Keskustelujen arkisto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Author

Topic: 199305

(145 messages)
Darin Reid
Just for everyone's information. I picked up Gladstone's "first" new
comic. It came out around monday or tuesday, I don't know which since my bro
picked it up for me. _Donald Duck Adventures_ #21 contains "Secret of
Hondorica" (Barks), and a Grandma Duck story, "Modern Conveniences". This
Comic looks almost exactly like one of the original Gladstones, even the
letters column has the same title ("Adventure Log"). The only difference is
the paper quality.

About Duckburg and time: Don't forget that in Barks' story the ducks used
rockets, and new-fangled equipment (shrinking rays), more than once. Sat.'s
would not seem that unusual...

- Darin
--
Bitnet : Areid at Fordmulc __ _ __
Unix/AIX: Reid at Dsm.Fordham.Edu / ) ' ) ) /
Vax/VMS : Areid at Mary.Fordham.Edu / / __. __ o ____ /--' _ o __/
DECnet : MARY::AREID /__/_(_/|_/ (_<_/ / <_ / \_</_<_(_/_
Freenet : Bz809 at Cleveland.Freenet.Edu
Andrew Krieg 5-5379
>> Just for everyone's information. I picked up Gladstone's "first" new
>>comic. It came out around monday or tuesday, I don't know which since my bro
>>picked it up for me. _Donald Duck Adventures_ #21 contains "Secret of
>>Hondorica" (Barks), and a Grandma Duck story, "Modern Conveniences". This
>>Comic looks almost exactly like one of the original Gladstones, even the
>>letters column has the same title ("Adventure Log"). The only difference is
>>the paper quality.

Does that mean the letters page and issue credits are back to being on
the inside front cover of the comics? Do they have a comic strip on the
back cover? Also, how many pages were devoted to ads?
Darin Reid
:)Does that mean the letters page and issue credits are back to being on
:)the inside front cover of the comics? Do they have a comic strip on the
:)back cover? Also, how many pages were devoted to ads?

The letters page and issue credits are on the last page (not inside back
cover), I remember them being there for some time in the "earlier" Gladstones.
I should go check, but all of my Gladstones are bagged, and in a comic box,
under another box, kind of a pain to get to. The inside front cover, and
inside back cover contain ads (general). Also in the center is a two page ad
for subscription and ordering the "CBL of WDC&S in Color". Then, near the
back (before the second story), there is an "upcoming comics ad, and a back
issue order page.

One interesting note: The Gladstones will be distributed on newsstands by
Marvel Comics!

- Darin
--
Bitnet : Areid at Fordmulc __ _ __
Unix/AIX: Reid at Dsm.Fordham.Edu / ) ' ) ) /
Vax/VMS : Areid at Mary.Fordham.Edu / / __. __ o ____ /--' _ o __/
DECnet : MARY::AREID /__/_(_/|_/ (_<_/ / <_ / \_</_<_(_/_
Freenet : Bz809 at Cleveland.Freenet.Edu
Per Starback
Don Rosa:
> Yes, there IS a long adventure story that I did especially for
> Norway's "Year of the Book" which WILL have some alternate panels
> when/if used by Gladstone. But... how did anyone KNOW about all
> that??? Did I pop off about it somewhere? I don't recall...

We have ways of knowing things like that...

Well, actually I heard about it from Stefan. If he had heard it from
you or seen it at work I don't know. Does it have a title?

> And yes, I will ask Gladstone to make some small changes in the
> "Life and Times of $crooge McDuck" when they use it; probably just
> dialogue changes. The biggest one involves part 3 where (...)

Yeah, I know what the continuity errors were, I just didn't want to
say too much of the stories for the majority who haven't read them.

> I hope readers will point out other goofs so I can correct them,
> too, in future printings.

Warning! Warning! You'd better beware of doing that!
Don is reported to have written the following about a young Swedish
Donaldist who reported on some continuity error in a Rosa comic:
"That XXX is too sharp for his own good. We may have to kill him."

:-)

> (...) yes, Disney comics licensees do pay a minimal fee when they
> wish to reprint a story, the fee to cover the cost of the photostats
> shipped to them by the story's producer or archiver, 99% of the time
> which is Egmont. Not even Disney ever bothered to keep copies of the
> old comic stories since they had so little concern for something as
> lowly as funnybooks; Dell and Egmont/Gutenberghus were the
> archivers.

I guess it must be part of the deal for licensees to have to archive
all their stories, as some other licensee might want it, but what
happens when they lose their license agreement with Disney? When the
Scandinavians reprinted Gladstone's (AR) stories, did they get them
from Gladstone, and was Gladstone really obliged to still archive them
and send them? And what about the comics produced at the Disney
Studios for the foreign market? Would it be possible for Gladstone to
get those from Disney if they'd like some of them and knew the codes?
(I'm thinking about recommending some of those stories never printed
in the USA for Gladstone, if they'd be interested.)
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at student.docs.uu.se
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Per Starback
I referred to Joe Torcivia's Mickey Mouse Checklist and Mark A.
McConnell asked:
> Where can a person get this or any other checklists. These would be good
> to add into the FAQ eventually. Fanzines and Checklists are often
> brought up when people realize they exist.

I don't know if that Checklist is still available, but it was sold
from The Duckburg Times, and its address is the same as Dana
Gabbard's: 3010 Wilshire Blvd. #362, Los Angeles, CA 90010, USA.
The other American Disney comics fanzine I know of is The Barks
Collector, published by Bear Mountain Enterprises, Box 616, Victoria
VA 23974, USA.

If noone else does it first I will eventually put together a file of
all organizations and fanzines I know of with a Disney comics theme.
But as usual, don't hold your breath...
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at student.docs.uu.se
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Per Starback
Colours
~~~~~~~

Don Rosa:
> If there ever was a one-page gag which involved HD&L having colored
> hats or sweaters which corresponded to the DUCKTALES color schemes,
> it was pure coincidence. Prior to DUCKTALES, there was NO designation
> of what color what nephew wore.

Well, if you make notes of what colours they have whenever they are
named, you will find that the Dell comics weren't coloured in a
consistent way. That much is obvious.

But I wouldn't want to dismiss the idea that the colourists, or at
least some of them, despite that had some views on this topic. Of
course there were some things that were known to all colourists, like
for instance the fact that HD&L had different cap colours and that
those colours were red, blue, and green. I don't know if knowledge
like that was ever written down somewhere or just something you
learnt from looking at others' colouring work, but I don't see
anything stopping those colourists from having such notions, and if
they did, it would probably show in an instance such as the one Rich
mentioned (sweaters with the boys' initials on them) as that is a case
where the colourists quickly can see who is who without having to
actually read the stories, something that they evidently not had the
time to do in their work.

To get any further on this question I guess one would have to either
speak to some of the actual old-time colourists or count instances of
the nephews having different colours and see if one can find any
tendencies in that data. BTW: even though confronted with
contradictory data my views when I was little was that they actually
were coloured in just that way: Huey red, Dewey blue, Louie green.
Divine inspiration? :-)

Ranks
~~~~~

Don Rosa:
> Ranks in the Junior Woodchucks are so ever-changing that I don't
> think HD&L have the same rank in any two stories.

But they do!

In WDC 125 they become five-star generals.
In WDC 132 they call each other generals and get promoted to ten-star
generals.
In WDC 137 they still are ten-star generals.
In WDC 150 they become hightails, which then is their rank for the
rest of the stories, something which often is referred to.

All those other titles, like "rear admirals of the arctic snows" are
no ranks but just titles that you can have or not, whatever your rank
is. At least I think that is pretty clear.
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at student.docs.uu.se
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Don Rosa
COMMENTS ON DIGEST #whatsit:

Yes, that's right, "War of the Wendigo", my long Peeweegah sequel, will NEVER be used in America simply because it involves Indians.

The comment was made that it must be difficult to keep EVERY Barks fan happy. You bet! I try hard to do stories in the same SPIRIT
as the stories I read in my youth, but while I read Barks I was also reading Harvey Kurtzman, Will Elder, Jack Davis, and Mort
Weisinger's SUPERMAN... so there's lots more than Barks in my brain. I think Barks fans have been magnanimously kind to me over
the past few years... and the only ones I can't seem to keep happy are people like my friend Geof Blum (Gladstone's text writer)
who grew up on STRICTLY Barks; his objections are that my stories are not EXACTLY Barks stories in every possible detail and
nuance, and all I can say to him is "Hey! I'm not Barks. I'm ME! Whaddiya want?"
Harry: I think I have the Dutch comic that used "On a Silver Platter", but I'd better check since you should know such stuff better
than me. But why would they NOT use that story, particularly since I did it for THEM? They've used some that were far worse,
including those that they had written FOR me (which were REAL stinkers). That "On a Silver Platter" was (in my opinion) my very
best 10-page gag story!
Someone commented that Barks showed the Ducks using rocket ships, so that Duckburg might be "far advanced" as in that one weird
story. But Barks really had no feel for science fiction -- it was one genre he was completely unfamiliar with -- and you'll see
that any time the Ducks used a rocket ship it was treated as something somewhat experimental or unusual, not commonplace... sorta
Jules Vernesian?
My adventure done for Norway's "Year of the Book" is titled "Guardians of the Lost Library". Stefan Dios knows of it because I let
him read my xerox copies last time I was in Stockholm. He said it was "the best ever" at the time... and Byron Erickson (Gladstone's
old editor and my current Egmont editor) claims it's the best story I've ever done. This puzzles me since I thought it was just
"okay". But one thing I've learned in just doing comics for 6 years: every story I write & draw will be one person's LEAST favorite
and one other person's TOP favorite. There's no explaining how or why a certain story, good or bad, will strike an individual.
More about Disney's nonexistant archives: As I said, Disney never kept copies of the comic stories since they were not responsible
for their production and, if anything, had contempt for "Disney" material that THEY did not produce. Western publishing keeps the
comic archives -- that's who Gladstone contacts when they need a story. Over the decades Egmont has built up its own archives based
on Western's -- but this is NOT something they are required to do by Disney. It's something they MUST do due to Disney's typical
cavalier treatment of their licensees whom they give very little worthwhile help to... they just collect their money and take
ownership of the stories that they (Egmont, Oberon, etc.) produce with no help from Disney. As for Gladstone using some of the stories
that Disney has produced for the foreign market, Gladstone has long told me that those stories aren't any good and it was a puzzle
why Disney kept producing them for years when none of the foreign markets liked them and no one wanted them when they could be using
the excellent Oberon and Egmont stuff.
Lastly, the Junior Woodchucks ranks. I maintain that the ranks are ever changing and part of the humor should be that the same rank
is never heard of twice. As for the ranks that Barks may have mentioned: if "Hightails" is the highest possible rank, and it is
denoted by the caps with the high tails, then how is it explained that ALL Woodchucks wear hightail caps? All Woodchucks are of the
highest rank? No, it's funnier not to try to make sense of it.
Mark Semich
Don Rosa writes:
>COMMENTS ON DIGEST #whatsit:
>
> Yes, that's right, "War of the Wendigo", my long Peeweegah
>sequel, will NEVER be used in America simply because it involves
>Indians.

So how does the Disney "no-indians" policy work? The latest Donald
Duck Adventures (21) contains Barks' "Secret of Hondorica" which,
although I liked, I thought contained some rather negative indian
stereotypes. Is this one grandfather claused or something?

- mark semich, mas at csa.bu.edu
David A Gerstein
Dear Folks,

Yes, Disney DOES have a comic archive and I know because -- as
a certain nutshell-dweller near Foola Zoola's village once said --
"I'VE BEEN THERE!"

Bob Foster invited me to the Disney Comics studio two years
ago. When I was there, we went over to an enormous trailer on the
regular Studio lot. Inside were huge filing cabinets loaded with
proofs to hundreds of old comics. Their WDC&S archive began with #31
and, although it was missing a few around #63, essentially went on
from there. Some issues they don't have the stats for all the STORIES
to; others only the COVERS! (such as MM OS 16). A lot of the
material is cheap Western debris such as their 1970s Daisy and Donald
title, and other such schlock.

They also have Dell's ORIGINAL proofs to at least some
stories. "The Hard Loser" in WDC&S 551 was reprinted directly from
badly yellowed 1943 proofs much larger than the original published
size. I saw 'em. They were not in great condition.

As to whether they have the long-lost proofs to MOC 20 and 41,
I don't know, and quite frankly I don't know who to even ask now,
since Disney Comics no longer exists. Disney used the reinked
versions from the CBL for their comics simply because those had
already been altered to meet their censors' demands. Actually NOTHING
seems to have been done to "South Seas." (Catch me if I'm wrong...)
Maybe they have ORIGINAL PROOFS (!!!) to that story in their vault.
Wouldn't surprise me, because they reprinted the cover to that book on
WDC 562 and it was a very clean version, NOT the seemingly retouched
Xerox that appeared in the CBL. ("Nephew bathing in piano," I mean)

I heard that Gladstone was planning to do the MOC stories all
in one album at some point in the near future. Perhaps it would pay
for them to visit Disney's 'nonexistent' archive...

Your friend,

David Gerstein
Don Rosa
COMMENTS ON #25:

Not much new here...

As for the possibility of Disney allowing my Peeweegah story, "The War of the Wendigo", to be used in light of the current use of
"Secret of Hondorica" -- surely we all see the vast difference in the level of "political correctness" involving a tale about
Amazonian natives and AMERICAN INDIANS. What Disney weasels fear is that SINGLE letter from some hothead who probably wouldn't have
even read the Peeweegah story. It's far less likely that any natives in the Upper Amazon region would ever see a copy of "Hondorica"
, much less write Disney a crank letter. They don't want to make waves with anything as "stupid and useless and unprofitable" as
comic books.

If Disney NOW has a growing file of comic story photostats, it must only be because they have been building it during the past
6 years by demanding copies of everything Another Rainbow has used, and by getting the recently liquidated Dell stuff. Prior to
that, they couldn't have cared less. Now, not having ever seen what they might have, I can only DOUBT that Disney has unretouched
proofs of those MOC stories "Darkest Africa" or "Race to the South Seas". As far as I know, those just don't exist anymore. Any fool
who looks at the recent uses of "Darkest Africa" can see that it's all poorly done tracings off of old comic pages (or off heavilly
damaged proofs?) -- whatever the case, it's quite clearly NOT Barks art! As for "South Seas", that bit of forgery is so well done that
I don't think even Another Rainbow ever bothered to admit it -- but anytime you've seen "South Seas" reprinted, it's Dan Jippes
art you're looking at, not Barks. I don't see how Disney could have anything that Another Rainbow or Egmont or Oberon doesn't,
since THOSE are the sources for what it DOES have. The fact that it's housed in a lousy TRAILER tends to suggest how recent an
acquisition it is and how much respect they have for it. Egmont keeps its files in an underground VAULT.
David A Gerstein
Dear Mr. Rosa (and everyone),

Just a few things about Disney's archive...

It's like this. It's called a "trailer" because the building
is shaped a little like one, but in fact it's shaped about as much
like Scrooge's money bin as it is like a trailer. It doesn't have
wheels, it's a large, solid building in which the stats (and sample
copies of many foreign album series, housed on huge metal bookshelves)
are kept. The stats aren't randomly strewn around either: each
drawer is filled with manila envelopes, in order that read like this:
"WDC 31" -- "WDC 32" -- "WDC 33" -- and so on. Each one has stats to
at least most of the inside material to each issue. I'm not saying
we're talking COMPLETE: for some mid-'40s issues only the Donald
material by Barks and Taliaferro is there. Strange, huh? But just a
few are like this. Many of the wartime issues don't have cover stats.
To some, cover stats are all that they have (like MM OS 16).
Nonetheless, for the postwar WDC&S material they're pretty close to
complete, I think.

As for whether this material was Dell's once, I don't know.
Mr. Rosa mentioned the "recently-liquidated Dell" material. Did Dell
have an archive like Western's, and is that stuff being destroyed
(!!!) now? Are you talking about Western's stock of Dell Comics
proofs -- are those being destroyed? I don't think so, since whenever
Disney lacked some material in its vault (such as the fifth chapter of
"MM and the 'Lectro Box" as reformatted for WDC 55), they would just
order it from Western. So Western's archive is still standing, and
the material Disney has is far beyond only what Gladstone printed and
sent them copies of.

As for Disney having the original proofs to MOC 41 and/or 20:
they still COULD. The reason that the redone (CBL) versions of those
stories were used Disney's recent reprints (DDA 26 and 29) is that
those versions were modified so as to be approved for the CBL. I
don't think Bob knew that they were REINKED until it actually came
time to do the editing work on the already-solicited issues.

Anyway, as I've said, Disney DOES have one thing Gladstone
doesn't: a neat, clean stat to the cover of MOC 41, which they
reprinted on WDC 562. This was an authentic proof, and far superior
to the version that Gladstone used in CBL VI (which I suspect was a
retouched Xerox from an actual printed copy). Where that cover proof
is, methinks there must be a STORY proof as well.

Of course, I could be wrong: like with OS 16, Disney's vault
may only have the cover to MOC 41, as well. But who knows?
Gladstone's planned an album of all the MOC stories (as mentioned in
some CBG issue) for this winter, I think. With some investigation
they could have original stats to work with. The same may be true of
MOC 20, although I don't know about this and Gladstone will probably
be required to make the same changes that were made in the CBL all
over again, anyway. Nonetheless, that's better than throwing out a
third printing of the very poorly reinked version of that story.

Well, gotta go. Your friend,

David Gerstein

(To be at Larry.J.Gerstein at Dartmouth.edu as of next Monday)
David A Gerstein
Dear Folks,

Well, Friday's come and went and I only ever got TWO people to
enter my Gottfredson quote quiz: Harry Fluks and Per Starback. But
since I officially gave Friday as the deadline, I assume no others
plan to enter. Was it the short deadline? I'm SURE it was. I should
never have offered a quiz when I was about to leave for another E-Mail
address and become unable to efficiently end it unless I did it almost
immediately.

So when I next give a quiz (watch for it... it'll be coming
from my dad's E-Mail address, Larry.J.Gerstein at Dartmouth.edu, because
I'll be at home for the summer) in a few weeks, I'll give at least two
weeks, not one, for answers to come in.

But let's see who won this one, shall we:

1. "Boy! A box! Another minute and that cannibal tom cat would be
picking me out of his teeth!"
Only Harry tried this one, wondering if it was the early '30s
story "MM, Boxing Champion." Unfortunately, it isn't, the quote being
from "MM, Circus Roustabout" (only a few months later, though).
Mickey is diving into a packing crate to get away from a tiger he's
accidentally set free. Note: "MM, Boxing Champion" hasn't been
reprinted in this country. I mentioned that the stories I was using
had all been printed in this country since 1986 (with the exception of
one, from Abbeville). This one was in WDC&S 585, just last month. I
assumed it would be fresh in people's minds. I didn't think of
INTERNATIONAL MAIL slowing down Harry's and Per's receipt of the
issue, however.

2. "Alas, pore Nell, I knowed her well-ll...."
No one tried this. It's Goofy, attempting to lure Pete out of
his desert hideout with a love song which he thinks will melt the
hearts of villains. It's from "MM at the Bar-None Ranch," which
Gladstone printed in MM Giant Album #3.

3. "At last a faint light begins to flicker through the cracks in my
dome!"
This is Mickey getting an edge on a candid camera scheme in
"MM Outwits the Phantom Blot." That was printed both in Gladstone's
MM in Color book, and Disney's Album #4 (which was a censored version,
but that scene was left intact). Again, no one tried this.

4. "Wait till Lindy sees this airship! HeUll be so jealous -- he'll
*resign* from the army!"
This one both of you got! I guess most hardcore Disney fans
bought Gladstone's MM 244, the sixtieth anniversary edition, in which
the first week of the MM strip was reprinted. This is 1/14/30, as
Mickey builds himself an airplane that's soon to be grounded.
A half point for each of you.

5. "It tells der whole story in a shelled nut!"
Good going, Harry. You recognized this one as being Dr.
Einmug from "Island in the Sky," and you're right! A point in your
general direction. Sorry, Per, but you didn't try this one. The
story was reprinted right at the beginning of this year in WDC&S
582-83. This was the first completely uncut reprint of the story,
by the way. It was COMPLETELY banned to Gladstone, but the ban
was eventually lifted with no changes required in the story.

6. "What a peculiar language these natives speak!"
Harry suspected it was one of the African stories, but didn't
make a guess. You're right about the type of story: it's "MM in the
Foreign Legion" which IS set in Africa. This is also the only
pre-Gladstone quote in the quiz, since between Abbeville's publication
and Gladstone's planned/bumped publication (would have been MM 240, I
believe), the story was banned by Disney. Despite this, however, the
quote is not regarding Africans, but MICKEY, who's disguised himself
with a stubble 'beard' of black paint and races across the streets
shouting "Whoopee! Hotcha! Hot Diggetty Dog! Yeowie!"
Sorry, though, Harry, I couldn't count your guess as being
right, since it wasn't specific.

7. "Too many dynamitoruses... and not enuff rabbits!"
You missed this one, too, Harry, but Per got it. It's Goofy,
commenting on the local wildlife in "The Land of Long Ago" (which
Gladstone had in MM 247-49), from 1941. A point for you, Per. Each
of you has 1-1/2 points now.

8. "I'll turn on this gas and end it once and for all! ...Goodbye,
Minnie! Goodbye, cruel world!"
Both of you got this one, the story quoted being "MM vs. Mr.
Slicker and the Egg Robbers" (1930). This story has never been
reprinted in full in America, but Gladstone printed a sample strip in
MM in Color, which seems to be where both of you saw it. Good going!
(And who says Mickey has no emotions? Mickey's trying to commit
suicide when he thinks Minnie has left him... Donald never did that!)
A point for each of you, and the score's tied at 2-1/2.

9. "I t'ink zat we shall throw zem for a loop, eh?"
Harry, you guessed "MM in the Foreign Legion" here, but you
vere thrown for a loop yourzelf. In fact, it was "Monarch of
Medioka" (1937), as Mickey heads for King Michael's palace and
prepares to assume power as a substitute king. This is my personal
favorite MM story and I'll recommend it to EVERYONE, and you can find
it in Gladstone's MM Giant Album #7. You didn't try, Per.

10. "Tell 'im de rest, Shyster! He won't live t' tell nobody!"
Harry, you also tried this one, and here you got it. It's
Pete relishing an apparent capture, in "MM the Mail Pilot" (1933),
which was in MM in Color from Gladstone. Another one of the really
superb stories, and one where Mickey boldly goes out and gets involved
in the adventure completely through his own personality. (I'm just
letting you Duck fans know...)
Per: 2-1/2. Harry: 3-1/2.

11. "Crazy inventors! Machines that won't work! I can feel a
headache starting already!"
Harry, you guessed "Blaggard Castle" on this one, but in fact
it's "MM and the 'Lectro Box" which Disney printed in WDC&S 568-72.
(This strip was in #569, by the way). Upon refusing a patent to
Mickey's invention, a stuffed-shirt official is sent ceilingward -- in
his DESK -- by a stray electron beam! The story's from 1943.

12. "Excuse my glove!"
I threw in another quote from "Circus Roustabout," assuming
you had it freshly in mind. Oh, well. I knew this was an unusual
quote for Mickey, but he's actually got ANOTHER glove on -- a baseball
glove -- over his REGULAR one, so a strong-man's bravuro handshake
won't leave him in tatters. Neither of you tried it. Again, here's a
great one that's available NOW, folks, in WDC&S 585. It's from 1931.

13. "Just because I'm a *girl*, that's no sign I'm a *coward!*"
Well, Harry, you guessed "In Search of Jungle Treasure," but
again, there's one that is banned over here and which hasn't been
reprinted since 1941. So it wasn't eligible. However, I've got it in
German myself with only the last chapter in English (WDC&S 5), so
maybe she DOES say this. I dunno.
But Per, you *got* it, the quote being Minnie's firm resolve
to fly through a lightning storm regardless of the consequences, in
1934's "The Captive Castaways."

So the contest's a tie, with Per and Harry each getting 3-1/2
points. I see I need to give everyone not only time to GET TO my
contests, but wait longer so that people can actually look through ALL
their issues. Both my entrants were pressed for time, which
undoubtedly hurt them.

However, if the quotes got you reading Gottfredson again, my
dirty plot is revealed. :-) To quote Magica de Spell: "Hee, hee,
hee!"

But in all due seriousness, folks, I'm going home on Tuesday
and will have a new address, my dad's office E-mail. That's:

Larry.J.Gerstein at Dartmouth.edu

Thanks, Harry and Per, for entering my contest! "I'll be back
like a bad penny... or a ghost!"

Your friend,

David Gerstein! (Esq.)

"GHOST? Merciful goodness! What have I DONE?" *SLAM!*
Per Starback
Luigi:
> Why all the ducks, all Disney characters, and many many other
> comics people have FOUR FINGERS ???????

Don't they have *eight* fingers? :-)

Don Rosa:
> (...) and tried drawing their hats with the tails at the bottom --
> but I turned the hats into "exalted highttails" since the hats just
> don't LOOK right to me without the tails on the top. I see ALL JW
> caps now as being the "hightail" style... checking Barks stories
> will proove that.

It's true that there seems to be many hightails in the Junior
Woodchucks, at least in Duckburg, which is strange as exalted
hightails "is the next rank above ten-star generals", and HD&L, still
addressed as generals, seem to be pretty high up in the hierarchy:

* They often command the troops.
* I've never seen another kid being general. When their titles are
given it's mostly colonel of sergeant.
* In WDC 137 (even before HD&L became exalted hightails) a Junior
Woodchuck in Avalanche Valley thinks "A strange request! But those
boys up there [HD&L] are *ten-star generals*! They must have a good
reason!"

Even though there are lots of hightails in Barks's stories, certainly
not all of them are. The kid I recently quoted isn't and in WDC 253
only HD&L are hightails, to name a few examples. BUT..., there is
something strange about all this, because in WDC 125, where Junior
Woodchuckism debuts, HD&L wear hightail caps, and they certainly
weren't hightails by then. Somehow I get the impression that Barks
thought it natural to draw the caps like that, and only added the
hightail thing later to have an excuse for drawing the caps like
that... In WDC 243 where Donald has a similar cap it looks rather
hightail-y too (that story has nothing to do with JW though).

David:
> So the [Gottfredson quote quiz is] a tie, with Per and Harry each
> getting 3-1/2 points.

Very exciting, even though that should have been 3 points, as we only
should get half a point each for question #8.

> However, if the quotes got you reading Gottfredson again, my dirty
> plot is revealed. :-) To quote Magica de Spell: "Hee, hee, hee!"

Oh no, you got me! :-)
-- "
Per Starback, Uppsala, Sweden. email: starback at student.docs.uu.se
"Ta ta, boys! I'll see you in the funny papers!"
David A Gerstein
Dear Folks,

I'll be going home from college for the summer starting
Tuesday. For the next month, home means New Hampshire, as my dad
wraps up a sabbatical at Dartmouth (where he's teaching mathematics).
I'll be going down to his office a lot, so that's where any E-mail you
have for me should be sent.

Disregarding the address that MacIP will stick on the top of
this letter, my E-Mail address from now on is:

Larry.J.Gerstein at Dartmouth.edu

It will remain thus until I tell you otherwise. Sending stuff
to Williamstown for me will essentially get nowwhere.

Thanks a lot, folks.
David A Gerstein
Dear Folks,

Just looked over the MM "Hoozoo" again. A few corrections:

Aunt Marissa is Minnie's aunt, not Mickey's (Agatha then being
Mickey's only aunt, presumably), as is shown by the Walsh/Gottfredson
story reprinted in WDC&S 95 (and again in #575). This has been
confused because the "Between the Lines" column for the reprint
mentioned her as being *Mickey's* aunt.

Uncle Mortimer's status is uncertain, since both Minnie and
Mickey refer to him as their uncle. Nonetheless, it would seem that
he's *really* Minnie's uncle, because in the first story to feature
him Minnie was shown as being in his will, Mickey was not, and he was
introduced as "*your* Uncle Mortimer" (Shyster to *Minnie*).

As for famous phrases: "heh-heh" being the only one?? In
Gottfredson's stories he says, "Oh, fer gosh sakes," "Good gosh!"
"Hot diggety dog!" and "Fer th' luvva Mike!" more frequently than his
nervous laugh (which was mainly confined to the screen).

As for his personality, allow me to submit:

Mickey is ruled by his own enthusiasm. Although this has its
good points -- giving him compassion, kindness and forthrightness --
it also is his Achilles heel, because Mickey looks before he leaps,
gets carried away by his excitement, and ambitiously dives into
situations that he's not prepared for. Mickey is an emotional
character: overcome by grief or panic, he is likely to make clumsy
moves (and, in one case, attempted suicide) when things seem at their
worst. Mickey loves nothing more than a good practical joke on
Minnie, Goofy, Horace or Clarabelle, but by being too impulsive,
Mickey finds himself more often than not to end up with the joke
played on him. Mickey is a bit of a chauvinist, believing that
Minnie's faults are representative of all women, but always discovers
after making generalizations that he has essentially the same faults
himself. Mickey's greatest foils are destructive animals -- although
others may find them cute, he is bothered by that and regards
nuisances as nuisances. Mickey possesses great powers of deduction
and thought, but must contain his integral exuberance to make them
work properly, which he seldom does. Only when confronted by an
aggressive foe is Mickey intimidated and unsettled enough for his
logic and decisive thought to come to the fore.

---

The above is based on the pre-Bill-Walsh Gottfredson Mickey.
It seems to me that the person who wrote the hoozoo was going by the
later Paul Murry Mouse: really, there's not much there, which is I
guess why I found the description, although well-written, exemplary of
why many people find Mickey bland.

I hope you guys find this useful. If it gets someone to give
Mickey another chance, it's worth every moment it took to write. I'd
also like to do Hoozoos for Minnie and Goofy, if you'd let me.

Your friend,

David Gerstein
<now at: Larry.J.Gerstein at Dartmouth.edu>
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10