Please unsubsribe me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Please unsubsribe
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Author
Topic: 199511
(224 messages)
BrerRab1
Unsubscribe
Message 46 -
1995-11-09 at 03:08:36
H.W. Fluks
Digest #1. (#1? Yes, #1.)
Message 47 -
1995-11-09 at 10:48:12
I'm getting a bit nostalgic here... Per is starting with digest #1 again
and Melanie, whom I haven't "seen" in 3 years, is still there!
JYRKI VAINIO (Welcome. Your name looks perfectly normal to me 8-):
> So far my greatest shock has been a story that was
> published already few years ago: the Finnish title of the story
> was "Todenpuhuja" - a straight translation would be "the Truth
> Speaker".
This is one of the funniest stories I read in the past few years.
The Dutch name of the guy is "Telepatoe", and I think the way he is
drawn is very funny. About the violence in the story: similar scenes
(not showing the violence, but people have black eyes afterwards)
are in other Dutch stories.
This "Telepatoe" story was drawn by Mau Heymans. Unfortunately, I don't
know who wrote it. Code: H 91022. Reprinted in Denmark in Anders And
27, 1993 (in other countries about the same time).
> Finland's Comic Society's magazine had
> picked up a panel from a Danish Duck story that had FOUR nephews
> in it. Does anyone know anything more?
I remember one Danish story where 3 aliens come to the earth, and they
look exactly like the nephews. Maybe that's the one, but they could
also have picked a panel with six nephews in that case.
PER:
> I've started a new mailing list in Swedish now about Donaldism in
> general.
I hope we non-Swedes keep informed if interesting news appears on that
list!
FRANK, about Scarpa:
> So you can compare the styles for yourself if you don't have the
> comics, or recognise the story and find your own translations of the comics
> if you have non-Italian reprints.
Also, the new version of the Disney comics Database contains a lot of
information about Danish reprints of Scarpa stories (thanks to Ole
Reichstein). Other European reprints (in pocket books) could be derived
from the Danish info, since the pocket books often contain the same
stories all over Europe.
(Unfortunately, I can't look at your or any WWW page, since I can only
use e-mail.)
--Harry.
Harry Fluks ()_() Dutch Disney comics freak
PTT Telecom (_) fluks at pcssdc.pttnwb.nl
Netherlands "Yeah.. I've _heard_ of coral barques"
and Melanie, whom I haven't "seen" in 3 years, is still there!
JYRKI VAINIO (Welcome. Your name looks perfectly normal to me 8-):
> So far my greatest shock has been a story that was
> published already few years ago: the Finnish title of the story
> was "Todenpuhuja" - a straight translation would be "the Truth
> Speaker".
This is one of the funniest stories I read in the past few years.
The Dutch name of the guy is "Telepatoe", and I think the way he is
drawn is very funny. About the violence in the story: similar scenes
(not showing the violence, but people have black eyes afterwards)
are in other Dutch stories.
This "Telepatoe" story was drawn by Mau Heymans. Unfortunately, I don't
know who wrote it. Code: H 91022. Reprinted in Denmark in Anders And
27, 1993 (in other countries about the same time).
> Finland's Comic Society's magazine had
> picked up a panel from a Danish Duck story that had FOUR nephews
> in it. Does anyone know anything more?
I remember one Danish story where 3 aliens come to the earth, and they
look exactly like the nephews. Maybe that's the one, but they could
also have picked a panel with six nephews in that case.
PER:
> I've started a new mailing list in Swedish now about Donaldism in
> general.
I hope we non-Swedes keep informed if interesting news appears on that
list!
FRANK, about Scarpa:
> So you can compare the styles for yourself if you don't have the
> comics, or recognise the story and find your own translations of the comics
> if you have non-Italian reprints.
Also, the new version of the Disney comics Database contains a lot of
information about Danish reprints of Scarpa stories (thanks to Ole
Reichstein). Other European reprints (in pocket books) could be derived
from the Danish info, since the pocket books often contain the same
stories all over Europe.
(Unfortunately, I can't look at your or any WWW page, since I can only
use e-mail.)
--Harry.
Harry Fluks ()_() Dutch Disney comics freak
PTT Telecom (_) fluks at pcssdc.pttnwb.nl
Netherlands "Yeah.. I've _heard_ of coral barques"
Daniel Van Eijmeren
King Scrooge the First / David
Message 48 -
1995-11-09 at 11:43:47
GEIR:
> Is there anybody from Holland who knows if Daan Jippes indends to
> re-draw all the Junior-Woodchucks stories written by Barks? If YES, is
> he also going to re-draw the U$ 71 "King $crooge the first" story?
Schroder already did redraw the "King Scrooge" story, but later it was
said that he destroyed his work. As I remember, someone here said that
he *might* have only told that because he was not satified with his
editor's policy or something.
A little example of Schroders work on "King Scrooge" was published in
the CBL, it looks *very* good.
As I already asked before in a previous posting: Maybe there's a chance
that art still exists? Is there someone here who can find out?
The material was sent to Gladstone, but later returned to Schroder for
minor changes. Didn't they make xeroxes of the art before posting it?
DAVID:
Maybe you're the right person here to find out if Schroder's work did
survive somewhere? Don't the editors xerox the art before returning it
for minor changes? (The art might get lost during it's post-traveling.)
> The Current Gladstones Page has recently been updated to
> describe DONALD DUCK 295, DONALD DUCK AND MICKEY MOUSE 2, and WALT
> DISNEY GIANT 3. (I don't, however, know what the DD ten-pager is in
> that second comic. Which one is it?)
Maybe you can also send something of it to Disney-Comics? I can't
visit your page (although I'd really like to.)
> Do more parents spank their kids now than in years past?
No, I don't think so. It might be that spanking children is a subject
to discuss for people now, while it was taken for granted in the past?
There has also been a kind of "slogan" for it, something like: "The
one who loves his children, chastices them."
Maybe Disney placed this subject on their growing censor-list because
spanking children isn't taken for granted anymore? Anyway, it's
certainly not new that they don't accept it anymore: In the 50's Barks
was already told to tone down the violence in his stories.
Greetings,
--- Daniel
> Is there anybody from Holland who knows if Daan Jippes indends to
> re-draw all the Junior-Woodchucks stories written by Barks? If YES, is
> he also going to re-draw the U$ 71 "King $crooge the first" story?
Schroder already did redraw the "King Scrooge" story, but later it was
said that he destroyed his work. As I remember, someone here said that
he *might* have only told that because he was not satified with his
editor's policy or something.
A little example of Schroders work on "King Scrooge" was published in
the CBL, it looks *very* good.
As I already asked before in a previous posting: Maybe there's a chance
that art still exists? Is there someone here who can find out?
The material was sent to Gladstone, but later returned to Schroder for
minor changes. Didn't they make xeroxes of the art before posting it?
DAVID:
Maybe you're the right person here to find out if Schroder's work did
survive somewhere? Don't the editors xerox the art before returning it
for minor changes? (The art might get lost during it's post-traveling.)
> The Current Gladstones Page has recently been updated to
> describe DONALD DUCK 295, DONALD DUCK AND MICKEY MOUSE 2, and WALT
> DISNEY GIANT 3. (I don't, however, know what the DD ten-pager is in
> that second comic. Which one is it?)
Maybe you can also send something of it to Disney-Comics? I can't
visit your page (although I'd really like to.)
> Do more parents spank their kids now than in years past?
No, I don't think so. It might be that spanking children is a subject
to discuss for people now, while it was taken for granted in the past?
There has also been a kind of "slogan" for it, something like: "The
one who loves his children, chastices them."
Maybe Disney placed this subject on their growing censor-list because
spanking children isn't taken for granted anymore? Anyway, it's
certainly not new that they don't accept it anymore: In the 50's Barks
was already told to tone down the violence in his stories.
Greetings,
--- Daniel
Per Starback
Digest #1. (#1? Yes, #1.)
Message 49 -
1995-11-09 at 12:25:42
Harry> I'm getting a bit nostalgic here... Per is starting with
Harry> digest #1 again
I am?! Oops. As usual when messages get lost or partly lost or other
strange things happen I blaim lack of disk space. This time the disk
was so full that the digest making program couldn't even write the
file where it remembers what the number of the last digest was, so
that file became empty, and then it started anew with digest #1 after
that. The next one will be #842. (I hope!)
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at minsk.docs.uu.se
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Harry> digest #1 again
I am?! Oops. As usual when messages get lost or partly lost or other
strange things happen I blaim lack of disk space. This time the disk
was so full that the digest making program couldn't even write the
file where it remembers what the number of the last digest was, so
that file became empty, and then it started anew with digest #1 after
that. The next one will be #842. (I hope!)
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at minsk.docs.uu.se
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Geir J. Netland
King Scrooge the First / David
Message 50 -
1995-11-09 at 13:24:31
On Thu, 9 Nov 1995, Daniel van Eijmeren wrote:
DANIEL:
> Schroder already did redraw the "King Scrooge" story, but later it was
> said that he destroyed his work. As I remember, someone here said that
> he *might* have only told that because he was not satified with his
> editor's policy or something.
This sounds really interesting! I would really like to see
the "King $crooge" story drawn by somebody else than
Tony Strobl. By the way, who is Schroder?
I've never heard of him before. Has he ever drawn something
published by Egmont? (Denmark/Norway)
---------------
Geir J. Netland
---------------
Hide, men! If he sees us, he'll put
two and two together and get THREE
-Three guilty ducklings, that is!
DANIEL:
> Schroder already did redraw the "King Scrooge" story, but later it was
> said that he destroyed his work. As I remember, someone here said that
> he *might* have only told that because he was not satified with his
> editor's policy or something.
This sounds really interesting! I would really like to see
the "King $crooge" story drawn by somebody else than
Tony Strobl. By the way, who is Schroder?
I've never heard of him before. Has he ever drawn something
published by Egmont? (Denmark/Norway)
---------------
Geir J. Netland
---------------
Hide, men! If he sees us, he'll put
two and two together and get THREE
-Three guilty ducklings, that is!
Jørgen Andreas Bangor
Four nephews
Message 51 -
1995-11-09 at 14:05:26
Jyrki:
| Finland's Comic Society's magazine had
| picked up a panel from a Danish Duck story that had FOUR nephews
| in it. Does anyone know anything more?
Harry:
| I remember one Danish story where 3 aliens come to the earth, and they
| look exactly like the nephews. Maybe that's the one, but they could
| also have picked a panel with six nephews in that case.
I guess the the story mentioned in the Finnish magazine is a very
recent story drawn by Vicar. He drew four nephews in a panel. Quite
funny, since the same panel describes the discovery of a hidden bottle
of N2O2 ;-)
It was also mentioned by the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten. They
credited the discovery to Soland, who said that it tells us that the
Disney comics artists are just humans.
The Norwegian Rosa index will soon be finished, BTW (I've been away for
some days).
Jorgen
| Finland's Comic Society's magazine had
| picked up a panel from a Danish Duck story that had FOUR nephews
| in it. Does anyone know anything more?
Harry:
| I remember one Danish story where 3 aliens come to the earth, and they
| look exactly like the nephews. Maybe that's the one, but they could
| also have picked a panel with six nephews in that case.
I guess the the story mentioned in the Finnish magazine is a very
recent story drawn by Vicar. He drew four nephews in a panel. Quite
funny, since the same panel describes the discovery of a hidden bottle
of N2O2 ;-)
It was also mentioned by the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten. They
credited the discovery to Soland, who said that it tells us that the
Disney comics artists are just humans.
The Norwegian Rosa index will soon be finished, BTW (I've been away for
some days).
Jorgen
H.W. Fluks
Schoder
Message 52 -
1995-11-09 at 15:02:03
GEIR N.:
> By the way, who is Schroder?
There are several Schroders (o with umlaut) related to Disney comics,
but in this case Daniel meant the German Ulrich Schroder.
He inked a few covers for Holland, from Barks sketches:
Dutch DD:
84-36 DD Toy deer
85-13 US Warms bed with hot gold
86-31 DD Kids at bat
92-44 DD Nephews in hammocks
The last (hammocks) one was done for the German fanzine Der Hamburger
Donaldist. I don't know if these covers were reprinted in Scandinavia.
One of them was reprinted in the Carl Barks Library.
Schroder inked another Barks sketch, about the nephews cutting cheese with
a harp. This seems to have been published as a cover on one of the Danish
pockets. (If anyone has an extra copy of that: I'm interested!)
The final thing we know about Ulrich, is that he inked the daily newspaper gag
of Sep. 7, 1986 ("Yucca Flats", reprinted in Disney's DD Adventures 26).
But did they credit the right Schroder here?
--Harry.
Harry Fluks ()_() Dutch Disney comics freak
PTT Telecom (_) fluks at pcssdc.pttnwb.nl
Netherlands "Yeah.. I've _heard_ of coral barques"
> By the way, who is Schroder?
There are several Schroders (o with umlaut) related to Disney comics,
but in this case Daniel meant the German Ulrich Schroder.
He inked a few covers for Holland, from Barks sketches:
Dutch DD:
84-36 DD Toy deer
85-13 US Warms bed with hot gold
86-31 DD Kids at bat
92-44 DD Nephews in hammocks
The last (hammocks) one was done for the German fanzine Der Hamburger
Donaldist. I don't know if these covers were reprinted in Scandinavia.
One of them was reprinted in the Carl Barks Library.
Schroder inked another Barks sketch, about the nephews cutting cheese with
a harp. This seems to have been published as a cover on one of the Danish
pockets. (If anyone has an extra copy of that: I'm interested!)
The final thing we know about Ulrich, is that he inked the daily newspaper gag
of Sep. 7, 1986 ("Yucca Flats", reprinted in Disney's DD Adventures 26).
But did they credit the right Schroder here?
--Harry.
Harry Fluks ()_() Dutch Disney comics freak
PTT Telecom (_) fluks at pcssdc.pttnwb.nl
Netherlands "Yeah.. I've _heard_ of coral barques"
David A Gerstein
Disney-comics digest #1.
Message 53 -
1995-11-09 at 17:51:05
JYRKI:
I read the "Truthspeaker-bird" story in a German edition.
This was at a time when I was choosing some of my favorite H-coded
stories to translate for Gladstone, and this story didn't make it
because I thought the violence was a little too strong (DD and the
kids, together, giving Scrooge that black eye). The basic concept of
the story had more potential than it ended up with IMHO.
The art was by Mau Heymans however, which is one thing I LIKED
very much about it!
If you think the violence is getting worse in Disney comics
these days... we were discussing a story from 1943 when this topic got
started ("The Rabbit's Foot," WDC 32). Disney's own censorship keeps
battles with villains fairly unrealistic these days (esp. with regard
to MM stories), and I would say that DD's treatment of the boys in
modern stories is less hostile than it used to be... but that dates
back to the late '40s, when conflict between the Ducks in general
began to be less important in the stories.
Several Gottfredson stories which Gladstone notably hasn't
used have extended battle sequences, but they aren't banned for that
reason. Instead it's a matter of stereotypes which Disney won't allow
to be reprinted, but won't allow to be "cleaned up" either (unlike
with Barks stories, Disney regards FG art as sacrosanct and will no
longer allow an old story to be altered for reprint... if it's banned,
it's banned).
Today I don't think I could get away with MM having a "High
Noon" style gunfight with a villain, as happens in some '30s stories.
I also could never do a scene like the Italians did in the '50s, where
an argument among U$ and DD includes U$ shooting his cannon or a
blunderbuss at DD, but I wouldn't be tempted to do that to begin with.
I think that in the 1991 MICKEY MOUSE ADVENTURES stories
Disney was doing, their editorial staff would not allow "real" guns to
be shown at all. They also shied away from showing Mickey being
threatened with any kind of weapon in close range. In my opinion,
that's pretty silly. Who's offended when Mickey is threatened any
more than when Donald is? Sure, Mickey is Disney's symbol and all
that, but while that affects HIS behavior, it shouldn't affect, say,
Pegleg Pete's. Mickey comes out okay, doesn't he?
David Gerstein
<96dag at williams.edu>
"Well, I'll be...! Poor old Shakespeare -- they GOT him!"
I read the "Truthspeaker-bird" story in a German edition.
This was at a time when I was choosing some of my favorite H-coded
stories to translate for Gladstone, and this story didn't make it
because I thought the violence was a little too strong (DD and the
kids, together, giving Scrooge that black eye). The basic concept of
the story had more potential than it ended up with IMHO.
The art was by Mau Heymans however, which is one thing I LIKED
very much about it!
If you think the violence is getting worse in Disney comics
these days... we were discussing a story from 1943 when this topic got
started ("The Rabbit's Foot," WDC 32). Disney's own censorship keeps
battles with villains fairly unrealistic these days (esp. with regard
to MM stories), and I would say that DD's treatment of the boys in
modern stories is less hostile than it used to be... but that dates
back to the late '40s, when conflict between the Ducks in general
began to be less important in the stories.
Several Gottfredson stories which Gladstone notably hasn't
used have extended battle sequences, but they aren't banned for that
reason. Instead it's a matter of stereotypes which Disney won't allow
to be reprinted, but won't allow to be "cleaned up" either (unlike
with Barks stories, Disney regards FG art as sacrosanct and will no
longer allow an old story to be altered for reprint... if it's banned,
it's banned).
Today I don't think I could get away with MM having a "High
Noon" style gunfight with a villain, as happens in some '30s stories.
I also could never do a scene like the Italians did in the '50s, where
an argument among U$ and DD includes U$ shooting his cannon or a
blunderbuss at DD, but I wouldn't be tempted to do that to begin with.
I think that in the 1991 MICKEY MOUSE ADVENTURES stories
Disney was doing, their editorial staff would not allow "real" guns to
be shown at all. They also shied away from showing Mickey being
threatened with any kind of weapon in close range. In my opinion,
that's pretty silly. Who's offended when Mickey is threatened any
more than when Donald is? Sure, Mickey is Disney's symbol and all
that, but while that affects HIS behavior, it shouldn't affect, say,
Pegleg Pete's. Mickey comes out okay, doesn't he?
David Gerstein
<96dag at williams.edu>
"Well, I'll be...! Poor old Shakespeare -- they GOT him!"
Deckerd
USA #36
Message 54 -
1995-11-09 at 18:17:25
Uncle Scrooge Adventures #36 just came out here, with a
couple of stories I translated from Dutch. Unfortunately,
the issue only demonstrates that computerized type fonts
that look just like hand-lettering also open the door to...
typographical errors. On the last page of the Duncan McDuck
story, Donald's speech in panel 5 is scrambled. My script
had him saying:
"No matter how smart you think you are, there are times when you
should be smart enough to leave things well enough alone!"
As printed, however, Donald is saying:
"No matter how smart you think you are, there aren't enough
times when you should be smart enough to leave things well
enough alone!"
That "there aren't enough times" makes no sense and seems like
a typo.
To which the mayor replies, "Well said! It sounds as though
there may be a wee bit of a politician in you, Mr. Duck!"
Of course it's Mr. Duck. Donald made the speech, right? As
printed, however, it came out as "Mr. McDuck." It may even
be justifiable as an understandable error on the Mayor's part:
the Mayor only knows Donald as a descendant of Duncan McDuck
and a relative of Scrooge McDuck, and might be plausibly
unaware that Donald's last name is a little different. On the
other hand, I would argue that the point is a little too subtle,
and calling Donald by his right name just saves confusion. I
don't see a reason for the change, myself.
The second story (H91134) is a four-page Scrooge & Gyro story
I translated several years ago. In that time, I've lost my
copies of the original script I did (hard-drive problem). All
I can say is that there are a couple of screaming errors of
wording that I _hope_ weren't in my original script. If they
were, I'll own up to 'em and take my lumps, but I still have to
ask the question why the editor didn't catch and correct them
before the story went out the door. "Why don't you make some
yourself" in the last panel makes no sense, for example, when
Gyro is telling Scrooge he should try his hand at making an
invention himself to relax. "Why don't you make -one- yourself"
was clearly meant.
Well, I don't mean to sit here and whine about Gladstone. I
just wanted to express some dismay at how the stories turned out
to an understanding audience, and now I feel better.
Cheers--
--Dwight Decker
couple of stories I translated from Dutch. Unfortunately,
the issue only demonstrates that computerized type fonts
that look just like hand-lettering also open the door to...
typographical errors. On the last page of the Duncan McDuck
story, Donald's speech in panel 5 is scrambled. My script
had him saying:
"No matter how smart you think you are, there are times when you
should be smart enough to leave things well enough alone!"
As printed, however, Donald is saying:
"No matter how smart you think you are, there aren't enough
times when you should be smart enough to leave things well
enough alone!"
That "there aren't enough times" makes no sense and seems like
a typo.
To which the mayor replies, "Well said! It sounds as though
there may be a wee bit of a politician in you, Mr. Duck!"
Of course it's Mr. Duck. Donald made the speech, right? As
printed, however, it came out as "Mr. McDuck." It may even
be justifiable as an understandable error on the Mayor's part:
the Mayor only knows Donald as a descendant of Duncan McDuck
and a relative of Scrooge McDuck, and might be plausibly
unaware that Donald's last name is a little different. On the
other hand, I would argue that the point is a little too subtle,
and calling Donald by his right name just saves confusion. I
don't see a reason for the change, myself.
The second story (H91134) is a four-page Scrooge & Gyro story
I translated several years ago. In that time, I've lost my
copies of the original script I did (hard-drive problem). All
I can say is that there are a couple of screaming errors of
wording that I _hope_ weren't in my original script. If they
were, I'll own up to 'em and take my lumps, but I still have to
ask the question why the editor didn't catch and correct them
before the story went out the door. "Why don't you make some
yourself" in the last panel makes no sense, for example, when
Gyro is telling Scrooge he should try his hand at making an
invention himself to relax. "Why don't you make -one- yourself"
was clearly meant.
Well, I don't mean to sit here and whine about Gladstone. I
just wanted to express some dismay at how the stories turned out
to an understanding audience, and now I feel better.
Cheers--
--Dwight Decker
Wilmer Rivers
Pacifist Mickey
Message 55 -
1995-11-09 at 18:39:09
David Gerstein writes:
> Today I don't think I could get away with MM having a "High
> Noon" style gunfight with a villain, as happens in some '30s stories
>
Interesting, since Scrooge (as opposed to Mickey) apparently can -
in fact, he did [in the LO$ episode in South Africa, where he pursues
Flintheart], even to the extent of using the theme song from "High
Noon" in the background! Also, Donald can get pretty violent in his
battles with Neighbor Jones, it seems. I suppose Disney just wants
Mickey to be "nice". As long as they operate under that constraint,
Mickey likely will continue to be less interesting than the Ducks.
Wilmer Rivers
> Today I don't think I could get away with MM having a "High
> Noon" style gunfight with a villain, as happens in some '30s stories
>
Interesting, since Scrooge (as opposed to Mickey) apparently can -
in fact, he did [in the LO$ episode in South Africa, where he pursues
Flintheart], even to the extent of using the theme song from "High
Noon" in the background! Also, Donald can get pretty violent in his
battles with Neighbor Jones, it seems. I suppose Disney just wants
Mickey to be "nice". As long as they operate under that constraint,
Mickey likely will continue to be less interesting than the Ducks.
Wilmer Rivers
David A Gerstein
Disney-comics digest #842.
Message 56 -
1995-11-10 at 04:51:41
WILMER:
Hey, now, I didn't say I wasn't allowed to show Mickey
involved in slapstick, I just meant that I couldn't have him actually
firing a gun at someone (as, we have noticed, Scrooge was allowed to
do in LO$ 6). Donald is also not allowed to fire a pistol, as pertains
to a scene changed in "Colossus of the Nile" (which will be published
next month). I don't want to do a spoiler here, so I'll just say that
the scene was changed by making the bullet into something else that
served the desired function.
Even Disney Comics showed MM punching a villain (in MMA 17)
and, in "Return to Blaggard Castle," knocking down a disguised Blot by
shoving an enormous ray machine right into him. So slapstick is okay.
I'll be the first person to give Disney credit where it's due.
I hope and believe all of you will find my version of Mickey
to be quite interesting. Prior to writing my first Mickey story, some
of you may recall that I asked for thoughts about how MM should be
from fellow digest members, and I did my best to take them into
account.
THE STORY WITH 4 NEPHEWS IN ONE PANEL
was actually by Jose Colomer Fonts, I think. Egmont's house
newsletter reprinted the telltale panel as an example of the kind of
mistake that anyone can make, but usually doesn't get by the editorial
staff. That time (a seagoing story, exact issue unknown to me) it did.
There has also been a Jaime Diaz story with 4 nephews in one
panel: "The Phantom Lighthouse" in US #245. I can't tell you the
panel offhand, though. Someone wrote in and mentioned it in a letter
column, whereupon Bob Foster gave the fourth nephew the name "Phooey".
That was probably the word that was heard in the editorial room upon
the discovery, too. ;-)
Please "unsubsribe" poor "Br'er Rabbit", Per. He's trying to
coax us, as you can see, with dialect typical of the old Br'er Rabbit
stories... no, I'm just joking, as Dwight points out, everyone makes a
typo now and then (aggravating, I'll admit, when it's in a published
story, but the same has happened to me and to Don).
David Gerstein
<96dag at williams.edu>
"Have a chestnut, boys! ... OW!"
Hey, now, I didn't say I wasn't allowed to show Mickey
involved in slapstick, I just meant that I couldn't have him actually
firing a gun at someone (as, we have noticed, Scrooge was allowed to
do in LO$ 6). Donald is also not allowed to fire a pistol, as pertains
to a scene changed in "Colossus of the Nile" (which will be published
next month). I don't want to do a spoiler here, so I'll just say that
the scene was changed by making the bullet into something else that
served the desired function.
Even Disney Comics showed MM punching a villain (in MMA 17)
and, in "Return to Blaggard Castle," knocking down a disguised Blot by
shoving an enormous ray machine right into him. So slapstick is okay.
I'll be the first person to give Disney credit where it's due.
I hope and believe all of you will find my version of Mickey
to be quite interesting. Prior to writing my first Mickey story, some
of you may recall that I asked for thoughts about how MM should be
from fellow digest members, and I did my best to take them into
account.
THE STORY WITH 4 NEPHEWS IN ONE PANEL
was actually by Jose Colomer Fonts, I think. Egmont's house
newsletter reprinted the telltale panel as an example of the kind of
mistake that anyone can make, but usually doesn't get by the editorial
staff. That time (a seagoing story, exact issue unknown to me) it did.
There has also been a Jaime Diaz story with 4 nephews in one
panel: "The Phantom Lighthouse" in US #245. I can't tell you the
panel offhand, though. Someone wrote in and mentioned it in a letter
column, whereupon Bob Foster gave the fourth nephew the name "Phooey".
That was probably the word that was heard in the editorial room upon
the discovery, too. ;-)
Please "unsubsribe" poor "Br'er Rabbit", Per. He's trying to
coax us, as you can see, with dialect typical of the old Br'er Rabbit
stories... no, I'm just joking, as Dwight points out, everyone makes a
typo now and then (aggravating, I'll admit, when it's in a published
story, but the same has happened to me and to Don).
David Gerstein
<96dag at williams.edu>
"Have a chestnut, boys! ... OW!"
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Sch[r]oder
Message 57 -
1995-11-10 at 05:42:14
HARRY:
> Schroder inked another Barks sketch, about the nephews cutting
> cheese with a harp. This seems to have been published as a cover on
> one of the Danish pockets. (If anyone has an extra copy of that: I'm
> interested!)
Finally I betrayed you on giving wrong information! ;-)
First, it's a *pie* that the nephews are cutting. Second, the cover
wasn't by Schroder. Volker Reiche did the inking. I checked the CBL
for that (set 9, page 496): "Idea & sketch by Carl Barks, inked by
V. Reiche."
Is the sketch listed wrong in the database?
ALL:
Is there someone here who has a xerox of the original sketch? Volker
Reiche got his xerox from one Stephen Eberhart (as mentioned in
the CBL).
DAVID:
Didn't you see my questions in digest #842? I asked if you can find
out if Schroder's work on "King Scrooge the First" has survived
somewhere. I also asked if you will continue sending your Gladstone-
list to the club. (If not, can you send it to me in private?)
Greetings,
--- Daniel
> Schroder inked another Barks sketch, about the nephews cutting
> cheese with a harp. This seems to have been published as a cover on
> one of the Danish pockets. (If anyone has an extra copy of that: I'm
> interested!)
Finally I betrayed you on giving wrong information! ;-)
First, it's a *pie* that the nephews are cutting. Second, the cover
wasn't by Schroder. Volker Reiche did the inking. I checked the CBL
for that (set 9, page 496): "Idea & sketch by Carl Barks, inked by
V. Reiche."
Is the sketch listed wrong in the database?
ALL:
Is there someone here who has a xerox of the original sketch? Volker
Reiche got his xerox from one Stephen Eberhart (as mentioned in
the CBL).
DAVID:
Didn't you see my questions in digest #842? I asked if you can find
out if Schroder's work on "King Scrooge the First" has survived
somewhere. I also asked if you will continue sending your Gladstone-
list to the club. (If not, can you send it to me in private?)
Greetings,
--- Daniel
Vidar Svendsen
Three new Rosa stories within an hour!
Message 58 -
1995-11-10 at 09:08:34
On Tue, 7 Nov 1995, Mike Pohjola wrote:
> Anyways, The Guardians of the Lost Library was great! One of Rosa's
> best, but not _the_ best however. Great adventure and an ending to make you
I don't think it's one of his best. All the ducks do is running from one
town to another doing similar things in all of 'em. This means that the
story is based to much on the traveling and not on a "real" plot.
I also think "the lost charts..." is too similar to GotLL. (although even
these stories are much better than most of the other non-Barks stories)
DON:
*pleassse* don't make more stories like these.
You could do better than this...!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Vidar
Gentlemen!...
THE world's greatest kite maker -
and her PROVES it by arriving
at the banquet in his car.....
entirely by kite power!
> Anyways, The Guardians of the Lost Library was great! One of Rosa's
> best, but not _the_ best however. Great adventure and an ending to make you
I don't think it's one of his best. All the ducks do is running from one
town to another doing similar things in all of 'em. This means that the
story is based to much on the traveling and not on a "real" plot.
I also think "the lost charts..." is too similar to GotLL. (although even
these stories are much better than most of the other non-Barks stories)
DON:
*pleassse* don't make more stories like these.
You could do better than this...!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Vidar
Gentlemen!...
THE world's greatest kite maker -
and her PROVES it by arriving
at the banquet in his car.....
entirely by kite power!
TKlein28
Gladstone lettering
Message 59 -
1995-11-10 at 14:01:41
DWIGHT:
Sorry to hear about your script errors. I'd like to know who's doing those
computer jobs (using "Whizbang") at Gladstone. It could be their production
people, or a freelancer. If I ever hear from John Clark again, I'll ask him
for us. Todd
Sorry to hear about your script errors. I'd like to know who's doing those
computer jobs (using "Whizbang") at Gladstone. It could be their production
people, or a freelancer. If I ever hear from John Clark again, I'll ask him
for us. Todd
H.W. Fluks
Anser too Danials mesage
Message 60 -
1995-11-10 at 14:56:15
Daniel:
> Finally I betrayed you on giving wrong information! ;-)
Well, I *have* made mistakes before.. 8-)
The "Barks" cover that was inked by Reiche is not in our database at all,
so it was entirely *my* mistake.
The cover should have been printed on Danish Jumbobog 59 or 58 or somewhere
around that time. Again, if anyone has information about that, or an
extra issue of the Jumbobog: please tell me!
--Harry.
> Finally I betrayed you on giving wrong information! ;-)
Well, I *have* made mistakes before.. 8-)
The "Barks" cover that was inked by Reiche is not in our database at all,
so it was entirely *my* mistake.
The cover should have been printed on Danish Jumbobog 59 or 58 or somewhere
around that time. Again, if anyone has information about that, or an
extra issue of the Jumbobog: please tell me!
--Harry.