Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Author

Topic: IDW takes over Disney properties: Monthly titles and Artist editions

(89 messages)
Rodney
I think that a new monthly Uncle Scrooge title is launching in April. :-)
Thogru
Wow. You just made my day, rodney.
Thanks for the very good news!!!!!
Fritz Baugh
Much more information is now on IDW's home page:
http://www.idwpublishing.com/monthly-disney-comics-back-idw/
There's even an "events calendar" which shows us what to expect:
Donald Duck #1 (#368) in May (it doesn't say whether it will carry a second number like Scrooge does, but I hope so)
Mickey Mouse #1 (#310) in June
And hold on to your hats:
WDC #721 in July! It won't even be #1(#721) according to that list (#721(#1) maybe lol)
Fritz Baugh
Quote from user: The Rhyming ManWhat's that "TPB"? :|

Sorry I'm so noob...

Short for "trade paperback". They're probably reprints of the material from the main books, same as Boom used to do (it's a common model nowadays)
MustangRockstar
I would agree on the TPB theory.
Either way, I'm happy. A total of $16 per month is very reasonable and IDW has done a great job with everything I've purchased from them.
Dutch Duckfan Down Under
Glad to see it's back.

It feels a little bit weird that we're starting all the way back at #1, since it looks a bit like a generic Disney publication without the huge number behind it. Ah, maybe they'll revert back to the old numbering at some point.
Not sure what the deal is with that "legacy cover theme" thing, though... What's with all the Disneyland places?

By the way, now that WDC&S is back and running again with no. 723, whereas DC started renumbering all their old comics a few years back, that should make WDC&S something like the longest-running continuously-numbered monthly American comic book ever... or something?
I'd have said highest-numbered American comic, but then I remembered Dell cranking out Four Color comics up to number 1300something in a quarter century, something WDC&S probably won't overtake for another 75 years!

Speaking of which, Walt Disney's Comics and Stories #724 (October 2015) should be the 75th anniversary issue!
Baar Baar Jinx
Quote from user: Dutch Duckfan Down UnderIt feels a little bit weird that we're starting all the way back at #1, since it looks a bit like a generic Disney publication without the huge number behind it. Ah, maybe they'll revert back to the old numbering at some point.
I really would have preferred that they just stick to the clean, traditional numbering, but I guess they're trying to keep everyone happy with this dual numbering system. If that's the compromise we have to make, so be it. But to me the next issue of Uncle Scrooge will always be #405, not #1, although it looks like they'll always market their issues with the new numbering to attract collectors, and keep the traditional numbering on the cover as an allowance to long-time fans . Maybe they could have used the new numbering for variant covers, and the traditional numbering with their regular covers to serve the same purpose (variant covers is another thing I'm not crazy about, but again, looks like they're the rule these days among all comic book companies)? I assume (and hope) the Mickey and Donald books will follow the same dual numbering format, but can anyone confirm that? I wonder why WDC&S is being marketed with just the traditional issue numbering.

Quote from user: Dutch Duckfan Down UnderBy the way, now that WDC&S is back and running again with no. 723, whereas DC started renumbering all their old comics a few years back, that should make WDC&S something like the longest-running continuously-numbered monthly American comic book ever... or something?
Probably the longest-running continuously-numbered comic book still in publication, though? On a related note, Archie recently announced that they would be resetting their flagship title (with an issue number currently somewhere in the high 600s) to #1 in 2015. Of course, that comes with a completely new look. But I still think it's kind of betrayal of their long-time fans. Maybe they should follow the dual numbering system pioneered by IDW, it's not too late!
Frik
Quote from user: Fritz BaughQuote from user: The Rhyming ManWhat's that "TPB"? :|

Sorry I'm so noob...

Short for "trade paperback". They're probably reprints of the material from the main books, same as Boom used to do (it's a common model nowadays)

So, if I understand this correctly, the TPBs will not reprint the contents of the individual issues that came before? For instance, the first Uncle Scrooge TPB will be released in August. Will this be a collection of the contents of the first four individual issues? You're saying......reprints of the material from the main books......At first I wasn't sure what you meant, but now I assume you mean the comics?
So my question would be answered with a yes?!

I would love to see the comics reprinted as HC editions. Isn't this common practice?

sk
Fritz Baugh
Quote from user: frikSo, if I understand this correctly, the TPBs will not reprint the contents of the individual issues that came before? For instance, the first Uncle Scrooge TPB will be released in August. Will this be a collection of the contents of the first four individual issues? You're saying......reprints of the material from the main books......At first I wasn't sure what you meant, but now I assume you mean the comics?
So my question would be answered with a yes?!

I would love to see the comics reprinted as HC editions. Isn't this common practice?

sk

We don't know for sure yet. But yeah, reprinting the contents of the individual comics is the common practice nowadays.
Baar Baar Jinx
Does anyone have any idea why the Disney comics license is split between Joe books and IDW? I understand that Disney Princesses and Disney-Pixar are very different from the Duck and Mouse universes, but surely IDW could have easily handled Darkwing Duck and DuckTales? I would have thought they'd all come under one license. Just curious about how these things work.
The Rhyming Man
Quote from user: Baar Baar JinxDoes anyone have any idea why the Disney comics license is split between Joe books and IDW? I understand that Disney Princesses and Disney-Pixar are very different from the Duck and Mouse universes, but surely IDW could have easily handled Darkwing Duck and DuckTales? I would have thought they'd all come under one license. Just curious about how these things work.
IDW can print classic Disney Comics, while Joe Books can print Disney comics adapted from cartoons.
So, DuckTales and Darkwing are cartoons before comics, isn't it?
Baar Baar Jinx
Quote from user: The Rhyming ManIDW can print classic Disney Comics, while Joe Books can print Disney comics adapted from cartoons.
So, DuckTales and Darkwing are cartoons before comics, isn't it?

It just strikes me as an artificial and meaningless distinction to make at this point. In the 90s, after Disney Comics (the company) failed, the license was split into the "traditional" line (Gladstone II) and the "modern" line (Marvel). Back then, the Disney Afternoon was current and Darkwing, DuckTales, Goof Troop et al., were still appearing on TV, so having a "modern" line seemed to make a degree of sense. I get the impression Gladstone was offered the chance to publish all the Disney comics, but took a pass on the "modern" line (I have no evidence to back that up, though, and would love to hear from someone in the know about that) so Marvel stepped in. Today, almost a quarter century later, such a division of the licenses makes little sense to me, and IDW as a company strikes me as comfortable with publishing new comics based on current properties (the eclectic mix of titles they currently put out seems to confirm that). Surely they would have wanted to print Darkwing, DuckTales and Disney movie-based titles. Why split up the license now?

Also, Fantagraphics has been putting out the Disney creators archival editions since 2011. Had they ever considered applying for the "Core Four" license?
Debbie
"On a related note, Archie recently announced that they would be resetting their flagship title (with an issue number currently somewhere in the high 600s) to #1 in 2015. Of course, that comes with a completely new look. But I still think it's kind of betrayal of their long-time fans. Maybe they should follow the dual numbering system pioneered by IDW, it's not too late!"
Archie has probably long-since brushed off most of their long-time fans with gimmick after gimmick, chasing a larger audience that seems to get bored quickly. By the very nature of their (older) books, Archie is the sort of comic that gets kids hooked on comics, but then they grow out of them. A few readers either stick with them or come back later in life out of nostalgia, but the material doesn't seem to inspire the same loyalty that Marvel/DC/and Carl Barks/Don Rosa do. Look at the comments on any news story about Archie Comics, and you'll find people saying things like, "Do they still print those?" or "Who reads those?" or "I haven't read an Archie Comic in years".
MustangRockstar
I've never found the Archie comics very interesting. My favorite comics tend to either entertain me through comedy or through adventure - ideally a little bit of both. For me, Archie does neither.
Outside of the ducks and some other classic Disney titles, I like the Batman character, but haven't picked up a Batman comic in years. My uncle worked in the old DC comics building so I used to get tons of comics each month. At this point my connection with the character is either through television, movies, games, or general lore.
Thanks to IDW I've rediscovered Dick Tracy and the original Ninja Turtles. But that's about it for comics these days.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6