it's a cause for celebration when a new Don Rosa
story comes out. They like his stories because they are packed chock full of
jokes, front and back, the adventures are genuinely scary in places, and the
art looks, I guess they describe it as "crisper." I held back the Life of
Scrooge stories until I had them all, because I knew they wouldn't be able to
hold out during the bi-monthly schedule Gladstone published them. I met Don
at Mid-Ohio Con a few years ago, and as far as I'm concerned, he's the nicest
and most talented comics creater working today. so there.
SRoweCanoe
In a message dated 97-05-09 00:40:39 EDT, John Patrick wrote:

<< I was going through some of my old comics the other day and came across
something I have never understood. Were Goldkey and Whitman publishing at
the same time? I must assume so, since I have 2 copies of the same comic,
1 from Whitman and the other from GoldKey. Were all the comics during
this time period published under both labels?
>>

Yes, Gold Key went to newstands, and Whitman went 3 in a bag to toy stores
(and other non-neswstands).

Steven Rowe
Kriton Kyrimis
DON:

> Because they figure someone
> in Arabia might order photostats someday and they would then need to remove
> even "?"s...

Not to mention someone from Greece...

> and let the Arabians fix their own problems when that time comes, if ever.

...who will most definitely be ordering your stories. (For those who don't
know, the Greek question mark is ";". The equivalent of the semi-colon is a
period that is shifted upwards. Of course, I doubt there are many people in
Greece who don't know what "?" is, even if they don't speak a word in any
language other than Greek.)

JOHN PATRICK:
> Regarding the New Rosa Albums from Gladstone:
>
> What, no 'collectors cards'?

I'm not sure I disapprove. A few more of those cards, and I'll have to throw
out a couple of bucketfuls of Junior Woodchuck merit badges if I am to make
room for them...

(Besides, whatever value I place on those albums is because of the stories in
them, not on their being accompanied by a collector's card, whith the comic
preferably still in its shrink wrap.)
--
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"You speak treason!"
"Fluently!"
-----
LoLehmann
DON :

> So "An Eye for Detail" is in the new Duck issues in Europe? Not one of my
> better stories -- it's no "Matter of Some Gravity", anyhow.

A Matter Of Some Gravity is the new Don Rosa story in Picsou 304... Quite
impressive stuff, 16 pages full of patented Don Rosa little details (the
labelled brooms on the first panel, $crooge's paying parking lot, the little
dog,...). I like this kind of story, that you have to read several times :
one time for the overall story, and then a careful panel-by-panel
examination...
Thanks, Don !

Laurent
Harry Fluks
To everyone who is corresponding with me: I won't be able to read
my e-mail until May 17.

See you all in a week!
--Harry.
Gary Leach
Don:

>...somebody from Gladstone had a booth at the last Chicago Con with
>my original art on display? That's the first I'd heard of them doing
>that...Gary L.,
>did this happen?

It did. However, it was Disney's licensed publishing division (the one
Gladstone works with), and not Gladstone itself, that had that booth at
last year's Chicago Con. We thought it was pretty neat of them to do that.
For our part, we provided them with a blowup photostat of the *original*
version of your cover for US 300 as part of their display, along with the
albums they handed out.

Of course, the question no doubt burning in your brain is: why did they
feel that version of the art was fine for the con, but not for the comic?
You're guess is as good as mine, bud. We just gave 'em what they asked for.

By the by, putting "Keno" on the latest Don Rosa album covers was one of
Bruce's notions. And that "novelty photo" cover...if I never have to
reformat and recolor that one again, I'll die a happy man.

Gary

****************************
"You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you
think it means."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gladstone on the Web: http://www.hamlco.com/bhc/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Cebarat
Everyone --

AUGIE:
You're absolutely right about the reversal of policy at Gladstone concerning
the reprinting of Barks' $crooge epics in album form. I have to admit, the
trend-reversal does annoy me. Gladstone appears to be making itself VERY
vulnerable to charges of ripoff. All that is required to defuse the
suspicions is a "decent interval" between the appearance of a $crooge story
in album form and its reappearance in comic-book form.

DON:
Actually, I was aware of your actual first name being "Keno"; it was the
unexpected appearance of it on the cover that boggled me... And that "Mickey
Mouse novelty photo" cover is indeed my least favorite among that particular
set of covers. What it's doing illustrating a book of "Uncle $crooge
Adventures," I haven't a clue.

JOHN PATRICK:
If your "Gold Key and Whitman lookalike comics" date from the early 1970's,
then this may represent Western Publishing's earliest attempt to sell comics
in bags at toy stores and department stores. There was a short period of
time in 1973 or thereabouts when the month and year seemed to disappear from
the comics indicia, as they later did during the early-to-mid-1980's, when
Western had fully committed itself to the "Whitman bag" policy. This may
have been a trial run that didn't work out at the time.

MARCO:
If you want more info on "Quack Pack," try the "QP" website at
www.disney.com. By the way, what do you mean by Becattini's "red book"? Is
that some new reference work that Becattini has recently published?

Speaking of "Quack Pack," one of the few things about the series that Disney
TV fanciers HAVE enjoyed en masse is the "recharacterization" of Daisy as a
somewhat more hip "intelligent career woman of the 90's". Daisy is
successfully "modernized" without becoming annoying. Would anyone like to
see this "new version of Daisy" appear in comic-book stories?

Christopher E. Barat
(Email removed)
Homepage http://members.aol.com/cebarat/home.htm
"I AM ARMSTRONG...I AM YOUR FRIEND." -- Armstrong the robot, "DuckTales"
episode "Armstrong"
Matt Sommer
Don--

>Hm. You say somebody from Gladstone had a booth at the last Chicago Con with
>my original art on display? That's the first I'd heard of them doing that. I

well, i'm assuming it was gladstone... it might also have been someone
from disney themselves, as they were hawking the disney adventures
magazine in the same booth (if i remember correctly...). From your
reaction, i am starting to doubt myself! ;-) But seriously, it *WAS*
there... i'm not sure exactly *WHO* set it up... but...

there was definitely a reproduction (at least) of the cover, this was
only in B&W, with no logo or other stuff pasted onto it... seeing as it
was just sitting on the table, propped up on a stand, it probably wasnt
the original (but you could have fooled me...)

>was told they don't set up at conventions any longer. And giving away free
>$10 albums to anyone who could name 3 characters on a cover that showed all
>the most famous $crooge characters INCLUDING DD and HD&L? In other words,
>free albums to one and all? That doesn't sound like something Bruce would
>send his people out to do. Gary L., did this happen?

Actually, what i'd said was he said he'd give me a free album if i could
name 3 characters OTHER than the really easy ones (donald, HD&L, etc.).
I cant remember who i did pick, but i think i named a terry firmian,
flinty, and cant recall the 3rd... Again, not sure if he did that for
everyone, or just me (I might have been one of the few adults at a
"superhero" show that actually chatted about disney stuff...). The end
result was that i walked away with a free copy of LO$ #2...! iwas pretty
happy... that con was my first foray into barksdom...i bought about 30
albums at discount prices...hope i can complete the collection this
year!

-matt-

--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V97 Issue #97
*****************************************
Don Rosa
I will be leaving the vicinity of my computer on Tuesday, and I won't be
back until May 20... although, after Hoy Murphy's last message, I'm
considering skipping my trip so as not to miss any other too-nice messages!
(By the way, Hoy -- how much was it you said you'd charge me for posting
those comments I wrote out for you?)
But, as some of you know, I'll be at EXPOCARTOON in Rome next weekend. (And
a big Hoo-hah to that!) I won't be able to answer any questions sent to me
on this List until I return, unless one of my Italian friends with a laptop
makes it possible for me to send in a "convention report" just for fun. Or
someone like Frank or Fabio might do that himself.
Well, here I go off for another week of being treated like a minor-league
movie star in Europe before I return to being an ignored guy in Kentucky
riding around on a garden-tractor mowing my grass.
Ciao.
Marco Barlotti
CHRISTOPHER:

> By the way, what do you mean by Becattini's "red book"? Is
>that some new reference work that Becattini has recently published?

It's a 192-page large format book called "Disney Comics", covering Disney
comics all over the world with a vast list of Disney Artists and Disney
Characters. Is it <recent>? I don't know whether you can say that. It was
published in November 1995...
I think you can find more infomation on Frank Stajano's web site:

http://www.orl.co.uk/~fms/

Marco

http://marcobar.cce.unifi.it
Ole R. Nielsen
Don made you believe that there was no secret message in the
optometricis... optimopr... eyedoctor's test chart in his
latest story "An Eye for Detail". I wouldn't say he's lying,
though the explanation why there shouldn't be any would imply
there never was, and never will be, any D.U.C.K.s, e-mail
addresses, or anything literal hidden in Don's panels.
Which is blatantly wrong, as we all know.

I believe however that Don's subconsciousness put exactly
those letters in that order on the chart, since they spell
the word "ARBEJD" - albeit upside-down, backwards and with
an extra 'H'.

The word means in Danish "(to) work", or "a job". A phrase
Don must have overheard on his phone calls to Copenhagen,
maybe even from Byron, who may have picked up this most
fundamental word in Danish. And maybe not, leaving it in.

So now you know, also consciously, what hidden messages
you have been sneaking in to spoil the children, Don.

A letter in my newspaper the other day described the
Danish postal service's falability describing how a
certain Jannick Storm had been waiting months for a
package from another certain Don Rosa, and how they
had swapped curses across the internet about it.
Apart from a sentence explaining that it dealt with
Don's alledged 'poaching' on Disney artist Carl Barks'
territory, there was no further explanation to what
this was all about, just that Don had sent his own
comics to Jannick, and how they had disappeared into
a temporal vortex (a container on the central post
administration) for months.

Since it was a letter about an altogether other topic
from Jannick, and not an article, it explains why there
were no factual errors, or even significant typos.

oLe <(Email removed)>
U
Poul S. Frøkjær
Hi everyone

Here is a new duck maniac joining the list.
I have been following the discussions/messages
for a couple of weeks now and (of course) I have
enjoyed it very much.

Originally, I had in mind to stay a bit in the
background. But when I read the news (news to me,
anyway) about the "Barks Treasury" book, I simply
had to break out.

CHRIS:

What, When, Who, Where, How many, How much!

I'm very curious to know more about this book,
but at the places I usually buy my Gladstone comics
(in Denmark) they don't know anything about it (!).

So please (Chris or anyone else that has got the
information) tell me:

- is ALL of Barks' new 75 drawings in this book?

- who has printed it and who is selling (Another
Rainbow perhaps)? An address, phone or fax number
would be very useful

- How many copies are printed (wasn't there
something about a "Limited Edition")?

- How much for this "the duck book of 1997"?

I was not quite sure whether this message should go
through the "open" line or in private mail to Chris.
On a second thought I believe that everyone of you
out there ought to be simply DESPERATELY interested
in this new release (right?).

--Poul Frokjar
Deckerd
I just thought I'd mention I'm back from my recent
trip to Europe. Being out of the country is why I
haven't been seen on the List lately. Actually, I've
been back for a few days, but between jet lag and
sheer sloth I've been a little slow about answering
the e-mail and so on. Anyway, it was a fun trip, and
I met up with a couple of people from the Disney Comics ML.
Didier Ghez showed me a bit of Paris, while Jacob
Sparre Anderson took me to the comic shops of
Copenhagen. I dropped by the Egmont offices and
went out to lunch with the editors, but by some comedy
of errors missed seeing Byron Erickson. Oh well...
it looks like I'll be back in Copenhagen in September,
so I can tie up any loose ends then. But as many times
as I've been to Copenhagen, I _still_ haven't seen the
Little Mermaid statue, called by some "the World's Most
Overrated Tourist Attraction, but maybe I can lay eyeballs
on it in September.

On the way to Copenhagen, I went through Hamburg, Gemrany,
where I picked up a couple of albums reprinting Don Rosa
stories. One of them includes the Peewee-Gah story that
will likely _never_ be reprinted here, so now I can see
what's so politically incorrect about it.

--Dwight Decker

--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V97 Issue #98
*****************************************
Marco Barlotti
This is a quote from issue #2 of "Zio Paperone". It's almost 10 years old
(January 1988) and Lidia Cannatella had presumably NOTHING to do with this
issue!!!
The colophon says: translations: Rosalda Falchi.

Now listen what Rosalda did.
[Credit is due to my 9-year-old son Iacopo for this]

We are considering a Barks 1-pager, from UNCLE SCROOGE 6, 6-8/1954.
Newspapers headlines have (as I can imagine) BIG OIL STRIKE.
Let's take a dictionary.
STRIKE (1) = a discovery; an accession.
This is clearly what is meant here. Italian translation: SCOPERTA.
STRIKE (2) = a refusal by employees to work. Italian translation: SCIOPERO.
And this is Rosalda's translation in "Zio Paperone" #2!

Big Oil Strike! $crooge earns zillions from the Big Oil Strike! Paperone
guadagna bilioni (!) con lo sciopero del petrolio!

Now, how could Rosalda ever think of STRIKE as SCIOPERO!!!
Lidia, your translations are PURE GOLD when compared to this! So, at last,
we know that evil translations are proper of "Zio Paperone", **NOT** of poor
Lidia Cannatella!!!

Marco

(who will put this instance on his www pages as soon as his friend Tiziano
learns how to use his scanner...)

http://marcobar.cce.unifi.it
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12