> > Our friend Donald Duck is now 65 years old. Here in Europe you get
> > with an age of 65 the status as a pensioner. But what's happen in
> > Duckburgh ?. Is there a right/claim to be in retire ?
>
>According to Don's "The Duck Who Never Was", one is forcibly retired
>at sixty.
At sixty? As far as I can remember, the museum guy who tries to force Donald
to retire on his 60th birthday comes back later in the story to say
something like "We're sorry, we've made a mistake, the real age is 65 years"
Juha
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Author
Topic: 199906
(110 messages)
Juha Viikki
Retirement at sixty??
Message 46 -
1999-06-16 at 21:59:23
Paolo Castagno
Whither Duck Hunt?
Message 47 -
1999-06-16 at 22:36:38
"Michael G. Pfefferkorn" wrote:
> Does anyone know where the Don Rosa based site Duck Hunt has
> migrated to?
AFAIK it should be http://www.duckhunt.de
Ciao,
- Paolo
http://www.confor.it:2222/disney
> Does anyone know where the Don Rosa based site Duck Hunt has
> migrated to?
AFAIK it should be http://www.duckhunt.de
Ciao,
- Paolo
http://www.confor.it:2222/disney
Olof Gustafsson
Carl Barks Library
Message 48 -
1999-06-17 at 10:26:59
I want to thank for all the answers on my last question. Maybe it's time for
me to introduce myself. I'm 18 years old and I like to draw Disney ducks,
and have been doing so on my speartime, only for fun of course, for the last
3-4 years. Now, my next question is where I can buy the sets of the Carl
Barks Library. Does anyone know?
Olof Gustafsson
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
me to introduce myself. I'm 18 years old and I like to draw Disney ducks,
and have been doing so on my speartime, only for fun of course, for the last
3-4 years. Now, my next question is where I can buy the sets of the Carl
Barks Library. Does anyone know?
Olof Gustafsson
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
HoyMurphy
Donald's Birthday
Message 49 -
1999-06-17 at 15:12:23
Every time I go to the local Disney store I ask for anything with $crooge on
it, and I either get a blank look or an apology for not having anything.
However, last week I asked and was told that After the Tarzan stuff this
month the stores will be celebrating Donald Duck's 65th Birthday and they
will have a lot of duck items, possibly including something with $crooge. So
I am hopeful for that.
Anyway, that got me to wondering if my pal Don Rosa has done/is doing an
anniversary story about Donald that we might see before the year is out, if
the Gemstone deal goes through. How about it, Don?
--your pal, Hoy
it, and I either get a blank look or an apology for not having anything.
However, last week I asked and was told that After the Tarzan stuff this
month the stores will be celebrating Donald Duck's 65th Birthday and they
will have a lot of duck items, possibly including something with $crooge. So
I am hopeful for that.
Anyway, that got me to wondering if my pal Don Rosa has done/is doing an
anniversary story about Donald that we might see before the year is out, if
the Gemstone deal goes through. How about it, Don?
--your pal, Hoy
Kriton Kyrimis
Disney comics Digest V99 #106
Message 50 -
1999-06-17 at 16:20:12
RODNEY:
> I can't believe people are hoping that Gladstone isn't going to go with
> the deluxe format books. I honestly don't care either way, as long as
> some books come out. But, the Deluxe format books were the finest Disney
> books to ever be released in America. I think that as long as there are
> inexpensive titles for the casual reader, there is a place for the
> beautiful deluxe books.
Prestige format books are for collectors, and for people with lots of
money to spend. No one argues that these books are beautiful, but they
are too expensive. What's worse, they are somewhat impractical to read,
as you have to be careful not to break the spine, not to mention that
they can't lie flat on a table.
I don't even think that printing some stories in a prestige title and
some others in a regular title is a good idea either, as it would deprive
those readers who can't afford the prestige books from reading some of
the stories. It would be best if prestige titles reprinted recently
printed stories, for those who might want to adorn their bookshelves
with something better than plain comic books.
I don't know how practical it would be to do something similar to what
Another Rainbow did with their Mickey Mouse in Color book, which was
published in an expensive coffe table format and in a much cheaper
smaller edition, and publish each comic book in both prestige and regular
formats, with the former having only a small run.
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"And tell them the Doctor told you."
"Who?"
"Exactly!"
-----
> I can't believe people are hoping that Gladstone isn't going to go with
> the deluxe format books. I honestly don't care either way, as long as
> some books come out. But, the Deluxe format books were the finest Disney
> books to ever be released in America. I think that as long as there are
> inexpensive titles for the casual reader, there is a place for the
> beautiful deluxe books.
Prestige format books are for collectors, and for people with lots of
money to spend. No one argues that these books are beautiful, but they
are too expensive. What's worse, they are somewhat impractical to read,
as you have to be careful not to break the spine, not to mention that
they can't lie flat on a table.
I don't even think that printing some stories in a prestige title and
some others in a regular title is a good idea either, as it would deprive
those readers who can't afford the prestige books from reading some of
the stories. It would be best if prestige titles reprinted recently
printed stories, for those who might want to adorn their bookshelves
with something better than plain comic books.
I don't know how practical it would be to do something similar to what
Another Rainbow did with their Mickey Mouse in Color book, which was
published in an expensive coffe table format and in a much cheaper
smaller edition, and publish each comic book in both prestige and regular
formats, with the former having only a small run.
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"And tell them the Doctor told you."
"Who?"
"Exactly!"
-----
Luca Boschi
To Steven Rowe, from Luca Boschi
Message 51 -
1999-06-18 at 04:15:01
Hi, Steven (and all)!
Some days ago I posted a mail with a question on Bob Ogle and Del
Connell, but noone seems to have a satisfying answer... But maybe you
have one, since I know how wide your knowledges in the Golden and
Silver comic books Ages are!
Having read articles (and an old interview) about and with Del
Connell, I learned that he wrote (or, at least, conceived) stories for
the short-lived Phantom Blot series, around 1965.
I assume that the idea was developed by him and Chase Craig.
Particularly, from an article written by Joe Torcivia, introducing
Super Goof, I learn that he created the character of Super Goof in
1964 and he turned his script over the artist Paul Murry to
illustrate it.
Super Goof made his debut in " The P. Blot" of April 1965.
It really seems that all the stories of P. Blot come from the same
mind, from the same concept... Is this true?
Mybe also Bob Ogle was involved in the creative process of the Blot
stories, like happened for Super Goof?
Thank you in advance!
Bye!
Luca
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V99 Issue #107
******************************************
Some days ago I posted a mail with a question on Bob Ogle and Del
Connell, but noone seems to have a satisfying answer... But maybe you
have one, since I know how wide your knowledges in the Golden and
Silver comic books Ages are!
Having read articles (and an old interview) about and with Del
Connell, I learned that he wrote (or, at least, conceived) stories for
the short-lived Phantom Blot series, around 1965.
I assume that the idea was developed by him and Chase Craig.
Particularly, from an article written by Joe Torcivia, introducing
Super Goof, I learn that he created the character of Super Goof in
1964 and he turned his script over the artist Paul Murry to
illustrate it.
Super Goof made his debut in " The P. Blot" of April 1965.
It really seems that all the stories of P. Blot come from the same
mind, from the same concept... Is this true?
Mybe also Bob Ogle was involved in the creative process of the Blot
stories, like happened for Super Goof?
Thank you in advance!
Bye!
Luca
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V99 Issue #107
******************************************
Kriton Kyrimis
Disney comics Digest V99 #107
Message 52 -
1999-06-18 at 14:58:33
Juha:
> >According to Don's "The Duck Who Never Was", one is forcibly retired
> >at sixty.
>
> At sixty? As far as I can remember, the museum guy who tries to force Donald
> to retire on his 60th birthday comes back later in the story to say
> something like "We're sorry, we've made a mistake, the real age is 65 years"
I stand corrected. I was quoting from memory, and I guess that the gag
about Donald's shortest-lasting job was what made the biggest impression
on me.
I suspect that I somehow missed the joke, however, and that Don did not
mean to say that Donald was sixty in that story, but that the museum
guy *thought* that he was sixty.
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"I'm fully booked for the next two centuries, but any time after that..."
-----
> >According to Don's "The Duck Who Never Was", one is forcibly retired
> >at sixty.
>
> At sixty? As far as I can remember, the museum guy who tries to force Donald
> to retire on his 60th birthday comes back later in the story to say
> something like "We're sorry, we've made a mistake, the real age is 65 years"
I stand corrected. I was quoting from memory, and I guess that the gag
about Donald's shortest-lasting job was what made the biggest impression
on me.
I suspect that I somehow missed the joke, however, and that Don did not
mean to say that Donald was sixty in that story, but that the museum
guy *thought* that he was sixty.
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"I'm fully booked for the next two centuries, but any time after that..."
-----
Don Rosa
Digest #107
Message 53 -
1999-06-18 at 15:24:46
From: HoyMurphy
>>>>Every time I go to the local Disney store I ask for anything with $crooge on
it, and I either get a blank look or an apology for not having anything.
However, last week I asked and was told that After the Tarzan stuff this
month the stores will be celebrating Donald Duck's 65th Birthday and they
will have a lot of duck items, possibly including something with $crooge. So
I am hopeful for that.
$crooge has nothing to do with DD's 65th Birthday. And since Disney currently has nothing to do with $crooge ("Ducktales" having come and gone), I see no reason why they would have any $crooge items. Remember, $crooge is a comic-book character, popular in Europe, not popular with the T-shirt and Beanie-Boobie buyers at an American Disney Store. And it's Americans who decide on the contents of those stores, so Donald items are not frequent, and $crooge items are rare if not virtually unknown.
>>>Anyway, that got me to wondering if my pal Don Rosa has done/is doing an
anniversary story about Donald that we might see before the year is out,
Nope. I can't do an anniversary story for each character every 5 years. That would mean that every other one of my stories would be an anniversary story for somebody. I was ready to go crackers by the time the last series of anniversary stories went through and I was doing Gladstone Gander's 50th... that was a bridge too far. Maybe I'll do a DD 70th anniversary story. But this was the 150th anniversary of the Kalevala in the country where Donald/$crooge are perhaps more popular than anywhere else... so it was the year I blended the Ducks into *that* anniversary.
Somebody asked why Sweden does not use my stories like "Lost Charts of Columbus" and "Treasure of the Ten Avatars". "Avatars" was a one-part, unserialized near-30 pager. Sweden does no supplement issues and doesn't want to use up that much space in their weekly with one story. That applies to their non-use of "Avatars", "Last Lord of Eldorado", "Master of the Mississippi"...... but NOT to "Lost Charts" which was a normal 3-parter. They didn't use that? Maybe it was because the story featured an Irish/Celtic style Christian CROSS... I was told that upset some publishers.
>>>>Every time I go to the local Disney store I ask for anything with $crooge on
it, and I either get a blank look or an apology for not having anything.
However, last week I asked and was told that After the Tarzan stuff this
month the stores will be celebrating Donald Duck's 65th Birthday and they
will have a lot of duck items, possibly including something with $crooge. So
I am hopeful for that.
$crooge has nothing to do with DD's 65th Birthday. And since Disney currently has nothing to do with $crooge ("Ducktales" having come and gone), I see no reason why they would have any $crooge items. Remember, $crooge is a comic-book character, popular in Europe, not popular with the T-shirt and Beanie-Boobie buyers at an American Disney Store. And it's Americans who decide on the contents of those stores, so Donald items are not frequent, and $crooge items are rare if not virtually unknown.
>>>Anyway, that got me to wondering if my pal Don Rosa has done/is doing an
anniversary story about Donald that we might see before the year is out,
Nope. I can't do an anniversary story for each character every 5 years. That would mean that every other one of my stories would be an anniversary story for somebody. I was ready to go crackers by the time the last series of anniversary stories went through and I was doing Gladstone Gander's 50th... that was a bridge too far. Maybe I'll do a DD 70th anniversary story. But this was the 150th anniversary of the Kalevala in the country where Donald/$crooge are perhaps more popular than anywhere else... so it was the year I blended the Ducks into *that* anniversary.
Somebody asked why Sweden does not use my stories like "Lost Charts of Columbus" and "Treasure of the Ten Avatars". "Avatars" was a one-part, unserialized near-30 pager. Sweden does no supplement issues and doesn't want to use up that much space in their weekly with one story. That applies to their non-use of "Avatars", "Last Lord of Eldorado", "Master of the Mississippi"...... but NOT to "Lost Charts" which was a normal 3-parter. They didn't use that? Maybe it was because the story featured an Irish/Celtic style Christian CROSS... I was told that upset some publishers.
Ole Reichstein Nielsen
Top Comics
Message 54 -
1999-06-18 at 16:08:01
Re: the recent discussion on Gold Key/Whitman comics I've just noticed
some Disney books with the label "Top Comics" on eBay auctions.
They appear to be parallel to contemporary Gold Key issues, but what is
the story behind these?
oLe
_U
some Disney books with the label "Top Comics" on eBay auctions.
They appear to be parallel to contemporary Gold Key issues, but what is
the story behind these?
oLe
_U
Stefan Persson
Digest #107
Message 55 -
1999-06-18 at 16:19:05
>Somebody asked why Sweden does not use my stories like "Lost Charts of
>Columbus" and "Treasure of the Ten Avatars". "Avatars" was a one-part,
>unserialized near-30 pager. Sweden does no supplement issues and doesn't
>want to use up that much space in their weekly with one story. That applies
>to their non-use of "Avatars", "Last Lord of Eldorado", "Master of the
>Mississippi"...... but NOT to "Lost Charts" which was a normal 3-parter.
>They didn't use that? Maybe it was because the story featured an
>Irish/Celtic style Christian CROSS... I was told that upset some
>publishers.
"Last Lord of Eldorado" has actually been published in Sweden in Kalle Anka
& C:o (in KA 5-6/98, I think).
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>Columbus" and "Treasure of the Ten Avatars". "Avatars" was a one-part,
>unserialized near-30 pager. Sweden does no supplement issues and doesn't
>want to use up that much space in their weekly with one story. That applies
>to their non-use of "Avatars", "Last Lord of Eldorado", "Master of the
>Mississippi"...... but NOT to "Lost Charts" which was a normal 3-parter.
>They didn't use that? Maybe it was because the story featured an
>Irish/Celtic style Christian CROSS... I was told that upset some
>publishers.
"Last Lord of Eldorado" has actually been published in Sweden in Kalle Anka
& C:o (in KA 5-6/98, I think).
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Fluks, H.W.
The Duck Who Never Was (Si Donald n'était
Message 56 -
1999-06-18 at 16:20:38
Kriton:
> [Don Rosa's "The Duck Who Never Was"]
> I was quoting from memory, and I guess that the gag
> about Donald's shortest-lasting job was what made the biggest
> impression on me.
> I suspect that I somehow missed the joke, however, and that
> Don did not
> mean to say that Donald was sixty in that story, but that the museum
> guy *thought* that he was sixty.
This story is reprinted in the French Picsou Magazine this month. There they
changed the text, in a way that Donald really writes his birth year, 1934,
on the sheet! The officer is not holding anything upside-down anymore:
Donald really claims he is 65!
An article in the back of the comic states that they had to change that from
the original, since Donald is now 65 in stead of 60, and you can't turn 65
upside-down. But they failed to notice that they made a *major* change by
stating "in the framework" that Donald is 65...
Another thing about that story: the French apparently translated directly
from the Gladstone publication. They even left that one text balloon blank!
What must they have been thinking?
--Harry.
(Who can't believe that it's already 5 years ago that he first read that
story...)
(BTW Kriton: I hope to know more details about Athens next week)
> [Don Rosa's "The Duck Who Never Was"]
> I was quoting from memory, and I guess that the gag
> about Donald's shortest-lasting job was what made the biggest
> impression on me.
> I suspect that I somehow missed the joke, however, and that
> Don did not
> mean to say that Donald was sixty in that story, but that the museum
> guy *thought* that he was sixty.
This story is reprinted in the French Picsou Magazine this month. There they
changed the text, in a way that Donald really writes his birth year, 1934,
on the sheet! The officer is not holding anything upside-down anymore:
Donald really claims he is 65!
An article in the back of the comic states that they had to change that from
the original, since Donald is now 65 in stead of 60, and you can't turn 65
upside-down. But they failed to notice that they made a *major* change by
stating "in the framework" that Donald is 65...
Another thing about that story: the French apparently translated directly
from the Gladstone publication. They even left that one text balloon blank!
What must they have been thinking?
--Harry.
(Who can't believe that it's already 5 years ago that he first read that
story...)
(BTW Kriton: I hope to know more details about Athens next week)
Fluks, H.W.
Columbus and a cross
Message 57 -
1999-06-18 at 16:37:18
Don:
> "Lost Charts of Columbus" [..] in Sweden [..]
> They didn't use that? Maybe it was because
> the story featured an Irish/Celtic style Christian CROSS... I
> was told that upset some publishers.
Why would that upset anyone?
--Harry.
> "Lost Charts of Columbus" [..] in Sweden [..]
> They didn't use that? Maybe it was because
> the story featured an Irish/Celtic style Christian CROSS... I
> was told that upset some publishers.
Why would that upset anyone?
--Harry.
Bhc
Disney comics Digest V99 #106
Message 58 -
1999-06-18 at 20:48:53
Dan Shane wrote
>I would be amazed to hear anyone deny that $7.00 regular issues (and =
>little or no choice of lesser-priced books) doesn't hurt both the =
>consumer and the publisher.
To those of you who share an opinion similar to Dan Shane's, you may now
proceed to gawp in amazement. To wit:
The prestige format books never hurt the consumer or the publisher, because
before idea of a regular prestige book was even a twinkle in our eye the
writing was on the wall for the cheap, i.e. newsstand titles. Decades of
declining distribution and sales had simply, and finally, rendered the
volume economics of the format untenable to a publisher such as Gladstone.
Gladstone Disney comics became a two-title prestige line because we were
determined to stay in business. The first issues of the prestige Walt
Disney's Comics and Stories had demonstrated the viability of that format
and price point in the direct market, the only market we realistically had
left (and German customs, bless 'em, managed to make even that a bit more
challenging). Had we not known this, it is very likely there would have
been no Disney comics at all in 1998.
Perhaps $6.95 is a premium price to pay for a monthly comic, but there are
those who find sufficient value for the money and see no harm in that, and
there are those who do not find sufficient value and see great harm. What's
truly amazing, then, is that anyone could think that the debate over this,
and any aspect of it, is anything but wide open.
Gary
****************************
"Who Knows Whose Nose Sniffs the Rose I Chose" - old sourdough song title
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gladstone on the Web: http://www.brucehamilton.com
>I would be amazed to hear anyone deny that $7.00 regular issues (and =
>little or no choice of lesser-priced books) doesn't hurt both the =
>consumer and the publisher.
To those of you who share an opinion similar to Dan Shane's, you may now
proceed to gawp in amazement. To wit:
The prestige format books never hurt the consumer or the publisher, because
before idea of a regular prestige book was even a twinkle in our eye the
writing was on the wall for the cheap, i.e. newsstand titles. Decades of
declining distribution and sales had simply, and finally, rendered the
volume economics of the format untenable to a publisher such as Gladstone.
Gladstone Disney comics became a two-title prestige line because we were
determined to stay in business. The first issues of the prestige Walt
Disney's Comics and Stories had demonstrated the viability of that format
and price point in the direct market, the only market we realistically had
left (and German customs, bless 'em, managed to make even that a bit more
challenging). Had we not known this, it is very likely there would have
been no Disney comics at all in 1998.
Perhaps $6.95 is a premium price to pay for a monthly comic, but there are
those who find sufficient value for the money and see no harm in that, and
there are those who do not find sufficient value and see great harm. What's
truly amazing, then, is that anyone could think that the debate over this,
and any aspect of it, is anything but wide open.
Gary
****************************
"Who Knows Whose Nose Sniffs the Rose I Chose" - old sourdough song title
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gladstone on the Web: http://www.brucehamilton.com
Stefan Diös
Disney comics Digest V99 #107
Message 59 -
1999-06-18 at 22:51:49
Martin Berglund:
>I guess I have to start reading the Danish & Norweigan DD comics since so
much material never appears here ("The Lost Charts of Columbus", "Treasure
of the Ten Avatars" etc... *grumble*)
>
>Could someone provide me with a logical reason as to why stories like these
>were dropped from Swedish publishing?
>(Probably some simple detail I've missed, but irritating...)
You are right on the button, my good man! There *is* a simple explanation!
In Denmark and Norway, most of the stories you refer to came as extra
supplements to the standard magazine, sort of like a double issue. Usually
the weeklies in our three countries are more or less identical, but on those
occasions Sweden decided not to have the supplements. These are economic and
marketing-related decisions, not editorial, and have nothing to do with the
contents of the supplement.
The way I got it explained at the time was that the Swedish "Kalle Anka" had
a larger percentage of prepaid subscriptions, therefore not needing to rely
as much on expensive campaigns to sell extra copies as did "Anders And"
(Denmark) and "Donald Duck" (Norway). Yes, Kalle Anka did have supplements
regularly, and still does, but not as many as their sister publications. A
32 page supplement is very costly and doesn't yield any more money from the
subscribers. An inveterate Donaldist might argue that a supplement with a
new Don Rosa story still could sell so many extra copies as to make up for
the higher costs, but I'm not sure that the marketing people would accept
such an argument... and they might be right, at that...
However, don't despair, Swedish readers! Keep your eyes open the next few
weeks! Some summer supplements of Kalle Anka & C:o are coming up soon, and
sometimes we may make a decision to use some stuff we missed out on before...!
Stefan Dios
Malmo, Sweden
>I guess I have to start reading the Danish & Norweigan DD comics since so
much material never appears here ("The Lost Charts of Columbus", "Treasure
of the Ten Avatars" etc... *grumble*)
>
>Could someone provide me with a logical reason as to why stories like these
>were dropped from Swedish publishing?
>(Probably some simple detail I've missed, but irritating...)
You are right on the button, my good man! There *is* a simple explanation!
In Denmark and Norway, most of the stories you refer to came as extra
supplements to the standard magazine, sort of like a double issue. Usually
the weeklies in our three countries are more or less identical, but on those
occasions Sweden decided not to have the supplements. These are economic and
marketing-related decisions, not editorial, and have nothing to do with the
contents of the supplement.
The way I got it explained at the time was that the Swedish "Kalle Anka" had
a larger percentage of prepaid subscriptions, therefore not needing to rely
as much on expensive campaigns to sell extra copies as did "Anders And"
(Denmark) and "Donald Duck" (Norway). Yes, Kalle Anka did have supplements
regularly, and still does, but not as many as their sister publications. A
32 page supplement is very costly and doesn't yield any more money from the
subscribers. An inveterate Donaldist might argue that a supplement with a
new Don Rosa story still could sell so many extra copies as to make up for
the higher costs, but I'm not sure that the marketing people would accept
such an argument... and they might be right, at that...
However, don't despair, Swedish readers! Keep your eyes open the next few
weeks! Some summer supplements of Kalle Anka & C:o are coming up soon, and
sometimes we may make a decision to use some stuff we missed out on before...!
Stefan Dios
Malmo, Sweden
Oyvind J. Karstad
Sergio Asteriti
Message 60 -
1999-06-18 at 23:01:13
Today I picked up one of my old pocketbooks with Italian stories.
I read the stories and found them in the Disney Comics Database,
and found out who the creators were.
I found that this two stories:
I TL 1697-A, Topolino e la foresta da salvare
I AT 251-B, Topolino Kid e la trib=F9 fasulla,=20
both were drawn by Sergio Asteriti.
What I think is weird is that the drawings are totally different.
The "drawing style" on the first story is very easy to recognise,=20
I have several stories that look familiar.
But the second story is drawn in a more "normal" style,=20
almost like a S-coded story.
Does anybody know why?
Is both of the stories really drawn by Asteriti?
O/yvind J. Karstad
I read the stories and found them in the Disney Comics Database,
and found out who the creators were.
I found that this two stories:
I TL 1697-A, Topolino e la foresta da salvare
I AT 251-B, Topolino Kid e la trib=F9 fasulla,=20
both were drawn by Sergio Asteriti.
What I think is weird is that the drawings are totally different.
The "drawing style" on the first story is very easy to recognise,=20
I have several stories that look familiar.
But the second story is drawn in a more "normal" style,=20
almost like a S-coded story.
Does anybody know why?
Is both of the stories really drawn by Asteriti?
O/yvind J. Karstad