200503 - DCML - Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

KUR

Who's Quacky McSlant ??? (and obaut TNT CAMEOS) Message 16 - 2005-03-06 at 01:26:11

Hello

I read the "Goosebusters" and as far It's the best one of the TNT seris.
Very funny and I like the Ending.

I notice Vacation Van Honk Cameo (Yep, I still remember this guy from
DuckTales).
After Dicki Duck, Herbert, Lunchpad, OK Quack, Timon and Pumba I wonder who
will have a cameo next...

Anny way I hop to the COA
(http://coa.inducks.org/coa/c1/story.php/0/D+2003-170//) to check for some
Info...

And it mention "Quacky McSlant" Charecter having a Cemeo as well. I
understend his the guy siting next to Van Honk.
Can sombody tell me who is he?

Thank's for anny Info on this Charecter.

Yours
Maciek Kur

Le Richard

Article on Don Rosa in French newspaper Message 17 - 2005-03-06 at 14:56:30

This is from the daily Sud-Ouest (south west).

http://img224.exs.cx/img224/4839/articlejournal3zt.jpg

--
I'm not reading mails sent to lerichard at free.fr anymore. To contact me use
f-wi at induREMOVE.also.THIScks (remove the hyphen and add ".org").

Le Richard

New feature on Inducks Message 18 - 2005-03-06 at 15:41:33

Resent. It seems my revious mail didn't appear (?).

It's now possible to add descriptions of stories in the Inducks!

Try it and let me know of any bug/missing feature.

The decriptions appear instantaneously on the COA pages. They can be edited by
anyone, and the history of changes for each description is available.

Example:
http://coa.inducks.org/coa/c1/story.php/0/W+OS++223-02

This is from the FAQ on the edit page:

Q: Is there any style or guideline for the description?
A: The most useful are long and precise descriptions. Names of secondary
characters and locations could change depending on reprints. If you use them,
it's best to mention the publication from which they come in the comment
field.

Q: This Inducks description is poor
A: It can happen that the Inducks description consists of several ones in the
same language that are very similar, or a very short text. Obviously they are
not examples to follow!

Q: What if my contribution is deleted or edited by someone else?
A: All changes are saved, so if someone edits your text (or removes it), you
or another visitor will still be able to revert it to the version you
provided. We also look regularly at submissions...

--
I'm not reading mails sent to lerichard at free.fr anymore. To contact me use
f-wi at induREMOVE.also.THIScks (remove the hyphen and add ".org").

Daniel Van Eijmeren

Question about Rosa's Lo$ and Penny Wise Message 19 - 2005-03-07 at 07:05:49

Friends and I are trying to think of any reasons why Rosa decided to
ignore old Miss Penny Wise (WDC 164) in the 'Life of $crooge', even
though Penny has a big influence on Scrooge and his entire fortune.
She appeared in 1954, only one year after Glittering Goldie (OS 456).

So, our question is:
What Barks-fact (or Rosa-fact) made Rosa decide to ignore Penny Wise?

--- Dani?l

David Gerstein

DCML Digest, Vol 25, Issue 2 Message 20 - 2005-03-07 at 07:34:58

MARVIN:

> I would hope that the support expressed by the 'Gottfredson in
> Gemstone' messages would be taken note by?Gemstone staff contributors
> to DCML including?Gary Leach, David Gerstein, and Travis Seitler.

Do know, Marvin, that I'm as much a Gottfredson fan as I've ever been,
and have long wanted to see his work in our books very much. Alas, all
I'm able to say for right now is that "we're working on it..."

MACIEK:

> I read the "Goosebusters" and as far It's the best one of the TNT
> seris.
> Very funny and I like the Ending.

I'm passing along a hearty thanks from both myself and Lars Jensen on
this. (Lars is presently so hard at work on some other stories that he
didn't have a chance to respond directly.)

> After Dickie Duck, Herbert, Launchpad, OK Quack, Timon and Pumbaa I
> wonder who will have a cameo next...

Heh, heh, just wait and see!

> And it mention "Quacky McSlant" Charecter having a Cemeo as well. I
> understend his the guy siting next to Van Honk. Can sombody tell me
> who is he?

Quacky McSlant is a character created for DuckTales who was intended
to be a regular character, but never actually ended up playing any
significant role. He was to have always walked around leaning to one
side, hence his name.
I think he only ever actually appeared once or twice. Joe Torcivia and
Christopher Barat would know better than I.

Best, David

M.J. Prior

Miss Penny Wise Message 21 - 2005-03-07 at 15:12:44

Daniel Van Eijmeren

Question about other holes in Rosa's Lo$ Message 22 - 2005-03-07 at 16:36:42

MICHIEL PRIOR to me, 07-03-2005:

> [Miss Penny Wise in WDC 164] This subject has been discussed here
> before. A quick search through the DCML archives shows us...

Thanks! How did you do that so fast?

Can you or someone else also give me an answer to these questions:

- What Barks-fact (or Rosa-fact) made Rosa decide to ignore the story
'The Magic Hourglass'? (OS 291)

- What Barks-fact (or Rosa-fact) made Rosa decide to debunk the power
of Scrooge's Old Number One dime, as seen in 'Lost Beneath the Sea'?
(US 46)

> I hope this satifies your hunger for information.

We'll see. Friends and I are investigating Rosa's compatibility with
Barks. As basis for a fan-booklet. So, any help is appreciated.

Thanks again!

--- Dani?l

P.S. When will the DCML archives complete again? Is there a server with
the missing episodes?

M.J. Prior

Uncle Plothole Message 23 - 2005-03-07 at 17:34:29

DANIEL VAN EIJMEREN:

> Thanks! How did you do that so fast?

I recently reread the archives and recognized this
subject. So I knew where to look.

> - What Barks-fact (or Rosa-fact) made Rosa decide to
> ignore the story 'The Magic Hourglass'? (OS 291)

The Barks-fact that $crooge earned all his money with his
own bare hands, by working hard instead of by sheer good
luck (and thus without help of any magical object,
including lucky dimes and such).

> Friends and I are investigating Rosa's compatibility with
> Barks. [...] So, any help is appreciated.

If you want a full list of all Barksian facts in- AND
excluded from Rosa's Lo$-series, including Don's own
motivation for changes and exclusions, you should take a
look at Don Rosa's own Lo$-site:

http://personal.sdf.bellsouth.net/d/a/danshane/scroopage/scroohome.htm

Regards,

Michiel Prior.

Le Richard

(no subject) Message 24 - 2005-03-10 at 22:07:56

I think this item is a false, what's your opinion?
http://cgi.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=81756&item=6516545484&rd=1

Daniel Van Eijmeren

Correspondence between Bomar and Don Rosa Message 25 - 2005-03-11 at 00:32:06

DON ROSA:

Someone forwarded an email to me, written by a person named Inge Bomer or
Ingmar Bomer, which has been sent to you, about a month ago, at the time
you had visited a big event. He told me that you sent at least two replies,
in which you mentioned me, accusing *me* of being the author of the thing.

I want to know what this is all about. Since you where referring to me as
being the person you were writing to, I want you to forward those replies
to me, so I can *really* read them.

This situation causes a lot of confusion for me, as you might understand.

--- Dani?l

----- Original Message -----
From: Inge Bomer
To: Z#####
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 11:30 PM
Subject: Oh-oh..

Dear Don,
I email you because I am a little worried about what's going on in especially
the Dutch Don Rosa Fansite "McDuck"
People are discussing your stories there in an incredibly nasty way; they are
analyzing your beautiful stories and they find a lot of weak points in them,
it's really so low to the ground.
More and more people find the stories not as good anymore as they once were and
even the better stories appear to have a lot of doubtful things, they say.
It's horrible to read, Don, all this criticizing, and it really affects a lot
of people's views upon your great work.
Some of them also say that you really screwed up C.Barks's world, but what are
they talking about, he's a nice artist but is not the God they think he is,
especially compared to you. You really made his rather common fairy-tale world
into a realistic one.
And now a lot of people are in doubt, your albums don't sell as good anymore
they say. Why are they so much against you, WHY? It's terrible Don, it's
terrible! What can we do about those people, WHAT CAN WE DO?
For me, I really try to stay on the good side of the line, but they make me so
angry! For example a very close friend of mine, that used to be a big fan of
yours is now talking bullshit about your work sometimes, and I hate him for
that. Don't wanna see him anymore.
I'm also a little bit ashamed about a thing that happened last night, but I'm
sure you'll get the point of it. I had not eaten much and I read the story
"Trash or Treasure". And seeing all these very well drawn trash-thingies I
really started feeling sick in the stomach. Don't misunderstand, this is a
great compliment for your realistic way of drawing Don, It's just fantastic!
But okay, I couldn't help vomiting over the magazine, that's terrible, I know
it, but it proves how well you draw!
So I told this on the forum and the criticizers made fun about it, and ignored
the fact that I was trying to make a point about your drawing skills!
Fortunately I have a lot of people who are with me, against the Barksfront
(that's how they call themselves, claiming to defend "Barks' Precious Universe"
against your "deformation" of it, as they say). But WE say: who needs Barks if
we have you? You developed the slightly weak characters into real ones! And we
prefer what you did, reforming all those unlikely storielines of his into very
realistic ones! And thus re-creating Barks'Universe into a very credible one!
I still re-read your great work every day and Still enjoy it almost just as
much as always. Thanks for that!
Don't bother about these stupid idiots who are criticizing you on the Internet,
we'll deal with them!
Yours sincerely,
Ingmar Bomer
A very big fan

Kai Saarto

(no subject) Message 26 - 2005-03-11 at 10:31:01

le Richard wrote:

>I think this item is a false, what's your opinion?
>http://cgi.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=81756&item=6516545484&rd=1
>
>
>
Don can probably tell right off, but if it is a fake it pretty well
done. If I absolutely had to pick one thing that might look suspicious,
its the feet. But why would anyone include a dedication if they planned
to sell it? Granted, it is written on the upper corner so it can be
easily hidden. It would be pretty clever, since Don always dedicates these.

What made you suspicious?

Kai Saarto

Correspondence between Bomar and Don Rosa Message 27 - 2005-03-11 at 11:59:01

Daniel's public anti-Rosa campaign has been allowed here for far too
long. Anyone can see that almost all of his messages are nowadays direct
or barely veiled personal attacks.

Could someone please stop this, permanently? Per Starb?ck, who who ever
is in charge here: could you please ban the IP-address. Not a single
soul here wants to read this spam.

This has been going on for years. Stop it by banning this person, once
and for all. This is really starting to make the whole list look bad.

Daniel Van Eijmeren

Correspondence between Bomar and Don Rosa Message 28 - 2005-03-11 at 13:05:21

KAI SAARTO, 11-03-2005

> Daniel's public anti-Rosa campaign has been allowed here for far too
> long.

Let Don Rosa reply himself.

Rosa mentions my name in private emails to one of his fans, reportedly
in a *very* nasty way. So, may I PLEASE know what's going on here?

--- Dani?l

Lars Jensen

Correspondence between Bomar and Don Rosa Message 29 - 2005-03-11 at 13:41:50

Without commenting on the subject itself...

This is only related to Disney comics in a tangential manner. I suggest
the discussion is moved to DCML-talk. (www.dcml-talk.org .)

Lars

Kai Saarto

Correspondence between Bomar and Don Rosa Message 30 - 2005-03-11 at 13:53:32

Daniel van Eijmeren wrote:

>KAI SAARTO, 11-03-2005
>
>
>
>>Daniel's public anti-Rosa campaign has been allowed here for far too
>>long.
>>
>>
>
>Let Don Rosa reply himself.
>
>Rosa mentions my name in private emails to one of his fans, reportedly
>in a *very* nasty way. So, may I PLEASE know what's going on here?
>
>
Other people's private messages should be no concern of yours. I don't
give a damn if someone says something about me in their PRIVATE emails.
Why should you? You just want attention here, and behave like a child. I
hope there are laws against the harassment you do.

Besides, now that you miraciously got your hands to the original message
by the said Ingebor, why on earth wouldn't you get the replies to it as
well?? I guess you'd better contact this mysterious deepthroath of yours
for further information if you so crave to read other people' s mail.
Don't come here asking for it. You seem to think this forum is your
personal playground and that you can write about whatever you want.

Do it somewhere else.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Keskustelujen arkisto

Topic: 200503