Daniel,
The long message was sent 3 times. I'm sent to digest so I didn't get
it before I sent it myself. Then I sent it accidentally as an encoded
file (actually Word Perfect 6) and when I realized what I did, sent it
again as ASCII. Apologies to all who pay by the message.
Mike Rhode
Author
Topic: 199506
(219 messages)
RHODE
Marks on Barks mistake explained
Message 151 -
1995-06-16 at 19:09:55
Gianfranco Goria - Anonima Fumetti - Italian Cartoonists Society
Professionals needed
Message 152 -
1995-06-17 at 17:07:33
>The Forth Annual Comic Arts Conference still needs professionals to participate
>in two of the seminars.
I just want you to know that the Italian professionals are now united in an
association:
ANONIMA FUMETTI - Italian Cartoonists Society
We work to promote Comics and Authors, we try to link the Italian
cartoonists and we teach Comics and Graphic Novel in schools and Universites
in Italy.
You can find us at CARTOONET (European Cartoon Arts Network):
http://www.pavilion.co.uk/cartoonet/network/anonima/anonima.htm
Our e-mail address is:
goria at inrete.alpcom.it
Bye!
>in two of the seminars.
I just want you to know that the Italian professionals are now united in an
association:
ANONIMA FUMETTI - Italian Cartoonists Society
We work to promote Comics and Authors, we try to link the Italian
cartoonists and we teach Comics and Graphic Novel in schools and Universites
in Italy.
You can find us at CARTOONET (European Cartoon Arts Network):
http://www.pavilion.co.uk/cartoonet/network/anonima/anonima.htm
Our e-mail address is:
goria at inrete.alpcom.it
Bye!
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Dutch Donald Duck #25
Message 153 -
1995-06-17 at 19:34:27
Hi all!
I recieved my new Donald Duck Weekly # 25, yesterday. It contents the
first set of stickers of Don's Family Tree (redrawn here).
In the mailbox there's always a little item, called "Did you know
that...". Now it tells the reader about a statue of Walt Disney and
Mickey in California. We also learn from it that "Steamboat Willie"
is the first cartoon with sound... (yeah) and in *color*! (What?)
What a mistake!
The first story (H8860, 10 pages) is about Donald finding a ancient
vase with the inscription "...ade...onkong" on it. He thinks it says
"Jade from Hongkong". But soon he learns it is "Made in Hongkong!"
Eh... oh! That was a *joke*! (To make it even more boring, the gag is
explained as foot-note, because it's English.) (ZZZZ) It's not the
final gag, but the story was too dull to read IMHO. The art is
not bad.
Then a Bucky Bug-story follows (H94124, 3 pages) and after that a
Chip'an Dale-story (WDC 2, 6 pages). The latter looks restored or
redrawn to me, it's one of those "Chip an' Dale and a girl"-stories.
(ZZZZ)
The fourth story is a Duck-story (D8072, 6 pages). It's about Donald
being years to late with returning books to the library. He tries to
get rid of the books at several locations, but... you guessed it
right: He gets the book back every time. And then he....(ZZZZZ).
I'm sorry, I couldn't stay awake here. ;-)
We also have to miss Don this month: No story in Donald Duck Extra.
Anyone here having sleepless nights, lately? Then I'll gladly send
the comic to you! ;-)
Bye!
--- Daniel
PS. Please don't fire me if the situation occurs that I offend a
story made by someone here on the forum. Mostly I don't know who
made it, and it's just me giving a frankly review of a story.
I recieved my new Donald Duck Weekly # 25, yesterday. It contents the
first set of stickers of Don's Family Tree (redrawn here).
In the mailbox there's always a little item, called "Did you know
that...". Now it tells the reader about a statue of Walt Disney and
Mickey in California. We also learn from it that "Steamboat Willie"
is the first cartoon with sound... (yeah) and in *color*! (What?)
What a mistake!
The first story (H8860, 10 pages) is about Donald finding a ancient
vase with the inscription "...ade...onkong" on it. He thinks it says
"Jade from Hongkong". But soon he learns it is "Made in Hongkong!"
Eh... oh! That was a *joke*! (To make it even more boring, the gag is
explained as foot-note, because it's English.) (ZZZZ) It's not the
final gag, but the story was too dull to read IMHO. The art is
not bad.
Then a Bucky Bug-story follows (H94124, 3 pages) and after that a
Chip'an Dale-story (WDC 2, 6 pages). The latter looks restored or
redrawn to me, it's one of those "Chip an' Dale and a girl"-stories.
(ZZZZ)
The fourth story is a Duck-story (D8072, 6 pages). It's about Donald
being years to late with returning books to the library. He tries to
get rid of the books at several locations, but... you guessed it
right: He gets the book back every time. And then he....(ZZZZZ).
I'm sorry, I couldn't stay awake here. ;-)
We also have to miss Don this month: No story in Donald Duck Extra.
Anyone here having sleepless nights, lately? Then I'll gladly send
the comic to you! ;-)
Bye!
--- Daniel
PS. Please don't fire me if the situation occurs that I offend a
story made by someone here on the forum. Mostly I don't know who
made it, and it's just me giving a frankly review of a story.
Don Rosa
Disney-comics digest #697.
Message 154 -
1995-06-18 at 08:30:00
> Whew! I'm finally back! Hiya!
Cdoberman
Disney-comics digest #697.
Message 155 -
1995-06-19 at 03:11:07
Don:
"Whew! I'm finally back! Hiya!"
Don't you mean "phew?" ;-) And welcome back.
Wes
"But, Mickey! It's SUICIDE! We'll be KILLED! How'll we ever land without
wheels?" -- Captain Doberman
"Whew! I'm finally back! Hiya!"
Don't you mean "phew?" ;-) And welcome back.
Wes
"But, Mickey! It's SUICIDE! We'll be KILLED! How'll we ever land without
wheels?" -- Captain Doberman
Hana Miyake
Unsubscribe
Message 156 -
1995-06-19 at 09:50:44
Please unsubscribe me.
$B at D;33X1!Bg3X9q:]@/<#7P:Q3XIt9q:]@/<#3X2J(B
a6195100 at cc.aoyama.ac.jp
Hana Miyake
$B at D;33X1!Bg3X9q:]@/<#7P:Q3XIt9q:]@/<#3X2J(B
a6195100 at cc.aoyama.ac.jp
Hana Miyake
H.W. Fluks
Dutch Donald Duck #25
Message 157 -
1995-06-19 at 10:27:27
Daniel:
> I recieved my new Donald Duck Weekly # 25, yesterday. It [contains] the
> first set of stickers of Don's Family Tree (redrawn here).
Plus some not quite accurate explanations of who the characters are, as
I expected...
> The first story (H8860, 10 pages) is about Donald finding a ancient
> vase with the inscription "...ade...ongkong" on it. He thinks it says
> "Jade from Hongkong". But soon he learns it is "Made in Hongkong!"
> Eh... oh! That was a *joke*!
Actually, I thought it was quite funny. Not the joke itself, but the way
Donald reacts.
> (To make it even more boring, the gag is
> explained as foot-note, because it's English.)
I'm sure this footnote was not in the original script. There was no
caption reserved for this. An editor must have decided at last notice that
English is too difficult for little children.
> the story was too dull to read IMHO. The art is not bad.
I thought this was quite a good story. Script by Jan Kruse, who did a lot
of worse stories in the past. His working title was "Archeologica" (also
too hard for little children).
The story code should have been H 8866, not H 8860.
The art is by Jaap Stavenuiter, who did quite a good job imitating Barks in
1949. Jaap is also drawing for the magazine "Razzafrazz", of which
Frits Leenheer is an editor. This explains the notes "Leenheer Oud Papier"
and "Lees [Read] Habbakrazz" on the first page. Jaap expected (last October)
that the editors would white this out, but they didn't.
> Chip'an Dale-story (WDC 2, 6 pages).
This code in the comic is obviously wrong. There should have been 2 more
digits. Sigh. How am I supposed to update my Database properly if they
keep printing wrong code?
> it's one of those "Chip an' Dale and a girl"-stories.
I wondered if this would be the first story with Chi-chi. Chip 'n' Dale
don't know her yet; she's to be a new neighbour. But maybe this isn't
Chi-chi? She has no name in the story.
> it's just me giving a frankly review of a story.
Tastes differ, apparently!
--Harry.
> I recieved my new Donald Duck Weekly # 25, yesterday. It [contains] the
> first set of stickers of Don's Family Tree (redrawn here).
Plus some not quite accurate explanations of who the characters are, as
I expected...
> The first story (H8860, 10 pages) is about Donald finding a ancient
> vase with the inscription "...ade...ongkong" on it. He thinks it says
> "Jade from Hongkong". But soon he learns it is "Made in Hongkong!"
> Eh... oh! That was a *joke*!
Actually, I thought it was quite funny. Not the joke itself, but the way
Donald reacts.
> (To make it even more boring, the gag is
> explained as foot-note, because it's English.)
I'm sure this footnote was not in the original script. There was no
caption reserved for this. An editor must have decided at last notice that
English is too difficult for little children.
> the story was too dull to read IMHO. The art is not bad.
I thought this was quite a good story. Script by Jan Kruse, who did a lot
of worse stories in the past. His working title was "Archeologica" (also
too hard for little children).
The story code should have been H 8866, not H 8860.
The art is by Jaap Stavenuiter, who did quite a good job imitating Barks in
1949. Jaap is also drawing for the magazine "Razzafrazz", of which
Frits Leenheer is an editor. This explains the notes "Leenheer Oud Papier"
and "Lees [Read] Habbakrazz" on the first page. Jaap expected (last October)
that the editors would white this out, but they didn't.
> Chip'an Dale-story (WDC 2, 6 pages).
This code in the comic is obviously wrong. There should have been 2 more
digits. Sigh. How am I supposed to update my Database properly if they
keep printing wrong code?
> it's one of those "Chip an' Dale and a girl"-stories.
I wondered if this would be the first story with Chi-chi. Chip 'n' Dale
don't know her yet; she's to be a new neighbour. But maybe this isn't
Chi-chi? She has no name in the story.
> it's just me giving a frankly review of a story.
Tastes differ, apparently!
--Harry.
H.W. Fluks
Rosa is back
Message 158 -
1995-06-19 at 17:03:10
Don:
> Whew! I'm finally back! Hiya!
Welcome back. Strange thing that you can be reached better when you're on
the other side of the earth. We have been not far away from each other last
week. I was in Bocholt, but I couldn't make it to Bochum or Koeln, where
you were that day.
I looked for a TEMPO magazine with your art in it. But the current edition
(June, 1995) has not a single panel of Rosa. Which issue contains (or will
contain) your 1-page gag?
Another question:
Have you read all the digests from the period you were in Germany?
--Harry.
> Whew! I'm finally back! Hiya!
Welcome back. Strange thing that you can be reached better when you're on
the other side of the earth. We have been not far away from each other last
week. I was in Bocholt, but I couldn't make it to Bochum or Koeln, where
you were that day.
I looked for a TEMPO magazine with your art in it. But the current edition
(June, 1995) has not a single panel of Rosa. Which issue contains (or will
contain) your 1-page gag?
Another question:
Have you read all the digests from the period you were in Germany?
--Harry.
Knut Hunstad
Daisy's siblings
Message 159 -
1995-06-20 at 01:26:44
>About this "family business"... In Holland children sometimes also
>call *friends of their parents* "uncle" or "aunt". Is that also a
>"habit" in other countries? This could mean then, that Daisy doesn't
>need to be family...
Goes for Norway, too!
Knut Hunstad
Trondheim, Norway
>call *friends of their parents* "uncle" or "aunt". Is that also a
>"habit" in other countries? This could mean then, that Daisy doesn't
>need to be family...
Goes for Norway, too!
Knut Hunstad
Trondheim, Norway
Knut Hunstad
Some remarks on Lo$
Message 160 -
1995-06-20 at 02:05:02
Hi,
I just reread Lo$ and have a few questions and remarks. I know some of these
might have been answered/discussed before, but please don't get too upset :-)
For norwegians only: Is there any D.U.C.K in the first panel of chapter 8 in
the norwegian version? I don't want to know where it is if there is one, but
if there isn't I don't want to spend any more time looking for it!
- I guess it's no coincidence that the poem used in the norwegian version in
the poetry part of the highland games is from Scotland's national poet:
Robert Burns (translated to norwegian)? If it is, the original should be
something like: "O, my luve is like a red, red rose, That's newly sprung in
June." (No spelling mistakes in luve here, this is quoted from the book: The
essential Burns, and I think it's the original dialect).
- A curiosity for scandinavians concerning that very same poem by Burns. The
well known Evert Taube's song: "Min alskling, du er som en ros" is an almost
direct translation of that poem. You can even sing Burns' original text to
Taube's melody with only minor modifications to the rythm. I don't know if
that's a well known fact and if Taube ever pointed it out himself, but at
least I have never heard it anywhere. If you compare them, there is no doubt
about it, though. That brings me to a question here: did the swedish version
use the words from Taube's song? I'll check some day if the norwegian
version comes from one of the published translations of Burns' poems or not.
- Anyone who'd enjoy a real juicy poem should check out Burns' "Tam o'
Shanter", BTW (or the excellent norwegian translation by Hartvig Kiran)
- The scene where U$'s father passes away is the most touching I've ever
seen in a comic! I want to go away like that, too!
- Is the "Voodoo hoodoo"-story published in Norway? I am getting quite
curious about what parts are Barks' and what parts are Rosa's.
- Has anyone (except Don :-) ever made a compilation of what stories are
mentioned in one way or another in Lo$? I'd like something like a list in
order of the pages of Lo$ where I can see which stories relate to the page
and where I can find the stories. And then read the whole Lo$ again while
reading each "original" story in the progress (and of course the wonderful
ODaDaD). I understand you italians will get all this compiled into some sort
of huge library? Lucky you!
Well, that's all for now, folks!
Knut Hunstad
I just reread Lo$ and have a few questions and remarks. I know some of these
might have been answered/discussed before, but please don't get too upset :-)
For norwegians only: Is there any D.U.C.K in the first panel of chapter 8 in
the norwegian version? I don't want to know where it is if there is one, but
if there isn't I don't want to spend any more time looking for it!
- I guess it's no coincidence that the poem used in the norwegian version in
the poetry part of the highland games is from Scotland's national poet:
Robert Burns (translated to norwegian)? If it is, the original should be
something like: "O, my luve is like a red, red rose, That's newly sprung in
June." (No spelling mistakes in luve here, this is quoted from the book: The
essential Burns, and I think it's the original dialect).
- A curiosity for scandinavians concerning that very same poem by Burns. The
well known Evert Taube's song: "Min alskling, du er som en ros" is an almost
direct translation of that poem. You can even sing Burns' original text to
Taube's melody with only minor modifications to the rythm. I don't know if
that's a well known fact and if Taube ever pointed it out himself, but at
least I have never heard it anywhere. If you compare them, there is no doubt
about it, though. That brings me to a question here: did the swedish version
use the words from Taube's song? I'll check some day if the norwegian
version comes from one of the published translations of Burns' poems or not.
- Anyone who'd enjoy a real juicy poem should check out Burns' "Tam o'
Shanter", BTW (or the excellent norwegian translation by Hartvig Kiran)
- The scene where U$'s father passes away is the most touching I've ever
seen in a comic! I want to go away like that, too!
- Is the "Voodoo hoodoo"-story published in Norway? I am getting quite
curious about what parts are Barks' and what parts are Rosa's.
- Has anyone (except Don :-) ever made a compilation of what stories are
mentioned in one way or another in Lo$? I'd like something like a list in
order of the pages of Lo$ where I can see which stories relate to the page
and where I can find the stories. And then read the whole Lo$ again while
reading each "original" story in the progress (and of course the wonderful
ODaDaD). I understand you italians will get all this compiled into some sort
of huge library? Lucky you!
Well, that's all for now, folks!
Knut Hunstad
Joel Caceres
Disney-comics digest #699.
Message 161 -
1995-06-20 at 06:28:41
any chance I can get the digest sent to 7317497 at mcimail.com instead of my
compuserve address? I don't have to pay postage at my mci box unlike compuserve
which charges .12 cents for each letter.
Thanks!
-Joel
'a Mickey Mouse Fan"
compuserve address? I don't have to pay postage at my mci box unlike compuserve
which charges .12 cents for each letter.
Thanks!
-Joel
'a Mickey Mouse Fan"
Don Rosa
Disney-comics digest #699.
Message 162 -
1995-06-20 at 08:09:00
HARRY:
I was also looking for that issue of TEMPO when I first arrived in
Germany, but they told me it was not out yet. I had thought it was intended
to coincide with my tour, but I guess not. I also found out that the German
publisher sent the art photostat to them uncolored and they planned to use
it in B&W -- I never intended they do that and I'll be very disappointed if
it doesn't appear in full color. But the way these things go, I guess I'll
be lucky if they put all the correct text into the balloons and
sound-effects and signage.
Yes, I read ALL the Digests sent to me while I was gone, and, along
with my Compuserve mail, it took me about 4 hours! I either saw nothing
there that needed my comments, or I was to pooped to make any by the time I
was done reading. My "whew" might have referred to that moment rather than
my mad dash through Germany, top to bottom.
KNUT:
Yes, there is definitely a "D.U.C.K." in the splash panel of chapter
8. Look for it somemore before I give you a hint. And there was supposed to
be one in the first panel of "Of Ducks and Dimes and Destinies", but it was
mostly cut off when they chopped the bottom off that panel (as they always
do to my splash panels in Egmont countries due to their policy of putting
the logo above and outside the panel).
I didn't know about "luve" being the proper dialect version of
writing Brown's poem word... but I wouldn't have used it even if I had. One
scholar in Scotland would have understood what it was, and the entire
remainder of the readership would have thought it was a spelling error.
And what's this about you thinking the Italians will get the "Lo$"
in one great compilation? Where did you hear that?
When I finally finished opening my mail today, I stumbled onto a new
COMICS JOURNAL with a lengthy review of my $crooge bio series in it. I
thought it was a completely accurate and fair review... it basically praised
how I did my series but questioned the necessity of it (which I understand,
though I wonder what the "necessity" is for any $crooge story or any comic
book story, period). The writer decided the reason was purely financial,
which I felt was so off the mark that I'm sending a letter to explain that
fallacy, while agreeing with the review otherwise. I mean, when I collect no
royalties and the difficulty of the series resulted in a drop in page
production for me for those 2 years, the financial result for ME was to lose
income! And the Disney comics already sell too well in Europe that 12
stories would never make a whit of difference to circulation. No, the
really-and-truly reason was that we all wanted to prevent the impending
threat of a "Lo$" written by Marv Wolfman and drawn by the Haime Diaz
studio. I also corrected the inference made from some inaccurate quotes
attributed to me by Geof Blum in ancient text pieces. But read the review
yourselves, and see if you don't think it was on the mark otherwise. It was
also good attention for Barks' Ducks, which I always like to see in America,
especially after again returning from Europe where Barks' Ducks are
universally regarded as the supreme comic, along with ASTERIX and TINTIN.
I was also looking for that issue of TEMPO when I first arrived in
Germany, but they told me it was not out yet. I had thought it was intended
to coincide with my tour, but I guess not. I also found out that the German
publisher sent the art photostat to them uncolored and they planned to use
it in B&W -- I never intended they do that and I'll be very disappointed if
it doesn't appear in full color. But the way these things go, I guess I'll
be lucky if they put all the correct text into the balloons and
sound-effects and signage.
Yes, I read ALL the Digests sent to me while I was gone, and, along
with my Compuserve mail, it took me about 4 hours! I either saw nothing
there that needed my comments, or I was to pooped to make any by the time I
was done reading. My "whew" might have referred to that moment rather than
my mad dash through Germany, top to bottom.
KNUT:
Yes, there is definitely a "D.U.C.K." in the splash panel of chapter
8. Look for it somemore before I give you a hint. And there was supposed to
be one in the first panel of "Of Ducks and Dimes and Destinies", but it was
mostly cut off when they chopped the bottom off that panel (as they always
do to my splash panels in Egmont countries due to their policy of putting
the logo above and outside the panel).
I didn't know about "luve" being the proper dialect version of
writing Brown's poem word... but I wouldn't have used it even if I had. One
scholar in Scotland would have understood what it was, and the entire
remainder of the readership would have thought it was a spelling error.
And what's this about you thinking the Italians will get the "Lo$"
in one great compilation? Where did you hear that?
When I finally finished opening my mail today, I stumbled onto a new
COMICS JOURNAL with a lengthy review of my $crooge bio series in it. I
thought it was a completely accurate and fair review... it basically praised
how I did my series but questioned the necessity of it (which I understand,
though I wonder what the "necessity" is for any $crooge story or any comic
book story, period). The writer decided the reason was purely financial,
which I felt was so off the mark that I'm sending a letter to explain that
fallacy, while agreeing with the review otherwise. I mean, when I collect no
royalties and the difficulty of the series resulted in a drop in page
production for me for those 2 years, the financial result for ME was to lose
income! And the Disney comics already sell too well in Europe that 12
stories would never make a whit of difference to circulation. No, the
really-and-truly reason was that we all wanted to prevent the impending
threat of a "Lo$" written by Marv Wolfman and drawn by the Haime Diaz
studio. I also corrected the inference made from some inaccurate quotes
attributed to me by Geof Blum in ancient text pieces. But read the review
yourselves, and see if you don't think it was on the mark otherwise. It was
also good attention for Barks' Ducks, which I always like to see in America,
especially after again returning from Europe where Barks' Ducks are
universally regarded as the supreme comic, along with ASTERIX and TINTIN.
Don Rosa
Disney-comics digest #699.
Message 163 -
1995-06-20 at 08:10:00
> Oh, yeah! And congratulations to us on Digest #700!!!
Anders Engwall
Father Ludwig
Message 164 -
1995-06-20 at 09:26:54
Daniel van Eijmeren wrote:
> > I've heard of a theory about HDL's father before, it said that HDL
> > blew up their father with a giant firework. At least that was
> > told in the cartoon "Donald's nephews" or the newspaper-strips. Maybe
> > their father could have died by then... (as the theory said).
Fredrik Ekman replied:
> The fireworks story was told in the first newspaper-strip appearance of
> HDL.
More precisely, in the Sunday strip of 17 October 1937.
> I recall having read somewhere that they later briefly returned to
> their parents after their father had recovered.
Indeed they did, in the strip of 21 November 1937. They returned to
Donald on 25 February 1940, without any explanation whatsoever. Actually
we didn't see them return, suddenly they were just there.
/Anders
> > I've heard of a theory about HDL's father before, it said that HDL
> > blew up their father with a giant firework. At least that was
> > told in the cartoon "Donald's nephews" or the newspaper-strips. Maybe
> > their father could have died by then... (as the theory said).
Fredrik Ekman replied:
> The fireworks story was told in the first newspaper-strip appearance of
> HDL.
More precisely, in the Sunday strip of 17 October 1937.
> I recall having read somewhere that they later briefly returned to
> their parents after their father had recovered.
Indeed they did, in the strip of 21 November 1937. They returned to
Donald on 25 February 1940, without any explanation whatsoever. Actually
we didn't see them return, suddenly they were just there.
/Anders
Knut Hunstad
Disney-comics digest #699.
Message 165 -
1995-06-20 at 11:29:03
Thanks for your answer, Don! I'll have to check up on those D.U.C.K.s...
> I didn't know about "luve" being the proper dialect version of
>writing Brown's poem word... but I wouldn't have used it even if I had. One
>scholar in Scotland would have understood what it was, and the entire
>remainder of the readership would have thought it was a spelling error.
Which is a confirmation that you _did_ use that poem, I guess. And you may
be right about not using the dialect, if people wouldn't recognize is as that.
> And what's this about you thinking the Italians will get the "Lo$"
>in one great compilation? Where did you hear that?
In one quite recent message from one of our italian list members. It was
worded more or less like a fact, if I'm not mistaken. Sorry I deleted the
message and can't remember who it was, but could you (mr. italian) perhaps
repeat and elaborate the issue?
>especially after again returning from Europe where Barks' Ducks are
>universally regarded as the supreme comic, along with ASTERIX and TINTIN.
I would include Spirou, Gaston and Lucky Luke among those, too. And the
Phantom (not the americanized version!) is also quite popular. That is a
comic that has even more prehistory to consider all the time than Lo$ and
the "Rosa Duck universe", because it has been written more or less as a tale
of "real time and facts" for quite many years (was that understandable?).
Knut
> I didn't know about "luve" being the proper dialect version of
>writing Brown's poem word... but I wouldn't have used it even if I had. One
>scholar in Scotland would have understood what it was, and the entire
>remainder of the readership would have thought it was a spelling error.
Which is a confirmation that you _did_ use that poem, I guess. And you may
be right about not using the dialect, if people wouldn't recognize is as that.
> And what's this about you thinking the Italians will get the "Lo$"
>in one great compilation? Where did you hear that?
In one quite recent message from one of our italian list members. It was
worded more or less like a fact, if I'm not mistaken. Sorry I deleted the
message and can't remember who it was, but could you (mr. italian) perhaps
repeat and elaborate the issue?
>especially after again returning from Europe where Barks' Ducks are
>universally regarded as the supreme comic, along with ASTERIX and TINTIN.
I would include Spirou, Gaston and Lucky Luke among those, too. And the
Phantom (not the americanized version!) is also quite popular. That is a
comic that has even more prehistory to consider all the time than Lo$ and
the "Rosa Duck universe", because it has been written more or less as a tale
of "real time and facts" for quite many years (was that understandable?).
Knut