On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Anders Chr. Sivebaek wrote:
> BTW I received a sequel to Micro-ducks from outher-space (made by vicar I
> think)
Yes, it is drawn by Vicar! Does someone recall another sequel to a Barks
story drawn by Vicar or Branca? The one Anders is talking about is a pretty
good story.
Francois
Author
Topic: 199810
(197 messages)
Willot Eleve Promo 98
Todays mail and e-mail
Message 1 -
1998-10-01 at 00:26:18
Bror Hellman
Digest #240
Message 2 -
1998-10-01 at 09:15:06
> Yes, it's Lydia... I don't know if it would have worked in Sweden.
> Is Lydien a Swedish girls name?
Nope."Lydien" is only geography and history...
Steamboat Willie
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V98 Issue #241
******************************************
> Is Lydien a Swedish girls name?
Nope."Lydien" is only geography and history...
Steamboat Willie
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V98 Issue #241
******************************************
Gerstein, David DK - ECN
Disney comics Digest V98 #241
Message 3 -
1998-10-01 at 10:53:07
FRANCOIS:
>Does someone recall another sequel to a Barks
>story drawn by Vicar or Branca?
Well, there's always "Return To Bear Mountain" (D 9614), by Tom Anderson and
Daniel Branca. Scrooge decides to test the *whole* duck family's bravery in
his cabin, but finds his own will being tested, too, as mysterious Yuletide
money-snatchers are on the prowl. I'm not going to reveal any more of that
great story (which I read in Disney Comics' DONALD DUCK ADVENTURES 32-33 in
the USA), but it's certainly one of my favorite pieces ever drawn by Branca.
Gary Gabner's American dialogue was spot-on, too, in the USA edition.
David Gerstein
<(Email removed)>
"I'm beginning to smell a *tightwad!*"
"Will you *please* keep it down?"
>Does someone recall another sequel to a Barks
>story drawn by Vicar or Branca?
Well, there's always "Return To Bear Mountain" (D 9614), by Tom Anderson and
Daniel Branca. Scrooge decides to test the *whole* duck family's bravery in
his cabin, but finds his own will being tested, too, as mysterious Yuletide
money-snatchers are on the prowl. I'm not going to reveal any more of that
great story (which I read in Disney Comics' DONALD DUCK ADVENTURES 32-33 in
the USA), but it's certainly one of my favorite pieces ever drawn by Branca.
Gary Gabner's American dialogue was spot-on, too, in the USA edition.
David Gerstein
<(Email removed)>
"I'm beginning to smell a *tightwad!*"
"Will you *please* keep it down?"
Don Rosa
Digest #241
Message 4 -
1998-10-01 at 10:53:36
From: "Stahl, Joachim :
>>>>the way Don Rosa is mistreating the
name of our first German translator forces me to write another comment.
And it makes me believe that obviously I was not so wrong to change the
names of Taliaferro and Osborne.
Sorry. I left the 's' off of Fuchs simply due to my hasty typing, not my
ability or inability to pronounce her name (which, believe me, I would not
dare attempt, with my American ignorance of foreign tongues). But you do
have a point! I concede! "Erika Fuchs" is definitely a difficult name for me
to handle. Therefore, regardless of the fact that this great lady is well
deserving of my respect and recognition, but due to the fact that I might
have difficulty pronouncing her name, rather than try to learn how to
pronounce it, I'll follow your example and from now on I'll just call her
"Bob".
>>> By the way, Don Rosa seems to be irritated because the Greek editor
is writing his name in a way that leads to some mispronouncement. But of
course the same is true for any European edition.
Please don't accuse me of "irritation" where none was expressed. I am on the
best possible terms with the folks at KOMIX, the best looking and best
produced Disney comic in Europe (along with the Italian editions like ZIO
PAPERONE). And this is not at all the same situation as in "any European
edition". In Greece they use a whole different set of letters and must
reconstruct names from scratch, based on phonetic sounds. It's not a matter
of learning pronunciation, it's a whole different alphabet. If they are
starting from scratch, I thought I'd help them, as I often do on many topics
at their request, to correct what might have been an error. But as it turns
out, their reconstruction of my name is as close as their alphabet can get.
But I'm glad you mention the Greeks in this "usage of proper names" subject.
I sent a private message last week to new ML member Dionysis who had used
the name "Dennis" in his e-mail, and as he will attest, the first thing I
said to him was that he should *not* change his name to "Dennis" simply
because he thought non-Greeks might have difficulty pronouncing "Dionysis".
If Dionysis is his name, we need to *learn* to pronounce/use it, it should
not be changed because we are ignorant.
That remninds me of how sorry I am that my father decided to change our fine
Italian family names to nicknames when I was created in 1951... making me
Keno Don Hugo Rosa rather than what my name *should* be, Gioachino Dante Ugo
Rosa. But I was not able to object at the time and I had no more control
over such things then than I do now (although I believe I might have drooled
a bit and burped).
>>>>Maybe you don't notice them amongst the thousands of comic-magazines
that are sent to you every year, but we do send you the collected "Micky
Maus"-editions with your stories every few months.
I receive weekly subscriptions from all the other European publishers, all
unsolicited. I get weekly copies of the Danish, Swedish, Icelandic and
Finnish issues, I get 10 copies (!) of the Norwegian weekly, France sends me
5, Greece sends several, Italy sends them in bunches. No, I don't have work
in all these (very few of them, actually) but I admire the gesture and I
give these extra issues away to kids when I attend conventions. My good
friend Klaus Strzyz (as you say, a freelancer like myself) has sent me the
"Rosa issues" once a year, about 4 or 5 issues each year, on his own, I
assumed... but it has been a year or so since the last bunch (unless they
were lost in transit) and individual fans have sent me those German editions
voluntarilly at their own expense. (And I thank them.)
>>>>the way Don Rosa is mistreating the
name of our first German translator forces me to write another comment.
And it makes me believe that obviously I was not so wrong to change the
names of Taliaferro and Osborne.
Sorry. I left the 's' off of Fuchs simply due to my hasty typing, not my
ability or inability to pronounce her name (which, believe me, I would not
dare attempt, with my American ignorance of foreign tongues). But you do
have a point! I concede! "Erika Fuchs" is definitely a difficult name for me
to handle. Therefore, regardless of the fact that this great lady is well
deserving of my respect and recognition, but due to the fact that I might
have difficulty pronouncing her name, rather than try to learn how to
pronounce it, I'll follow your example and from now on I'll just call her
"Bob".
>>> By the way, Don Rosa seems to be irritated because the Greek editor
is writing his name in a way that leads to some mispronouncement. But of
course the same is true for any European edition.
Please don't accuse me of "irritation" where none was expressed. I am on the
best possible terms with the folks at KOMIX, the best looking and best
produced Disney comic in Europe (along with the Italian editions like ZIO
PAPERONE). And this is not at all the same situation as in "any European
edition". In Greece they use a whole different set of letters and must
reconstruct names from scratch, based on phonetic sounds. It's not a matter
of learning pronunciation, it's a whole different alphabet. If they are
starting from scratch, I thought I'd help them, as I often do on many topics
at their request, to correct what might have been an error. But as it turns
out, their reconstruction of my name is as close as their alphabet can get.
But I'm glad you mention the Greeks in this "usage of proper names" subject.
I sent a private message last week to new ML member Dionysis who had used
the name "Dennis" in his e-mail, and as he will attest, the first thing I
said to him was that he should *not* change his name to "Dennis" simply
because he thought non-Greeks might have difficulty pronouncing "Dionysis".
If Dionysis is his name, we need to *learn* to pronounce/use it, it should
not be changed because we are ignorant.
That remninds me of how sorry I am that my father decided to change our fine
Italian family names to nicknames when I was created in 1951... making me
Keno Don Hugo Rosa rather than what my name *should* be, Gioachino Dante Ugo
Rosa. But I was not able to object at the time and I had no more control
over such things then than I do now (although I believe I might have drooled
a bit and burped).
>>>>Maybe you don't notice them amongst the thousands of comic-magazines
that are sent to you every year, but we do send you the collected "Micky
Maus"-editions with your stories every few months.
I receive weekly subscriptions from all the other European publishers, all
unsolicited. I get weekly copies of the Danish, Swedish, Icelandic and
Finnish issues, I get 10 copies (!) of the Norwegian weekly, France sends me
5, Greece sends several, Italy sends them in bunches. No, I don't have work
in all these (very few of them, actually) but I admire the gesture and I
give these extra issues away to kids when I attend conventions. My good
friend Klaus Strzyz (as you say, a freelancer like myself) has sent me the
"Rosa issues" once a year, about 4 or 5 issues each year, on his own, I
assumed... but it has been a year or so since the last bunch (unless they
were lost in transit) and individual fans have sent me those German editions
voluntarilly at their own expense. (And I thank them.)
Kriton Kyrimis
Disney comics Digest V98 #241
Message 5 -
1998-10-01 at 12:11:30
> By the way, Don Rosa seems to be irritated because the Greek editor
> is writing his name in a way that leads to some mispronouncement.
I wouldn't say irritated, but rather puzzled regarding whether this is
actually happening or not. The whole business started when I asked him
about this myself, when I started buying Komix a couple of years ago,
and was surprised to see how they rendered his name. (The equivalent
would be to spell it as "Rossa" in English.) The spelling I recommended
in the list the other day is a lot closer to the correct American
pronunciation.
Being sensitive about the way people spell or pronounce your name is
not unreasonable. Witness my remarks to those Red Dwarf fans who
occasionally misspell my name as "Kryton", or the late Isaac Asimov's
insistence that people pronounce his name correctly (i.e., Azimov). As
Data once put it in a Star Trek episode, "one is my name, the other is
not".
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"After their second death, most people need some time to think things
over and consider the changes in their lives."
-----
> is writing his name in a way that leads to some mispronouncement.
I wouldn't say irritated, but rather puzzled regarding whether this is
actually happening or not. The whole business started when I asked him
about this myself, when I started buying Komix a couple of years ago,
and was surprised to see how they rendered his name. (The equivalent
would be to spell it as "Rossa" in English.) The spelling I recommended
in the list the other day is a lot closer to the correct American
pronunciation.
Being sensitive about the way people spell or pronounce your name is
not unreasonable. Witness my remarks to those Red Dwarf fans who
occasionally misspell my name as "Kryton", or the late Isaac Asimov's
insistence that people pronounce his name correctly (i.e., Azimov). As
Data once put it in a Star Trek episode, "one is my name, the other is
not".
Kriton (e-mail: (Email removed))
(WWW: http://dias.cti.gr/~kyrimis
-----
"After their second death, most people need some time to think things
over and consider the changes in their lives."
-----
Marco Barlotti
Bark's sequel by Branca
Message 6 -
1998-10-01 at 13:07:08
FRANCOIS:
>Does someone recall another sequel to a Barks
>story drawn by Vicar or Branca?
There are at least two. One is again drawn by Vicar, a sequel to "Back to
Klondike": D 5199.
Another one is by Branca, a sequel to "Christmas on Bear Mountain" (I don't
have the code right now but I can look for it later). Too bad we apparently
know nothing of the WRITERS of these stories!
Marco
http://marcobar.cce.unifi.it/Comics
>Does someone recall another sequel to a Barks
>story drawn by Vicar or Branca?
There are at least two. One is again drawn by Vicar, a sequel to "Back to
Klondike": D 5199.
Another one is by Branca, a sequel to "Christmas on Bear Mountain" (I don't
have the code right now but I can look for it later). Too bad we apparently
know nothing of the WRITERS of these stories!
Marco
http://marcobar.cce.unifi.it/Comics
GaryB98294
Help!
Message 7 -
1998-10-01 at 15:19:25
I missed Walt Disney's Comics & Stories #628 -- or rather, my comic shop
screwed up the order and can't seem to reorder from Diamond. Anyone have
access to that issue -- or does Gladstone sell recent back numbers? Thanks.
Gary Brown
screwed up the order and can't seem to reorder from Diamond. Anyone have
access to that issue -- or does Gladstone sell recent back numbers? Thanks.
Gary Brown
Marquetta Pisarcik
Lost in the Andes---Return to Plain Awful songs
Message 8 -
1998-10-01 at 16:20:29
The song the square guy was singing in "Lost in the Andes" was a changed
form of "Dixie", a southern, American Folksong (First verse of the song
begins: "Oh, way down south in the land of cotton, old times there are
not forgotten, look away, look away, look away, Dixie
Land....Awfultonian sings this part: "Oh I wish I were in Dixie, away,
away! In Dixieland I'll take my stand, to "Whoop it up in
Dixie"---(should be "to live and die in Dixie" in the original song, but
Barks changed it to the "whoop it up in Dixie" for the comic.
This song fits well with their adopted Southern culture (from the
introduction of Prof. Rhutt Betler into their world).
In "Return to Plain Awful" the ducks (US & Flintheart) are singing
"Happy Days Are Here Again", a song from the depression era of American
History. The frames include these parts of the song:
Flintheart: "Happy days are here again,
"Lets sing a song of cheer again,"
Scrooge: "The Skies above are clear again"
(next frame)
Scrooge: "Happy days are here again!"
Marquetta
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
form of "Dixie", a southern, American Folksong (First verse of the song
begins: "Oh, way down south in the land of cotton, old times there are
not forgotten, look away, look away, look away, Dixie
Land....Awfultonian sings this part: "Oh I wish I were in Dixie, away,
away! In Dixieland I'll take my stand, to "Whoop it up in
Dixie"---(should be "to live and die in Dixie" in the original song, but
Barks changed it to the "whoop it up in Dixie" for the comic.
This song fits well with their adopted Southern culture (from the
introduction of Prof. Rhutt Betler into their world).
In "Return to Plain Awful" the ducks (US & Flintheart) are singing
"Happy Days Are Here Again", a song from the depression era of American
History. The frames include these parts of the song:
Flintheart: "Happy days are here again,
"Lets sing a song of cheer again,"
Scrooge: "The Skies above are clear again"
(next frame)
Scrooge: "Happy days are here again!"
Marquetta
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Don Rosa
More Digest #241
Message 9 -
1998-10-01 at 18:05:04
Oh, sorry, I missed something late last night that I should have responded
to, and now that Digest is gone and I can't quote the passage.
But the unfair implication was made that I would term any changes in a
story, removal of gags, additions of gags, as "sabotage".This is clearly not
the sort of thing I have been referring to, and I have even already
specifically stated that in a previous message.
Also: I have always been first to admit that there is vast room for
improvement in everything I do. I admit this so readily that some publishers
ask me to please stop deprecating my own work if only for their sake. But as
to whether a branch-editor is able to improve my works by changing it to
suit himself, that's possible, maybe, but this is clearly a matter of
opinion. Such "improvements" are supposed to be made by the editor-in-chief
whom I work directly with, whose responsibility it is to produce good
stories and art to supply the publishing branches, and who will discuss such
changes with the "creators" before mutually agreeing to have them made, or
having them made by his own authority in the matter but with the knowledge
of the "creator" whose work it is.
to, and now that Digest is gone and I can't quote the passage.
But the unfair implication was made that I would term any changes in a
story, removal of gags, additions of gags, as "sabotage".This is clearly not
the sort of thing I have been referring to, and I have even already
specifically stated that in a previous message.
Also: I have always been first to admit that there is vast room for
improvement in everything I do. I admit this so readily that some publishers
ask me to please stop deprecating my own work if only for their sake. But as
to whether a branch-editor is able to improve my works by changing it to
suit himself, that's possible, maybe, but this is clearly a matter of
opinion. Such "improvements" are supposed to be made by the editor-in-chief
whom I work directly with, whose responsibility it is to produce good
stories and art to supply the publishing branches, and who will discuss such
changes with the "creators" before mutually agreeing to have them made, or
having them made by his own authority in the matter but with the knowledge
of the "creator" whose work it is.
Bhc
Disney comics Digest V98 #238
Message 10 -
1998-10-01 at 18:05:05
DAN:
>Don may be extending the use of the word "sabotage" beyond the harsh
>definition that Webster applies, but rather than argue over semantics I
>would like to suggest that Don (or any other creative artist) would
>naturally see the alterations discussed lately as direct attacks on his
>creative process.
Don may see it that way, but if so, let me be blunt: he's wrong. If I was
to "attack" Don's work, to "sabotage" it, I would have to really dislike
Don, personally, and anything he represents. I don't, and I don't know of
anyone on the editorial-production end of doing comics who does. Us
edit-prod types are humans, fallible humans, and we can flub up, goof up,
mangle, muddle, twist, and fall over our own feet about things at times.
But, to my knowledge, not one of us has ever set out with the directed
intention of attacking Don's, or anyone's, creative process.
And that's the thing. If Don will forgive me once more for trying to get
inside his head, I don't think he really believes his creative processes to
be under attack. What he does see is his creations being sent out into the
cold, cruel world of publishing to fare as best they can, where they often
don't get the respect and attention they deserve. And in that he is only
too right; in a world where the products of the creative process get fed
through two more quite distinct and very demanding processes - editorial
and production - respect and attention are very difficult to find, even
harder to acquire, and nearly impossible to keep. But the hard fact is, in
terms of getting out to as wide an audience as possible, where else are
these creations going to go?
>Don may be extending the use of the word "sabotage" beyond the harsh
>definition that Webster applies, but rather than argue over semantics I
>would like to suggest that Don (or any other creative artist) would
>naturally see the alterations discussed lately as direct attacks on his
>creative process.
Don may see it that way, but if so, let me be blunt: he's wrong. If I was
to "attack" Don's work, to "sabotage" it, I would have to really dislike
Don, personally, and anything he represents. I don't, and I don't know of
anyone on the editorial-production end of doing comics who does. Us
edit-prod types are humans, fallible humans, and we can flub up, goof up,
mangle, muddle, twist, and fall over our own feet about things at times.
But, to my knowledge, not one of us has ever set out with the directed
intention of attacking Don's, or anyone's, creative process.
And that's the thing. If Don will forgive me once more for trying to get
inside his head, I don't think he really believes his creative processes to
be under attack. What he does see is his creations being sent out into the
cold, cruel world of publishing to fare as best they can, where they often
don't get the respect and attention they deserve. And in that he is only
too right; in a world where the products of the creative process get fed
through two more quite distinct and very demanding processes - editorial
and production - respect and attention are very difficult to find, even
harder to acquire, and nearly impossible to keep. But the hard fact is, in
terms of getting out to as wide an audience as possible, where else are
these creations going to go?
Dr. Archontis Pantsios
KOMIX #124
Message 11 -
1998-10-01 at 18:25:03
Fellow Quackeroos:
KOMIX #124, October 1998, hit the stands of the Greek kiosks today and includes:
1) An 3-page editorial on Ancient Egypt and how Scarpa's "Colossus of the
Nile" fits historically.
2) Scarpa's "Collossus of the Nile"--the single, 44-page version with
BEAUTIFUL color. This concludes KOMIX's 1998 Scarpa trilogy: the other two
being "Il Premio di Bonta" and "The Flying Scot".
3) Barks' "Traveling Truants" from WDC&S #169.
Cheers,
Archontis
KOMIX #124, October 1998, hit the stands of the Greek kiosks today and includes:
1) An 3-page editorial on Ancient Egypt and how Scarpa's "Colossus of the
Nile" fits historically.
2) Scarpa's "Collossus of the Nile"--the single, 44-page version with
BEAUTIFUL color. This concludes KOMIX's 1998 Scarpa trilogy: the other two
being "Il Premio di Bonta" and "The Flying Scot".
3) Barks' "Traveling Truants" from WDC&S #169.
Cheers,
Archontis
Willot Eleve Promo 98
KOMIX #124
Message 12 -
1998-10-01 at 19:27:45
ARCHONTIS:
> Scarpa's "Collossus of the Nile"--the single, 44-page version with
> BEAUTIFUL color. This concludes KOMIX's 1998 Scarpa trilogy: the other two
> being "Il Premio di Bonta" and "The Flying Scot".
How about the last pages of the first part?
In the Gladstone version, the last two pages or so appears
badly, with a strange inking. It's obviously not the original...
"Collossus of the Nile" was not published in Mickey-Parade, possibly
because the original art is not available (?).
Francois
> Scarpa's "Collossus of the Nile"--the single, 44-page version with
> BEAUTIFUL color. This concludes KOMIX's 1998 Scarpa trilogy: the other two
> being "Il Premio di Bonta" and "The Flying Scot".
How about the last pages of the first part?
In the Gladstone version, the last two pages or so appears
badly, with a strange inking. It's obviously not the original...
"Collossus of the Nile" was not published in Mickey-Parade, possibly
because the original art is not available (?).
Francois
Marco Barlotti
Sequels to Barks by Branca - Addendum!
Message 13 -
1998-10-02 at 00:12:50
FRANCOIS:
I told in my last posting about the sequel to "Christmas at Bear Mountain"
drawn by Daniel Branca. Now I've looked up the details: it is D 9614
"Return to Bear Mountain" written by Tom Anderson according to our
database, and also by Gary Gabner according to "Zio Paperone"...
Marco
I told in my last posting about the sequel to "Christmas at Bear Mountain"
drawn by Daniel Branca. Now I've looked up the details: it is D 9614
"Return to Bear Mountain" written by Tom Anderson according to our
database, and also by Gary Gabner according to "Zio Paperone"...
Marco
Willot Eleve Promo 98
Sequels to Barks by Branca - Addendum!
Message 14 -
1998-10-02 at 01:47:39
MARCO:
> I told in my last posting about the sequel to "Christmas at Bear Mountain"
> drawn by Daniel Branca. Now I've looked up the details: it is D 9614
> "Return to Bear Mountain" written by Tom Anderson according to our
> database, and also by Gary Gabner according to "Zio Paperone"...
I guess you are not a member of the non-digest list (David also
talked about this sequel to "Christmas on Bear Mountain"). In fact, I knew
this one, but I think I've never seen the other one you mention, inspired
by "Back to the Klondike" (is there Goldie in it? or a new lady appears?).
Regarding the US credit, I have the impression that Gladstone
is wrong about writers of Danish stories in more than 25 per cent of the
cases... It's sad but (more or less) true... at least that's my
impression. I read somewhere that the
credit of the story where DD is driving a special car for Scrooge,
attributed to Jim Kenner by Gladstone, is not by him.
BTW, is it "Gary Gabner" or "Gary
Gabner and Tom Anderson" in ZP. This is the 1st time I heard that G.
Gabner wrote something for the Danish publishers.
Francois
> I told in my last posting about the sequel to "Christmas at Bear Mountain"
> drawn by Daniel Branca. Now I've looked up the details: it is D 9614
> "Return to Bear Mountain" written by Tom Anderson according to our
> database, and also by Gary Gabner according to "Zio Paperone"...
I guess you are not a member of the non-digest list (David also
talked about this sequel to "Christmas on Bear Mountain"). In fact, I knew
this one, but I think I've never seen the other one you mention, inspired
by "Back to the Klondike" (is there Goldie in it? or a new lady appears?).
Regarding the US credit, I have the impression that Gladstone
is wrong about writers of Danish stories in more than 25 per cent of the
cases... It's sad but (more or less) true... at least that's my
impression. I read somewhere that the
credit of the story where DD is driving a special car for Scrooge,
attributed to Jim Kenner by Gladstone, is not by him.
BTW, is it "Gary Gabner" or "Gary
Gabner and Tom Anderson" in ZP. This is the 1st time I heard that G.
Gabner wrote something for the Danish publishers.
Francois
Francois Willot
Sequel to Xmas on Bear Mountain
Message 15 -
1998-10-02 at 01:58:51
MARCO:
Now I think I know... According to David, Gary Gabner is the author of
the american script in the US version. And the editors of "Zio Paperone"
attributes the story to G. Gabner (in part). Maybe they adapted the
american version directly, and in such a case they have to credit Gary
for the american dialogues they translated/used. But the original story
is by Tom Anderson.
Francois
Now I think I know... According to David, Gary Gabner is the author of
the american script in the US version. And the editors of "Zio Paperone"
attributes the story to G. Gabner (in part). Maybe they adapted the
american version directly, and in such a case they have to credit Gary
for the american dialogues they translated/used. But the original story
is by Tom Anderson.
Francois