Dons Markstein and Rosa, Christopher Barat and Wilmer Rivers (as well as
others on the list, earlier) have been discussing Don R's "On Stolen Time" and
similar ideas appearing in other works of fiction. So this would include a
certain Duck Tales episode (I have seen none) as well as MacDonald's "The Girl,
the Gold Watch and Everything". Muses Don R in the last digest:
<<And the whole point behind "The Girl, the Gold Watch and Everything" is
NOT that the watch stops time... it merely (?) slows it down. This enables
the watch-owner to move stuff around, rearrange reality and so forth before
he turns the watch back on. This is a MUCH better idea than the others,
which includes mine.>>
and concludes,
<<Neat, eh?>>.
We should not be surprised that there are several other works of fiction that
in some way or another use the "slowing down or stopping of time" device.
One instance worthy of mention here is Nicholson Baker's "The Fermata"
[**non-married sub-28 readers please refrain from reading this paragraph,
unless in a parentally guided situation**] which I read some years ago. It
happened to say something about "the funniest book about sex ever written" or
words to that effect on the cover, but _I_ of course chose to read it for more
respectful reasons: I liked the musical title, the cover (a pair of glasses),
and knew that Baker's other books (Vox; The Mezzanine) had achieved serious
praise. And Baker's (and his hero, 35-year old Arno Strine's) device is similar
to both that of MacDonald's and that of Rosa's Stolen Time. Through intricate
mechanisms Strine/Baker is _partly_ able to stop or slow down time for the rest
of the world, for some minutes or hours at most, during which he (for example)
indulges in the undressing (and then, with equal love and respect, re-dressing)
of a good number of women [and occasionally tends to the backlog at his work,
created by all the un- and redressing of said women].
Baker is a serious and good writer, imVho. The basic camel-to-be-swallowed for
the reader, the time-stopping mechanisms, is well drawn and accounted for, and
I thought at the time that perhaps he had been reading Rosa's story! I also
admired very much, for example, his long philosophical introduction to one of
the chapters where he accurately describes the feeling filling a human at the
start of each month, with an unused unspoiled sequence of 30 or 31
hope-generating empty dates in front of him (as well as what invariably happens
gradually through the month...). If I had planned my time well enough to be
able to give a time-planning course for my students I would have made these
particular Baker pages mandatory reading.
On stolen time, probably; Nils Lid Hjort.
Author
Topic: 199710
(359 messages)
Nils Lid Hjort
Stolen Time & The Fermata
Message 211 -
1997-10-20 at 20:15:40
Francois Willot
Donald Duck Daily Strips
Message 212 -
1997-10-20 at 20:36:56
Luna Sorta wrote:
> ABOUT DAILY DONALD:
>
> Last saturday, on 11-oct-97 number of Disney MEGAzine
> (from La Repubblica) there was a Donald Duck daily strip
> dated 9-nov-40 where Donald covers Daisy eyes and makes her
> try to guess who he is... Daisy starts telling names such
> as Floyd, Bob, Hank, Ted, Dick, etc... Am I wrong or those
> names are all from the guys working in the Disney Comics
> Department?
You're right! They all are first names of different guys working in the
comic strips departement (or the animation's) at that time.
But all is not that clear... I have seen two **different** versions of
that strip. One in the book "Disney Comics" published in 1995 (with an
short explanation) that includes only one panel with the following
names:
Tom Tom Wood
Floyd Floyd Gottfredson
Bob Bob Karp
Ted Ted Thwaites
Al Al Taliaferro
Bill Bill Wright (who possibly inked the strip...)
Hank Hank Porter
Johnny ???
"Dick" is not here (probably Dick Moores?).
Now, I also saw an Egmont version in English, with totally different
names. The first Daisy strips are entirely translated, and on two
panels, Daisy mentions: Peter, George, Scott, Stephan, Tom, Hank,
Thomas, Freddy, Michael, John and Andy.
Francois
> ABOUT DAILY DONALD:
>
> Last saturday, on 11-oct-97 number of Disney MEGAzine
> (from La Repubblica) there was a Donald Duck daily strip
> dated 9-nov-40 where Donald covers Daisy eyes and makes her
> try to guess who he is... Daisy starts telling names such
> as Floyd, Bob, Hank, Ted, Dick, etc... Am I wrong or those
> names are all from the guys working in the Disney Comics
> Department?
You're right! They all are first names of different guys working in the
comic strips departement (or the animation's) at that time.
But all is not that clear... I have seen two **different** versions of
that strip. One in the book "Disney Comics" published in 1995 (with an
short explanation) that includes only one panel with the following
names:
Tom Tom Wood
Floyd Floyd Gottfredson
Bob Bob Karp
Ted Ted Thwaites
Al Al Taliaferro
Bill Bill Wright (who possibly inked the strip...)
Hank Hank Porter
Johnny ???
"Dick" is not here (probably Dick Moores?).
Now, I also saw an Egmont version in English, with totally different
names. The first Daisy strips are entirely translated, and on two
panels, Daisy mentions: Peter, George, Scott, Stephan, Tom, Hank,
Thomas, Freddy, Michael, John and Andy.
Francois
Lothar Bertsch
Disney comics Digest V97 #228
Message 213 -
1997-10-20 at 21:06:13
Hi Folks !!!
I am a big Don Rosa fan and I would like to get some original stuff. Do=
es
anyone know where to get it ??
Here in Stuttgart (Germany) you can hardly find anything. When you get =
a
page or something it is an old one and very expensive (900- 1200 DM). I
search for a page or cover or a little drawing from a "$crooge, his lif=
e and
times"- comic !
Thanks for your help !!! :)
To all guys from outside germany :
Did Ehapa/Egmont puplish a special edition from part 0 in your countrie=
s
????
If yes, what does it look like. The german one is soooooo poor and mise=
rable
!! (I am sure you heard about it)
See u,
LOTHAR !
(Gruessle an den Mike ! Wie geht=B4s ? Habe mich gerade in der Liste
eingetragen ! See u !)
I am a big Don Rosa fan and I would like to get some original stuff. Do=
es
anyone know where to get it ??
Here in Stuttgart (Germany) you can hardly find anything. When you get =
a
page or something it is an old one and very expensive (900- 1200 DM). I
search for a page or cover or a little drawing from a "$crooge, his lif=
e and
times"- comic !
Thanks for your help !!! :)
To all guys from outside germany :
Did Ehapa/Egmont puplish a special edition from part 0 in your countrie=
s
????
If yes, what does it look like. The german one is soooooo poor and mise=
rable
!! (I am sure you heard about it)
See u,
LOTHAR !
(Gruessle an den Mike ! Wie geht=B4s ? Habe mich gerade in der Liste
eingetragen ! See u !)
Tarjei Kidd Olsen
Disney comics Digest V97 #228
Message 214 -
1997-10-20 at 21:49:48
DON:
>You're kidding me?!?!? Now that IS criminal mistranslation!!! That story
>was not to honor a translator or an editor!!!! It was to honor actual
>creators!!!!!
in the norwegian edition the honorary titles are awarded to Osborne and
Taliaferro.
>You mean the guy leaving the comic PUBLISHER (not a shop -- did they change
>that, too?) carrying a copy of CHERRY POPTART? Byron...
in the norwegian edition it is indeed a comic publishers office, and the guy
is carrying what I thought was a magazine (the word "Cherry" is visible).
EVEN (.):
>Why the question mark? It is my name! Honest!!
did you get my e-mail?
MIKKO
>
>> I think the German government is making a mistake, because while
>> Gladstone comics certainly can't be sold on the INDIRECT market
>> (newsstands, grocery stores) outside of the USA,
>
> Actually, I've seen Gladstone comics here in regular newstands.
> They're also available for subscription through Finnish
> distributor.
they're on newsstands here too.
DAVE:
>Could you expand a bit on the above? I'm not sure I'm properly
>understanding. For instance, when you refered to "most of the European
>Duck scripts" did you intend to mean the local European *translations*
>of those scripts? Or did you actually mean the original creator's
>scripts seem hastily, thoughtlessly written because they incorporate so
>few references?
well, I don't get to see the original creators scripts, only the norwegian
ones. I guess I find many of the scripts to be over-simplified. but every
now and again there are some excellent stories too. For me the quality of
the artwork also has a huge impact on my enjoyment of the script. So maybe I
wouldn't consider the script quite so simplified if the art wasn't so..well,
simplified. I think there is a certain originality lacking in SOME scripts.
A script doesn't have to incorporate references to be well-written, but
sometimes the scripts are just silly (things just don't make sense, to many
impossibilities). I like the kind of stories that f.eks Don Rosa writes as
they mention a lot of previous incidents and always make sense. Could you
mention a Donald comic with one of your stories? I'd be happy to comment.
>And by "references" did you mean to Barks? Or to
>"Literature" outside of comics?
well, both I guess, but at the time I was thinking mainly of external
litterature, yes. References to Bark's stories are always fun, too.
|| <<<<Tarjei Kidd Olsen>>>> ||
||___________________________||
|| http://home.sol.no/~kidd/ ||
|| (Email removed) ||
>You're kidding me?!?!? Now that IS criminal mistranslation!!! That story
>was not to honor a translator or an editor!!!! It was to honor actual
>creators!!!!!
in the norwegian edition the honorary titles are awarded to Osborne and
Taliaferro.
>You mean the guy leaving the comic PUBLISHER (not a shop -- did they change
>that, too?) carrying a copy of CHERRY POPTART? Byron...
in the norwegian edition it is indeed a comic publishers office, and the guy
is carrying what I thought was a magazine (the word "Cherry" is visible).
EVEN (.):
>Why the question mark? It is my name! Honest!!
did you get my e-mail?
MIKKO
>
>> I think the German government is making a mistake, because while
>> Gladstone comics certainly can't be sold on the INDIRECT market
>> (newsstands, grocery stores) outside of the USA,
>
> Actually, I've seen Gladstone comics here in regular newstands.
> They're also available for subscription through Finnish
> distributor.
they're on newsstands here too.
DAVE:
>Could you expand a bit on the above? I'm not sure I'm properly
>understanding. For instance, when you refered to "most of the European
>Duck scripts" did you intend to mean the local European *translations*
>of those scripts? Or did you actually mean the original creator's
>scripts seem hastily, thoughtlessly written because they incorporate so
>few references?
well, I don't get to see the original creators scripts, only the norwegian
ones. I guess I find many of the scripts to be over-simplified. but every
now and again there are some excellent stories too. For me the quality of
the artwork also has a huge impact on my enjoyment of the script. So maybe I
wouldn't consider the script quite so simplified if the art wasn't so..well,
simplified. I think there is a certain originality lacking in SOME scripts.
A script doesn't have to incorporate references to be well-written, but
sometimes the scripts are just silly (things just don't make sense, to many
impossibilities). I like the kind of stories that f.eks Don Rosa writes as
they mention a lot of previous incidents and always make sense. Could you
mention a Donald comic with one of your stories? I'd be happy to comment.
>And by "references" did you mean to Barks? Or to
>"Literature" outside of comics?
well, both I guess, but at the time I was thinking mainly of external
litterature, yes. References to Bark's stories are always fun, too.
|| <<<<Tarjei Kidd Olsen>>>> ||
||___________________________||
|| http://home.sol.no/~kidd/ ||
|| (Email removed) ||
Tarjei Kidd Olsen
Disney comics Digest V97 #227
Message 215 -
1997-10-20 at 21:50:04
DONALD:
> society. When, say, a TV show has a cast that (to use Bill Clinton's
> expression) "looks like America" -- i.e., has one or two black
> members, one or two Asians, some Hispanics, etc. -- it is often
> denigrated as "politically correct"; whereas in reality, that show
> is a better representation of what I see around me than the former
> norm, where nobody on the air had any non-European ancestors.
that's true enough, and isn't what I consider to be an attempt at "political
correctness", that seems more like attempting to achieve equality. You could
say that about political correctitude(hmm...did I just make that word up now
or what?) too, except that here it's taken too far.
> and change "splinter" to "minority", and yes, that's a pretty
> familiar process here in America. But it was happening LONG before
> it got the sneering epithet "politically correct" attached to it.
> And why shouldn't it? Why should a company like Disney WANT to
> alienate portions of the audience it's trying to attract?
yes, but I was just using Disney stories as an example; the same goes for
f.eks movies. I don't know how the government is about censoring movies in
America, but here in Norway...well actually, more in Ireland (I lived there
for 5 years until last summer) the government often goes as far as banning
movies. Among banned movies in Ireland (at least until last year) are: Kids,
Natural Born Killers and in all probability Crash(which I haven't
seen(Crash, that is)). I don't see how those who decide that we aren't able
to cope with these movies can assume that THEY, on the other hand, can. I
have no idea why they ban these movies except maybe to please "splinter-groups".
As regards Disney not wanting to alienate the audience it's trying to
attract; if that particular audience is that important to Disney, then
surely it isn't a small splinter/minority group. I don't think most people
would bother with being so terribly offended by everything if it wasn't for
a few extremists who maybe don't like todays society, or are bitter at
something (IMHO). Maybe they just have a lot of "hang-ups"....
> As I said, surely there are excesses. But (to propose an
> excess in the other direction) Cartoon Network's decision not to put
> "Coal Black an' de Sebben Dwarfs" in the package with the rest of
> its producer's output, to turn up periodically on The Bugs'N'Daffy
> Show, isn't political correctitude. It's survival.
what IS this "Coal Black an' de Sebben Dwarfs" anyway?
> Of course, the ideal situation would be for such material to
> be available to an audience sophisticated enough not to be offended
> by it. So -- all we have to do is convince them there are enough of
> us to be worth marketing to. Difficult, but NOT impossible.
exactly
>Just
> this week, "The Chain Gang" turned up on The Disney Channel's "Ink
> and Paint Club" -- a PRIME candidate for self-censorship, inasmuch
> as it depicts Mickey Mouse in prison.
what's so bad about Mickey being in prison?
|| <<<<Tarjei Kidd Olsen>>>> ||
||___________________________||
|| http://home.sol.no/~kidd/ ||
|| (Email removed) ||
> society. When, say, a TV show has a cast that (to use Bill Clinton's
> expression) "looks like America" -- i.e., has one or two black
> members, one or two Asians, some Hispanics, etc. -- it is often
> denigrated as "politically correct"; whereas in reality, that show
> is a better representation of what I see around me than the former
> norm, where nobody on the air had any non-European ancestors.
that's true enough, and isn't what I consider to be an attempt at "political
correctness", that seems more like attempting to achieve equality. You could
say that about political correctitude(hmm...did I just make that word up now
or what?) too, except that here it's taken too far.
> and change "splinter" to "minority", and yes, that's a pretty
> familiar process here in America. But it was happening LONG before
> it got the sneering epithet "politically correct" attached to it.
> And why shouldn't it? Why should a company like Disney WANT to
> alienate portions of the audience it's trying to attract?
yes, but I was just using Disney stories as an example; the same goes for
f.eks movies. I don't know how the government is about censoring movies in
America, but here in Norway...well actually, more in Ireland (I lived there
for 5 years until last summer) the government often goes as far as banning
movies. Among banned movies in Ireland (at least until last year) are: Kids,
Natural Born Killers and in all probability Crash(which I haven't
seen(Crash, that is)). I don't see how those who decide that we aren't able
to cope with these movies can assume that THEY, on the other hand, can. I
have no idea why they ban these movies except maybe to please "splinter-groups".
As regards Disney not wanting to alienate the audience it's trying to
attract; if that particular audience is that important to Disney, then
surely it isn't a small splinter/minority group. I don't think most people
would bother with being so terribly offended by everything if it wasn't for
a few extremists who maybe don't like todays society, or are bitter at
something (IMHO). Maybe they just have a lot of "hang-ups"....
> As I said, surely there are excesses. But (to propose an
> excess in the other direction) Cartoon Network's decision not to put
> "Coal Black an' de Sebben Dwarfs" in the package with the rest of
> its producer's output, to turn up periodically on The Bugs'N'Daffy
> Show, isn't political correctitude. It's survival.
what IS this "Coal Black an' de Sebben Dwarfs" anyway?
> Of course, the ideal situation would be for such material to
> be available to an audience sophisticated enough not to be offended
> by it. So -- all we have to do is convince them there are enough of
> us to be worth marketing to. Difficult, but NOT impossible.
exactly
>Just
> this week, "The Chain Gang" turned up on The Disney Channel's "Ink
> and Paint Club" -- a PRIME candidate for self-censorship, inasmuch
> as it depicts Mickey Mouse in prison.
what's so bad about Mickey being in prison?
|| <<<<Tarjei Kidd Olsen>>>> ||
||___________________________||
|| http://home.sol.no/~kidd/ ||
|| (Email removed) ||
Francois Willot
HD&L
Message 216 -
1997-10-20 at 23:41:31
Dwight Decker:
> Didn't I just read someplace (like in one of Geoffrey Blum's essays)
> that the guys in the studio pretty definitely patterned Donald's
> nephews after the example of Happy Hooligan's?
I know *two* different "stories". Some people (including Don Rosa?) say
that H,D&L were created at the animation departement of the Walt Disney
studio (Harry Reeves, Carl Barks, etc.), and that Al Taliaferro used
them in his strips *after* (a cartoon took much more time to be made, so
the nephews appeared in the US in the daily strips first). On the other
hand, other people consider that Al Taliaferro himself created the
nephews (after Happy Hooligan's nephews), and *then* they were used in
the cartoons.
In an interview of Floyd Gottfredson, from 1975, the mouse-master said:
"The only thing I know in the Comic Strip Departement that was adapted
in the pictures was Al's creation of Donald's nephews in the DD daily
strip. Al's widow, Lucy, called me recently to read me a memo she had
found while cleaning up Al's stuff at home. It was someone in the story
departement, thanking Al for having created the nephews and telling him
that they were going to use it in a short".
Don Markstein:
>You know, recently, I was trying to think of sets of
>identical characters... I'm SURE there must be more than
>just three sets.
I can add a few characters nobody quoted:
- The Beagle Brats (I think that's their name), nephews of the Beagle
Boys
- The Beagle Boys' nieces
- The notaries in Barks' Heirloom Watch
Tarjei Kidd Olsen:
Why isn't there a capital letter at the beginnings of your sentences?
Francois
> Didn't I just read someplace (like in one of Geoffrey Blum's essays)
> that the guys in the studio pretty definitely patterned Donald's
> nephews after the example of Happy Hooligan's?
I know *two* different "stories". Some people (including Don Rosa?) say
that H,D&L were created at the animation departement of the Walt Disney
studio (Harry Reeves, Carl Barks, etc.), and that Al Taliaferro used
them in his strips *after* (a cartoon took much more time to be made, so
the nephews appeared in the US in the daily strips first). On the other
hand, other people consider that Al Taliaferro himself created the
nephews (after Happy Hooligan's nephews), and *then* they were used in
the cartoons.
In an interview of Floyd Gottfredson, from 1975, the mouse-master said:
"The only thing I know in the Comic Strip Departement that was adapted
in the pictures was Al's creation of Donald's nephews in the DD daily
strip. Al's widow, Lucy, called me recently to read me a memo she had
found while cleaning up Al's stuff at home. It was someone in the story
departement, thanking Al for having created the nephews and telling him
that they were going to use it in a short".
Don Markstein:
>You know, recently, I was trying to think of sets of
>identical characters... I'm SURE there must be more than
>just three sets.
I can add a few characters nobody quoted:
- The Beagle Brats (I think that's their name), nephews of the Beagle
Boys
- The Beagle Boys' nieces
- The notaries in Barks' Heirloom Watch
Tarjei Kidd Olsen:
Why isn't there a capital letter at the beginnings of your sentences?
Francois
Wilmer Rivers
Identical characters
Message 217 -
1997-10-21 at 00:24:51
Aren't Lady and the Tramp parents of 4 puppies: Scamp and 3
identical little "Ladies"?
And, unless the Disney cartoonists are **very** skillful, I
would bet that more than a few of the 101 Dalmatians are
identical, too. :)
Wilmer Rivers
identical little "Ladies"?
And, unless the Disney cartoonists are **very** skillful, I
would bet that more than a few of the 101 Dalmatians are
identical, too. :)
Wilmer Rivers
Katie Sullivan
Goldie again
Message 218 -
1997-10-21 at 01:34:04
--------------63835AB971E10ECC00B53984
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Regarding the ongoing debate of Goldie's moral character...
Call me a naive idealist, but I just don't see her in "the business".
Despite the company she kept, Goldie always struck me a duck/woman of
dignity. Crafty, yes. Willing to bend the law for her own good, yes.
Tough, yes. One might even say "tougher than the toughies". ;-) And
along those lines I'd say she "made it square". To refer to Don's King
of the Klondike, remember her clothes? Plain long skirt and a red
flannel shirt. Not exactly the garb of someone who's...uh, looking for
customers. Christopher Barat suggested that she's "been out of the
"game" for a while". Maybe so, but I think Goldie is resourceful enough
to make a life for herself by more honorable means. And, (to risk
lapsing into one of my huge bouts of rambling,) think about how she
acted with $crooge. Someone with so much *ahem* experience wouldn't be
so shy in approaching him. She wouldn't play so hard-to-get.
I'll conclude with what Don R said earlier...
"I just figured she homesteaded the land and built the joint herself, by
being smarter than the smarties and tougher than the toughies. How else
could she be worthy to be $crooge's only love?"
That kind of sums it up for me.
(IMHO, of course)
Katie Sullivan
a.k.a. Mrs. Quackfaster
http://www.execpc.com/~sulliva1
--------------63835AB971E10ECC00B53984
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
Regarding the ongoing debate of Goldie's moral character...
Call me a naive idealist, but I just don't see her in "the business".
Despite the company she kept, Goldie always struck me a duck/woman of dignity.
Crafty, yes. Willing to bend the law for her own good, yes.
Tough, yes. One might even say "tougher than the toughies". ;-)
And along those lines I'd say she "made it square". To refer to Don's
King of the Klondike, remember her clothes? Plain long skirt and
a red flannel shirt. Not exactly the garb of someone who's...uh,
looking for customers. Christopher Barat suggested that she's "been
out of the "game" for a while". Maybe so, but I think Goldie is resourceful
enough to make a life for herself by more honorable means. And, (to
risk lapsing into one of my huge bouts of rambling,) think about how she
acted with $crooge. Someone with so much *ahem* <I>experience </I>wouldn't
be so shy in approaching him. She wouldn't play so hard-to-get.
I'll conclude with what Don R said earlier...
"I just figured she homesteaded the land and built the joint herself,
by being smarter than the smarties and tougher than the toughies. How else
could she be worthy to be $crooge's only love?"
That kind of sums it up for me.
(IMHO, of course)
Katie Sullivan
a.k.a. Mrs. Quackfaster
<A HREF="http://www.execpc.com/~sulliva1">http://www.execpc.com/~sulliva1</A></HTML>
--------------63835AB971E10ECC00B53984--
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Regarding the ongoing debate of Goldie's moral character...
Call me a naive idealist, but I just don't see her in "the business".
Despite the company she kept, Goldie always struck me a duck/woman of
dignity. Crafty, yes. Willing to bend the law for her own good, yes.
Tough, yes. One might even say "tougher than the toughies". ;-) And
along those lines I'd say she "made it square". To refer to Don's King
of the Klondike, remember her clothes? Plain long skirt and a red
flannel shirt. Not exactly the garb of someone who's...uh, looking for
customers. Christopher Barat suggested that she's "been out of the
"game" for a while". Maybe so, but I think Goldie is resourceful enough
to make a life for herself by more honorable means. And, (to risk
lapsing into one of my huge bouts of rambling,) think about how she
acted with $crooge. Someone with so much *ahem* experience wouldn't be
so shy in approaching him. She wouldn't play so hard-to-get.
I'll conclude with what Don R said earlier...
"I just figured she homesteaded the land and built the joint herself, by
being smarter than the smarties and tougher than the toughies. How else
could she be worthy to be $crooge's only love?"
That kind of sums it up for me.
(IMHO, of course)
Katie Sullivan
a.k.a. Mrs. Quackfaster
http://www.execpc.com/~sulliva1
--------------63835AB971E10ECC00B53984
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
Regarding the ongoing debate of Goldie's moral character...
Call me a naive idealist, but I just don't see her in "the business".
Despite the company she kept, Goldie always struck me a duck/woman of dignity.
Crafty, yes. Willing to bend the law for her own good, yes.
Tough, yes. One might even say "tougher than the toughies". ;-)
And along those lines I'd say she "made it square". To refer to Don's
King of the Klondike, remember her clothes? Plain long skirt and
a red flannel shirt. Not exactly the garb of someone who's...uh,
looking for customers. Christopher Barat suggested that she's "been
out of the "game" for a while". Maybe so, but I think Goldie is resourceful
enough to make a life for herself by more honorable means. And, (to
risk lapsing into one of my huge bouts of rambling,) think about how she
acted with $crooge. Someone with so much *ahem* <I>experience </I>wouldn't
be so shy in approaching him. She wouldn't play so hard-to-get.
I'll conclude with what Don R said earlier...
"I just figured she homesteaded the land and built the joint herself,
by being smarter than the smarties and tougher than the toughies. How else
could she be worthy to be $crooge's only love?"
That kind of sums it up for me.
(IMHO, of course)
Katie Sullivan
a.k.a. Mrs. Quackfaster
<A HREF="http://www.execpc.com/~sulliva1">http://www.execpc.com/~sulliva1</A></HTML>
--------------63835AB971E10ECC00B53984--
Marco Barlotti
Sloppy stories
Message 219 -
1997-10-21 at 03:14:30
> Tarjei Kidd Olsen <(Email removed)>
> it seems like most of the European Duck scripts are written very
> hastily, incorporating few references, or even much thought.
(Dave)
>Could you expand a bit on the above?[...] did you actually mean the
original creator's
>scripts seem hastily, thoughtlessly written because they incorporate so
>few references?
Strangely enough, the sloppiest Italian stories (certainly written in great
haste, certainly incorporating NO references... or wrong ones!) were
probably (most of) those scripted by the late Jerry Siegel... ;-)
Marco
> it seems like most of the European Duck scripts are written very
> hastily, incorporating few references, or even much thought.
(Dave)
>Could you expand a bit on the above?[...] did you actually mean the
original creator's
>scripts seem hastily, thoughtlessly written because they incorporate so
>few references?
Strangely enough, the sloppiest Italian stories (certainly written in great
haste, certainly incorporating NO references... or wrong ones!) were
probably (most of) those scripted by the late Jerry Siegel... ;-)
Marco
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Identical characters / King Scrooge the First
Message 220 -
1997-10-21 at 03:24:14
Hi!
Five identical barristers (McEagle, McEagle, McHawk, McCrow and McChicken)
appear in Barks-story "Heirloom Watch" (U$ 10).
Some news(?):
I've heard a rumour that Ulrich Schroder plans to do the re-inking of the
Barks script-only story "King Scrooge the First" (U$ 71) again. The art he
did on it in the past (which was *not* the entire story, but about 3 or 4
pages) unfortunately got lost in a fire. Now he plans to work on it again
and to finish it this time. People who have seen the half page printed
in CBL 5 will know that this is great news (to say the least), because
Schroder can perfectly imitate Barks' style.
BTW. "King Scrooge the First" is from a different category than the Junior
Woodchuck-scripts, because it's *not* retirement work. Barks drew the
script before he retired, but he "didn't want the long grind of drawing
'King Scrooge' to run [him] into overtime." (Tony Strobl was asked to
do it.)
Unfortunately, the original script got lost after the story was finished.
Tony Strobl recalled it "had a fantastic layout and I hardly needed to do
any preliminary sketches, just trace."
Barks quote: Notes for the CBL, 25 March 1989
Strobl quote: "The Duckburg Times" No. 16 (1 January 1983)
Greetings,
--- Daniel
"After living forty centuries anyone'd be *nut*!"
Scrooge McDuck (King Scrooge the First)
Five identical barristers (McEagle, McEagle, McHawk, McCrow and McChicken)
appear in Barks-story "Heirloom Watch" (U$ 10).
Some news(?):
I've heard a rumour that Ulrich Schroder plans to do the re-inking of the
Barks script-only story "King Scrooge the First" (U$ 71) again. The art he
did on it in the past (which was *not* the entire story, but about 3 or 4
pages) unfortunately got lost in a fire. Now he plans to work on it again
and to finish it this time. People who have seen the half page printed
in CBL 5 will know that this is great news (to say the least), because
Schroder can perfectly imitate Barks' style.
BTW. "King Scrooge the First" is from a different category than the Junior
Woodchuck-scripts, because it's *not* retirement work. Barks drew the
script before he retired, but he "didn't want the long grind of drawing
'King Scrooge' to run [him] into overtime." (Tony Strobl was asked to
do it.)
Unfortunately, the original script got lost after the story was finished.
Tony Strobl recalled it "had a fantastic layout and I hardly needed to do
any preliminary sketches, just trace."
Barks quote: Notes for the CBL, 25 March 1989
Strobl quote: "The Duckburg Times" No. 16 (1 January 1983)
Greetings,
--- Daniel
"After living forty centuries anyone'd be *nut*!"
Scrooge McDuck (King Scrooge the First)
Katie Sullivan
Historical Precedent
Message 221 -
1997-10-21 at 03:30:28
I was doing some websurfing, and I ran into some really neat sites on
the Yukon Gold Rush. I found this anecdote particularly interesting:
Martha Louise Black :
Abandoned by her first husband en route to the Klondike in 1898, she
hiked over the Chilkoot Pass, sailed pregnant down the Yukon River in a
homemade boat to Dawson, bore her child in a log cabin, raised money,
bought a sawmill, bossed 16 men on a mining claim, married George Black
who became Yukon's Member of Parliament and upon his illness ran for,
and won, his seat. Martha Black became Yukon's first, and Canada's
second, woman Member of Parliament.
So Goldie could certainly have gotten a saloon for herself without
compromising her morals.
Katie
the Yukon Gold Rush. I found this anecdote particularly interesting:
Martha Louise Black :
Abandoned by her first husband en route to the Klondike in 1898, she
hiked over the Chilkoot Pass, sailed pregnant down the Yukon River in a
homemade boat to Dawson, bore her child in a log cabin, raised money,
bought a sawmill, bossed 16 men on a mining claim, married George Black
who became Yukon's Member of Parliament and upon his illness ran for,
and won, his seat. Martha Black became Yukon's first, and Canada's
second, woman Member of Parliament.
So Goldie could certainly have gotten a saloon for herself without
compromising her morals.
Katie
Katie Sullivan
I'll take prunes any day!
Message 222 -
1997-10-21 at 03:33:49
Just me again, with yet another historical tidbit. Think all the
starving people eating saddle and boots in "Hearts of the Yukon" is
far-fetched? Not so. Check out this:
The Bishop Who Ate His Boots
This story was the inspiration for the famous scene in Charlie Chaplin's
movie "The Gold Rush." Lost in an ice fog at 40 below with no more
provisions, Bishop Stringer hit on the idea of boiling his and his
companion's sealskin and walrus sole boots for seven hours, then
drinking the broth. According to the Bishop, it was "tough and stringy,
but palatable and fairly satisfying." The Bishop lost 50 pounds, but
eventually found his way to a Native village near where Eagle Plains on
the Dempster Highway is today and he was nursed back to health.
For more on these stories, go to http://www.gold-rush.org/ghost-01.htm
Katie Sullivan
starving people eating saddle and boots in "Hearts of the Yukon" is
far-fetched? Not so. Check out this:
The Bishop Who Ate His Boots
This story was the inspiration for the famous scene in Charlie Chaplin's
movie "The Gold Rush." Lost in an ice fog at 40 below with no more
provisions, Bishop Stringer hit on the idea of boiling his and his
companion's sealskin and walrus sole boots for seven hours, then
drinking the broth. According to the Bishop, it was "tough and stringy,
but palatable and fairly satisfying." The Bishop lost 50 pounds, but
eventually found his way to a Native village near where Eagle Plains on
the Dempster Highway is today and he was nursed back to health.
For more on these stories, go to http://www.gold-rush.org/ghost-01.htm
Katie Sullivan
Shaun Craill
Horsefeathers
Message 223 -
1997-10-21 at 03:47:09
Hi everyone,
I think I need to make a wee retraction about a post I sent in about the
design of Ducks vs Mice a short while back. Noel Van Horn's Mickey stories
and art are gems, a case in point is D97242 'Horsefeathers'.
I loved the Fantasia/Silly Symphony inspired trees, perfect for the story,
and Mickey's expressions are brilliant. Very nice use of eyebrow ridges in
the close ups. If the foliage had had more inspired colouring it would have
had more depth and looked even better.
I do wonder though if there is a case for having Mickey's ears more maleable
to give a greater range of *expression*. The wings on Asterix's helmet are
just about alive and tell us a lot about what the character is feeling.
Mickey's ears are very dominant on his head but instead of moving about they
sort of stick out like rigid radar dishes.
I realise that Mickey's silohuette is the main identification of his
character (and even DISNEY itself) so maybe what we can see in
'Horsefeathers' is as good as we will get!
I think I need to make a wee retraction about a post I sent in about the
design of Ducks vs Mice a short while back. Noel Van Horn's Mickey stories
and art are gems, a case in point is D97242 'Horsefeathers'.
I loved the Fantasia/Silly Symphony inspired trees, perfect for the story,
and Mickey's expressions are brilliant. Very nice use of eyebrow ridges in
the close ups. If the foliage had had more inspired colouring it would have
had more depth and looked even better.
I do wonder though if there is a case for having Mickey's ears more maleable
to give a greater range of *expression*. The wings on Asterix's helmet are
just about alive and tell us a lot about what the character is feeling.
Mickey's ears are very dominant on his head but instead of moving about they
sort of stick out like rigid radar dishes.
I realise that Mickey's silohuette is the main identification of his
character (and even DISNEY itself) so maybe what we can see in
'Horsefeathers' is as good as we will get!
Merlin Haas
Identical characters
Message 224 -
1997-10-21 at 04:09:20
Don Markstein wrote:
> You know, recently, I was trying to think of sets of
> identical characters -- those who are precisely the same, one to the
> next (with the exception of very superficial identifiers like
> numbers or cap colors) -- and aside from the Beagles and the
> Nephews, all I could come up with were the Twins from the
> GORMENGHAST books. Maybe my brain is defective, because I'm SURE
> there must be more than just three sets, two of which are associated
> with Donald Duck.
How about the three bats from Walt Kelly's Pogo: Bewitched, Bothered,
and Bemildred?
best -- Merlin Haas
> You know, recently, I was trying to think of sets of
> identical characters -- those who are precisely the same, one to the
> next (with the exception of very superficial identifiers like
> numbers or cap colors) -- and aside from the Beagles and the
> Nephews, all I could come up with were the Twins from the
> GORMENGHAST books. Maybe my brain is defective, because I'm SURE
> there must be more than just three sets, two of which are associated
> with Donald Duck.
How about the three bats from Walt Kelly's Pogo: Bewitched, Bothered,
and Bemildred?
best -- Merlin Haas
Wilmer Rivers
More identical characters
Message 225 -
1997-10-21 at 05:09:15
Identical characters in Barks stories:
Peeweegahs, Terries, Fermies, lemmings. :)
Wilmer Rivers
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V97 Issue #229
******************************************
Peeweegahs, Terries, Fermies, lemmings. :)
Wilmer Rivers
--------------------------------
End of Disney comics Digest V97 Issue #229
******************************************