Can someone sent me digest v. 7 #3 directly?
Thanks,
Mike
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Author
Topic: 200309
(480 messages)
Mike Rhode
Need digest v. 7 #3
Message 61 -
2003-09-03 at 16:18:56
H.W.Fluks
A Fallberg script
Message 62 -
2003-09-03 at 18:49:25
I wrote:
HF> I have a xerox of the original Fallberg script of a
HF> story, drawn by Carpi.
Marco asked:
MB> What about a scan?
The 9 pages that were published in a Laqua catalog are now available at:
http://dd50.inducks.org/fallberg/ (more than 2 megabytes in total).
The story is S 75153, "The Pursuit Of Big Paw". The 19-page script was drawn in Italy as an 18-pager.
--Harry.
HF> I have a xerox of the original Fallberg script of a
HF> story, drawn by Carpi.
Marco asked:
MB> What about a scan?
The 9 pages that were published in a Laqua catalog are now available at:
http://dd50.inducks.org/fallberg/ (more than 2 megabytes in total).
The story is S 75153, "The Pursuit Of Big Paw". The 19-page script was drawn in Italy as an 18-pager.
--Harry.
Arie Fachrisal
Pigs is pigs
Message 63 -
2003-09-03 at 20:08:15
> From: "Gerstein, David DK - ECN" <DGE at ECN.egmont.com>
> Meanwhile, the Arab use of pig characters varies with the country,
> as Jehan's research found. Publishers in Egypt, which Jehan saw as
> comparatively liberal, let a pig stay a pig. But in Gulf countries such as
> Kuwait, where the editors were more conservative, Jehan found McSwine
> redrawn with a dog's nose and other pigfaces becoming unspecified
creatures
> (still rather piglike, but with nostrils removed from their snouts).
In Indonesia, few stories featuring pig-faces have been "altered" (just like
you described, David). It happened several years ago but eventually after a
few of those, they dont do that now. One can say that they were trying
things out, the results like you said, David wasnt too pretty as the
pig-faced characters has been made loking like a pig but not truely so it
became an unspecified creature.
Keep On Quacking,
Arie Fachrisal
-------------------------------------------------
"Ho, Maid Moonshine! Wherefore artst you at?"
-------------------------------------------------
> Meanwhile, the Arab use of pig characters varies with the country,
> as Jehan's research found. Publishers in Egypt, which Jehan saw as
> comparatively liberal, let a pig stay a pig. But in Gulf countries such as
> Kuwait, where the editors were more conservative, Jehan found McSwine
> redrawn with a dog's nose and other pigfaces becoming unspecified
creatures
> (still rather piglike, but with nostrils removed from their snouts).
In Indonesia, few stories featuring pig-faces have been "altered" (just like
you described, David). It happened several years ago but eventually after a
few of those, they dont do that now. One can say that they were trying
things out, the results like you said, David wasnt too pretty as the
pig-faced characters has been made loking like a pig but not truely so it
became an unspecified creature.
Keep On Quacking,
Arie Fachrisal
-------------------------------------------------
"Ho, Maid Moonshine! Wherefore artst you at?"
-------------------------------------------------
Shad Z.
Witch-Queen Snow White / Harry's trick
Message 64 -
2003-09-03 at 20:17:15
From: "Daniel van Eijmeren" <dve at kabelfoon.nl>
>
> SHAD Z to RICH BELLACERA, 01-09-2003:
>
> >> 4) Witch-Queen from Snow White
> >> Another witch typically encountered in Forest-related stories.
> >> Always evil. Not much used these days.
>
> > Whenever she appears in comics, she's wearing her "old crone" disguise
> > from the end of the movie (at least, in all the comics stories I've
> > seen her in, except for actual adaptations of the movie). Why is that?
>
> In comics, Disney movie characters are often used in their most memorable
> appearance. Think of "Belle and the Beast". In the comics, Belle still
> meets her lover as the beast, instead of the person with the very big nose
> in the last minutes of the movie. (Maybe he decided that he was better of
> as beast.) There's also The Lion King. In the movie the father is killed,
> and Simba has grown old. In the comics, Simba's father is still alive and
> Simba is still young.
Yeah, but there you are talking about a series/feature based on the movie.
It makes since that the series would be based somehow during the film, since
after the film all the dramatic arcs and conflicts have been wrapped up.
Here, I'm talking about random appearinces of the Witch Queen as the villian
in a Chip 'n' Dale story, etc.
Anyway, the Queens "old crone" disguise is NOT her "most memorable
appearance," IMHO. Her natural looks are much more interesting
and scary.
--
Shad Z. ^Q^
http://shadz.homestead.com/files/
HONK TO SEE PUPPIES
Sign along US 287, Loveland CO
--
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers
>
> SHAD Z to RICH BELLACERA, 01-09-2003:
>
> >> 4) Witch-Queen from Snow White
> >> Another witch typically encountered in Forest-related stories.
> >> Always evil. Not much used these days.
>
> > Whenever she appears in comics, she's wearing her "old crone" disguise
> > from the end of the movie (at least, in all the comics stories I've
> > seen her in, except for actual adaptations of the movie). Why is that?
>
> In comics, Disney movie characters are often used in their most memorable
> appearance. Think of "Belle and the Beast". In the comics, Belle still
> meets her lover as the beast, instead of the person with the very big nose
> in the last minutes of the movie. (Maybe he decided that he was better of
> as beast.) There's also The Lion King. In the movie the father is killed,
> and Simba has grown old. In the comics, Simba's father is still alive and
> Simba is still young.
Yeah, but there you are talking about a series/feature based on the movie.
It makes since that the series would be based somehow during the film, since
after the film all the dramatic arcs and conflicts have been wrapped up.
Here, I'm talking about random appearinces of the Witch Queen as the villian
in a Chip 'n' Dale story, etc.
Anyway, the Queens "old crone" disguise is NOT her "most memorable
appearance," IMHO. Her natural looks are much more interesting
and scary.
--
Shad Z. ^Q^
http://shadz.homestead.com/files/
HONK TO SEE PUPPIES
Sign along US 287, Loveland CO
--
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers
Eric Chun
The Barks Collector 43
Message 65 -
2003-09-03 at 21:03:54
John Nichols (Bear Mountain Enterprises) is planning to
print a new issue of "The Barks Collector". (Message
attached below.)
Best,
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: John Nichols [mailto:jnichols at kingston.net]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:49 AM
Subject: The Barks Collector 43
September 1, 2003
John Nichols
Dear Barks fan:
Plans for The Barks Collector 43 are well under way. Thanks to those who
ordered already. If you want a copy but haven't yet reserved, please let me
know and I'll put you on our list. No money now, just tell me you'll want
one.
COST AND FORMAT: The Barks Collector 43 will cost $10 and shipping (probably
$3). We will do either 100 or 150 copies, with each copy numbered. This
will be the entire run, and the issue will never be reprinted. We are not
selling to stores.
LETTERS COLUMN: Send your letter for inclusion in our Letters Column. I'd
especially like to hear from you "old timers" (you know
who you are)- Re- your thoughts on the question "Will Barks collecting
survive us?" In other words- when we're gone, will the hobby go with us?
What will the nature of the hobby be in 50 years? Or will it die out with us
'baby boomers' ?
SOLICITATION FOR ARTICLES- You may never see your name in lights, but you
can certainly see it in print. How? Just send your Duckie article for
inclusion in TBC 43- Original articles only please. TBC 43 will be all new
material, with no reprints from past issues.
GENERAL COMMENTS: Plans are to continue TBC past issue #43, with very
limited runs on each issue, probably no more than 100 or 150 copies. You're
invited to send in your letters for inclusion in our Letters Column. You're
also invited to submit articles for inclusion in TBC.
Thanks for reading- Please email us if you'll want a copy of TBC 43.
Till next time,
John Nichols
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
print a new issue of "The Barks Collector". (Message
attached below.)
Best,
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: John Nichols [mailto:jnichols at kingston.net]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:49 AM
Subject: The Barks Collector 43
September 1, 2003
John Nichols
Dear Barks fan:
Plans for The Barks Collector 43 are well under way. Thanks to those who
ordered already. If you want a copy but haven't yet reserved, please let me
know and I'll put you on our list. No money now, just tell me you'll want
one.
COST AND FORMAT: The Barks Collector 43 will cost $10 and shipping (probably
$3). We will do either 100 or 150 copies, with each copy numbered. This
will be the entire run, and the issue will never be reprinted. We are not
selling to stores.
LETTERS COLUMN: Send your letter for inclusion in our Letters Column. I'd
especially like to hear from you "old timers" (you know
who you are)- Re- your thoughts on the question "Will Barks collecting
survive us?" In other words- when we're gone, will the hobby go with us?
What will the nature of the hobby be in 50 years? Or will it die out with us
'baby boomers' ?
SOLICITATION FOR ARTICLES- You may never see your name in lights, but you
can certainly see it in print. How? Just send your Duckie article for
inclusion in TBC 43- Original articles only please. TBC 43 will be all new
material, with no reprints from past issues.
GENERAL COMMENTS: Plans are to continue TBC past issue #43, with very
limited runs on each issue, probably no more than 100 or 150 copies. You're
invited to send in your letters for inclusion in our Letters Column. You're
also invited to submit articles for inclusion in TBC.
Thanks for reading- Please email us if you'll want a copy of TBC 43.
Till next time,
John Nichols
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Dangerous Glomgold and Beagle Boys Inc.
Message 66 -
2003-09-04 at 01:43:34
MACIEK KUR to me, 03-09-2003:
>> In "So Far and No Safari" (US 61), [Flintheart Glomgold] tries to kill
>> the Ducks by literally BOMBING them.
> Maby dis is aut of subject but Glomgold tries to kil the Duck's in
> Don Rosa story "Last Lord of Eldorado" by pushing Big rock on them.
> Beagle Boys and Magica (and maby even Jhon. Rockerduck) woud never do
> somthing like dies.
In Barks's 'The Doom Diamond' (US 70), the Beagle Boys Inc. leave the Ducks
on a raft, doomed in a typhoon on the ocean. On their way back to Duckburg,
they hear a radio message which tells that Scrooge McDuck, the financier,
is presumed lost in a terrible storm the South Pacific. Unless he returns
shortly, Duckburg officials will remove his vast fortune to Fort Knox. The
Beagle Boys conclude that their trained falcons/bluejays won't be able to
steal pints of Scrooge's money every day. They turn the ship around, to
"Find Scrooge before it's TOO LATE!"
This is rather odd motive to save the Ducks' lifes. The Beagle Boys don't
show any emotion nor sentiment for the Ducks themselves. So, I'm not so
sure if the Beagle Boys would never do something like killing the Ducks...
--- Dani?l
"Awk! Stubbed my toe!"
>> In "So Far and No Safari" (US 61), [Flintheart Glomgold] tries to kill
>> the Ducks by literally BOMBING them.
> Maby dis is aut of subject but Glomgold tries to kil the Duck's in
> Don Rosa story "Last Lord of Eldorado" by pushing Big rock on them.
> Beagle Boys and Magica (and maby even Jhon. Rockerduck) woud never do
> somthing like dies.
In Barks's 'The Doom Diamond' (US 70), the Beagle Boys Inc. leave the Ducks
on a raft, doomed in a typhoon on the ocean. On their way back to Duckburg,
they hear a radio message which tells that Scrooge McDuck, the financier,
is presumed lost in a terrible storm the South Pacific. Unless he returns
shortly, Duckburg officials will remove his vast fortune to Fort Knox. The
Beagle Boys conclude that their trained falcons/bluejays won't be able to
steal pints of Scrooge's money every day. They turn the ship around, to
"Find Scrooge before it's TOO LATE!"
This is rather odd motive to save the Ducks' lifes. The Beagle Boys don't
show any emotion nor sentiment for the Ducks themselves. So, I'm not so
sure if the Beagle Boys would never do something like killing the Ducks...
--- Dani?l
"Awk! Stubbed my toe!"
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Is Gladstone no Scrooge heir?
Message 67 -
2003-09-04 at 01:53:23
In Barks's "The Doom Diamond" (US 70), the Duckburg officials plan
to remove Scrooge's fortune to Fort Knox, presuming him lost in a
terrible storm the South Pacific.
There's no mention of Donald and the nephews as being Scrooge's heirs.
A reason could be that they may be presumed lost, too. But there's no
mention of Gladstone Gander at all, either...
This seems to mean that Gladstone is not considered a heir of Scrooge,
at least not inherently.
--- Dani?l
to remove Scrooge's fortune to Fort Knox, presuming him lost in a
terrible storm the South Pacific.
There's no mention of Donald and the nephews as being Scrooge's heirs.
A reason could be that they may be presumed lost, too. But there's no
mention of Gladstone Gander at all, either...
This seems to mean that Gladstone is not considered a heir of Scrooge,
at least not inherently.
--- Dani?l
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Dialogue censoring in The Doom Diamond?
Message 68 -
2003-09-04 at 02:09:27
In panel 5.7 of Barks's "The Doom Diamond" (US 70), there seems to
be a dialogue change. At least to my eyes, checking The Carl Barks
Library reprint.
Srooge says: "I've got other terrible weapons I'm building, lads!
This ship will be a tiger of the seas when we finally sail!"
The words "weapons I'm building" (and maybe also "lads") look
different to me. Since there's a reference to weapons, I'm
wondering if the dialogue was censored by Western.
Does anyone have some comments on this?
Is there scan available of the first publication of this panel?
--- Dani?l
"Ouch! A darn rock fell out of the sky from somewhere!"
be a dialogue change. At least to my eyes, checking The Carl Barks
Library reprint.
Srooge says: "I've got other terrible weapons I'm building, lads!
This ship will be a tiger of the seas when we finally sail!"
The words "weapons I'm building" (and maybe also "lads") look
different to me. Since there's a reference to weapons, I'm
wondering if the dialogue was censored by Western.
Does anyone have some comments on this?
Is there scan available of the first publication of this panel?
--- Dani?l
"Ouch! A darn rock fell out of the sky from somewhere!"
Daniel Van Eijmeren
House of Haunts cross-reference
Message 69 -
2003-09-04 at 02:26:12
According to "The Doom Diamond" (US 70), Beagle Boy 176-176 has
learned medicine in prison.
Some stories earlier, in "The House of Haunts" (US 63), the Beagle
Boys receive their diploma's for finishing their courses in Studio
Hours School. (176-176 is professor of encephalography.)
This must be a cross-reference. Maybe even more because 176-176 uses
the same method in both stories. He taps on Scrooge's head (US 63)
and tail (US 70).
Is this already mentioned somewhere?
--- Dani?l
"Yeeeeowch! All at once a swordfish doesn't like me!"
learned medicine in prison.
Some stories earlier, in "The House of Haunts" (US 63), the Beagle
Boys receive their diploma's for finishing their courses in Studio
Hours School. (176-176 is professor of encephalography.)
This must be a cross-reference. Maybe even more because 176-176 uses
the same method in both stories. He taps on Scrooge's head (US 63)
and tail (US 70).
Is this already mentioned somewhere?
--- Dani?l
"Yeeeeowch! All at once a swordfish doesn't like me!"
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Barks's Beagle Boys spelling
Message 70 -
2003-09-04 at 02:55:58
COA spells "The Beagle Boys".
http://coa.inducks.org/coa/c1/character.php/0/BB
In Barks's 'House of Haunts' (US 63), 'Heedless Horseman' (US 65),
and 'The Doom Diamond' (US 70) their shirts spell "Beagle Boys Inc."
In their first appearance (WDC 143), their shirts spell "Beagle Boys".
According to a transcription of a February 25, 1976 Barks letter to
Marty and Elouise Martin, published in Geoffrey Blum article "Letters
From the Duck Man Part Eighteen: All Good Things", published in The
Carl Barks Library of Walt Disney's Comics and Stories in Color album
No. 45, (gasp!), Barks spells "the Beagle Boys".
Where does the spelling of "The Beagle Boys" originate from?
I haven't taken a look at other Barks stories. I'm having sleepless
nights of my reports of getting lost in The Carl Barks Library, every
time I open it. Just for that I'm going to throw the whole thing out
of the window! :-)
--- Dani?l
"Let's get away from here, mates!"
http://coa.inducks.org/coa/c1/character.php/0/BB
In Barks's 'House of Haunts' (US 63), 'Heedless Horseman' (US 65),
and 'The Doom Diamond' (US 70) their shirts spell "Beagle Boys Inc."
In their first appearance (WDC 143), their shirts spell "Beagle Boys".
According to a transcription of a February 25, 1976 Barks letter to
Marty and Elouise Martin, published in Geoffrey Blum article "Letters
From the Duck Man Part Eighteen: All Good Things", published in The
Carl Barks Library of Walt Disney's Comics and Stories in Color album
No. 45, (gasp!), Barks spells "the Beagle Boys".
Where does the spelling of "The Beagle Boys" originate from?
I haven't taken a look at other Barks stories. I'm having sleepless
nights of my reports of getting lost in The Carl Barks Library, every
time I open it. Just for that I'm going to throw the whole thing out
of the window! :-)
--- Dani?l
"Let's get away from here, mates!"
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Throwing Barks art out of a window / newly-wed Murphys (WDC 140)
Message 71 -
2003-09-04 at 05:03:58
It isn't just The Carl Barks Library giving me sleepness nights.
Donald Ault's book "Carl Barks Conversations" is guilty, too! :-)
In my latest email, I though I was funny by ending with a reference to
a Barks story in which the newly-wed Murphys are fighting again, the
story of Gladstone's mystery (WDC 140), where Gladstone walks past a
window and hears the following dialogue: "You're three minutes late
for lunch! Just for that I'm going to throw the whole meal out of the
window!"
This reminded me of some information from a Barks interview by Donald
and Lynda Ault, conducted on 13-14 June 1997:
DA: Do I remember correctly that you said that your second wife
[Clara Balken] used to tear up your comic books or something?
CD: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah, well, she started out doing my blacking, solid
blacks, and even ink the borders around the panels.
DA: Your second wife did this?
CB: Yeah, she did that for a while. And she had a--she came from a
family that had a long record of alcoholism. And she just loved the
taste of liquor. And so she kept drinking more and more, and finally
she just got to the point that she was hostile and half crazy. And she
would tear up my comic books and my drawings if I didn't get them out
of sight. I had to just be walking on eggshells around her because you
never knew what time she would start being hostile and want to tear
something up.
DA: So she actually did tear up some of your pages?
CB: Yes, well, I can't remember of her ever tearing up a finished one
that had all been inked and everything, but she did tear up one or two
that were just in the beginning stages, the pencil sketches. But she did
take one of my whole 10-pages stories after I'd practically finished it
and threw it outside. Thank God it was not muddy or wet out there--they
all landed in the dirt.
DA: About what year was this?
CB: It was around the late 1940s.
Source: Donald Ault - Carl Barks Conversations, page 181 and 182. In the
book, the above mentioned part continues with Ault and Barks talking about
a connection between this and Barks's most experimental stories of that
time, but that's another matter. I'm getting tired of typing. :-) I hope
I didn't make any typos, by the way. (ALWAYS BEWARE OF THAT!)
To my (sleepy) eyes, the fighting newly-wed Murphys scene in WDC 140 looks
like an autobiographical reference to the above described events.
Mrs. Murphy threw out a whole meal.
Clara threw out a whole 10-pager.
According to Donald Ault's chronology in "Carl Barks Conversations",
Barks's second marriage began in 1938, broke up in 1950-1951, and the
divorce was declared final in December 1951.
The story with the fighting Murphys was accepted on 23 August 1951.
There are instances of (possible) autobiographical references to this
second marriage and divorce. For example, "The Golden Helmet" with the
annoying lawyer was accepted on 3 December 1951, around the time of
the divorce.
Barks also has portayed some rather mean, unreasonable and agressive
women in (mostly) his 1940s and early-1950s stories. Maybe these women
also were inspired by the circumstances of the second marriage?
In fact, are there *any* kind, warm, reasonable women in Barks's stories
of the 1940s and early-1950s? That would be quite quiz for me! At the
moment, I can only think of Grandma Duck.
Two notes:
- This email is about Barks's *second* wife, not to be confused with his
third (and last) wife Gar? Barks. This marriage lasted until Gar?'s death
in 1993.
- Clara Balken died in 1964(?). According to Barks, "it was alcohol that
killed her and it took 13 years to do it." (All those years Barks paid
$250 a month alimony, "and she used it to buy more booze. Eventually she
just died of cirrhosis of the liver.")
Guess from which interview, and interview book I took that quote.
Do I really need to say it again? :-)
--- Dani?l the Spam-Spam-Spammer
P.S. All jokes aside. This email is fully my own initiave and opinion.
I'm really so favourable of Ault's book "Carl Barks Conversations".
And also, the more people who buy it, the more likely new books about
Barks will be written and published. So, yes, BUY this darned book,
and have some sleepness Barks-nights, too! :-)
Donald Ault's book "Carl Barks Conversations" is guilty, too! :-)
In my latest email, I though I was funny by ending with a reference to
a Barks story in which the newly-wed Murphys are fighting again, the
story of Gladstone's mystery (WDC 140), where Gladstone walks past a
window and hears the following dialogue: "You're three minutes late
for lunch! Just for that I'm going to throw the whole meal out of the
window!"
This reminded me of some information from a Barks interview by Donald
and Lynda Ault, conducted on 13-14 June 1997:
DA: Do I remember correctly that you said that your second wife
[Clara Balken] used to tear up your comic books or something?
CD: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah, well, she started out doing my blacking, solid
blacks, and even ink the borders around the panels.
DA: Your second wife did this?
CB: Yeah, she did that for a while. And she had a--she came from a
family that had a long record of alcoholism. And she just loved the
taste of liquor. And so she kept drinking more and more, and finally
she just got to the point that she was hostile and half crazy. And she
would tear up my comic books and my drawings if I didn't get them out
of sight. I had to just be walking on eggshells around her because you
never knew what time she would start being hostile and want to tear
something up.
DA: So she actually did tear up some of your pages?
CB: Yes, well, I can't remember of her ever tearing up a finished one
that had all been inked and everything, but she did tear up one or two
that were just in the beginning stages, the pencil sketches. But she did
take one of my whole 10-pages stories after I'd practically finished it
and threw it outside. Thank God it was not muddy or wet out there--they
all landed in the dirt.
DA: About what year was this?
CB: It was around the late 1940s.
Source: Donald Ault - Carl Barks Conversations, page 181 and 182. In the
book, the above mentioned part continues with Ault and Barks talking about
a connection between this and Barks's most experimental stories of that
time, but that's another matter. I'm getting tired of typing. :-) I hope
I didn't make any typos, by the way. (ALWAYS BEWARE OF THAT!)
To my (sleepy) eyes, the fighting newly-wed Murphys scene in WDC 140 looks
like an autobiographical reference to the above described events.
Mrs. Murphy threw out a whole meal.
Clara threw out a whole 10-pager.
According to Donald Ault's chronology in "Carl Barks Conversations",
Barks's second marriage began in 1938, broke up in 1950-1951, and the
divorce was declared final in December 1951.
The story with the fighting Murphys was accepted on 23 August 1951.
There are instances of (possible) autobiographical references to this
second marriage and divorce. For example, "The Golden Helmet" with the
annoying lawyer was accepted on 3 December 1951, around the time of
the divorce.
Barks also has portayed some rather mean, unreasonable and agressive
women in (mostly) his 1940s and early-1950s stories. Maybe these women
also were inspired by the circumstances of the second marriage?
In fact, are there *any* kind, warm, reasonable women in Barks's stories
of the 1940s and early-1950s? That would be quite quiz for me! At the
moment, I can only think of Grandma Duck.
Two notes:
- This email is about Barks's *second* wife, not to be confused with his
third (and last) wife Gar? Barks. This marriage lasted until Gar?'s death
in 1993.
- Clara Balken died in 1964(?). According to Barks, "it was alcohol that
killed her and it took 13 years to do it." (All those years Barks paid
$250 a month alimony, "and she used it to buy more booze. Eventually she
just died of cirrhosis of the liver.")
Guess from which interview, and interview book I took that quote.
Do I really need to say it again? :-)
--- Dani?l the Spam-Spam-Spammer
P.S. All jokes aside. This email is fully my own initiave and opinion.
I'm really so favourable of Ault's book "Carl Barks Conversations".
And also, the more people who buy it, the more likely new books about
Barks will be written and published. So, yes, BUY this darned book,
and have some sleepness Barks-nights, too! :-)
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Mrs. Murphy vs. Mr. Murphy
Message 72 -
2003-09-04 at 05:35:52
In my previous email I wrote that Mrs. Murphy threw out a whole meal.
The story (WDC 140) doesn't state that it is Mrs. Murphy, but in those
days it was mostly the wife who did the cooking, I'm told. (Nowadays,
the *men* always do that.)
To avoid any protests I want to mention that principally speaking it
could have been Mister Murphy who threw the food out of the window.
(Principally because *men* don't do such things, of course.)
Disclaimer: This email has not been set-up to upset women. Any comment
that looks that way, is a typo or a distortion in the transmission. :-P
--- Dani?l
"Men! I hate 'em!"
(Which Barks story?) :-)
The story (WDC 140) doesn't state that it is Mrs. Murphy, but in those
days it was mostly the wife who did the cooking, I'm told. (Nowadays,
the *men* always do that.)
To avoid any protests I want to mention that principally speaking it
could have been Mister Murphy who threw the food out of the window.
(Principally because *men* don't do such things, of course.)
Disclaimer: This email has not been set-up to upset women. Any comment
that looks that way, is a typo or a distortion in the transmission. :-P
--- Dani?l
"Men! I hate 'em!"
(Which Barks story?) :-)
Myklebust,Are
Throwing Barks art out of a window
Message 73 -
2003-09-04 at 09:37:38
Hi Daniel - and others!
A photo of Carl Barks and his second wife Clara is for the moment offered
on ebay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2188651300&category=144
I have no idea where it comes from.
Best,
Are Myklebust
A photo of Carl Barks and his second wife Clara is for the moment offered
on ebay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2188651300&category=144
I have no idea where it comes from.
Best,
Are Myklebust
Olivier
Barks's Beagle Boys spelling
Message 74 -
2003-09-04 at 12:53:25
Dani?l:
>>>In Barks's 'House of Haunts' (US 63), 'Heedless Horseman' (US 65),
>>>and 'The Doom Diamond' (US 70) their shirts spell "Beagle Boys Inc."
>>>In their first appearance (WDC 143), their shirts spell "Beagle Boys".
I don't remember noticing the name change (dropping/adding the "Inc"). I
like the idea of thieves registering as a legit business company, it's
quite funny.
Union rules was suggested in the recent quote from "The Too-Safe Safe"
about disturbing old ladies.
My favorite fully-unionized organized crime society gag in Barks' stories is
the running gag in "The Statu Seeker" (U$ 41, March '63, CBLiC U$A album
39):
- (p 6 panel 5) "Burglars, Thugs, and Pirates Union, Local No 6 1/2"
- (p 6 panel 6) secretary
- (p 7 panels 1-2):
"Yes, hiring those Beagle Boys will give your job *status*, sir!"
"You mean there are status symbols in this business, too?"
"Oh, yes, indeed!"
"Well, come along, you status sumbols! I hadn't expected to be *proud*
of this job!"
- (p 13 panels 3-4):
"The sub ecaped! all I get for following that old duck is a *goose
egg*!"
"We Beagle Boys have got to be paid with better wages than goose eggs!"
"We're *union pirates*! We demand the union scale!"
Even though it's for a the sake of the status gags, this suggests the
Beagle Boys are not petty thieves but are recognized as "tops" (p 6 panel
7).
This may seem in contradiction with the fact we always see them fail.
Actually, they do succeed in robbing Scrooge several times, in quiet
ingenious ways; it's just that the ducks manage to get the money back.
Other Beagle gags I love:
- the baptizing of the "Beagle Boys" gang in L&T chapter 2 ("The Mardi Gras
Gang", ...)
- "Scram! We ain't got your dang *chickens*! Besides, you got no *proof*!"
etc (L&T chapter 10, p 7)
>>> I haven't taken a look at other Barks stories. I'm having sleepless
>>> nights of my reports of getting lost in The Carl Barks Library, every
>>> time I open it. Just for that I'm going to throw the whole thing out
>>> of the window! :-)
Throw it my way! throw it my way!
;)
Olivier
( "Oink"? We didn't hear no "oink"! )
>>>In Barks's 'House of Haunts' (US 63), 'Heedless Horseman' (US 65),
>>>and 'The Doom Diamond' (US 70) their shirts spell "Beagle Boys Inc."
>>>In their first appearance (WDC 143), their shirts spell "Beagle Boys".
I don't remember noticing the name change (dropping/adding the "Inc"). I
like the idea of thieves registering as a legit business company, it's
quite funny.
Union rules was suggested in the recent quote from "The Too-Safe Safe"
about disturbing old ladies.
My favorite fully-unionized organized crime society gag in Barks' stories is
the running gag in "The Statu Seeker" (U$ 41, March '63, CBLiC U$A album
39):
- (p 6 panel 5) "Burglars, Thugs, and Pirates Union, Local No 6 1/2"
- (p 6 panel 6) secretary
- (p 7 panels 1-2):
"Yes, hiring those Beagle Boys will give your job *status*, sir!"
"You mean there are status symbols in this business, too?"
"Oh, yes, indeed!"
"Well, come along, you status sumbols! I hadn't expected to be *proud*
of this job!"
- (p 13 panels 3-4):
"The sub ecaped! all I get for following that old duck is a *goose
egg*!"
"We Beagle Boys have got to be paid with better wages than goose eggs!"
"We're *union pirates*! We demand the union scale!"
Even though it's for a the sake of the status gags, this suggests the
Beagle Boys are not petty thieves but are recognized as "tops" (p 6 panel
7).
This may seem in contradiction with the fact we always see them fail.
Actually, they do succeed in robbing Scrooge several times, in quiet
ingenious ways; it's just that the ducks manage to get the money back.
Other Beagle gags I love:
- the baptizing of the "Beagle Boys" gang in L&T chapter 2 ("The Mardi Gras
Gang", ...)
- "Scram! We ain't got your dang *chickens*! Besides, you got no *proof*!"
etc (L&T chapter 10, p 7)
>>> I haven't taken a look at other Barks stories. I'm having sleepless
>>> nights of my reports of getting lost in The Carl Barks Library, every
>>> time I open it. Just for that I'm going to throw the whole thing out
>>> of the window! :-)
Throw it my way! throw it my way!
;)
Olivier
( "Oink"? We didn't hear no "oink"! )
Olivier
Mrs. Murphy vs. Mr. Murphy
Message 75 -
2003-09-04 at 13:00:08
>>> Disclaimer: This email has not been set-up to upset women. Any comment
>>> that looks that way, is a typo or a distortion in the transmission. :-P
Of course ;)
>>> "Men! I hate 'em!"
>>> (Which Barks story?) :-)
Answer in the PS
Olivier
PS
If I remember correctly, the trick is that it's actually a bird saying
that, a parrot or something.
Maybe in the ten-dollar bill story, when Donald tries to find who lost the
bill his nephews found in the street.
Yup, that's it - WDC&S 63, DEc '45 (WDC&S LiC album 7)
>>> that looks that way, is a typo or a distortion in the transmission. :-P
Of course ;)
>>> "Men! I hate 'em!"
>>> (Which Barks story?) :-)
Answer in the PS
Olivier
PS
If I remember correctly, the trick is that it's actually a bird saying
that, a parrot or something.
Maybe in the ten-dollar bill story, when Donald tries to find who lost the
bill his nephews found in the street.
Yup, that's it - WDC&S 63, DEc '45 (WDC&S LiC album 7)