>>>>From: "Olaf Moriarty Solstrand" <olaf.solstrand at andebyonline.com>
>>>>> And even though he's not among us to read this -- congratulations to
>>>>> Floyd
>>>>> Gottfredson with entering The Eisner Award Hall of Fame!
How could I miss this ?!?!
Thanks for pointing it out, Olaf !
Gottfredson highly deserved such recognition, as one of the masters of the
genre-- one of the pioneers, too.
Olivier
Author
Topic: 200607
(106 messages)
Olivier
Eisner Awards 2006
Message 76 -
2006-07-28 at 00:07:24
Ole Damgaard
English Language Disney Comics Forum
Message 77 -
2006-07-28 at 14:05:46
There's an english forum at this adress too: http://discussion.mcduck.nl
----- Original Message -----
From: Vernon Meiers
To: dcml at nafsk.se
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:38 AM
Subject: English Language Disney Comics Forum
>I decided to launch a new English-only Disney Comics web forum. This is a
>place to discuss anything related to both comics and Disney.
Check it out at:
http://dcmlforum.jconserv.net/index.php
----- Original Message -----
From: Vernon Meiers
To: dcml at nafsk.se
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:38 AM
Subject: English Language Disney Comics Forum
>I decided to launch a new English-only Disney Comics web forum. This is a
>place to discuss anything related to both comics and Disney.
Check it out at:
http://dcmlforum.jconserv.net/index.php
Rodney-selfhelpbikeco
DCML Digest, Vol 41, Issue 28
Message 78 -
2006-07-28 at 14:12:38
You can also discuss Disney comics (and cartoons, and other classic comics and cartoons) on the forums at www.goldenagecartoons.com
That's where I spend most of my time these days, and I know a few of our other friends are around there as well.
Rodney
________________________________________________________________________
Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!
That's where I spend most of my time these days, and I know a few of our other friends are around there as well.
Rodney
________________________________________________________________________
Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!
Daniel Van Eijmeren
English Language Disney Comics Forum
Message 79 -
2006-07-29 at 15:37:24
> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:05:46 +0200
> From: "Ole Damgaard" <ole at disneycomics.dk>
<There's an english forum at this adress too: http://discussion.mcduck.nl>
The McDuck International forum works on PunBB software.
The biggest problem is that this software doesn't have any (public) archive
options. Any tips and advice would be welcome, as McDuck is intended as a
steady platform that will stay on internet, including a downloadable
archive.
At this moment there's a discussion going on about "RSS". The way I get it,
this is a system that can send posted messsages by email. So, people will
have local copies to reply to, without having the visit the forum first.
Index ? About this forum ? RSS?
http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=29
Best,
Dani?l
> From: "Ole Damgaard" <ole at disneycomics.dk>
<There's an english forum at this adress too: http://discussion.mcduck.nl>
The McDuck International forum works on PunBB software.
The biggest problem is that this software doesn't have any (public) archive
options. Any tips and advice would be welcome, as McDuck is intended as a
steady platform that will stay on internet, including a downloadable
archive.
At this moment there's a discussion going on about "RSS". The way I get it,
this is a system that can send posted messsages by email. So, people will
have local copies to reply to, without having the visit the forum first.
Index ? About this forum ? RSS?
http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=29
Best,
Dani?l
Daniel Van Eijmeren
English Language Disney Comics Forum
Message 80 -
2006-07-29 at 15:52:52
> an internal link pointer on the DCML at:
> http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/pointers.html
The page contains dead links. For example:
- Jacob Sparre Andersen's Disney page
- Harry's Disney comics web pages
Also, I wonder why the site 'D.U.C.K.hunt' is listed under this general
overview. It's devoted to just one artist, Don Rosa, even though there are
separate listings for individual artists:
http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/creators/carl-barks.html
http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/creators/don-rosa.html
I think this double listing of one individual artist under "general" is
unfair to fans of the many other Disney comics artists, including Carl
Barks. I hope the moderator will correct this.
Best,
Dani?l
> http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/pointers.html
The page contains dead links. For example:
- Jacob Sparre Andersen's Disney page
- Harry's Disney comics web pages
Also, I wonder why the site 'D.U.C.K.hunt' is listed under this general
overview. It's devoted to just one artist, Don Rosa, even though there are
separate listings for individual artists:
http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/creators/carl-barks.html
http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/creators/don-rosa.html
I think this double listing of one individual artist under "general" is
unfair to fans of the many other Disney comics artists, including Carl
Barks. I hope the moderator will correct this.
Best,
Dani?l
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
Message 81 -
2006-07-29 at 16:28:54
[This is a resent version. With correct links. I goofed up by giving a
wrong, confusing McDuck-URL and requested for blocking myself.
Compliments and thanks to the DCML-moderator for the help! DvE.]
> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:12:38 GMT
> From: "rodney-selfhelpbikeco at juno.com"
>
wrong, confusing McDuck-URL and requested for blocking myself.
Compliments and thanks to the DCML-moderator for the help! DvE.]
> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:12:38 GMT
> From: "rodney-selfhelpbikeco at juno.com"
>
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Reconstruction of the DCML archives 1992-2006
Message 82 -
2006-07-29 at 21:27:26
Here's an attempt to reconstruct the enitre DCML archives, from its
beginning in August 1992 up to now, July 2006.
1. Official archives
Currently archived complete years:
- August 1992 - December 1994
- January 2000 - July 2006
available at: http://nafsk.se/pipermail/dcml/
Dates are sometimes mixed up, as in "1970" and "2016"-files.
The current incarnation of the Disney Comics Mailing List is the third.
The first one (up to and including November 1995) is still archived.
available at: ftp://ftp.update.uu.se/pub/comics/disney/archive/
The archives of the second incarnation are currently unavailable.
2. Member archives
Currently archived complete years:
August 1992 - December 1999
available at: http://mcduck.nl/archief/dcml/dcml_1995-2000.zip
Downloaded archive-files of August 1992 - June 1995, and email digests from
a Dutch subscriber.
These email digests should be complete from 24 May 1995 up to 30 January
2000.
Corrections, additions, comments, suggestions, file-comparing, etc., are
welcome.
see also:
McDuck - Reconstruction of the DCML archives
http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=36
Best,
Dani?l
beginning in August 1992 up to now, July 2006.
1. Official archives
Currently archived complete years:
- August 1992 - December 1994
- January 2000 - July 2006
available at: http://nafsk.se/pipermail/dcml/
Dates are sometimes mixed up, as in "1970" and "2016"-files.
The current incarnation of the Disney Comics Mailing List is the third.
The first one (up to and including November 1995) is still archived.
available at: ftp://ftp.update.uu.se/pub/comics/disney/archive/
The archives of the second incarnation are currently unavailable.
2. Member archives
Currently archived complete years:
August 1992 - December 1999
available at: http://mcduck.nl/archief/dcml/dcml_1995-2000.zip
Downloaded archive-files of August 1992 - June 1995, and email digests from
a Dutch subscriber.
These email digests should be complete from 24 May 1995 up to 30 January
2000.
Corrections, additions, comments, suggestions, file-comparing, etc., are
welcome.
see also:
McDuck - Reconstruction of the DCML archives
http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=36
Best,
Dani?l
Deanmary
Possible Archive Volumes
Message 83 -
2006-07-29 at 23:53:23
A few days ago Joakim Gunnarsson posted a piece from this site:http://www.marvelessentials.com/current_news.html
that talked about Gemstone publishing archive libraries of Carl Barks and Floyd Gottfredson as early as 2008. I was wondering if anyone from Gemstone could confirm this information? I realize that 2008 is far away yet and that plans would be far from firm, but it would really great to hear that such ideas are in Gemstone's long term plans.
And under the theory of "in for a penny, in for a pound", does Gemstone also have plans for Don Rosa and/or Al Taliaferro libraries? Any information anyone at Gemstone could provide would be *greatly* appreciated! I apologize in advance for being too nosey! :)
Dean Rekich
that talked about Gemstone publishing archive libraries of Carl Barks and Floyd Gottfredson as early as 2008. I was wondering if anyone from Gemstone could confirm this information? I realize that 2008 is far away yet and that plans would be far from firm, but it would really great to hear that such ideas are in Gemstone's long term plans.
And under the theory of "in for a penny, in for a pound", does Gemstone also have plans for Don Rosa and/or Al Taliaferro libraries? Any information anyone at Gemstone could provide would be *greatly* appreciated! I apologize in advance for being too nosey! :)
Dean Rekich
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Reconstruction of the DCML archives 1992-2006
Message 84 -
2006-07-30 at 00:20:59
Some technical comments, as addition to my previous email.
Advantage of the email digests in comparison to the third incarnation of the
official archive, is that digests can be used to reveal wrong date-fields.
At the official archive this can currently only be seen with obvious
mistakes, like "January 1970", "January 1980" and "October 2016".
Therefore I think all the digests deserve to be archived. At least I can
submit the years 2000 up to now. But I don't have dates before 24 May 1995
(ten-current 'Disney-comics digest #672').
My first original digest seems to be then-current 'Disney-comics digest
#676', dated 28 May 1995. Preceding digests #672-#675 are forwards dated 27
May 1995, without original dates.
A problem with digests is that there are sometimes emails falling outside of
the digest, only being sent as loose email to subscribers who opted for a
real-time subscription.
In short there are at least three types of copies:
- loose emails
- digest collections of emails
- official archive
All versions should be exact the same, except for technical problems. For
example, a current problem is email bodies being "scrubbed" from loose
emails and digests. These email bodies are now only available at the
official archives.
Dani?l
Advantage of the email digests in comparison to the third incarnation of the
official archive, is that digests can be used to reveal wrong date-fields.
At the official archive this can currently only be seen with obvious
mistakes, like "January 1970", "January 1980" and "October 2016".
Therefore I think all the digests deserve to be archived. At least I can
submit the years 2000 up to now. But I don't have dates before 24 May 1995
(ten-current 'Disney-comics digest #672').
My first original digest seems to be then-current 'Disney-comics digest
#676', dated 28 May 1995. Preceding digests #672-#675 are forwards dated 27
May 1995, without original dates.
A problem with digests is that there are sometimes emails falling outside of
the digest, only being sent as loose email to subscribers who opted for a
real-time subscription.
In short there are at least three types of copies:
- loose emails
- digest collections of emails
- official archive
All versions should be exact the same, except for technical problems. For
example, a current problem is email bodies being "scrubbed" from loose
emails and digests. These email bodies are now only available at the
official archives.
Dani?l
Ole Damgaard
Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
Message 85 -
2006-07-30 at 00:55:31
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel van Eijmeren" <dve at kabelfoon.nl>
To: <dcml at nafsk.se>
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
>Rodney's message was "scrubbed". Is this scrubbing problem still going on
>at DCML? I would expect our beloved DCML-moderator to finally fix this
>problem. It's going on for years now.
Send your messages as plain text instead of html, and there will be no
scrubbing.
>the administrator became almost unreachable. As if DCML is some inferior
>hobby.
When you do some work or run a service without getting paid for it, then it
*is* by definition a hobby.
>I'm always curious if the mighty DCML-moderator will block something.
Whoever owns/administrates a mailing list, has the right to moderate it. If
you for instance created a mailing list, you could moderate that too.
Doesn't that sound fair to you?
/od
From: "Daniel van Eijmeren" <dve at kabelfoon.nl>
To: <dcml at nafsk.se>
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
>Rodney's message was "scrubbed". Is this scrubbing problem still going on
>at DCML? I would expect our beloved DCML-moderator to finally fix this
>problem. It's going on for years now.
Send your messages as plain text instead of html, and there will be no
scrubbing.
>the administrator became almost unreachable. As if DCML is some inferior
>hobby.
When you do some work or run a service without getting paid for it, then it
*is* by definition a hobby.
>I'm always curious if the mighty DCML-moderator will block something.
Whoever owns/administrates a mailing list, has the right to moderate it. If
you for instance created a mailing list, you could moderate that too.
Doesn't that sound fair to you?
/od
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Moderation of DCML and McDuck
Message 86 -
2006-07-30 at 01:44:27
My request to block an email with a wrong link is a good example of benefits
of moderation. The wrong link opened a new topic, and that would have caused
confusion at DCML and McDuck.
What I would like to know is what to expect from the current DCML
moderation. Is it just a safety-net for technical problems and last-minute
corrections, or is there censoring involved? What are the rules?
On the webforum McDuck International there's mostly just technical
moderation. This happens afterwards. Removing of spambots, closing of double
subjects, etc. And if a message gets censored by the McDuck maintainer, it's
really past the borders. I've seen some examples like short submissions
solely about certain minorities getting certain deathly diseases. These are
a few exceptions, and to my knowlegde they have been the worst so far. In
that light, I have a lot of trust in minimal moderation and humanity.
link: http://discussion.mcduck.nl/
At DCML messsages get logged after being approved. And then they can never
be changed. In contrary to a webforum. This way I can understand moderation,
but not if it limits the liberty of speech in uncertain ways. I think
obvious rules are important, including a discussion about what those rules
should be.
On the technical side, I think the moderation includes concern about the
"scrubbed" messages, which are now left out of emails and digests. There are
many programmers around, so I guess there could be help from them, if
needed.
I think DCML isn't old-fashioned in comparison to webfora. Both media have
pros and cons. The way I see it, only the principle of one or two volunteers
doing all the maintaining should be something from the past, as it often
results in bottle-neck problems. I think DCML could benefit from having more
volunteers joining forces together.
I'm curious for comments.
Dani?l
of moderation. The wrong link opened a new topic, and that would have caused
confusion at DCML and McDuck.
What I would like to know is what to expect from the current DCML
moderation. Is it just a safety-net for technical problems and last-minute
corrections, or is there censoring involved? What are the rules?
On the webforum McDuck International there's mostly just technical
moderation. This happens afterwards. Removing of spambots, closing of double
subjects, etc. And if a message gets censored by the McDuck maintainer, it's
really past the borders. I've seen some examples like short submissions
solely about certain minorities getting certain deathly diseases. These are
a few exceptions, and to my knowlegde they have been the worst so far. In
that light, I have a lot of trust in minimal moderation and humanity.
link: http://discussion.mcduck.nl/
At DCML messsages get logged after being approved. And then they can never
be changed. In contrary to a webforum. This way I can understand moderation,
but not if it limits the liberty of speech in uncertain ways. I think
obvious rules are important, including a discussion about what those rules
should be.
On the technical side, I think the moderation includes concern about the
"scrubbed" messages, which are now left out of emails and digests. There are
many programmers around, so I guess there could be help from them, if
needed.
I think DCML isn't old-fashioned in comparison to webfora. Both media have
pros and cons. The way I see it, only the principle of one or two volunteers
doing all the maintaining should be something from the past, as it often
results in bottle-neck problems. I think DCML could benefit from having more
volunteers joining forces together.
I'm curious for comments.
Dani?l
Søren Krarup Olesen
Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
Message 87 -
2006-07-30 at 13:56:23
Dani?l wrote:
> In case this email will be blocked, I will put it on McDuck International. I
> think DCML is worth a good discussion before it fades out.
>
> The URL is:
> Disney Comics Mailing List (DCML)
> http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=35
Absolutely. However, I wonder why there suddenly are so many replies to
your post on *that* site, when the topic is clearly related to *this*
mailing list.
The posts there could just as well have been mails here(?!)
S?ren
> In case this email will be blocked, I will put it on McDuck International. I
> think DCML is worth a good discussion before it fades out.
>
> The URL is:
> Disney Comics Mailing List (DCML)
> http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=35
Absolutely. However, I wonder why there suddenly are so many replies to
your post on *that* site, when the topic is clearly related to *this*
mailing list.
The posts there could just as well have been mails here(?!)
S?ren
Olivier
Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
Message 88 -
2006-07-30 at 14:32:47
>>>> The URL is:
>>>> Disney Comics Mailing List (DCML)
>>>> http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=35
So are all those places where everybody is?
Olivier,
felling lonely
>>>> Disney Comics Mailing List (DCML)
>>>> http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=35
So are all those places where everybody is?
Olivier,
felling lonely
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Rodney's scrubbed email about fora
Message 89 -
2006-07-30 at 18:31:13
> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:55:31 +0200
> From: "Ole Damgaard" <ole at disneycomics.dk>
<Send your messages as plain text instead of html, and there will be no
scrubbing.>
Emails with HTML exist for years and years already, so I think it's strange
that the DCML-software expects users to turn off such an often used option.
I see that as a lack of technical support. Even more because people on DCML
have to guess for themselves what's going on, without any help from the
maintainer or the moderator. If your message gets scrubbed, well, who cares?
That's an example of what I think is going wrong here on DCML. There's no
communication about the current status and the future. To me it looks like
we're running on old software that severely needs an update. But will such
an update ever come?
<When you do some work or run a service without getting paid for it, then it
*is* by definition a hobby.>
Okay, but when one starts an hobby that brings people together in a
community, there should be responsibitity for it. Morally speaking, at
least. Otherwise any fool can start a forum and leave it deserted after a
while.
Nowadays on internet, amateur fora are popping up like mushrooms. I always
felt that DCML had the intention to be a steady, reliable forum. But in
recent years, it just looks like the place is just waiting to be switched
off by lack of interest. Looking at the website of DCML, with dead links,
I'm not surprised at all that people are leaving DCML.
http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/index.html
<Whoever owns/administrates a mailing list, has the right to moderate it. If
you for instance created a mailing list, you could moderate that too.
Doesn't that sound fair to you?>
From what I've understood, there are laws and rules for raising a community.
Human rights, for example. Or would the maintainer be allowed to block
people who wear glasses, for example?
There's a difference between moderation and censoring. And there needs to be
rules and clarity about what to expect from it. Otherwise there might be
discrimination in what gets through and what gets blocked. As the blocking
happens in private mail, I'm curious for outtakes and the explanations for
blocking them. I want to know what the moderation means for the liberty of
speech.
That's one of my reasons to raise up a topic at a free independent place. If
people have complaints about blocked emails, they will have a place to
discuss them. Anonymously, if preferred. I think such a independent place is
important for any community.
Disney Comics Mailing List (DCML)
http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=35
Dani?l
> From: "Ole Damgaard" <ole at disneycomics.dk>
<Send your messages as plain text instead of html, and there will be no
scrubbing.>
Emails with HTML exist for years and years already, so I think it's strange
that the DCML-software expects users to turn off such an often used option.
I see that as a lack of technical support. Even more because people on DCML
have to guess for themselves what's going on, without any help from the
maintainer or the moderator. If your message gets scrubbed, well, who cares?
That's an example of what I think is going wrong here on DCML. There's no
communication about the current status and the future. To me it looks like
we're running on old software that severely needs an update. But will such
an update ever come?
<When you do some work or run a service without getting paid for it, then it
*is* by definition a hobby.>
Okay, but when one starts an hobby that brings people together in a
community, there should be responsibitity for it. Morally speaking, at
least. Otherwise any fool can start a forum and leave it deserted after a
while.
Nowadays on internet, amateur fora are popping up like mushrooms. I always
felt that DCML had the intention to be a steady, reliable forum. But in
recent years, it just looks like the place is just waiting to be switched
off by lack of interest. Looking at the website of DCML, with dead links,
I'm not surprised at all that people are leaving DCML.
http://stp.ling.uu.se/~starback/dcml/index.html
<Whoever owns/administrates a mailing list, has the right to moderate it. If
you for instance created a mailing list, you could moderate that too.
Doesn't that sound fair to you?>
From what I've understood, there are laws and rules for raising a community.
Human rights, for example. Or would the maintainer be allowed to block
people who wear glasses, for example?
There's a difference between moderation and censoring. And there needs to be
rules and clarity about what to expect from it. Otherwise there might be
discrimination in what gets through and what gets blocked. As the blocking
happens in private mail, I'm curious for outtakes and the explanations for
blocking them. I want to know what the moderation means for the liberty of
speech.
That's one of my reasons to raise up a topic at a free independent place. If
people have complaints about blocked emails, they will have a place to
discuss them. Anonymously, if preferred. I think such a independent place is
important for any community.
Disney Comics Mailing List (DCML)
http://discussion.mcduck.nl/viewtopic.php?id=35
Dani?l
Rich
Moderation of DCML
Message 90 -
2006-07-30 at 22:08:26
Wow! I've read some pretty heated items here in the past but this attack on the Moderator is really uncalled for. As one of the
original members of the DCML (since it's creation in 1992 in a more abreviated and primitive format) I find the mean-spirited
comment really sad. The Moderator is doing an awesome job. He has a REAL LIFE too and shouldn't be expected to do
anything more than provide a friendly place where people can chat about Disney comics and creators. Keeping people from
doing things that would disrupt that format is part of the role of a moderator and a valuable asset.
The DCML was originally created when there was no formalized database of Disney comics and it's formation has GREATLY
enhance the ability of everyone to contribute to the database, as a wonderful sidebar, it also opened the door for creators and
others who have production and publishing standing in the Disney realm to also meet and discuss items of interest with the
fans directly.
The DCML has a humble, but wonderful origin and a strong connection to the world of Disney comics LONG before any other
Message Boards (etc.) were even concieved.
I'm proud to be a member of the DCML and even happier and grateful to all the wonderful people I have met here! Sure there
are much more Hi-Tech formats out there, and there are people who have no other life than to occupy themselves with 24/7
running their boards... maybe that's a world that appeals to some and there is nothing wrong with it.
If I might add one thing? No one is forcing ANYONE to read or post to this mailing list. We are ALL here of our own volition
and because of a shared, INTERNATIONAL interest. Thus, if you don't like it here, there is no one on EARTH forcing you to
remain.
Thanks,
Rich
(Email removed)
---- Msg sent via CWNet - http://www.cwnet.com/
original members of the DCML (since it's creation in 1992 in a more abreviated and primitive format) I find the mean-spirited
comment really sad. The Moderator is doing an awesome job. He has a REAL LIFE too and shouldn't be expected to do
anything more than provide a friendly place where people can chat about Disney comics and creators. Keeping people from
doing things that would disrupt that format is part of the role of a moderator and a valuable asset.
The DCML was originally created when there was no formalized database of Disney comics and it's formation has GREATLY
enhance the ability of everyone to contribute to the database, as a wonderful sidebar, it also opened the door for creators and
others who have production and publishing standing in the Disney realm to also meet and discuss items of interest with the
fans directly.
The DCML has a humble, but wonderful origin and a strong connection to the world of Disney comics LONG before any other
Message Boards (etc.) were even concieved.
I'm proud to be a member of the DCML and even happier and grateful to all the wonderful people I have met here! Sure there
are much more Hi-Tech formats out there, and there are people who have no other life than to occupy themselves with 24/7
running their boards... maybe that's a world that appeals to some and there is nothing wrong with it.
If I might add one thing? No one is forcing ANYONE to read or post to this mailing list. We are ALL here of our own volition
and because of a shared, INTERNATIONAL interest. Thus, if you don't like it here, there is no one on EARTH forcing you to
remain.
Thanks,
Rich
(Email removed)
---- Msg sent via CWNet - http://www.cwnet.com/