> LoS stories in the right order. This is their order:
> Chapter 1
> Chapter 1-B, Ducks and Dimes and Destinies (they
> apparently didn't like the
> term "chapter 0")
> Chapter 2
> Chapter 3
> Chapter 3-B, Cutty Sark
> Chapter 4
> Chapter 5
> Chapter 6
> Chapter 6-B, the Buffalo Bill story (will appear in
> the next OOM DAGOBERT
> album)
> Chapter 6-C, Lost Dutchman's mine
> Chapter 7
> Chapter 8
> Chapter 8-B, Hearts of the Yukon
> Chapter 8-C, Last Sled to Dawson
> Chapter 9
> Chapter 10
Hey, dont forget Chapter 10b, The Sharpie of The
Culebra Cut...
> Chapter 11
> Chapter 12
Best regards from
Sigvald :-)
______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Dokumentmappe
Tilgang til dine viktigste filer uansett hvor du er!
http://no.briefcase.yahoo.com/
Author
Topic: 200205
(291 messages)
Sigvald Grøsfjeld Jr.
Rosa in Holland
Message 121 -
2002-05-13 at 20:49:06
Fluks, H.W.
Rosa in Holland
Message 122 -
2002-05-13 at 20:50:48
Sigvald:
> > This is their order: [..]
> Hey, dont forget Chapter 10b, The Sharpie of The
> Culebra Cut...
Don't tell *me*, tell *them*!
--Harry.
> > This is their order: [..]
> Hey, dont forget Chapter 10b, The Sharpie of The
> Culebra Cut...
Don't tell *me*, tell *them*!
--Harry.
DYER,SONIA (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Rosa stories
Message 123 -
2002-05-13 at 20:58:51
Hi Don-
I especially like your work, because you're not only a good story
teller, you actually put a lot of research and intelligent thought into it,
which comes through well. And your art is just fine. Please don't get
discouraged.
Sonia Dyer
San Jose, California
I especially like your work, because you're not only a good story
teller, you actually put a lot of research and intelligent thought into it,
which comes through well. And your art is just fine. Please don't get
discouraged.
Sonia Dyer
San Jose, California
MAS
Don Rosa
Message 124 -
2002-05-13 at 23:22:10
Don Rosa muses:
>From: "The Fenske's" <dbfenske at attcanada.ca>
>>>But I for one would be sad to see your stories go to the pens of other
>artists.
>
>Well, thanks, but you've misunderstood -- when I stop, I'll stop everything.
>For me, doing comics means doing both the writing and the art. I can't
>separate the two -- for me it's one job.
>I would not start writing comics for other artists -- I and those artists
>would still be in the same system as before.
>I'd just start selling art and old comics and RELAX for a change......
Well, you could always do some new Pertwilliby stories and publish them
here in the states - maybe Image or Dark Horse would be interested. Then
you could release a blockbuster Pertwilliby movie, with all sorts of
licensing tie-ins, and retire on the proceeds :-)
- M
>From: "The Fenske's" <dbfenske at attcanada.ca>
>>>But I for one would be sad to see your stories go to the pens of other
>artists.
>
>Well, thanks, but you've misunderstood -- when I stop, I'll stop everything.
>For me, doing comics means doing both the writing and the art. I can't
>separate the two -- for me it's one job.
>I would not start writing comics for other artists -- I and those artists
>would still be in the same system as before.
>I'd just start selling art and old comics and RELAX for a change......
Well, you could always do some new Pertwilliby stories and publish them
here in the states - maybe Image or Dark Horse would be interested. Then
you could release a blockbuster Pertwilliby movie, with all sorts of
licensing tie-ins, and retire on the proceeds :-)
- M
Stefan Persson
Donald Duck & Co nr 19 - 2002
Message 125 -
2002-05-14 at 10:29:37
>From: ?yvind Schei <stratyon at schei.no>
>To: <dcml at stp.ling.uu.se>
>Subject: Donald Duck & Co nr 19 - 2002
>Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 19:32:27 +0200
>
>Anyone from Norway happen to have a spare copy of this magazine? (DD 19 -
>2002)
>I lost my copy in the mail and it's vital to my existence that I get hold
>of a new one.
Can't you call Egmont and ask them to send you a new copy of it?
Stefan
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Foto ?r det enklaste s?ttet att dela eller skaffa papperskopior av dina
foton: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>To: <dcml at stp.ling.uu.se>
>Subject: Donald Duck & Co nr 19 - 2002
>Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 19:32:27 +0200
>
>Anyone from Norway happen to have a spare copy of this magazine? (DD 19 -
>2002)
>I lost my copy in the mail and it's vital to my existence that I get hold
>of a new one.
Can't you call Egmont and ask them to send you a new copy of it?
Stefan
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Foto ?r det enklaste s?ttet att dela eller skaffa papperskopior av dina
foton: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Halvor
Gyro's first success
Message 126 -
2002-05-14 at 10:36:53
I really loved Rosa's story about Gyro's first success, celebrating his first
50 years. What puzzles me a bit, is that in the story, Gyro is celebrating
something himself too. What could this be? It certainly cannot be the same
thing that WE celebrate. This would be a time-paradox. I liked the idea of
using Gyro to get Scrooge's money out, as using the toy-train would be a much
to slow method. Also combining this idea with the invention of Little Helper is
very nice. What's a bit strange about this though, is that Little Helper does
not appear in the first Gyro-stories by Barks, but this doesn't really bother
me. Using the think-box to make Little Helper intelligent was another nice
idea, and if I'm not mistaken, the think-box also worked on Gyro himself,
making him even more brilliant than he was before his little accident. His
inventions were not very successful up to this point. Of course, this makes me
wonder that maybe the think-box was his first success?
A couple of things bothers me a little about this story (but just a little).
The first thing is Gyro's appearance. In the first Gyro-stories by Barks, his
hair is quite different. It's longer, and cut in another way. In Rosa's story
Gyro has the appearance of later stories. Why is this so? Wasn't Rosa allowed
to draw Gyro the original way? Another thing, when reading Barks story about
the think-box, I get the impression that Donald doesn't really know Gyro, only
by reputation. Donald thinks Gyro's a nut, and he doesn't want his nephews to
help him. Isn't this a bit strange, considering that Donald knows at this time
that Gyro helped Scrooge with his big problem?
These things are only minor questions, not complains. The story was, as always
by Rosa, very good, and I'm looking forward to his next story.
Halvor
50 years. What puzzles me a bit, is that in the story, Gyro is celebrating
something himself too. What could this be? It certainly cannot be the same
thing that WE celebrate. This would be a time-paradox. I liked the idea of
using Gyro to get Scrooge's money out, as using the toy-train would be a much
to slow method. Also combining this idea with the invention of Little Helper is
very nice. What's a bit strange about this though, is that Little Helper does
not appear in the first Gyro-stories by Barks, but this doesn't really bother
me. Using the think-box to make Little Helper intelligent was another nice
idea, and if I'm not mistaken, the think-box also worked on Gyro himself,
making him even more brilliant than he was before his little accident. His
inventions were not very successful up to this point. Of course, this makes me
wonder that maybe the think-box was his first success?
A couple of things bothers me a little about this story (but just a little).
The first thing is Gyro's appearance. In the first Gyro-stories by Barks, his
hair is quite different. It's longer, and cut in another way. In Rosa's story
Gyro has the appearance of later stories. Why is this so? Wasn't Rosa allowed
to draw Gyro the original way? Another thing, when reading Barks story about
the think-box, I get the impression that Donald doesn't really know Gyro, only
by reputation. Donald thinks Gyro's a nut, and he doesn't want his nephews to
help him. Isn't this a bit strange, considering that Donald knows at this time
that Gyro helped Scrooge with his big problem?
These things are only minor questions, not complains. The story was, as always
by Rosa, very good, and I'm looking forward to his next story.
Halvor
Jussi Mantere
Gyro's first success
Message 127 -
2002-05-14 at 11:06:14
On 14 May 2002 halvor at sandven.net wrote:
> I really loved Rosa's story about Gyro's first success, celebrating his first
> 50 years. What puzzles me a bit, is that in the story, Gyro is celebrating
> something himself too. What could this be? It certainly cannot be the same
> thing that WE celebrate. This would be a time-paradox. I liked the idea of
The answer is actually trivial. In the beginning of the story, the time is
N years (where 1<N<2, I can't remember?:) after the time when the actual
story takes place. Donald and the nephews are sitting in the park,
watching Gyro walk by, and then they start reminiscing the time when they
helped Gyro start his inventing career. Time-leap, sort of, but not really
paradoxal IMO :)
> The first thing is Gyro's appearance. In the first Gyro-stories by Barks, his
> hair is quite different. It's longer, and cut in another way. In Rosa's story
> Gyro has the appearance of later stories. Why is this so? Wasn't Rosa allowed
> to draw Gyro the original way? Another thing, when reading Barks story about
Of course I don't know the real reason, but my guess is that Rosa draws
Gyro the way he wants to - and that is the way he looks in most of the
stories. After all, the "early Gyro" by Barks looked different just
because Barks hadn't yet decided how to make him look.
> the think-box, I get the impression that Donald doesn't really know Gyro, only
> by reputation. Donald thinks Gyro's a nut, and he doesn't want his nephews to
> help him. Isn't this a bit strange, considering that Donald knows at this time
> that Gyro helped Scrooge with his big problem?
Valid point:) Don, I seem to see a reason here for another story
explaining the change in Donald's attitude :)
> These things are only minor questions, not complains. The story was, as always
> by Rosa, very good, and I'm looking forward to his next story.
And I'm looking forward to read the end of this story. That darn Aku Ankka
publishes it in parts :)
-jussi
--
. jussi mantere
. http://www.iki.fi/obs/
. mister, i ain't no boy, no i'm a man
.. and i believe in the promised land
> I really loved Rosa's story about Gyro's first success, celebrating his first
> 50 years. What puzzles me a bit, is that in the story, Gyro is celebrating
> something himself too. What could this be? It certainly cannot be the same
> thing that WE celebrate. This would be a time-paradox. I liked the idea of
The answer is actually trivial. In the beginning of the story, the time is
N years (where 1<N<2, I can't remember?:) after the time when the actual
story takes place. Donald and the nephews are sitting in the park,
watching Gyro walk by, and then they start reminiscing the time when they
helped Gyro start his inventing career. Time-leap, sort of, but not really
paradoxal IMO :)
> The first thing is Gyro's appearance. In the first Gyro-stories by Barks, his
> hair is quite different. It's longer, and cut in another way. In Rosa's story
> Gyro has the appearance of later stories. Why is this so? Wasn't Rosa allowed
> to draw Gyro the original way? Another thing, when reading Barks story about
Of course I don't know the real reason, but my guess is that Rosa draws
Gyro the way he wants to - and that is the way he looks in most of the
stories. After all, the "early Gyro" by Barks looked different just
because Barks hadn't yet decided how to make him look.
> the think-box, I get the impression that Donald doesn't really know Gyro, only
> by reputation. Donald thinks Gyro's a nut, and he doesn't want his nephews to
> help him. Isn't this a bit strange, considering that Donald knows at this time
> that Gyro helped Scrooge with his big problem?
Valid point:) Don, I seem to see a reason here for another story
explaining the change in Donald's attitude :)
> These things are only minor questions, not complains. The story was, as always
> by Rosa, very good, and I'm looking forward to his next story.
And I'm looking forward to read the end of this story. That darn Aku Ankka
publishes it in parts :)
-jussi
--
. jussi mantere
. http://www.iki.fi/obs/
. mister, i ain't no boy, no i'm a man
.. and i believe in the promised land
Michael Rhode
Rosa story in Sweden weekly?
Message 128 -
2002-05-14 at 15:37:09
Can someone tell me the name and issue numbers of the Swedish weekly that
Don's new story is appearing in? I want to ask a friend to pick it up for
me.
Thanks,
Mike
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Don's new story is appearing in? I want to ask a friend to pick it up for
me.
Thanks,
Mike
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Dan Shane
Rosa in Holland
Message 129 -
2002-05-14 at 18:34:28
HARRY WROTE:
> As I wrote before, they *do* use the two blueprint pages, to my
> surprise. I
> saw a few minor mistakes ("F.J.Drake" on one page, "F.L. Drake" on the
> other), but apart from the big euro-sign, the translations seems to be OK.
> It includes "Dr. D. Shane" and "Keno Rosa BV, Louisville".
AND I REPLY:
I understand the blueprints are shown as black lines on blue paper, instead
of white lines on blue paper as they should.
HARRY CONTINUES:
> Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
> completely
> worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
> too LAZY for
> it)". Does this reflect the original text? (To me it looks like an apology
> that the panel does not match with the blueprints...)
AND I DO GO ON:
That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator, but Don may have
more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the person is
trying to insult -- Don, myself, or the fictitious architect, but none of us
are happy about it! I'm calling the ombudsman! I want a retraction!
> As I wrote before, they *do* use the two blueprint pages, to my
> surprise. I
> saw a few minor mistakes ("F.J.Drake" on one page, "F.L. Drake" on the
> other), but apart from the big euro-sign, the translations seems to be OK.
> It includes "Dr. D. Shane" and "Keno Rosa BV, Louisville".
AND I REPLY:
I understand the blueprints are shown as black lines on blue paper, instead
of white lines on blue paper as they should.
HARRY CONTINUES:
> Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
> completely
> worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
> too LAZY for
> it)". Does this reflect the original text? (To me it looks like an apology
> that the panel does not match with the blueprints...)
AND I DO GO ON:
That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator, but Don may have
more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the person is
trying to insult -- Don, myself, or the fictitious architect, but none of us
are happy about it! I'm calling the ombudsman! I want a retraction!
Frank Stajano
Rosa in Holland
Message 130 -
2002-05-14 at 19:34:25
At 2002-05-14 16:34, Dan Shane wrote:
>HARRY CONTINUES:
>
> > Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
> > completely
> > worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
> > too LAZY for
> > it)". Does this reflect the original text? (To me it looks like an apology
> > that the panel does not match with the blueprints...)
>
>AND I DO GO ON:
>
>That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator, but Don may have
>more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the person is
>trying to insult -- Don, myself, or the fictitious architect, but none of us
>are happy about it! I'm calling the ombudsman! I want a retraction!
I think you're both jumping to the wrong conclusions too quickly. To me it
sounds just like a joke by the author. It's the kind of thing that an
author can modestly say of himself in a joking way, but that nobody else
could without strongly upsetting him (and for good reason). Imagine someone
gratuitously adding a "this guy is lazy" footnote: what kind of editor
would that be?!?
Frank (filologo disneyano) http://www-lce.eng.cam.ac.uk/~fms27/
>HARRY CONTINUES:
>
> > Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
> > completely
> > worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
> > too LAZY for
> > it)". Does this reflect the original text? (To me it looks like an apology
> > that the panel does not match with the blueprints...)
>
>AND I DO GO ON:
>
>That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator, but Don may have
>more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the person is
>trying to insult -- Don, myself, or the fictitious architect, but none of us
>are happy about it! I'm calling the ombudsman! I want a retraction!
I think you're both jumping to the wrong conclusions too quickly. To me it
sounds just like a joke by the author. It's the kind of thing that an
author can modestly say of himself in a joking way, but that nobody else
could without strongly upsetting him (and for good reason). Imagine someone
gratuitously adding a "this guy is lazy" footnote: what kind of editor
would that be?!?
Frank (filologo disneyano) http://www-lce.eng.cam.ac.uk/~fms27/
Stefan Persson
Rosa story in Sweden weekly?
Message 131 -
2002-05-14 at 23:14:44
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Rhode" <mrhode at hotmail.com>
To: <dcomics at stp.ling.uu.se>
Sent: den 14 maj 2002 14:37
Subject: Rosa story in Sweden weekly?
> Can someone tell me the name and issue numbers of the Swedish weekly that
> Don's new story is appearing in? I want to ask a friend to pick it up for
> me.
The first part is in issue #19 (2002).
The second part is in the double-issue #20-21.
Both parts are 10 pages each, and the first issue also has a cover
illustrating the story.
Stefan
From: "Michael Rhode" <mrhode at hotmail.com>
To: <dcomics at stp.ling.uu.se>
Sent: den 14 maj 2002 14:37
Subject: Rosa story in Sweden weekly?
> Can someone tell me the name and issue numbers of the Swedish weekly that
> Don's new story is appearing in? I want to ask a friend to pick it up for
> me.
The first part is in issue #19 (2002).
The second part is in the double-issue #20-21.
Both parts are 10 pages each, and the first issue also has a cover
illustrating the story.
Stefan
HorizonHse
Ebay Mickey art item
Message 132 -
2002-05-15 at 07:44:23
In a message dated 5/14/02 3:04:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
dcml-request at stp.ling.uu.se writes:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2101993493
>
> As far as I can tell, these are not original art. They are simply two
> loose, black and white interior pages (i. e. "plates") from a Mickey Mouse
> Annual, which someone has extracted and professionally colored in by hand.
> Note how the pages are described as being "colored only on one side" - i.
> e. there are other comics
> on the back side of each page, as is usually the case with torn-out pages
> from a book.
Good detecting. I contacted the vendor and you are exactly right. The back
side of each page has a black and white comic on it. The dimensions of each
page match the dimensions of the magazines. These are loose, interior pages
from a MMA that someone has colored.
dcml-request at stp.ling.uu.se writes:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2101993493
>
> As far as I can tell, these are not original art. They are simply two
> loose, black and white interior pages (i. e. "plates") from a Mickey Mouse
> Annual, which someone has extracted and professionally colored in by hand.
> Note how the pages are described as being "colored only on one side" - i.
> e. there are other comics
> on the back side of each page, as is usually the case with torn-out pages
> from a book.
Good detecting. I contacted the vendor and you are exactly right. The back
side of each page has a black and white comic on it. The dimensions of each
page match the dimensions of the magazines. These are loose, interior pages
from a MMA that someone has colored.
Søren Krarup Olesen
Who is Jay Gould?
Message 133 -
2002-05-15 at 10:12:52
Again, one of those requests about artists, who are presumably cartoon
artists and not comics artists. This time from Linda, U.S.:
----------
Subj.: Disney artist Jay Gould
I'm looking for information on this artist who is no longer with us.
Can you direct me to a site or offer some information. Thank you,
Linda, U.S.
Linnielu88 at aol.com
----------
Anyone who can help this lady?
S?ren
artists and not comics artists. This time from Linda, U.S.:
----------
Subj.: Disney artist Jay Gould
I'm looking for information on this artist who is no longer with us.
Can you direct me to a site or offer some information. Thank you,
Linda, U.S.
Linnielu88 at aol.com
----------
Anyone who can help this lady?
S?ren
Fluks, H.W.
Rosa in Holland
Message 134 -
2002-05-15 at 11:41:51
Dan:
> > they *do* use the two blueprint pages
> I understand the blueprints are shown as black lines on blue
> paper, instead of white lines on blue paper as they should.
No, they are all white on blue. Who told you otherwise?
> > Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
> > completely
> > worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
> > too LAZY for
> > it)". Does this reflect the original text?
> That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator,
> but Don may have
> more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the
> person is trying to insult
I don't think this was meant as an insult in any way.
--Harry.
> > they *do* use the two blueprint pages
> I understand the blueprints are shown as black lines on blue
> paper, instead of white lines on blue paper as they should.
No, they are all white on blue. Who told you otherwise?
> > Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
> > completely
> > worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
> > too LAZY for
> > it)". Does this reflect the original text?
> That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator,
> but Don may have
> more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the
> person is trying to insult
I don't think this was meant as an insult in any way.
--Harry.
Anders Christian Siveb¾k
Re # 928 - Rosa in Holland
Message 135 -
2002-05-15 at 14:31:52
HARRY
>
>> > Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
>> > completely
>> > worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
>> > too LAZY for
>> > it)". Does this reflect the original text?
Who would know - maybe our friends at egmont?
DAN
>
>> That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator,
>> but Don may have
>> more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the
>> person is trying to insult
I think it's Don making a joke to himself - And I think that
having read all the versions so far. The danish, swedish, norwegian and
german.
Only one of these didn't have this text referring, as I see it, to the
fact that not even
this story fitted totally with the blue prints - as the bin will always
look as it needs to
do in a given story.
HARRY
>
>I don't think this was meant as an insult in any way.
Thus I don't think so either :-)
So Dan, you wont have to call the ombudsman (which is a loan word from
swedish or danish btw)
Yours
>
Anders Christian Siveb?k
Donaldist
>
>> > Page 13 has the text "Footnote: this intersection drawing is not
>> > completely
>> > worked out, for the overview (but mainly because the artist was
>> > too LAZY for
>> > it)". Does this reflect the original text?
Who would know - maybe our friends at egmont?
DAN
>
>> That was obviously an addition by an editor or translator,
>> but Don may have
>> more accurate information. In any case, I don't know who the
>> person is trying to insult
I think it's Don making a joke to himself - And I think that
having read all the versions so far. The danish, swedish, norwegian and
german.
Only one of these didn't have this text referring, as I see it, to the
fact that not even
this story fitted totally with the blue prints - as the bin will always
look as it needs to
do in a given story.
HARRY
>
>I don't think this was meant as an insult in any way.
Thus I don't think so either :-)
So Dan, you wont have to call the ombudsman (which is a loan word from
swedish or danish btw)
Yours
>
Anders Christian Siveb?k
Donaldist