Since it is apparently my lot in life to document Disney Adventures; let me
do so: Volume 6 #12 September 1996
next issue on sale September 3, 1996
only comic is an adaptation of Aladdin and the King of Thieves.
this 24pp story was written by Bobbi JG Weiss, pencilled by E.Savid and inked
by Khato. lettering by John Costanza and coloring by J. Parker. Said
story did not make me rush out to buy the video. However since it has Robin
Williams as the Genie (and on DA's cover), it might be funnier than this
straigt retelling of the story.
(Anybody want me to continue mentioning these as I read them? Or Marvel's
as I get around to it? Anybody got a copy of DA vol2 #2 that they don't
need?,<--note commerical ad, shame on me. anybody have a list of all the
alternative convers?)
Steven Rowe
Author
Topic: 199608
(341 messages)
SRoweCanoe
Disney Adventures Volume 6 #12
Message 106 -
1996-08-12 at 03:05:43
SRoweCanoe
Scarce and Rare
Message 107 -
1996-08-12 at 03:06:11
Michael Naiman did a list of scarce and Rare Disney comics. I have / had
none. Not being a completist (with an unlimited bank account), I hope to get
the more recent and cheaper ones. I was surprised to see the 3 pack Donald
and Scrooge comics. Which I may or may not have. I saw some just a few
months ago. Natch, I ran down to see if any were still there, and they were
not.
Steven Rowe
Oh, is there any easy way for USAmericans to subscribe to any foreign Disney
publications?
none. Not being a completist (with an unlimited bank account), I hope to get
the more recent and cheaper ones. I was surprised to see the 3 pack Donald
and Scrooge comics. Which I may or may not have. I saw some just a few
months ago. Natch, I ran down to see if any were still there, and they were
not.
Steven Rowe
Oh, is there any easy way for USAmericans to subscribe to any foreign Disney
publications?
Augie De Blieck Jr.
Disney comics Digest V96 #165
Message 108 -
1996-08-12 at 03:10:02
HARRY:
> > * DONALD DUCK #300
> > "Disco Ducks" (!) by Fred Milton and Daan Jippes (10-pages)
>
> Why is there a "(!)" behind "Disco Ducks"?
It's an interesting title which sends certain pictures into my mind
which send several chills down my back. Disco is dead, folks. =)
Actually, it also reminds me of that album from my childhood - was it
"Disco Duck"? Or "Disco Mickey" or something close to that.
-Augie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Augie De Blieck Jr. * (Email removed) * (Email removed)
Keeper of the VR.5 FAQ * http://daniel.drew.edu/~adebliec/index.html
> > * DONALD DUCK #300
> > "Disco Ducks" (!) by Fred Milton and Daan Jippes (10-pages)
>
> Why is there a "(!)" behind "Disco Ducks"?
It's an interesting title which sends certain pictures into my mind
which send several chills down my back. Disco is dead, folks. =)
Actually, it also reminds me of that album from my childhood - was it
"Disco Duck"? Or "Disco Mickey" or something close to that.
-Augie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Augie De Blieck Jr. * (Email removed) * (Email removed)
Keeper of the VR.5 FAQ * http://daniel.drew.edu/~adebliec/index.html
Tryg Helseth
Universal Solvent / U$ 300
Message 109 -
1996-08-12 at 05:35:48
MICHAEL:
>Chapter #2 of Universal Solvent is out this week in the US; it's pretty
>amazing how this story moves right along even though most of the "action"
>(so far) takes place on the platform.
I just finished reading that episode and it really does move along! I was
wondering, though, that when the super compacted walls start to melt from
the surrounding magma, do they resume their normal volume? That is, do
they decompress, or do they become a superconcentrated/super heavy liquid?
And if it is a solvent, why isn't the rock disolved in it as a solution?
I guess only Don knows... ;)
BTW, I enjoyed the little demo in episode one where the liquid penetrated
all sorts of materials including Impervium and the Queen Mother of
inpenetratable substances, the Disney Contract. (How did you get that one
past the censors, Don?)
BILL W: (On US $300)
>issue - everything else is reprint! A Barks, a Van Horn, a Rosa,
>and a Bark's plot. Good stuff, but still I've seen it all before.
Yeah, but it is important to reprint the "true" origin of Gladstone comics
now and then... ;)
Tryg
"I wish they all could be Calisota Ducks!" --the Beach Drakes
Tryg Helseth <(Email removed)> Minneapolis, MN, USA
or <(Email removed)>
>Chapter #2 of Universal Solvent is out this week in the US; it's pretty
>amazing how this story moves right along even though most of the "action"
>(so far) takes place on the platform.
I just finished reading that episode and it really does move along! I was
wondering, though, that when the super compacted walls start to melt from
the surrounding magma, do they resume their normal volume? That is, do
they decompress, or do they become a superconcentrated/super heavy liquid?
And if it is a solvent, why isn't the rock disolved in it as a solution?
I guess only Don knows... ;)
BTW, I enjoyed the little demo in episode one where the liquid penetrated
all sorts of materials including Impervium and the Queen Mother of
inpenetratable substances, the Disney Contract. (How did you get that one
past the censors, Don?)
BILL W: (On US $300)
>issue - everything else is reprint! A Barks, a Van Horn, a Rosa,
>and a Bark's plot. Good stuff, but still I've seen it all before.
Yeah, but it is important to reprint the "true" origin of Gladstone comics
now and then... ;)
Tryg
"I wish they all could be Calisota Ducks!" --the Beach Drakes
Tryg Helseth <(Email removed)> Minneapolis, MN, USA
or <(Email removed)>
Anders Engwall
The Dragon's Amulet
Message 110 -
1996-08-12 at 13:45:02
markoff <(Email removed)> asked:
> >>* UNCLE $CROOGE ADVENTURES #42
> >> "The Dragon's Amulet" by Tony Strobl
> >> unnamed backup by Vicar
> >> Cover by Carl Barks (from U$ #63)
> > ...but that's not the half of it. After scheduling and soliciting
> >this "Amulet" story with the cover to U$ 64 (_not_ #63, as mentioned),
> >Gladstone was informed by Disney that Strobl's tale was banned. Gladstone
> >is thus presenting "Treasure of Marco Polo," the Barks story that really
> >_should_ go with the cover they've got. This will be the CBL-edited
> >version.
>
> Why is the amulet story banned? (BTW, I thought "Treasure of Marco Polo" was
> banned.)
My guess is that it's due to the plentiful of ethnical stereotyping in it.
Another factor could be that the story is unusually hard-boiled; the villains
in here are genuinely *bad*.
OTOH, "Treasure of Marco Polo" *also* contains both ethnical stereotyping
and loads of violence, so...
Actually this is one of my favourites among Strobl's long stories. It would
have deserved that reprint...
---
Anders Engwall
"Alle man står still som en stum fisk, tills vi hittar den knyckta stångkorven!"
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V96 Issue #170
******************************************
> >>* UNCLE $CROOGE ADVENTURES #42
> >> "The Dragon's Amulet" by Tony Strobl
> >> unnamed backup by Vicar
> >> Cover by Carl Barks (from U$ #63)
> > ...but that's not the half of it. After scheduling and soliciting
> >this "Amulet" story with the cover to U$ 64 (_not_ #63, as mentioned),
> >Gladstone was informed by Disney that Strobl's tale was banned. Gladstone
> >is thus presenting "Treasure of Marco Polo," the Barks story that really
> >_should_ go with the cover they've got. This will be the CBL-edited
> >version.
>
> Why is the amulet story banned? (BTW, I thought "Treasure of Marco Polo" was
> banned.)
My guess is that it's due to the plentiful of ethnical stereotyping in it.
Another factor could be that the story is unusually hard-boiled; the villains
in here are genuinely *bad*.
OTOH, "Treasure of Marco Polo" *also* contains both ethnical stereotyping
and loads of violence, so...
Actually this is one of my favourites among Strobl's long stories. It would
have deserved that reprint...
---
Anders Engwall
"Alle man står still som en stum fisk, tills vi hittar den knyckta stångkorven!"
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V96 Issue #170
******************************************
Anders Engwall
Discooo....Disco Duck! Awk! Awk! Awk!
Message 111 -
1996-08-12 at 13:55:41
AUGIE:
> HARRY:
>
> > > * DONALD DUCK #300
> > > "Disco Ducks" (!) by Fred Milton and Daan Jippes (10-pages)
> >
> > Why is there a "(!)" behind "Disco Ducks"?
>
> It's an interesting title which sends certain pictures into my mind
> which send several chills down my back. Disco is dead, folks. =)
> Actually, it also reminds me of that album from my childhood - was it
> "Disco Duck"? Or "Disco Mickey" or something close to that.
"Disco Duck" was a monstrously big hit single for one Dick Rees in 1976 or
1977. It also happens to be one of the cheesiest pieces of music from one of
the cheesiest time periods ever, pop culturally speaking. However, it *is*
rather amusing with a reference to contemporary (OK, *then*-contemporary)
pop culture like this...
---
Anders Engwall
"Alle man står still som en stum fisk, tills vi hittar den knyckta stångkorven!"
> HARRY:
>
> > > * DONALD DUCK #300
> > > "Disco Ducks" (!) by Fred Milton and Daan Jippes (10-pages)
> >
> > Why is there a "(!)" behind "Disco Ducks"?
>
> It's an interesting title which sends certain pictures into my mind
> which send several chills down my back. Disco is dead, folks. =)
> Actually, it also reminds me of that album from my childhood - was it
> "Disco Duck"? Or "Disco Mickey" or something close to that.
"Disco Duck" was a monstrously big hit single for one Dick Rees in 1976 or
1977. It also happens to be one of the cheesiest pieces of music from one of
the cheesiest time periods ever, pop culturally speaking. However, it *is*
rather amusing with a reference to contemporary (OK, *then*-contemporary)
pop culture like this...
---
Anders Engwall
"Alle man står still som en stum fisk, tills vi hittar den knyckta stångkorven!"
Per Starback
...and welcome to Pieter van Cleef and Jos Beekman
Message 112 -
1996-08-12 at 18:35:59
Arthur wrote:
> What? Gary Leach AND Byron Erickson joined the list? That is
> just GREAT! Welcome, you both! I hope you'll enjoy your stay here!
> I also hope you'll contribute to the list a lot,
Byron answered that he probably doesn't have much time for that.
I'm sure the same goes for Gary Leach, as he was hesitant that he
would have time to read the list at all.
Today I want to welcome editors of the Dutch Donald Duck Weekly,
Pieter van Cleef and Jos Beekman (with a shared account) who just
joined the list! Welcome!
There seems to be more and more Disney comics pros on this list each
month now...
--
Per Starback <(Email removed)> http://www.update.uu.se/~starback
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
> What? Gary Leach AND Byron Erickson joined the list? That is
> just GREAT! Welcome, you both! I hope you'll enjoy your stay here!
> I also hope you'll contribute to the list a lot,
Byron answered that he probably doesn't have much time for that.
I'm sure the same goes for Gary Leach, as he was hesitant that he
would have time to read the list at all.
Today I want to welcome editors of the Dutch Donald Duck Weekly,
Pieter van Cleef and Jos Beekman (with a shared account) who just
joined the list! Welcome!
There seems to be more and more Disney comics pros on this list each
month now...
--
Per Starback <(Email removed)> http://www.update.uu.se/~starback
"Life is but a gamble! Let flipism chart your ramble!"
Arthur De Wolf
Welcome to two more Dutch members!
Message 113 -
1996-08-12 at 18:55:03
Hi!
What? Pieter van Cleef AND Jos Beekman joined the list? That is
just GREAT! Welcome you both! I hope you'll enjoy your stay here!
This mailing list is really great! I bet you'll like it! It's SO cool
that more and more Disney comics pros come to this list. And now there
are even two more DUTCH ones! Just perfect! Harry, Daniel and I are the
only three Dutch members of this list (and two more lurkers who never
write anything to the list). Harry Fluks usually got information from
Frank Jonker about what stories were to be published in Dutch Disney
comics. I hope we can now get the info straight from you guys! I have
plenty of questions to ask you both, so maybe I'll just start with
a few:
1. Can you both tell something about what you exactly do at
the Donald Duck Weekly?
2. Why are Don Rosa's stories not printed in the weekly?
3. What will happen with the "Oom Dagobert"-series after the
12 chapters of the "Life of Scrooge" are all printed?
4. Will there be another story by Sander Gulien printed in
the weekly soon? I really like his artwork.
5. I've heard that Daan Jippes is still working on Barks
Junior Woodchucks-scripts. What's the status? And will
Mau Heymans make more?
That's all for now! Oh yeah ... one suggestion: Please print Rosa's
latest story "A matter of some Gravity" (D96001) as soon as possible in
the Extra. It's one of the best and most funny Duck-story I've ever read
since Barks. It's brilliant!
Bye!
Arthur de Wolf -- Roosendaal, the Netherlands
email: (Email removed)
homepage: www.pi.net/~wolfman/disney
What? Pieter van Cleef AND Jos Beekman joined the list? That is
just GREAT! Welcome you both! I hope you'll enjoy your stay here!
This mailing list is really great! I bet you'll like it! It's SO cool
that more and more Disney comics pros come to this list. And now there
are even two more DUTCH ones! Just perfect! Harry, Daniel and I are the
only three Dutch members of this list (and two more lurkers who never
write anything to the list). Harry Fluks usually got information from
Frank Jonker about what stories were to be published in Dutch Disney
comics. I hope we can now get the info straight from you guys! I have
plenty of questions to ask you both, so maybe I'll just start with
a few:
1. Can you both tell something about what you exactly do at
the Donald Duck Weekly?
2. Why are Don Rosa's stories not printed in the weekly?
3. What will happen with the "Oom Dagobert"-series after the
12 chapters of the "Life of Scrooge" are all printed?
4. Will there be another story by Sander Gulien printed in
the weekly soon? I really like his artwork.
5. I've heard that Daan Jippes is still working on Barks
Junior Woodchucks-scripts. What's the status? And will
Mau Heymans make more?
That's all for now! Oh yeah ... one suggestion: Please print Rosa's
latest story "A matter of some Gravity" (D96001) as soon as possible in
the Extra. It's one of the best and most funny Duck-story I've ever read
since Barks. It's brilliant!
Bye!
Arthur de Wolf -- Roosendaal, the Netherlands
email: (Email removed)
homepage: www.pi.net/~wolfman/disney
Augie De Blieck Jr.
Gladstone Gazette
Message 114 -
1996-08-12 at 20:37:06
JONATHAN:
> Wow! Gladstone sure cleaned up their act with THE GLADSTONE GAZETTE! The
> latest issue (no. 7) was eight pages long, and with letters on all pages!
Gee whiz, imagine if they could find the room to run some of those in
the comics themselves instead of some of those well-hidden ads they
call "The Year That Was..." Sheesh
> AUGIE:
> Your letters about DD 295, US 297, and DDMM 5 were in there. Good move
Great. (I think.) Thanks for letting me know. I wrote those when there
was a glimmer of hope that the letters would start reappearing in the
comics themselves. When that hope diminished again, I stopped again.
Would anyone here mind photocopying the Gazette for me? Or, at least,
just the relevant pages? I'd really like to see this and have a copy for
my "collection."
-Augie, hoping for a day when Gladstone prints comics again rather than
ads with stories unfortunately placed between them - I'm
beginning to wonder if WDC&S is their idea of a public service
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Augie De Blieck Jr. * (Email removed) * (Email removed)
Keeper of the VR.5 FAQ * http://daniel.drew.edu/~adebliec/index.html
"It's 10 p.m. Do you know where your FBI file is?"
> Wow! Gladstone sure cleaned up their act with THE GLADSTONE GAZETTE! The
> latest issue (no. 7) was eight pages long, and with letters on all pages!
Gee whiz, imagine if they could find the room to run some of those in
the comics themselves instead of some of those well-hidden ads they
call "The Year That Was..." Sheesh
> AUGIE:
> Your letters about DD 295, US 297, and DDMM 5 were in there. Good move
Great. (I think.) Thanks for letting me know. I wrote those when there
was a glimmer of hope that the letters would start reappearing in the
comics themselves. When that hope diminished again, I stopped again.
Would anyone here mind photocopying the Gazette for me? Or, at least,
just the relevant pages? I'd really like to see this and have a copy for
my "collection."
-Augie, hoping for a day when Gladstone prints comics again rather than
ads with stories unfortunately placed between them - I'm
beginning to wonder if WDC&S is their idea of a public service
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Augie De Blieck Jr. * (Email removed) * (Email removed)
Keeper of the VR.5 FAQ * http://daniel.drew.edu/~adebliec/index.html
"It's 10 p.m. Do you know where your FBI file is?"
Gary Leach
Opening remarks
Message 115 -
1996-08-12 at 23:51:45
To all:
Ah, I'm back! And better than ever!
Well, older and wiser, maybe. Definitely older. Anyway, here's to all of
you who've kept going on this, while I sputtered out a while back. You guys
got stamina!
Thanks for all the warm greetings, too.
While taking a break from my fierce napping (I'm way behind - hi!
backatcha, By!), I thought I might fill everyone in on the new Gladstone
web site. It came about because, quite to my surprise, Bruce Hamilton (the
head man, the top banana, the big cheese) hit the door last May, after an
around-the-world vacation, all fired up at the idea of Gladstone getting
"on the Web." Now, Bruce will be the first to admit that he only has the
sketchiest idea of what the Internet is all about, but there I was, newly
web-savvy (my wife and I had set up our personal ISP account just two
months prior), and ready to put the idea into action. Or almost ready; I
had to learn HTML first, but that proved relatively painless (and kinda
fun!). Content proved to be more daunting, but as I was also working on our
latest product catalog at the time, my brain was in the proper gear. The
site's now up, and the rest will be history.
I would like at this point to say a special thanks to Dave Rawson. The
present version of the site owes a great deal to his feedback on the very
first version.
The "voice" of Gladstone on the site will, in the main, be mine, though
others - including Bruce Hamilton, John Clark, Geoffrey Blum, and Gary
Gabner - will be contributing. I certainly don't hope - or intend - to do
everything!
Moving on, Byron Erickson wrote:
>I really like Disney comics, but since I spend
>my days working on them, I'd really rather spend my mythical freetime on
>other interests.
Nicely put. It could be our joint epitaph. For my part, I rejoined the
mailing list to read what everyone else has to say, not what I might babble
on about.
Night, all!
Gary
Ah, I'm back! And better than ever!
Well, older and wiser, maybe. Definitely older. Anyway, here's to all of
you who've kept going on this, while I sputtered out a while back. You guys
got stamina!
Thanks for all the warm greetings, too.
While taking a break from my fierce napping (I'm way behind - hi!
backatcha, By!), I thought I might fill everyone in on the new Gladstone
web site. It came about because, quite to my surprise, Bruce Hamilton (the
head man, the top banana, the big cheese) hit the door last May, after an
around-the-world vacation, all fired up at the idea of Gladstone getting
"on the Web." Now, Bruce will be the first to admit that he only has the
sketchiest idea of what the Internet is all about, but there I was, newly
web-savvy (my wife and I had set up our personal ISP account just two
months prior), and ready to put the idea into action. Or almost ready; I
had to learn HTML first, but that proved relatively painless (and kinda
fun!). Content proved to be more daunting, but as I was also working on our
latest product catalog at the time, my brain was in the proper gear. The
site's now up, and the rest will be history.
I would like at this point to say a special thanks to Dave Rawson. The
present version of the site owes a great deal to his feedback on the very
first version.
The "voice" of Gladstone on the site will, in the main, be mine, though
others - including Bruce Hamilton, John Clark, Geoffrey Blum, and Gary
Gabner - will be contributing. I certainly don't hope - or intend - to do
everything!
Moving on, Byron Erickson wrote:
>I really like Disney comics, but since I spend
>my days working on them, I'd really rather spend my mythical freetime on
>other interests.
Nicely put. It could be our joint epitaph. For my part, I rejoined the
mailing list to read what everyone else has to say, not what I might babble
on about.
Night, all!
Gary
Harry Fluks
Welcome to Van Cleef and Beekman / question for Rosa
Message 116 -
1996-08-13 at 00:34:37
Per wrote:
> Today I want to welcome editors of the Dutch Donald Duck Weekly,
> Pieter van Cleef and Jos Beekman (with a shared account) who just
> joined the list! Welcome!
Yes, welcome from me, too!
Pieter also sent me "The Holy Book" (in electronic form). This contains
all stories produced in Holland since 1980, including codes and credits!
So our Database will have a MAJOR Dutch update in a few weeks (after I
converted the data)!
DON ROSA:
One entry in Pieter's list showed your "Treasure under Glass". The Dutch
reserved a code for it, but didn't buy the story on second thought.
Does this mean you made this story *before* the 3 stories that have
an earlier D-code (D 90057 - "The Master Landscapist", D 90147 - "On
Stolen Time" and D 90161 - "The Duck Who Fell To Earth") and submitted
it to Egmont later (code D 90227)?
Was the story all finished when you offered it to the Dutch, or was there
only the script?
(I like to know in which order you made your stories.)
--Harry.
> Today I want to welcome editors of the Dutch Donald Duck Weekly,
> Pieter van Cleef and Jos Beekman (with a shared account) who just
> joined the list! Welcome!
Yes, welcome from me, too!
Pieter also sent me "The Holy Book" (in electronic form). This contains
all stories produced in Holland since 1980, including codes and credits!
So our Database will have a MAJOR Dutch update in a few weeks (after I
converted the data)!
DON ROSA:
One entry in Pieter's list showed your "Treasure under Glass". The Dutch
reserved a code for it, but didn't buy the story on second thought.
Does this mean you made this story *before* the 3 stories that have
an earlier D-code (D 90057 - "The Master Landscapist", D 90147 - "On
Stolen Time" and D 90161 - "The Duck Who Fell To Earth") and submitted
it to Egmont later (code D 90227)?
Was the story all finished when you offered it to the Dutch, or was there
only the script?
(I like to know in which order you made your stories.)
--Harry.
Harry Fluks
Disney Adventures Volume 6 #12
Message 117 -
1996-08-13 at 00:40:06
STEVEN ROWE:
> Since it is apparently my lot in life to document Disney Adventures; let me
> do so (...)
> Anybody want me to continue mentioning these as I read them?
I'm always interested in contents of Disney comics (past, present and future),
for our Disney comics Database. I'd also like to know though, if the story you
mentioned was the only story in the comic, and whether it had a code.
--Harry.
> Since it is apparently my lot in life to document Disney Adventures; let me
> do so (...)
> Anybody want me to continue mentioning these as I read them?
I'm always interested in contents of Disney comics (past, present and future),
for our Disney comics Database. I'd also like to know though, if the story you
mentioned was the only story in the comic, and whether it had a code.
--Harry.
Markoff
UNCLE $CROOGE 300
Message 118 -
1996-08-13 at 07:49:13
I just read Uncle $crooge 300. On the cover, I liked the foreground colors,
but I'm not so pleased with the white-on-blue--I think it would have been
better as black-on-blue. Why did they allow the "uncensored" version to be
printed inside and not outside?--I guess it's less "offensive" if it's less
prominent.
The selection puzzled me. "The Sunken Yacht" isn't really a milestone in the
development of Scrooge, and was reprinted a bit too recently in Gladstone's
DD Adv. 15 (1989), which can still be ordered from the back issue
department. The only "landmark" status it has is that it was read by
engineer Karl Kroeyer, who, inspired by it, used a method similar to the one
shown in the story to raise a sunken livestock transport ship from the
Persian Gulf in 1964. Ironically, that info was also left out of U$ 300. I
think a better Barks selection would have been the first appearance of the
Beagle Boys.
The Van Horn selection, although fairly good, made even less sense, even
moreso because it was a "DuckTales" story. For landmarks, I think a more
understandable choice would have been the one-pager from U$ 226 (WVH's first
story) plus "Floating Alone" (U$A 6, 9 pages), Van Horn's first full-fledged
$crooge story.
About the Blum version of "Go Slowly Sand of Time:" whereas the valley is
Hunza in this version, in Barks' original (printed in Celestial Arts' UNCLE
SCROOGE: HIS LIFE AND TIMES in 1981) it was Khunza! Also, this Egmont
version changed the ending a little to make it "hilarious irony," but I like
the CB version better. I guess you just can't beat the original!
"Nobody's Business" was also good, but at the time Don's habit of Barksian
references needed a little toning down. As in "Mythological Menagerie," some
"coincidences," such as the pop-up of Azure Blue and Sharky in one panel,
seem uncomfortably forced and without purpose. The artwork is also a little
crude. But not anymore! Evidence of the improvement is the cover and
"Anything But Those."
In general, I feel that this issue, like WDC&S 600, was ruined by cheap,
newsprint-like paper.
--Jonathan Markoff
but I'm not so pleased with the white-on-blue--I think it would have been
better as black-on-blue. Why did they allow the "uncensored" version to be
printed inside and not outside?--I guess it's less "offensive" if it's less
prominent.
The selection puzzled me. "The Sunken Yacht" isn't really a milestone in the
development of Scrooge, and was reprinted a bit too recently in Gladstone's
DD Adv. 15 (1989), which can still be ordered from the back issue
department. The only "landmark" status it has is that it was read by
engineer Karl Kroeyer, who, inspired by it, used a method similar to the one
shown in the story to raise a sunken livestock transport ship from the
Persian Gulf in 1964. Ironically, that info was also left out of U$ 300. I
think a better Barks selection would have been the first appearance of the
Beagle Boys.
The Van Horn selection, although fairly good, made even less sense, even
moreso because it was a "DuckTales" story. For landmarks, I think a more
understandable choice would have been the one-pager from U$ 226 (WVH's first
story) plus "Floating Alone" (U$A 6, 9 pages), Van Horn's first full-fledged
$crooge story.
About the Blum version of "Go Slowly Sand of Time:" whereas the valley is
Hunza in this version, in Barks' original (printed in Celestial Arts' UNCLE
SCROOGE: HIS LIFE AND TIMES in 1981) it was Khunza! Also, this Egmont
version changed the ending a little to make it "hilarious irony," but I like
the CB version better. I guess you just can't beat the original!
"Nobody's Business" was also good, but at the time Don's habit of Barksian
references needed a little toning down. As in "Mythological Menagerie," some
"coincidences," such as the pop-up of Azure Blue and Sharky in one panel,
seem uncomfortably forced and without purpose. The artwork is also a little
crude. But not anymore! Evidence of the improvement is the cover and
"Anything But Those."
In general, I feel that this issue, like WDC&S 600, was ruined by cheap,
newsprint-like paper.
--Jonathan Markoff
Don Rosa
Disney comics Digest V96 #170
Message 119 -
1996-08-13 at 15:09:00
ERIC:
??? Why would you ask me if there was ever a Captain Kentucky unless you
already knew there was? You must know I did a "Captain Kentucky" half-page
comic strip in the local major newspaper in 1979-81, right.
"The Son of the Sun" was the first professional comic work I'd ever done.
I'd done stuff for my school papers and stuff for fanzines for decades, but
that was all for free, just as a hobby. I was paid for "Captain Kentucky"
but it was still just a hobby since the pay was neglible -- it was $25 per
week, and that would average out to about $2 per hour just for the drawing
(not counting the writing which I'd do in my head during the day at the
construction company). And that first professional job I'd ever done ("The
Son of the Sun") was nominated for a Harvey Award -- I was rawthuh stunned
and proud of that.
I'll fire this at you since you've been the one mentioning it: times are
being set for my visit to the Cartoon Art Museum in San Francisco on Sept.
28. There will first be a signing at Joe Field's "Flying Colors" comic store
in the suburbs at 11 Am - 2 PM, then a signing at the Museum at 3-5 PM then
their reception at 6:30-8:30. I don't know who comes to the reception,
whether it's open to everyone or you need to make a donation to the
museum... I'm assuming they'll let me in, no questions asked.
And I've been very remiss in posting the particulars of my trip to Niagara
Falls this weekend. I will be at the 2-day comic show at the American Legion
Post, 136 Veteran's Dr., Aug. 17 & 18. Other guests include Roger Stern and
Peter David, last I heard, and others.
TRYG:
As to that gag about Omnisolve penetrating a "Disney contract" in my story
-- it's not at all a matter of what *I* can get past any censors. What I put
in my scripts is my business... what the editor chooses to tell the
letterers to put into the story is up to him. The editor is the person to be
held responsible for something like that... I put all sorts of stuff in my
scripts sometimes, just to amuse Byron... but if he includes some of those
secret jokes in his "official" script transcription, woe be to him, not me.
But I doubt if Disney minded that joke at all. Don't you think they might
LIKE people to get the idea that a Disney contract is harder than Impervium
or Forbidium? They probably endorsed that gag.
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V96 Issue #171
******************************************
??? Why would you ask me if there was ever a Captain Kentucky unless you
already knew there was? You must know I did a "Captain Kentucky" half-page
comic strip in the local major newspaper in 1979-81, right.
"The Son of the Sun" was the first professional comic work I'd ever done.
I'd done stuff for my school papers and stuff for fanzines for decades, but
that was all for free, just as a hobby. I was paid for "Captain Kentucky"
but it was still just a hobby since the pay was neglible -- it was $25 per
week, and that would average out to about $2 per hour just for the drawing
(not counting the writing which I'd do in my head during the day at the
construction company). And that first professional job I'd ever done ("The
Son of the Sun") was nominated for a Harvey Award -- I was rawthuh stunned
and proud of that.
I'll fire this at you since you've been the one mentioning it: times are
being set for my visit to the Cartoon Art Museum in San Francisco on Sept.
28. There will first be a signing at Joe Field's "Flying Colors" comic store
in the suburbs at 11 Am - 2 PM, then a signing at the Museum at 3-5 PM then
their reception at 6:30-8:30. I don't know who comes to the reception,
whether it's open to everyone or you need to make a donation to the
museum... I'm assuming they'll let me in, no questions asked.
And I've been very remiss in posting the particulars of my trip to Niagara
Falls this weekend. I will be at the 2-day comic show at the American Legion
Post, 136 Veteran's Dr., Aug. 17 & 18. Other guests include Roger Stern and
Peter David, last I heard, and others.
TRYG:
As to that gag about Omnisolve penetrating a "Disney contract" in my story
-- it's not at all a matter of what *I* can get past any censors. What I put
in my scripts is my business... what the editor chooses to tell the
letterers to put into the story is up to him. The editor is the person to be
held responsible for something like that... I put all sorts of stuff in my
scripts sometimes, just to amuse Byron... but if he includes some of those
secret jokes in his "official" script transcription, woe be to him, not me.
But I doubt if Disney minded that joke at all. Don't you think they might
LIKE people to get the idea that a Disney contract is harder than Impervium
or Forbidium? They probably endorsed that gag.
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V96 Issue #171
******************************************
Userpro
Disney comics Digest V96 #166
Message 120 -
1996-08-13 at 16:01:53
What is the disney http; address on the internet?