ETA BETA:
HF>Thanks, but I don't think big indexes like yours
HF>should be posted to the mailing list...
>
EB>Well, I've limited my list to '64-'65 to keep it short...
But why should you post it TWICE? ;-) ;-)
Marco
http://marcobar.cce.unifi.it/Fumetti
Author
Topic: 199802
(347 messages)
Marco Barlotti
To err is human, but to persevere...!
Message 46 -
1998-02-04 at 00:54:45
Augie De Blieck Jr.
Gladstone in April 1998
Message 47 -
1998-02-04 at 00:55:53
From PREVIEWS p. 258
UNCLE $CROOGE AND DONALD DUCK #1
Another $15-TPB for $9.95 format. Includes "The Pixilated Parrot," "All At
Sea," and a bunch of Junior Woodchucks stories.
8x11, 80 pages, $9.95
WALT DISNEY'S COMICS IN COLOR
Same format as above. This time featuring Donald Duck in "Secret of Honorico,"
"Go Slowly Sands of Time, and "the famous 14-page Grandma Duck story from the
$1500-collectible _Vacation Parade_ - a story that will not be reprinted in the
Carl Barks Library in Color series.
8x11, 80 pages, $9.95
UNCLE $CROOGE ADVENTURES IN COLOR #43
"Lost Beneath the Sea" and "The Lemonade Fling" from U$ #46
8x11, 32 pages, $9.95
UNCLE $CROOGE ADVENTURES IN COLOR #44
"The Thrifty Spendthrift" and "The Many Faces of Magica De Spell" from U$ 47
and 48
8x11, 32 pages, $9.95
[And how wrong does it look to list boks back to back with the same price point
- one containing close to 50 pages more than the other? Sheesh]
UNCLE $CROOGE #310
"The Sign of the Triple Distelfink" by Don Rosa (starring Gladstone Gander)
"The Spider Yarn" and "A Sticky Story" and "a classic Barks' Scrooge tale in
which Donald and U$ learn that a treasure of their piratical forebears is
buried on a desert isle." Cover is detail of Barks' painting based on
"Treasure Island."
6 4pages $6.95
WDC&S #625
WVH cover
"Mummery's the Word" by WVH
"The Egg Collector" - Mickey Mouse by David Gerstein and Ferioli
"Worst Class Mail" by Carl Barks
"Goofy and the Reluctant Dragon" from Summer Fun #2
"Gyro and Gladstone" by Barks from Four Color #1095
"Bucky Bug" by our very own Don Markstein
Daily Donald Duck reprint strips! Whoo-hoo!
65 pages $6.95
Now, I know better. I know and understand all the reasons why things with
Gladstone are as bas as they are. (Well, maybe not "all," but you get the
point.)
But it just looks incredibly bad to see this:
Page Count - Price
------------------
32 - $9.95
64 - $6.95
80 - $9.95
It looks incredibly wacky.
-Augie
----------------------------------------------------------------
Augie De Blieck Jr. * (Email removed) * (Email removed) <*>
Pipeline Commentary and Review: New Comic Book Commentary
Every Sunday: http://www.nic.com/~augie/pipeline/pipeline.htm
UNCLE $CROOGE AND DONALD DUCK #1
Another $15-TPB for $9.95 format. Includes "The Pixilated Parrot," "All At
Sea," and a bunch of Junior Woodchucks stories.
8x11, 80 pages, $9.95
WALT DISNEY'S COMICS IN COLOR
Same format as above. This time featuring Donald Duck in "Secret of Honorico,"
"Go Slowly Sands of Time, and "the famous 14-page Grandma Duck story from the
$1500-collectible _Vacation Parade_ - a story that will not be reprinted in the
Carl Barks Library in Color series.
8x11, 80 pages, $9.95
UNCLE $CROOGE ADVENTURES IN COLOR #43
"Lost Beneath the Sea" and "The Lemonade Fling" from U$ #46
8x11, 32 pages, $9.95
UNCLE $CROOGE ADVENTURES IN COLOR #44
"The Thrifty Spendthrift" and "The Many Faces of Magica De Spell" from U$ 47
and 48
8x11, 32 pages, $9.95
[And how wrong does it look to list boks back to back with the same price point
- one containing close to 50 pages more than the other? Sheesh]
UNCLE $CROOGE #310
"The Sign of the Triple Distelfink" by Don Rosa (starring Gladstone Gander)
"The Spider Yarn" and "A Sticky Story" and "a classic Barks' Scrooge tale in
which Donald and U$ learn that a treasure of their piratical forebears is
buried on a desert isle." Cover is detail of Barks' painting based on
"Treasure Island."
6 4pages $6.95
WDC&S #625
WVH cover
"Mummery's the Word" by WVH
"The Egg Collector" - Mickey Mouse by David Gerstein and Ferioli
"Worst Class Mail" by Carl Barks
"Goofy and the Reluctant Dragon" from Summer Fun #2
"Gyro and Gladstone" by Barks from Four Color #1095
"Bucky Bug" by our very own Don Markstein
Daily Donald Duck reprint strips! Whoo-hoo!
65 pages $6.95
Now, I know better. I know and understand all the reasons why things with
Gladstone are as bas as they are. (Well, maybe not "all," but you get the
point.)
But it just looks incredibly bad to see this:
Page Count - Price
------------------
32 - $9.95
64 - $6.95
80 - $9.95
It looks incredibly wacky.
-Augie
----------------------------------------------------------------
Augie De Blieck Jr. * (Email removed) * (Email removed) <*>
Pipeline Commentary and Review: New Comic Book Commentary
Every Sunday: http://www.nic.com/~augie/pipeline/pipeline.htm
Merlin Haas
Ducks in Canada
Message 48 -
1998-02-04 at 01:31:26
Shaun Knowler wrote:
>Anyway, would anyone like to help me form a list of Duck stories that >are set in Canada?
>
>I'll start it off with;
>
>BARKS:
>"Back To the Klondike"
>"Land of the Pygmy Indians"
Add "Donald Duck and the Golden Helmet" FC 408. The Ducks find the
Golden Helmet on the coast of Labrador.
best -- Merlin Haas
>Anyway, would anyone like to help me form a list of Duck stories that >are set in Canada?
>
>I'll start it off with;
>
>BARKS:
>"Back To the Klondike"
>"Land of the Pygmy Indians"
Add "Donald Duck and the Golden Helmet" FC 408. The Ducks find the
Golden Helmet on the coast of Labrador.
best -- Merlin Haas
Katie Sullivan
Fethry and Uff da
Message 49 -
1998-02-04 at 04:07:46
Re: Uff da and variations thereof:
Thanks everyone for the information!
Re: Fethry on DuckTales...
I was mistaken. It was a hat with ear flaps. But I still thought he
looked rather Fethry-ish.
Katie
Thanks everyone for the information!
Re: Fethry on DuckTales...
I was mistaken. It was a hat with ear flaps. But I still thought he
looked rather Fethry-ish.
Katie
Ventnor
Apology to Michael Naiman
Message 50 -
1998-02-04 at 05:14:11
A short while ago I complained to the mailing-list about the non-arrival of
some comics from Michael Naiman. It turns out I was hasty, and I hereby
apologize to Michael for any embarrassment I've caused him. In my defence I
can only say that when one party involved in a transaction sends material
airmail, the other party should do so too.
So, again, Michael: my full apologies!
David King.
"Mankind has not so much power to receive as the genius has power to give."
Schopenhauer
some comics from Michael Naiman. It turns out I was hasty, and I hereby
apologize to Michael for any embarrassment I've caused him. In my defence I
can only say that when one party involved in a transaction sends material
airmail, the other party should do so too.
So, again, Michael: my full apologies!
David King.
"Mankind has not so much power to receive as the genius has power to give."
Schopenhauer
Dave Rawson
Disney comics Digest V98 #40
Message 51 -
1998-02-04 at 05:32:49
Kriton Kyrimis <(Email removed)>:
> > 27% of adults in the United States still believe the Sun revolves
> > around the Earth!
>
> It's probably the same kind of people who do so because it says so in
> the bible.
I don't think so. Very, very few people take the Bible literally,
choosing instead to simply pick and choose what they wish to
bolster their own pre-existing convictions.
Fundamentalist-Chrisitan financed polls show that folks who share
self-described fundamentalist *belief* don't differ in any
substantial way from average American *behavior*.
Regardless, I think it's more a matter of *forgetting* (when
polled) the Earth revolves around the Sun, rather than denying
that it does, or choosing to believe otherwise. I think it's more
that it's just not important for folks to know as far as their
daily lives are concerned.
It's appalling ignorance, but I don't think it's willful
ignorance.
> If only these people would take the bible as the allegory that it is,
Different folks have different needs and different ways of
achieving emotional understanding, or conviction. I think there's
room for religion to appeal at a lot of levels. One's ceiling is
another's floor.
> rather than take it literally,
Few do. Even among self-described fundamentalists. Only the truly
Orthodox Christian or Jew observes all the Levitical injunctions
regarding health and hygiene. (If you ever want to make a
foam-at-the-mouth judgementalist blanch, question them in quoted
detail about the degree they observe the rules for dealing with
the menstruating women in their households.)
> they'd be surprised to find how much modern science is in accordance
> with the bible--in fact, they're in total agreement!
That's my experience. I find one of the outstanding qualities of
Truth is that it withstands anything.
--
riverrun past Eve's and Adam's from swerve of shore to bend of bay
(Email removed) -=*=- http://users.aol.com/dcrawson/home.htm
> > 27% of adults in the United States still believe the Sun revolves
> > around the Earth!
>
> It's probably the same kind of people who do so because it says so in
> the bible.
I don't think so. Very, very few people take the Bible literally,
choosing instead to simply pick and choose what they wish to
bolster their own pre-existing convictions.
Fundamentalist-Chrisitan financed polls show that folks who share
self-described fundamentalist *belief* don't differ in any
substantial way from average American *behavior*.
Regardless, I think it's more a matter of *forgetting* (when
polled) the Earth revolves around the Sun, rather than denying
that it does, or choosing to believe otherwise. I think it's more
that it's just not important for folks to know as far as their
daily lives are concerned.
It's appalling ignorance, but I don't think it's willful
ignorance.
> If only these people would take the bible as the allegory that it is,
Different folks have different needs and different ways of
achieving emotional understanding, or conviction. I think there's
room for religion to appeal at a lot of levels. One's ceiling is
another's floor.
> rather than take it literally,
Few do. Even among self-described fundamentalists. Only the truly
Orthodox Christian or Jew observes all the Levitical injunctions
regarding health and hygiene. (If you ever want to make a
foam-at-the-mouth judgementalist blanch, question them in quoted
detail about the degree they observe the rules for dealing with
the menstruating women in their households.)
> they'd be surprised to find how much modern science is in accordance
> with the bible--in fact, they're in total agreement!
That's my experience. I find one of the outstanding qualities of
Truth is that it withstands anything.
--
riverrun past Eve's and Adam's from swerve of shore to bend of bay
(Email removed) -=*=- http://users.aol.com/dcrawson/home.htm
Dave Rawson
Disney comics Digest V98 #41
Message 52 -
1998-02-04 at 05:45:01
(Email removed):
> I don't think the art [for THE GROUCH KINGS -- D96186] is a complete
> departure in style for Branca. He's only done one other of my stories
> and the art had much a similar quality of frantic lunacy.
Then it must be your writing inspires him!
--
riverrun past Eve's and Adam's from swerve of shore to bend of bay
(Email removed) -=*=- http://users.aol.com/dcrawson/home.htm
> I don't think the art [for THE GROUCH KINGS -- D96186] is a complete
> departure in style for Branca. He's only done one other of my stories
> and the art had much a similar quality of frantic lunacy.
Then it must be your writing inspires him!
--
riverrun past Eve's and Adam's from swerve of shore to bend of bay
(Email removed) -=*=- http://users.aol.com/dcrawson/home.htm
SRoweCanoe
The F guy
Message 53 -
1998-02-04 at 07:23:42
While I can't say too much about that F guy (I.m not sure that I've read many
of his stories), but I can respond to <<Seeing that F. was a hippy/beatnik
type of character, drawing from my own
language experiences from the late 60s...does this indicate that Fethry was
, as we used to say, "getting a buzz-on?" ...imbibing or otherwise???>>
I think that this was a case of the writer using outdated 40s slang. "What's
buzzin" Cousin", was apparently hep talk 20 years earlier (tip of the hat to
Tex Avery cartoons which include that phrase).
How many writers of the Disney overseas 60s crew are still around?
Steven Rowe
of his stories), but I can respond to <<Seeing that F. was a hippy/beatnik
type of character, drawing from my own
language experiences from the late 60s...does this indicate that Fethry was
, as we used to say, "getting a buzz-on?" ...imbibing or otherwise???>>
I think that this was a case of the writer using outdated 40s slang. "What's
buzzin" Cousin", was apparently hep talk 20 years earlier (tip of the hat to
Tex Avery cartoons which include that phrase).
How many writers of the Disney overseas 60s crew are still around?
Steven Rowe
Fluks, H.W.
Interesting subjects
Message 54 -
1998-02-04 at 10:27:39
EB:
>>Thanks, but I don't think big indexes like yours
>>should be posted to the mailing list...
>Well, I've limited my list to '64-'65 to keep it short...
>I understand it is unfair to "steal" precious digest space from
>such interesting items like Duck Tales, imperial measurement,
>how Americans call themselves or, lately, even the bible, with
>lists of *comics*, and I do apologies about it, but how, then,
>do I seek for contributors' help in identifying those stories,
>which was my purpose ?
If that was your purpose, then it's OK with me. And I
never said that the other subjects *are* on-topic. Maybe
I should have complained about that, too.
But, MARCO: I do not agree that Fethry is the *only*
on-topic subject these days. Stefan Dio"s and others
have (or had) an interesting discussion about translating
or re-scripting Disney comics.
--Harry.
><><><><
>>Thanks, but I don't think big indexes like yours
>>should be posted to the mailing list...
>Well, I've limited my list to '64-'65 to keep it short...
>I understand it is unfair to "steal" precious digest space from
>such interesting items like Duck Tales, imperial measurement,
>how Americans call themselves or, lately, even the bible, with
>lists of *comics*, and I do apologies about it, but how, then,
>do I seek for contributors' help in identifying those stories,
>which was my purpose ?
If that was your purpose, then it's OK with me. And I
never said that the other subjects *are* on-topic. Maybe
I should have complained about that, too.
But, MARCO: I do not agree that Fethry is the *only*
on-topic subject these days. Stefan Dio"s and others
have (or had) an interesting discussion about translating
or re-scripting Disney comics.
--Harry.
><><><><
PAULO CEZAR LOPES BARRETO,BARRETO
Fethry a googol fathoms under the sea
Message 55 -
1998-02-04 at 16:46:44
MARCO:
>> How about one googolth or one googolplexth of an inch? :-)
>Hey, don't cheat: that's metric! One googol equals ten to the 100th power,
and one googolplex equals ten to the googolth power, so that's
a-b-s-o-l-u-t-e-l-y metric!!!
Not quite: please note I'm referring to one googol(plex)th of an *inch*!
Just to follow the custom of dividing the inch in negative powers of
2, so to make it less metric, we can talk a 2^-googolplex of an
inch... more or less how high are my hopes to see the U.S. abandoning
the traditional English measures.
> By the way, Paulo (real reason why I'm writing this), you haven't told us
yet about the Fethry-king-of undersea-world subject! Is that too a spin-off
in $crooge's newspaper?
I can't say a thing about him. I've read a number of Pena Kid and
Pena das Selvas stories, but the Fethry-undersea-king stories are
completely unknown to me (except for the ML discussion, of course).
SOEREN:
> In Denmark we would say: "Uha da"
Ok, but what does it really mean?
[]s
P.C.Barreto
(Email removed)
>> How about one googolth or one googolplexth of an inch? :-)
>Hey, don't cheat: that's metric! One googol equals ten to the 100th power,
and one googolplex equals ten to the googolth power, so that's
a-b-s-o-l-u-t-e-l-y metric!!!
Not quite: please note I'm referring to one googol(plex)th of an *inch*!
Just to follow the custom of dividing the inch in negative powers of
2, so to make it less metric, we can talk a 2^-googolplex of an
inch... more or less how high are my hopes to see the U.S. abandoning
the traditional English measures.
> By the way, Paulo (real reason why I'm writing this), you haven't told us
yet about the Fethry-king-of undersea-world subject! Is that too a spin-off
in $crooge's newspaper?
I can't say a thing about him. I've read a number of Pena Kid and
Pena das Selvas stories, but the Fethry-undersea-king stories are
completely unknown to me (except for the ML discussion, of course).
SOEREN:
> In Denmark we would say: "Uha da"
Ok, but what does it really mean?
[]s
P.C.Barreto
(Email removed)
Eta Beta
Sorry
Message 56 -
1998-02-04 at 19:47:40
WRT that horribly long message that mysteriously appeared
again on #43, I can only offer my apologies, but it was
nothing of my doing. My computer wasn't even turned on, at
the time of its sending, so I believe it was the server at
my net-address that managed it, for mysterious reasons.
However, I understand I cannot run the risk of disturbing
the whole Mailing List just because my server is unreliable,
so I'll better keep quiet until I find something better.
Sorry again, thanks for the interesting discussions and
Ciao to you all.
Eta Beta
email to : (Email removed)
again on #43, I can only offer my apologies, but it was
nothing of my doing. My computer wasn't even turned on, at
the time of its sending, so I believe it was the server at
my net-address that managed it, for mysterious reasons.
However, I understand I cannot run the risk of disturbing
the whole Mailing List just because my server is unreliable,
so I'll better keep quiet until I find something better.
Sorry again, thanks for the interesting discussions and
Ciao to you all.
Eta Beta
email to : (Email removed)
Rich Bellacera
Fethry Follow-up
Message 57 -
1998-02-04 at 19:56:44
DAVID G. [& others interested]:
I finally found a copy of DD#106 which you'd mentioned to be one of
FETHRY's early American appearances [a story which, if I understood
correctly, you haven't seen]. Well here's some info you might want
to add to your Fethry Datafile you say you're developing:
No storycode displayed, but I'm sure you'll know how to find it.
Series: Donald Duck
Title: Jungle Journey
Page Count: 10 (though page 9 is only half a page since the rest
is filled with the legal jargon of "Statement of Ownership" for
"Walt Disney's Donald Duck" comic book).
Fethry's physical appearance is similar to the "Buzzin' Cousin"
and "Ducky Date" ones, except Fethry is wearing a dark blue
or dark purple stocking cap and sweater (the sweater has a broad
white stripe around the center) instead of the yellow ones.
**************SPOILERS***************
Synopsis & Notes: This tale begins with Fethry startling Don by
barging into his house while Don is reading a book about the Jungle.
No indication as to whether this story is concurrent with "Donald's
Buzz'n' Cousin" and "Ducky Date", but since it is written during the
same time period, that is certainly a possiblity, so Fethry could still
be on an extended visit to Duckburg and staying with Donald, which
would explain why he didn't knock before entering. Anyhow, Fethry
gets a wild idea to drag Don on a Jungle Safari and books free
passage on a freighter signing both of them on as crewmen (actually
"swabbies"), but Fethry manages to sweet talk the First Mate into
upgrading their passage to "first class." In Africa Fethry relates how
he made friends with many jungle animals when he was in Africa
before, and after a few *close calls* with animal strangers, they
hook up with "Goochuck" a Gorilla Fethry knew. After a few more
harrowing close calls Donald buys airplane tickets back to Duckburg.
Fethry is disappointed by Donald's lack of enthusiasm, while Donald
is content with returning to just reading about the Jungle. The final
gag involve an off-the-cuff comment Don makes about his druthers
for visiting old friends, "I'd much rather just give them a "call" and
have them drop over and stay a while!" To which Fethry responds
by inviting Chipchew (an eskimo), a polar bear and seal he'd
once met in Alaska to stay a while (at Don's expense of course).
****************END SPOILERS*******************
BTW, Tabby doesn't appear in this tale either, so I guess "Moutain
Magic" is still the best contender for his First American appearance.
Now I just need to find a copy of WDC#509 to own all the American
appearances of Fethry. Hopefully this Saturday I will be able to make
my way to Hayward, CA to get my hands on some more of the Gulf
Oil comics ("El Nino" notwithstanding).
-Rich (xephyr)
http://www.jps.net/xephyr/rich/disney.html
I finally found a copy of DD#106 which you'd mentioned to be one of
FETHRY's early American appearances [a story which, if I understood
correctly, you haven't seen]. Well here's some info you might want
to add to your Fethry Datafile you say you're developing:
No storycode displayed, but I'm sure you'll know how to find it.
Series: Donald Duck
Title: Jungle Journey
Page Count: 10 (though page 9 is only half a page since the rest
is filled with the legal jargon of "Statement of Ownership" for
"Walt Disney's Donald Duck" comic book).
Fethry's physical appearance is similar to the "Buzzin' Cousin"
and "Ducky Date" ones, except Fethry is wearing a dark blue
or dark purple stocking cap and sweater (the sweater has a broad
white stripe around the center) instead of the yellow ones.
**************SPOILERS***************
Synopsis & Notes: This tale begins with Fethry startling Don by
barging into his house while Don is reading a book about the Jungle.
No indication as to whether this story is concurrent with "Donald's
Buzz'n' Cousin" and "Ducky Date", but since it is written during the
same time period, that is certainly a possiblity, so Fethry could still
be on an extended visit to Duckburg and staying with Donald, which
would explain why he didn't knock before entering. Anyhow, Fethry
gets a wild idea to drag Don on a Jungle Safari and books free
passage on a freighter signing both of them on as crewmen (actually
"swabbies"), but Fethry manages to sweet talk the First Mate into
upgrading their passage to "first class." In Africa Fethry relates how
he made friends with many jungle animals when he was in Africa
before, and after a few *close calls* with animal strangers, they
hook up with "Goochuck" a Gorilla Fethry knew. After a few more
harrowing close calls Donald buys airplane tickets back to Duckburg.
Fethry is disappointed by Donald's lack of enthusiasm, while Donald
is content with returning to just reading about the Jungle. The final
gag involve an off-the-cuff comment Don makes about his druthers
for visiting old friends, "I'd much rather just give them a "call" and
have them drop over and stay a while!" To which Fethry responds
by inviting Chipchew (an eskimo), a polar bear and seal he'd
once met in Alaska to stay a while (at Don's expense of course).
****************END SPOILERS*******************
BTW, Tabby doesn't appear in this tale either, so I guess "Moutain
Magic" is still the best contender for his First American appearance.
Now I just need to find a copy of WDC#509 to own all the American
appearances of Fethry. Hopefully this Saturday I will be able to make
my way to Hayward, CA to get my hands on some more of the Gulf
Oil comics ("El Nino" notwithstanding).
-Rich (xephyr)
http://www.jps.net/xephyr/rich/disney.html
Soeren Krarup Olesen
Story coding & listing
Message 58 -
1998-02-04 at 22:17:01
Hi everyone, this is a topic way off Fethry, metrics or translation:
It has frequently puzzled me how and by whom the story coding
and listing is made. I am sure you have discussed this a dusins of
times, but not while I was here.
Who is in control and responsible for the story-codes? And I
certainly don't just mean the publisher.
Who is literally writing the story-codes on the panels?
(Italy: you know the "I" that looks pretty much like a "J")
I mean, that person must obviously have a list to choose
from, and why are those lists not available to *us* on the ML?
Such lists have no commercial value anyway...
I see e.g. inconsistent I-TL coding that lacks of the -A og -B etc.
How does that happen? And they (he/she) must have known
who did the art and who wrote the story????!
And what about the I-TL-XXXX-4A, what does 4A means,
except of course that it is the fourth story in issue XXXX
of Topolino?
There must be some kind of license/contracts connected to each
story code or...? And, thus, by archive someone must know
or have specific info.
Does Egmont for example know *all* about who did
what in Jumbobog nr. 123? Is it a secret? Have the listings
disappeared? or...?
Marco and perhaps Francois - you ought to know?!
Could anyone give me a brief description of how the process works?
S=F8ren
NB! Honestly, for Pete's and history's sake I wouldn't actually
like such lists to exist, I am just curious...
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V98 Issue #44
*****************************************
It has frequently puzzled me how and by whom the story coding
and listing is made. I am sure you have discussed this a dusins of
times, but not while I was here.
Who is in control and responsible for the story-codes? And I
certainly don't just mean the publisher.
Who is literally writing the story-codes on the panels?
(Italy: you know the "I" that looks pretty much like a "J")
I mean, that person must obviously have a list to choose
from, and why are those lists not available to *us* on the ML?
Such lists have no commercial value anyway...
I see e.g. inconsistent I-TL coding that lacks of the -A og -B etc.
How does that happen? And they (he/she) must have known
who did the art and who wrote the story????!
And what about the I-TL-XXXX-4A, what does 4A means,
except of course that it is the fourth story in issue XXXX
of Topolino?
There must be some kind of license/contracts connected to each
story code or...? And, thus, by archive someone must know
or have specific info.
Does Egmont for example know *all* about who did
what in Jumbobog nr. 123? Is it a secret? Have the listings
disappeared? or...?
Marco and perhaps Francois - you ought to know?!
Could anyone give me a brief description of how the process works?
S=F8ren
NB! Honestly, for Pete's and history's sake I wouldn't actually
like such lists to exist, I am just curious...
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V98 Issue #44
*****************************************
D Decker
Where's Della?
Message 59 -
1998-02-05 at 00:24:50
I just read the "Triple Distelfink" story that Don Rosa did to commemorate
Gladstone Gander's 50th anniversary (it recently ran in ANDERS AND, the Danish
Donald Duck weekly, along with the Barks story that had Gladstone's first
appearance). Don's story has a flashback showing Little Donald and Little
Gladstone and their respective mothers as well as Little Donald's father at a
family gathering (to say more would be spoiling things) -- but there's no sign
of Little Donald's twin sister, Della, the future mother of Huey, Dewey, and
Louie. If her parents and brother were at the family gathering, shouldn't Della
have been there, too? Or was it to be assumed that during the story she was
there but simply off-panel the whole time, and Don and/or Byron decided not to
show her because it would have been thought confusing/distracting/irrelevant?
Or did I miss something? Darn, Don would have to go into lurk mode about now...
--Dwight Decker
Gladstone Gander's 50th anniversary (it recently ran in ANDERS AND, the Danish
Donald Duck weekly, along with the Barks story that had Gladstone's first
appearance). Don's story has a flashback showing Little Donald and Little
Gladstone and their respective mothers as well as Little Donald's father at a
family gathering (to say more would be spoiling things) -- but there's no sign
of Little Donald's twin sister, Della, the future mother of Huey, Dewey, and
Louie. If her parents and brother were at the family gathering, shouldn't Della
have been there, too? Or was it to be assumed that during the story she was
there but simply off-panel the whole time, and Don and/or Byron decided not to
show her because it would have been thought confusing/distracting/irrelevant?
Or did I miss something? Darn, Don would have to go into lurk mode about now...
--Dwight Decker
Marco Barlotti
Codes (on-topic, isn't it?)
Message 60 -
1998-02-05 at 01:49:40
SOEREN:
>
>I see e.g. inconsistent I-TL coding that lacks of the -A og -B etc.
>How does that happen?
>
Careless coding. We've seen worse :-( like USA stories being given
I-xxx code when reprinted...
>And they (he/she) must have known
>who did the art and who wrote the story????!
Not necessarily. There is no relation between the code and **who**
wrote/drew the story. I-coded stories are just stories PRODUCED for Italy.
The writer might be American (Jerry Siegel?), the artist might be Spanish
(Bargada'?), but ITALY pays! On the other hand, stories written and drawn by
Italian Marco Rota but PAID by Egmont are D-coded!
>And what about the I-TL-XXXX-4A, what does 4A means,
>except of course that it is the fourth story in issue XXXX
>of Topolino?
It means that it's a 2-part story (the two parts being printed in the same
issue but with advertising in-between), and that's part "A".
Marco
>
>I see e.g. inconsistent I-TL coding that lacks of the -A og -B etc.
>How does that happen?
>
Careless coding. We've seen worse :-( like USA stories being given
I-xxx code when reprinted...
>And they (he/she) must have known
>who did the art and who wrote the story????!
Not necessarily. There is no relation between the code and **who**
wrote/drew the story. I-coded stories are just stories PRODUCED for Italy.
The writer might be American (Jerry Siegel?), the artist might be Spanish
(Bargada'?), but ITALY pays! On the other hand, stories written and drawn by
Italian Marco Rota but PAID by Egmont are D-coded!
>And what about the I-TL-XXXX-4A, what does 4A means,
>except of course that it is the fourth story in issue XXXX
>of Topolino?
It means that it's a 2-part story (the two parts being printed in the same
issue but with advertising in-between), and that's part "A".
Marco