TIMO:
<< Indeed interesting experiment. Spiegel's and Murry's styles don't fit
together, that?s for sure. I think they should've come closer to each other:
bit more realistically drawn Mickey and Goofy and a bit more stylished
humans. >>
I think those stories were created to be exactly the way they are,
inspired by many movies which put together human actors and
cartoon characters (Gene Kelly + Jerry Mouse, Roger Rabbit, and
so on...) If they fit well in those movies, so do Spiegel's and Murry's
styles... (IMHO)
Tchau,
-- Arthur.
Author
Topic: 200103
(376 messages)
Arthur Faria Jr.
Timo: Mickey Mouse Super Secret Agent
Message 271 -
2001-03-24 at 21:13:31
Luis Felipe
A Poem for Barks
Message 272 -
2001-03-25 at 00:04:02
A poem for Barks
An angel you were !
Like an angel, you spread so much goodness and joy
All over the world !
You blessed our childhood with your inspiring teachings,
Fantastic adventures
And the fancy world you created for us !
You made possible that the child inside each one of us could
never die !
For you to fully carry out your mission,
God allowed you to live almost a whole century !
A century of pure enjoyment,
A century of blessed grace,
A century of true love !
Oh, Carl !
Wherever you are,
The little child inside me
Tenderly kisses your hands,
Congratulates and thanks you,
For this whole century of eternal love !
from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,
Luís Felipe dos Santos Pires
luisfelipepires at uol.com.br
An angel you were !
Like an angel, you spread so much goodness and joy
All over the world !
You blessed our childhood with your inspiring teachings,
Fantastic adventures
And the fancy world you created for us !
You made possible that the child inside each one of us could
never die !
For you to fully carry out your mission,
God allowed you to live almost a whole century !
A century of pure enjoyment,
A century of blessed grace,
A century of true love !
Oh, Carl !
Wherever you are,
The little child inside me
Tenderly kisses your hands,
Congratulates and thanks you,
For this whole century of eternal love !
from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,
Luís Felipe dos Santos Pires
luisfelipepires at uol.com.br
Dennis Books
HERITAGE
Message 273 -
2001-03-25 at 01:23:56
I SUPPOSE BECAUSE CARL BARKS WAS OF SCOTISH HERITAGE. I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM HIM ONE DAY STATING THAT MY C.1936 KRUEGER DONALD DUCK DOLL DRESSED IN SCOTTISH ATTIRE WAS WEARING THE TARTAN PATTERN AND COLORS OF HIS FAMILY CLAN.
BEST...DENNIS
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
BEST...DENNIS
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
Fernando Ventura
Zé Carioca, spacial adventure!
Message 274 -
2001-03-25 at 14:26:21
Hello my friends! Remenber that some eeks ago I spoke about a "more" special
edition of Z? Carioca?
If someone like to have a look at the first historie of the edition, just
take a look here:
http://www.disneynews.hpg.com.br/Comics/index.html?
Thanks!
Fernando!
edition of Z? Carioca?
If someone like to have a look at the first historie of the edition, just
take a look here:
http://www.disneynews.hpg.com.br/Comics/index.html?
Thanks!
Fernando!
Gary Pantzer
Off topic:Ruff + Reddy
Message 275 -
2001-03-25 at 18:46:37
One day last week I got into a conversation with a co-worker
about tv cartoons. We had many favorites in common such as
Huckleberry Hound. When I mentioned watching Ruff+Reddy
he was lost. I bored him with a tale of living in the 50's in the
wilds (literally) of Wisconsin where we got one channel and how
on Saturday morning I would sit in a dark room to watch R+R
(sunlight would wash out the tv image). He never saw it as he is
8 years younger than I. The very next day,listening to the radio,
I heard the theme from the Huckleberry show followed by the
news of Hanna'a death. It was nice to see that Dan Shane can
still remember R+R too.
about tv cartoons. We had many favorites in common such as
Huckleberry Hound. When I mentioned watching Ruff+Reddy
he was lost. I bored him with a tale of living in the 50's in the
wilds (literally) of Wisconsin where we got one channel and how
on Saturday morning I would sit in a dark room to watch R+R
(sunlight would wash out the tv image). He never saw it as he is
8 years younger than I. The very next day,listening to the radio,
I heard the theme from the Huckleberry show followed by the
news of Hanna'a death. It was nice to see that Dan Shane can
still remember R+R too.
Timo Ronkainen
BB's ears/ MM Secret Super Agent etc.
Message 276 -
2001-03-25 at 21:39:24
Hi!
Somehow my previous posting disappeared to somewhere in nowhere, due to some
errors with hotmail.. %&¤#!
Can´t remember exactly what I said, but I go breafly on those first..
Olivier:
Subject: Beagle Boys' ears
>>BTW: sometimes Beagle Boys have floppy dog's ears and sometimes normal
human
>>ears.
>and in all four they do have *flappy dog's ears*:
- 1st appearance: WDC&S 134 (Nov 51, Album 19)
Yes, you got me there. Looks like Barks created Beagles with doggy ears.
Checking quickly couple of stories.. US 28 shows them with human ears.
But I was quite fascinated about US 7, where Barks seemed to be little bit
confused, whether to draw them with dog ears or just regular human ears..
Look for example page 13 panel 3 where one of them has floppy ears while
others have more or less human ears.. strange.
Steven Rowe:
>> I just wonder the logic of Disney/Western editors....
>Just Western editors (my understanding is that Disney left them alone),
but
>you are talking about two different editors 20 years apart.
Admit. But there still hasn't been clear yes or no on that matter..
morgan:
>i wish him well, and all of you who are going to the event. i
>hope you're not too disappointed when you meet a pinched and crabby man
who
>thinks his fans are interested in him and his work soley to make a few
>dollars by selling it to another fan.
I´ve never seen him like that, in Finland he has always been friendly and
cooperative. He have sometimes done extra hours to get signed copies of his
books to all people that have arrived to meet him. On each book he usually
drew something.
I could never sell an original drawing or book signed by Don, or by anyone
else if I happen to like the artist. That might be the difference between
truefan and speculative collector.. I guess.
Arthur Faria Jr.
Mickey Mouse Super Secret Agent
TIMO:
<< Indeed interesting experiment. Spiegel's and Murry's styles don't fit
together,
>I think those stories were created to be exactly the way they are,
>inspired by many movies which put together human actors and
>cartoon characters (Gene Kelly + Jerry Mouse, Roger Rabbit, and
>so on...) If they fit well in those movies, so do Spiegel's and Murry's
>styles... (IMHO)
If you say so (and those arguments are good) but my HO is just that it
doesn´t work. Lets not argue about this though. I do admit that those films
you mentioned worked well. Better than this MM comic. In a comic book
everything is drawn by hand, therefore one could imagine that they should
fit together better than drawn characters mixed with real people in a movie.
Yet it was much more fun to see *real* Gene Kelly dancing with drawn mouse,
than to see realistically *drawn* humans with Mickey.
Awh, I don't know if this made any sense.. :-/
Timo
^^''*''^^
Cartoonist - writer - donaldist -
Timo Ronkainen ---------------- -
YO-kylä 52 A 26 --------------- -
20540 Turku ------------------- -
Finland ----------------------- -
timoro at hotmail.com
timoro at sunpoint.net
¨¨ Personal:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/timoro/
¨¨ Ankkalinnan Pamaus:
http://welcome.to/ankistit
.................................
"Rumble on, buxom bumble bee!
Go sit on cowslip - far from me!"
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Somehow my previous posting disappeared to somewhere in nowhere, due to some
errors with hotmail.. %&¤#!
Can´t remember exactly what I said, but I go breafly on those first..
Olivier:
Subject: Beagle Boys' ears
>>BTW: sometimes Beagle Boys have floppy dog's ears and sometimes normal
human
>>ears.
>and in all four they do have *flappy dog's ears*:
- 1st appearance: WDC&S 134 (Nov 51, Album 19)
Yes, you got me there. Looks like Barks created Beagles with doggy ears.
Checking quickly couple of stories.. US 28 shows them with human ears.
But I was quite fascinated about US 7, where Barks seemed to be little bit
confused, whether to draw them with dog ears or just regular human ears..
Look for example page 13 panel 3 where one of them has floppy ears while
others have more or less human ears.. strange.
Steven Rowe:
>> I just wonder the logic of Disney/Western editors....
>Just Western editors (my understanding is that Disney left them alone),
but
>you are talking about two different editors 20 years apart.
Admit. But there still hasn't been clear yes or no on that matter..
morgan:
>i wish him well, and all of you who are going to the event. i
>hope you're not too disappointed when you meet a pinched and crabby man
who
>thinks his fans are interested in him and his work soley to make a few
>dollars by selling it to another fan.
I´ve never seen him like that, in Finland he has always been friendly and
cooperative. He have sometimes done extra hours to get signed copies of his
books to all people that have arrived to meet him. On each book he usually
drew something.
I could never sell an original drawing or book signed by Don, or by anyone
else if I happen to like the artist. That might be the difference between
truefan and speculative collector.. I guess.
Arthur Faria Jr.
Mickey Mouse Super Secret Agent
TIMO:
<< Indeed interesting experiment. Spiegel's and Murry's styles don't fit
together,
>I think those stories were created to be exactly the way they are,
>inspired by many movies which put together human actors and
>cartoon characters (Gene Kelly + Jerry Mouse, Roger Rabbit, and
>so on...) If they fit well in those movies, so do Spiegel's and Murry's
>styles... (IMHO)
If you say so (and those arguments are good) but my HO is just that it
doesn´t work. Lets not argue about this though. I do admit that those films
you mentioned worked well. Better than this MM comic. In a comic book
everything is drawn by hand, therefore one could imagine that they should
fit together better than drawn characters mixed with real people in a movie.
Yet it was much more fun to see *real* Gene Kelly dancing with drawn mouse,
than to see realistically *drawn* humans with Mickey.
Awh, I don't know if this made any sense.. :-/
Timo
^^''*''^^
Cartoonist - writer - donaldist -
Timo Ronkainen ---------------- -
YO-kylä 52 A 26 --------------- -
20540 Turku ------------------- -
Finland ----------------------- -
timoro at hotmail.com
timoro at sunpoint.net
¨¨ Personal:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/timoro/
¨¨ Ankkalinnan Pamaus:
http://welcome.to/ankistit
.................................
"Rumble on, buxom bumble bee!
Go sit on cowslip - far from me!"
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Rob Klein
More Relatives of Mickey and Donald
Message 277 -
2001-03-25 at 22:10:15
Below are a few more of Donald's and Mickey's relatives. But first I must
apologise for an error in my previous message: Dick Duck, Private Eye was
not introduced as a cousin of Donald. He was a member of the "greater Duck
family"; and having the same surname, we may postulate that he may be a
distant cousin, - but we cannot assume that. The private detective who
WAS introduced as Donald's cousin was Dickey Drake. That was in DD 91(USA
original series), a story drawn by Tony Strobl. That story was about a
Duck Family Reunion. Several other (male only) members of the Duck family
were shown, (in their work uniforms) but not introduced by name. There was
an astronaut, fireman, soldier, ship captain, explorer (pith helmet &
caquis),airplane pilot, deep sea diver, matador, track athlete, pirate (in
17th century garb, including eye-patch) - perhaps he was an actor - on a
break from a movie set (or perhaps just an insane person), and a university
professor(cap & gown). Donald addressed them all as "cousins". Therefore,
in addition to all the regular characters, Cousin Cuthbirt Coot, Cousin
Whitewater Duck, and any others mentioned by Barks and the others on the
family trees, Donald has at least 11 more cousins from this story alone.
Of course, there are many other non-Barks US, Italian, Danish, Dutch,
French and other stories which contain a family member used for that story
alone. In DD 42 (USA original series), McTavish Duck was an ancestor of
both Donald and Scrooge. With the last name "Duck", he must be the link
between Scrooge and Donald's family. He died approximately 200 years
before Donald's nephews were their "normal comic book story ages". That
shows that there was at least one link between the McDuck and Duck families
a long time ago. Could the recent link proposed by Rosa be incorrect? But
if that is so, Scrooge and Donald must be VERY DISTANTLY related.
Consistancy dictates that the two families must be linked BOTH in the
distant past, and again recently.
There is also a very distant link between Gladstone Gander's family and The
McDucks. In that same story, it is declared that Mctavish Duck's daughter
married a direct ancestor (Lochbert Gander) of Gladstone Gander.
Gladstone's Great, Great, Great, Great etc. Grandfather was married into
the Duck family. However, Donald and Gladstone must be reated more closely
from a more recent union of the two families, or they would not refer to
eachother as "cousins". Generally, in most "Western societies", 3rd or
certainly no further distant than 4th cousins would be the most distant kin
that would be considered related. A union 200 years earlier would make
Donald and Gladstone much more distant than 4th cousins. Similarly, as
they are both considered heirs to Scrooge's estate, the union that makes
that so cannot be the 200 year old connexion with McTavish Duck.
In DD 65 (USA original series - Tony Strobl), Scrooge has two Scottish
nephews, Wee Angus and Cousin Slye (both contemporaries of Donald). Wee
Angus has grown up to be a giant athlete, and Slye was a stingy thief. In
DD 61, Donald visits his Cousin Daniel, who is Sheriff of a Western town.
Dexter Duck (1959 Strobl story) and Dexter Drake (1954 Moores story) were
both Duck rivals of Donald for Daisy. Are they just distant members of the
Duck Clan, or are they more closely related?
Mickey Mouse Album (FC 1057 from 1959) introduces four male relatives of
Mickey Mouse:
Uncle Boomer - railroad owner
Ben Ali Maus - Arab Oil Sheikh
Uncle Mukluk - Old Alaskan Sourdough (miner)
Cousin Digger - Australian Rancher (should that be "Stationer"?)
I have only looked through a few of my US comics in this effort, and have
found many relatives of the stars. They are one-shot characters who were
used to meet a need in each individual story. I do not have the time to
look through all my US, Dutch, Scandinavian and German comics (some located
in Europe - some in North America) to come up with a larger list. I don't
have many Italian, French, Brazilian and other nations' productions, which
must also have an extremely large volume of similarly created characters.
But, I do applaud the efforts of those list members who are trying to put
together an exhaustive list from all the different Disney comics(and
animation) producers. As to the family trees: I think it is interesting to
postulate, but impractical (nee, impossible) to produce an accurate one,
due to the many controdictions. But, it is fun to consider them. To the
various DCML members who can look through ALL the printings of your own
country to tabulate these characters, I hope you can do so. Perhaps then,
we can later compile them onto a single, international list. Cheers, Rob
Klein
This shows that there are probably hundreds of one-shot character
apologise for an error in my previous message: Dick Duck, Private Eye was
not introduced as a cousin of Donald. He was a member of the "greater Duck
family"; and having the same surname, we may postulate that he may be a
distant cousin, - but we cannot assume that. The private detective who
WAS introduced as Donald's cousin was Dickey Drake. That was in DD 91(USA
original series), a story drawn by Tony Strobl. That story was about a
Duck Family Reunion. Several other (male only) members of the Duck family
were shown, (in their work uniforms) but not introduced by name. There was
an astronaut, fireman, soldier, ship captain, explorer (pith helmet &
caquis),airplane pilot, deep sea diver, matador, track athlete, pirate (in
17th century garb, including eye-patch) - perhaps he was an actor - on a
break from a movie set (or perhaps just an insane person), and a university
professor(cap & gown). Donald addressed them all as "cousins". Therefore,
in addition to all the regular characters, Cousin Cuthbirt Coot, Cousin
Whitewater Duck, and any others mentioned by Barks and the others on the
family trees, Donald has at least 11 more cousins from this story alone.
Of course, there are many other non-Barks US, Italian, Danish, Dutch,
French and other stories which contain a family member used for that story
alone. In DD 42 (USA original series), McTavish Duck was an ancestor of
both Donald and Scrooge. With the last name "Duck", he must be the link
between Scrooge and Donald's family. He died approximately 200 years
before Donald's nephews were their "normal comic book story ages". That
shows that there was at least one link between the McDuck and Duck families
a long time ago. Could the recent link proposed by Rosa be incorrect? But
if that is so, Scrooge and Donald must be VERY DISTANTLY related.
Consistancy dictates that the two families must be linked BOTH in the
distant past, and again recently.
There is also a very distant link between Gladstone Gander's family and The
McDucks. In that same story, it is declared that Mctavish Duck's daughter
married a direct ancestor (Lochbert Gander) of Gladstone Gander.
Gladstone's Great, Great, Great, Great etc. Grandfather was married into
the Duck family. However, Donald and Gladstone must be reated more closely
from a more recent union of the two families, or they would not refer to
eachother as "cousins". Generally, in most "Western societies", 3rd or
certainly no further distant than 4th cousins would be the most distant kin
that would be considered related. A union 200 years earlier would make
Donald and Gladstone much more distant than 4th cousins. Similarly, as
they are both considered heirs to Scrooge's estate, the union that makes
that so cannot be the 200 year old connexion with McTavish Duck.
In DD 65 (USA original series - Tony Strobl), Scrooge has two Scottish
nephews, Wee Angus and Cousin Slye (both contemporaries of Donald). Wee
Angus has grown up to be a giant athlete, and Slye was a stingy thief. In
DD 61, Donald visits his Cousin Daniel, who is Sheriff of a Western town.
Dexter Duck (1959 Strobl story) and Dexter Drake (1954 Moores story) were
both Duck rivals of Donald for Daisy. Are they just distant members of the
Duck Clan, or are they more closely related?
Mickey Mouse Album (FC 1057 from 1959) introduces four male relatives of
Mickey Mouse:
Uncle Boomer - railroad owner
Ben Ali Maus - Arab Oil Sheikh
Uncle Mukluk - Old Alaskan Sourdough (miner)
Cousin Digger - Australian Rancher (should that be "Stationer"?)
I have only looked through a few of my US comics in this effort, and have
found many relatives of the stars. They are one-shot characters who were
used to meet a need in each individual story. I do not have the time to
look through all my US, Dutch, Scandinavian and German comics (some located
in Europe - some in North America) to come up with a larger list. I don't
have many Italian, French, Brazilian and other nations' productions, which
must also have an extremely large volume of similarly created characters.
But, I do applaud the efforts of those list members who are trying to put
together an exhaustive list from all the different Disney comics(and
animation) producers. As to the family trees: I think it is interesting to
postulate, but impractical (nee, impossible) to produce an accurate one,
due to the many controdictions. But, it is fun to consider them. To the
various DCML members who can look through ALL the printings of your own
country to tabulate these characters, I hope you can do so. Perhaps then,
we can later compile them onto a single, international list. Cheers, Rob
Klein
This shows that there are probably hundreds of one-shot character
Francesco Spreafico
Zio Paperone #138
Message 278 -
2001-03-25 at 23:21:39
Kriton's (once Archontis's) monthly "column" about Komix got me to think
that maybe even the Italian Zio Paperone may deserve one.
In theory it should be interesting only for Italian readers, but if this
were true, Kriton's komix mails should be interesting only for Greek, and
that's not true, since I find it interesting, so... ;-)
Zio Paperone #138, March 2001.
- Cover by Marco Rota (it always is), illustrating "Somwhere in Nowhere";
- A little note by the editor promoting the Italian upcoming book to
celebrate Barks's 100th birthday;
- An article by Luca Boschi telling the meeting between Carl Barks and Don
Rosa in 1998;
- An illustration with a Xmas tree by Don Rosa from Picsou 347 (FC PM
347D);
- A one-page article by Alberto Becattini about Barks's "Firebug" and the
"censor" Buettner;
- Barks's "Firebug" (W OS 108-02);
- An article by Luca Boschi about "Somewhere in Nowhere" (Already
published in TESORI #3);
- Barks's, Lustig's, Block's "Somewhere in Nowhere" (note: ONLY in
Italian, like the rest of the mag);
- A one-page article by Alberto Becattini about "Storm Dancers";
- Jippes version of Barks's "Storm Dancers" (H 92012);
- Rota's "The Talking Totem" (D 96354);
- Two Barks's one-pagers: W OS 199-03 and W OS 199-04;
- Barks's "US in Egypt" (W US 25-05);
- Backcover by Rota with the usual Barks's pig villain.;
That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'" or "Barks's"?? :-)
--
Francesco
http://digilander.iol.it/sgrizzo
that maybe even the Italian Zio Paperone may deserve one.
In theory it should be interesting only for Italian readers, but if this
were true, Kriton's komix mails should be interesting only for Greek, and
that's not true, since I find it interesting, so... ;-)
Zio Paperone #138, March 2001.
- Cover by Marco Rota (it always is), illustrating "Somwhere in Nowhere";
- A little note by the editor promoting the Italian upcoming book to
celebrate Barks's 100th birthday;
- An article by Luca Boschi telling the meeting between Carl Barks and Don
Rosa in 1998;
- An illustration with a Xmas tree by Don Rosa from Picsou 347 (FC PM
347D);
- A one-page article by Alberto Becattini about Barks's "Firebug" and the
"censor" Buettner;
- Barks's "Firebug" (W OS 108-02);
- An article by Luca Boschi about "Somewhere in Nowhere" (Already
published in TESORI #3);
- Barks's, Lustig's, Block's "Somewhere in Nowhere" (note: ONLY in
Italian, like the rest of the mag);
- A one-page article by Alberto Becattini about "Storm Dancers";
- Jippes version of Barks's "Storm Dancers" (H 92012);
- Rota's "The Talking Totem" (D 96354);
- Two Barks's one-pagers: W OS 199-03 and W OS 199-04;
- Barks's "US in Egypt" (W US 25-05);
- Backcover by Rota with the usual Barks's pig villain.;
That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'" or "Barks's"?? :-)
--
Francesco
http://digilander.iol.it/sgrizzo
Apostolis Trikourakis
Zio Paperone #138
Message 279 -
2001-03-25 at 23:47:38
Hi all
Francesco wrote:
> That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> or "Barks's"?? :-)
It's "Barks'" :-)
Best Wishes
=====
Apostolis Trikourakis, Athens, Greece
E-mail: komixgreekpage at yahoo.com
Web Site: http://www.geocities.com/komixgreekpage
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Francesco wrote:
> That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> or "Barks's"?? :-)
It's "Barks'" :-)
Best Wishes
=====
Apostolis Trikourakis, Athens, Greece
E-mail: komixgreekpage at yahoo.com
Web Site: http://www.geocities.com/komixgreekpage
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Stefan Persson
Zio Paperone #138
Message 280 -
2001-03-25 at 23:59:27
----- Original Message -----
From: "Apostolis Trikourakis" <komixgreekpage at yahoo.com>
To: <dcml at stp.ling.uu.se>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:47 PM
Subject: Zio Paperone #138
> Francesco wrote:
>
> > That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> > or "Barks's"?? :-)
>
> It's "Barks'" :-)
It's "Barks'" in Swedish and "Barks's" in English. In English apostrophe
only is only used if the word ends with a plural "s." And this "s" is *not*
a plural one!
Stefan
From: "Apostolis Trikourakis" <komixgreekpage at yahoo.com>
To: <dcml at stp.ling.uu.se>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:47 PM
Subject: Zio Paperone #138
> Francesco wrote:
>
> > That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> > or "Barks's"?? :-)
>
> It's "Barks'" :-)
It's "Barks'" in Swedish and "Barks's" in English. In English apostrophe
only is only used if the word ends with a plural "s." And this "s" is *not*
a plural one!
Stefan
Francesco Spreafico
Zio Paperone #138
Message 281 -
2001-03-26 at 00:05:39
From: "Apostolis Trikourakis" <komixgreekpage at yahoo.com>
> > That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> > or "Barks's"?? :-)
>
> It's "Barks'" :-)
> Best Wishes
Thanks :-)
In the meanwhile I found the following rule:
---------------
When a singular noun ends in /s/. There are a number of nouns, often
names, which
end in /s/, e.g. Burns, Jones, Dickens. The writer has a choice when
making the
genitive. Either form within the following pairs is correct-
Dickens' novels or Dickens's novels
Burns' poetry or Burns's poetry
Barnabas' nose or Barnabas's nose
Dicken's novels or Burn's poetry or Barnaba's nose is not.
---------------
But I admit I like "Barks'" better.
--
Francesco
http://digilander.iol.it/sgrizzo
> > That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> > or "Barks's"?? :-)
>
> It's "Barks'" :-)
> Best Wishes
Thanks :-)
In the meanwhile I found the following rule:
---------------
When a singular noun ends in /s/. There are a number of nouns, often
names, which
end in /s/, e.g. Burns, Jones, Dickens. The writer has a choice when
making the
genitive. Either form within the following pairs is correct-
Dickens' novels or Dickens's novels
Burns' poetry or Burns's poetry
Barnabas' nose or Barnabas's nose
Dicken's novels or Burn's poetry or Barnaba's nose is not.
---------------
But I admit I like "Barks'" better.
--
Francesco
http://digilander.iol.it/sgrizzo
Stefan Persson
Zio Paperone #138
Message 282 -
2001-03-26 at 00:17:21
----- Original Message -----
From: "Francesco Spreafico" <frspreaf at tin.it>
To: "DCML" <dcml at stp.ling.uu.se>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Zio Paperone #138
> From: "Apostolis Trikourakis" <komixgreekpage at yahoo.com>
>
> > > That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> > > or "Barks's"?? :-)
> >
> > It's "Barks'" :-)
> > Best Wishes
>
> Thanks :-)
Don't trust him!
> In the meanwhile I found the following rule:
The left column is wrong!
> But I admit I like "Barks'" better.
But it's wrong!
Stefan
From: "Francesco Spreafico" <frspreaf at tin.it>
To: "DCML" <dcml at stp.ling.uu.se>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Zio Paperone #138
> From: "Apostolis Trikourakis" <komixgreekpage at yahoo.com>
>
> > > That's all for this month, just a question: "Barks'"
> > > or "Barks's"?? :-)
> >
> > It's "Barks'" :-)
> > Best Wishes
>
> Thanks :-)
Don't trust him!
> In the meanwhile I found the following rule:
The left column is wrong!
> But I admit I like "Barks'" better.
But it's wrong!
Stefan
Apostolis Trikourakis
Zio Paperone #138
Message 283 -
2001-03-26 at 00:27:47
Hi all
Stefan wrote:
> It's "Barks'" in Swedish and "Barks's" in English. >
In English apostrophe
> only is only used if the word ends with a > plural
"s." And this "s" is *not*
> a plural one!
Ooops! Sorry for the mistake. I thought "Barks's" is
wrong because of the 2 -s in the end of the word.
> Don't trust him!
Hey! :-)
> But it's wrong!
So what?? :-))
Best Wishes
=====
Apostolis Trikourakis, Athens, Greece
E-mail: komixgreekpage at yahoo.com
Web Site: http://www.geocities.com/komixgreekpage
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Stefan wrote:
> It's "Barks'" in Swedish and "Barks's" in English. >
In English apostrophe
> only is only used if the word ends with a > plural
"s." And this "s" is *not*
> a plural one!
Ooops! Sorry for the mistake. I thought "Barks's" is
wrong because of the 2 -s in the end of the word.
> Don't trust him!
Hey! :-)
> But it's wrong!
So what?? :-))
Best Wishes
=====
Apostolis Trikourakis, Athens, Greece
E-mail: komixgreekpage at yahoo.com
Web Site: http://www.geocities.com/komixgreekpage
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Olivier
Zio Paperone #138-- Genitive
Message 284 -
2001-03-26 at 01:01:49
Hello!
1/
The Genitive is marked by an -s and the end of the word.
ex: Fred's house
2/
Exceptions: Plural nouns ending with an -s
Apostrophe only
ex: Our neighbors' house
3/
This exception does not apply to nouns that end in -s in the singular
ex: the waitress's
house
irregular plurals
ex: the children's
house
acronyms
ex: the M.P.'s house
So it is Barks's.
But--
4/
The genitive of names ending in -s can be written with an apostrophe only
ex: Dickens' house
So you have the choice, and you can write either Barks's house
or Barks' house
(I prefer the latter too)
5/
Whichever way you write it, it is usually pronounced as if written with an 's
6/
Words in -es: apostrophe only
ex: Ulysses' home
pronounced the same, whether there's the genitive or not
7/
for convenience' sake
for N-s' sake
Olivier
1/
The Genitive is marked by an -s and the end of the word.
ex: Fred's house
2/
Exceptions: Plural nouns ending with an -s
Apostrophe only
ex: Our neighbors' house
3/
This exception does not apply to nouns that end in -s in the singular
ex: the waitress's
house
irregular plurals
ex: the children's
house
acronyms
ex: the M.P.'s house
So it is Barks's.
But--
4/
The genitive of names ending in -s can be written with an apostrophe only
ex: Dickens' house
So you have the choice, and you can write either Barks's house
or Barks' house
(I prefer the latter too)
5/
Whichever way you write it, it is usually pronounced as if written with an 's
6/
Words in -es: apostrophe only
ex: Ulysses' home
pronounced the same, whether there's the genitive or not
7/
for convenience' sake
for N-s' sake
Olivier
Fabio Blanco
Off topic:Ruff + Reddy
Message 285 -
2001-03-26 at 08:21:06
Here's somebody from Argentina that not only remember with pleasure the
adventures of Ruff and Reddy but that with the only mention of that names
can hear the theme of the show in his mind...
Regards...
Fabio Blanco
*****************************
Bonvolu postu al: longtom at oeste.com.ar
adventures of Ruff and Reddy but that with the only mention of that names
can hear the theme of the show in his mind...
Regards...
Fabio Blanco
*****************************
Bonvolu postu al: longtom at oeste.com.ar