The Barks 10-pager from WDC 197 as well as 4 gags by Carl
Barks are available from the following place:
http://www.imada.sdu.dk/~haagerup/aah/
Other links (and much more) can be found at Livia
http://mailotron.forez.com/livia/
Note: in one of my latest mails abiout "Porky Pig of the
Mounties", I talked about a certain "Leonard Buettner",
please read "Carl Buettner" instead.
Favio
______________________________________________________
Bo?te aux lettres - Caramail - http://www.caramail.com
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Author
Topic: 200104
(579 messages)
Thierry Fernand
New Barks comics online
Message 166 -
2001-04-17 at 14:10:43
Olivier
Treasure Hunt # 1 & Quizes
Message 167 -
2001-04-17 at 14:28:08
Hello!
Daniel:
>>Are there other Barks stories in which Scrooge refers to himself as a
>>poor old man/duck?
I think it is quite recurrent. Gotta check.
>>Which ones do you mean? Can you quote them again?
Sure.
Treasure Hunt # 1:
In which story can you find an old horsecar ticket & a wolf trap?
Hint: A Donald ten-pager in which Donald plays a particular record
I have received the answer for Treasure Hunt #1
but you have a couple more days to find out what it was.
Quiz:
er--- actually I mixed it up: no one could have found the answer,
since I was posting it in the same message I asked if anyone had an idea... : )
It's the one you have:
"Don't worry! *We* ' ll get you out!"
(Barks story; hint: not a 10-pager)
Vitamin Zee hint:
So it *is* a JW story. That's what I thought. I'm trying to *recall* and *infer*
where the quotes come from rather than going through all the stories.
On March 22, 2001, you wrote: "Quote quiz # 3: Remember "file 90L-6F" ?"
I can't remember this one being answered. It's "North of the Yukon"
(US 59), panel 6.3.
Correct. I remember Harry explained what it meant; I'm not sure it was actually
answered either.
And here's another tough one in the same line (Quiz 4):
"No. E 12278464 B , No. D 17913149 B, No. J 86556958 A are missing"
Good luck!
Olivier
Daniel:
>>Are there other Barks stories in which Scrooge refers to himself as a
>>poor old man/duck?
I think it is quite recurrent. Gotta check.
>>Which ones do you mean? Can you quote them again?
Sure.
Treasure Hunt # 1:
In which story can you find an old horsecar ticket & a wolf trap?
Hint: A Donald ten-pager in which Donald plays a particular record
I have received the answer for Treasure Hunt #1
but you have a couple more days to find out what it was.
Quiz:
er--- actually I mixed it up: no one could have found the answer,
since I was posting it in the same message I asked if anyone had an idea... : )
It's the one you have:
"Don't worry! *We* ' ll get you out!"
(Barks story; hint: not a 10-pager)
Vitamin Zee hint:
So it *is* a JW story. That's what I thought. I'm trying to *recall* and *infer*
where the quotes come from rather than going through all the stories.
On March 22, 2001, you wrote: "Quote quiz # 3: Remember "file 90L-6F" ?"
I can't remember this one being answered. It's "North of the Yukon"
(US 59), panel 6.3.
Correct. I remember Harry explained what it meant; I'm not sure it was actually
answered either.
And here's another tough one in the same line (Quiz 4):
"No. E 12278464 B , No. D 17913149 B, No. J 86556958 A are missing"
Good luck!
Olivier
O Bordier
To Olaf
Message 168 -
2001-04-17 at 14:35:55
SPOILER re Van Horn story in U$ 318
>>I have read a few stories (I believe it is William Van Horn?) where $crooge
>>has an former un-known half brother. At the end, I have decided that I can NOT
>>believe in the "fact" that Fergus McDuck has been cheating on his Downy.
It was by Van Horn indeed.
U$ 318 (Feb '99-- the last Gladstone issue), "Secrets"
I like Van Horn's stories very much-- expecially his ten-pagers.
But this secret relationship that was disclosed at the end disappointed me.
I don't like this idea either.
"Fergus cheating on Downy": it would be slightly better to think it was after her death,
but Rumpus is too old.
I wonder why Van Horn invented this and what he intended to do (and may have done)
with it in later stories. I haven't read anything else by him that's posterior to this story.
>>I have read a few stories (I believe it is William Van Horn?) where $crooge
>>has an former un-known half brother. At the end, I have decided that I can NOT
>>believe in the "fact" that Fergus McDuck has been cheating on his Downy.
It was by Van Horn indeed.
U$ 318 (Feb '99-- the last Gladstone issue), "Secrets"
I like Van Horn's stories very much-- expecially his ten-pagers.
But this secret relationship that was disclosed at the end disappointed me.
I don't like this idea either.
"Fergus cheating on Downy": it would be slightly better to think it was after her death,
but Rumpus is too old.
I wonder why Van Horn invented this and what he intended to do (and may have done)
with it in later stories. I haven't read anything else by him that's posterior to this story.
Don Rosa
DCML digest #480
Message 169 -
2001-04-17 at 15:38:04
S?ren Krarup Olesen wrote an excellent message that I quite agree with! But
I can't do much more than agree. I have always wondered why there is not
much discussion, or actually NO discussion, about the incredible array of
Italian artists who have been producing Duck (& mouse?) stories for
decades, and all of whom make me and others look like so much chopped
liver. But I can't contribute to such a discussion since I can't read any
of their stories and can't even come to a full appreciation of their art
without being able to do so -- that Italian art is too radically different
from anything we Americans have ever seen in a Disney comic, and it would
require reading the stories to come to a complete understanding of what the
artists are trying to do.
But then, why don't a pack of Italians get on here and discuss the stories?
My Euro-travel experience tells me that this *might* be because Italians
are generally not as comfortable with English as the Northern Europeans,
and since the "official language" of this site is English, they stay away
in droves. Our loss. (Especially *my* loss since Italy is my lost
homeland!) On the other hand, the Italian stories have appeared in the
North for decades in the digests -- don't those editions carry the artists'
and writers' names?
Still, no matter what amount of discussion there was about the Italian
artists, it wouldn't benefit us in America since we have never had any
exposure to those comics and probably never will (nor probably any other
Disney comics from now on). But it would still be nice to see more
discussion about them and all the other cartoonists. One of my philosophies
in life is that you should constantly endeavor to learn all you can about
what you like, and to *also* learn all that there is to learn *about*.
Olaf Solstrand also wrote an interesting message that I won't attempt to
quote from. But I will say that I am always quite pleased when someone says
they like my stories and the amount of extra work I put into them, and I am
very gratified if they decide that my stories seem to be their favorites --
I mean, of course this pleases me, how could it not? However, my purpose is
*not* to create stories that compel a reader to accept *my* stories and
*reject* all the others. I have always claimed that the strength in these
comics and the hope of the future of these comics is that they maintain a
variety of types of stories for a variety of types of readers, not in
trying to limit their readership to the lowest (or highest?) common
denominator. Hypothetically speaking, if all readers "accepted" only *my*
stories and no others, and since my stories appear only a few times a year,
these comics would be outta business in about 3 months, and readers would
no longer see my stories or *any* stories. The backbone of these comics is
the sort of variety that has been lost in American entertainment for about
30-40 years. If you reject all other writers' & artists' work
automatically, you're limiting your horizons and you're going to miss a lot
of great stuff (including work by actual *trained* cartoonists who actually
know what they're doing when they put pen to paper, and are not just doing
fanboy fanzine stories like I do for my niche of the readership). So, sure,
I hope you'll continue to enjoy my stories, but don't limit yourself... and
maybe that's not what you meant, anyway, so fine & dandy.
I can't do much more than agree. I have always wondered why there is not
much discussion, or actually NO discussion, about the incredible array of
Italian artists who have been producing Duck (& mouse?) stories for
decades, and all of whom make me and others look like so much chopped
liver. But I can't contribute to such a discussion since I can't read any
of their stories and can't even come to a full appreciation of their art
without being able to do so -- that Italian art is too radically different
from anything we Americans have ever seen in a Disney comic, and it would
require reading the stories to come to a complete understanding of what the
artists are trying to do.
But then, why don't a pack of Italians get on here and discuss the stories?
My Euro-travel experience tells me that this *might* be because Italians
are generally not as comfortable with English as the Northern Europeans,
and since the "official language" of this site is English, they stay away
in droves. Our loss. (Especially *my* loss since Italy is my lost
homeland!) On the other hand, the Italian stories have appeared in the
North for decades in the digests -- don't those editions carry the artists'
and writers' names?
Still, no matter what amount of discussion there was about the Italian
artists, it wouldn't benefit us in America since we have never had any
exposure to those comics and probably never will (nor probably any other
Disney comics from now on). But it would still be nice to see more
discussion about them and all the other cartoonists. One of my philosophies
in life is that you should constantly endeavor to learn all you can about
what you like, and to *also* learn all that there is to learn *about*.
Olaf Solstrand also wrote an interesting message that I won't attempt to
quote from. But I will say that I am always quite pleased when someone says
they like my stories and the amount of extra work I put into them, and I am
very gratified if they decide that my stories seem to be their favorites --
I mean, of course this pleases me, how could it not? However, my purpose is
*not* to create stories that compel a reader to accept *my* stories and
*reject* all the others. I have always claimed that the strength in these
comics and the hope of the future of these comics is that they maintain a
variety of types of stories for a variety of types of readers, not in
trying to limit their readership to the lowest (or highest?) common
denominator. Hypothetically speaking, if all readers "accepted" only *my*
stories and no others, and since my stories appear only a few times a year,
these comics would be outta business in about 3 months, and readers would
no longer see my stories or *any* stories. The backbone of these comics is
the sort of variety that has been lost in American entertainment for about
30-40 years. If you reject all other writers' & artists' work
automatically, you're limiting your horizons and you're going to miss a lot
of great stuff (including work by actual *trained* cartoonists who actually
know what they're doing when they put pen to paper, and are not just doing
fanboy fanzine stories like I do for my niche of the readership). So, sure,
I hope you'll continue to enjoy my stories, but don't limit yourself... and
maybe that's not what you meant, anyway, so fine & dandy.
Daniel Van Eijmeren
Olivier's Quiz #4
Message 170 -
2001-04-17 at 16:17:50
OLIVIER, 17-04-2001:
> Treasure Hunt # 1:
> In which story can you find an old horsecar ticket & a wolf trap?
> Hint: A Donald ten-pager in which Donald plays a particular record
The "trade rats" story (WDC 52), panels 1.7 and 5.5. The only
then-published 1940s story of which some original artwork has survived.
Page 5 to be precisely.
According to Matti Eronen's book "Surviving Comic Book Art", this page
survived only because a very eager Donald Duck strip reader wrote to
Dell Publishing in 1940s and asked for any original Donald Duck strip.
The point was that he had read newspaper strips, which were drawn by
Al Taliaferro. Later these two half pages were sold and resold as
Taliaferro's art, until someone noticed the real artist. On the lower
half-page there is one correction. Barks has at first drawn stitches on
the live rat and corrected them on the toy rat (in panel 5.6).
> "Don't worry! *We* ' ll get you out!"
> (Barks story; hint: not a 10-pager)
Er... let me think about this one, a few days. :-)
> I'm trying to *recall* and *infer* where the quotes come from rather
> than going through all the stories.
That's also what I do.
> And here's another tough one in the same line (Quiz 4):
> "No. E 12278464 B , No. D 17913149 B, No. J 86556958 A are missing"
"The Case of the Sticky Money" (US 42), panel 6.4.
Could these numbers have been *real* greenback serial numbers?
If so, then (in theory) it must be possible to get greenbacks which are
"proved" to have been in Scrooge's money bin. :-)
Best wishes,
--- Daniel
"I guess most folks are still pretty relaxed at 6:30 A.M.!"
(Which one?) :-)
> Treasure Hunt # 1:
> In which story can you find an old horsecar ticket & a wolf trap?
> Hint: A Donald ten-pager in which Donald plays a particular record
The "trade rats" story (WDC 52), panels 1.7 and 5.5. The only
then-published 1940s story of which some original artwork has survived.
Page 5 to be precisely.
According to Matti Eronen's book "Surviving Comic Book Art", this page
survived only because a very eager Donald Duck strip reader wrote to
Dell Publishing in 1940s and asked for any original Donald Duck strip.
The point was that he had read newspaper strips, which were drawn by
Al Taliaferro. Later these two half pages were sold and resold as
Taliaferro's art, until someone noticed the real artist. On the lower
half-page there is one correction. Barks has at first drawn stitches on
the live rat and corrected them on the toy rat (in panel 5.6).
> "Don't worry! *We* ' ll get you out!"
> (Barks story; hint: not a 10-pager)
Er... let me think about this one, a few days. :-)
> I'm trying to *recall* and *infer* where the quotes come from rather
> than going through all the stories.
That's also what I do.
> And here's another tough one in the same line (Quiz 4):
> "No. E 12278464 B , No. D 17913149 B, No. J 86556958 A are missing"
"The Case of the Sticky Money" (US 42), panel 6.4.
Could these numbers have been *real* greenback serial numbers?
If so, then (in theory) it must be possible to get greenbacks which are
"proved" to have been in Scrooge's money bin. :-)
Best wishes,
--- Daniel
"I guess most folks are still pretty relaxed at 6:30 A.M.!"
(Which one?) :-)
Anders Christian Siveb¾k
DCML dig.480
Message 171 -
2001-04-17 at 17:47:44
>
>From: Angelo Toti <donald313us at yahoo.com>
>http://www.geocities.com/donald313us/fandom.html
I too looked at your page and found something looking like copies of
S?rens, Francoiss and the Inducks pages. Why are you doing this I ask as
many others here? It would be egoistic to talk much baout duckhunt which
you also copied. As said, We don't know your reasons, maybe you've never
heard of the concept of linking to a page, not copying it to place it on
your own. (How do you have room for it on your webplace anyway?).
It's simply plain robbery, but our pages are made by ourselves and we
didn't take copyright on them, as small or bigger parts are related to
someone elses copyright. I am not sure what we can do about you.
Mailbombing is pretty rude, and I have other things to do, but there's no
web police as far as I know. If there was it would probably take many
other pages in the run.
S?REN
>
>Subject: What will the future bring
I read your mail, and what I read in it, that we should talk more about
what's happening right now, in the duck-realted world and comics? Maybe my
upcoming report on my pilgimage (!) to Italy well be a try to do so, but I
hope you people here will tell me what you think such a report - IT will
be somehow related to one I made back in '98 or so, after a trip to
Norway/Sweden
>
>
>Reading this very nice story, I wonder how much time we spend on
>current events in the Disney comics arena. When will Don Rosa get his
>next story published, and how was that inspired (or not) by late Carl
>Barks.
I do wonder if anyone here can answer that, even though it might not have
been what you meant to say.
Usually you can go to duckhunt an check, but I've no idea when the story
will come out. Maybe Don can tell how long the story has come by now.
Hilsen/Yours
Anders Christian Siveb?k
Donaldist
>From: Angelo Toti <donald313us at yahoo.com>
>http://www.geocities.com/donald313us/fandom.html
I too looked at your page and found something looking like copies of
S?rens, Francoiss and the Inducks pages. Why are you doing this I ask as
many others here? It would be egoistic to talk much baout duckhunt which
you also copied. As said, We don't know your reasons, maybe you've never
heard of the concept of linking to a page, not copying it to place it on
your own. (How do you have room for it on your webplace anyway?).
It's simply plain robbery, but our pages are made by ourselves and we
didn't take copyright on them, as small or bigger parts are related to
someone elses copyright. I am not sure what we can do about you.
Mailbombing is pretty rude, and I have other things to do, but there's no
web police as far as I know. If there was it would probably take many
other pages in the run.
S?REN
>
>Subject: What will the future bring
I read your mail, and what I read in it, that we should talk more about
what's happening right now, in the duck-realted world and comics? Maybe my
upcoming report on my pilgimage (!) to Italy well be a try to do so, but I
hope you people here will tell me what you think such a report - IT will
be somehow related to one I made back in '98 or so, after a trip to
Norway/Sweden
>
>
>Reading this very nice story, I wonder how much time we spend on
>current events in the Disney comics arena. When will Don Rosa get his
>next story published, and how was that inspired (or not) by late Carl
>Barks.
I do wonder if anyone here can answer that, even though it might not have
been what you meant to say.
Usually you can go to duckhunt an check, but I've no idea when the story
will come out. Maybe Don can tell how long the story has come by now.
Hilsen/Yours
Anders Christian Siveb?k
Donaldist
Gwtank
PP
Message 172 -
2001-04-17 at 18:25:19
I seem to recollect that Carl told me that PP is a Printers Proof. I have one signed as such from Mr. Barks.
Timo Ronkainen
Barks special tribute books
Message 173 -
2001-04-17 at 18:32:29
Hi!
I´d like to know what kind of books there were published around the globe to
celebrate Barks' 100th anniversary? I know those Swedish, Danish and Italian
books, but was there some others too? Well in Finland of course we had
"Vuosisadan ankat" (Ducks of the century) with Barks' own favorites
(excluding Lost in the Andes, since it was published in a book just a year
aerlier) with comments by Barks himself (!) plus Donald Ault preface.
What was the content of Swedish and Danish books, I think they were similar?
I´d like to collect this info together.
Timo
^^''*''^^
Cartoonist - writer - donaldist -
Timo Ronkainen ---------------- -
YO-kylä 52 A 26 --------------- -
20540 Turku ------------------- -
Finland ----------------------- -
timoro at hotmail.com
timoro at sunpoint.net
¨¨ Personal:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/timoro/
¨¨ Ankkalinnan Pamaus:
http://welcome.to/ankistit
.................................
"Rumble on, buxom bumble bee!
Go sit on cowslip - far from me!"
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
I´d like to know what kind of books there were published around the globe to
celebrate Barks' 100th anniversary? I know those Swedish, Danish and Italian
books, but was there some others too? Well in Finland of course we had
"Vuosisadan ankat" (Ducks of the century) with Barks' own favorites
(excluding Lost in the Andes, since it was published in a book just a year
aerlier) with comments by Barks himself (!) plus Donald Ault preface.
What was the content of Swedish and Danish books, I think they were similar?
I´d like to collect this info together.
Timo
^^''*''^^
Cartoonist - writer - donaldist -
Timo Ronkainen ---------------- -
YO-kylä 52 A 26 --------------- -
20540 Turku ------------------- -
Finland ----------------------- -
timoro at hotmail.com
timoro at sunpoint.net
¨¨ Personal:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/timoro/
¨¨ Ankkalinnan Pamaus:
http://welcome.to/ankistit
.................................
"Rumble on, buxom bumble bee!
Go sit on cowslip - far from me!"
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Gwtank
PP
Message 174 -
2001-04-17 at 18:36:47
I recall Carl telling me that PP stands for "Printers Proof". I happen to have one from him.
Olivier
Quiz & Treasure Hunt #2! , Comics (Søren)
Message 175 -
2001-04-17 at 19:08:22
David Gerstein & Daniel Eijmeren have dug up the first treasure!
Reminder & one more hint for fellow hunters:
In which story can you find an old horsecar ticket & a wolf trap?
Hints: A Donald ten-pager in which Donald plays a particular record
Are you missing something? The answer may be in this story...
Daniel also blitz-answered Quiz 4:
>>> "No. E 12278464 B , No. D 17913149 B, No. J 86556958 A are missing"
>"The Case of the Sticky Money" (US 42), panel 6.4.
>Could these numbers have been *real* greenback serial numbers?
>If so, then (in theory) it must be possible to get greenbacks which are
>"proved" to have been in Scrooge's money bin. :-)
Right! Hadn't thought of that. Funny thing.
Treasure Hunt &# 2:
Where can you find a ball of string... and a stub of pencil?
Hint: They are not used to tie or write anything.
S?ren:
I think it always boils down to Barks , Rosa , Murry; ..., because their stories are the
most wide-spread an well-known, not out of contempt for the other authors / artists.
I'd certainly like to read about other comics / artists, too, though I couldn't contribute much
this way: I am not a regular buyer of the French Disney magazines (shame on me
for missing this opportunity other countries don't have).
I stopped buying them regularly in the late '80s when they changed and "modernized"
to appeal to the next generation. The covers were hideously modern and the stories
uninteresting. I kept looking for the classics in the original language and finally found them
in '94. So for some ten years now I have only bought the special issues of the French
magazines. Sometimes I have thumb through other issues at the bookstore but am
not tempted enough; the cover of a recent Mickey Parade (announcing the introduction
of new ratface characters) rather repelled me in fact. The story and characters may have
turned out all right, but I just wasn't attracted.
For instance, I know Paperinik (Fantomiald in French), but not the modern one. I would
very much like to read some of these stories. Are there scans available somewhere?
To paraphrase Olaf, this Donald & these stories can't be part of the universe we know,
but they seem rather enjoyable nonetheless, judging from the couple of scans on the
official site-- you may think of them as dreams Donald makes. The covers are great:
the coloring is amazing!
There are artists I like very much but don't know their names. I've been wanting to scan
a few panels to ask for some time now but haven't done it yet. (Or check on the COA
using the story code)
Olivier
PS:
I made a mistake and used my private e-mail for the previous message.
Please use *this one*.
Reminder & one more hint for fellow hunters:
In which story can you find an old horsecar ticket & a wolf trap?
Hints: A Donald ten-pager in which Donald plays a particular record
Are you missing something? The answer may be in this story...
Daniel also blitz-answered Quiz 4:
>>> "No. E 12278464 B , No. D 17913149 B, No. J 86556958 A are missing"
>"The Case of the Sticky Money" (US 42), panel 6.4.
>Could these numbers have been *real* greenback serial numbers?
>If so, then (in theory) it must be possible to get greenbacks which are
>"proved" to have been in Scrooge's money bin. :-)
Right! Hadn't thought of that. Funny thing.
Treasure Hunt &# 2:
Where can you find a ball of string... and a stub of pencil?
Hint: They are not used to tie or write anything.
S?ren:
I think it always boils down to Barks , Rosa , Murry; ..., because their stories are the
most wide-spread an well-known, not out of contempt for the other authors / artists.
I'd certainly like to read about other comics / artists, too, though I couldn't contribute much
this way: I am not a regular buyer of the French Disney magazines (shame on me
for missing this opportunity other countries don't have).
I stopped buying them regularly in the late '80s when they changed and "modernized"
to appeal to the next generation. The covers were hideously modern and the stories
uninteresting. I kept looking for the classics in the original language and finally found them
in '94. So for some ten years now I have only bought the special issues of the French
magazines. Sometimes I have thumb through other issues at the bookstore but am
not tempted enough; the cover of a recent Mickey Parade (announcing the introduction
of new ratface characters) rather repelled me in fact. The story and characters may have
turned out all right, but I just wasn't attracted.
For instance, I know Paperinik (Fantomiald in French), but not the modern one. I would
very much like to read some of these stories. Are there scans available somewhere?
To paraphrase Olaf, this Donald & these stories can't be part of the universe we know,
but they seem rather enjoyable nonetheless, judging from the couple of scans on the
official site-- you may think of them as dreams Donald makes. The covers are great:
the coloring is amazing!
There are artists I like very much but don't know their names. I've been wanting to scan
a few panels to ask for some time now but haven't done it yet. (Or check on the COA
using the story code)
Olivier
PS:
I made a mistake and used my private e-mail for the previous message.
Please use *this one*.
Fluks, H.W.
What will the future bring
Message 176 -
2001-04-17 at 19:46:21
Hi Soeren!
> Reading this very nice story, I wonder how much time we spend on
> current events in the Disney comics arena. When will Don Rosa get his
> next story published, and how was that inspired (or not) by late Carl
> Barks. And how do we buy Carl Barks oils on ebay?!
The last question was not raised here recently, actually.
Dani?l just refers to Ebay now and then, to point us to interesting Barks
material that he hasn't seen anywhere else before.
> what happened to critisism on newer artists. Are they simply ignored,
> since they don't fit in the Rosa mainstream or what?!
I don't think it's fair to complain about the contents of a mailing list
that's completely filled by volunteers. If you think something's missing
here, then start a thread about it. If you don't get a reply, then try to
get people on DCML that *do* reply.
> Hey, great rock band you've got there, nice tunes and all, but it's
> nothing like Mozart, so why don't you just pack your gear and
> close the door behind you.
I don't think anyone here told anyone else to "pack his gear", with the
exception of obvious abuse or rudeness. Now tell us all about Pavarotti (or
any Italian), *and* let others have their discussions about Mozart.
Apart from general rules about "netiquette", there are only two basic rules
on DCML: the subject of a mail should be
- about Disney; *and*
- about comics.
(I'll be breaking that rule later today...)
--Harry.
> Reading this very nice story, I wonder how much time we spend on
> current events in the Disney comics arena. When will Don Rosa get his
> next story published, and how was that inspired (or not) by late Carl
> Barks. And how do we buy Carl Barks oils on ebay?!
The last question was not raised here recently, actually.
Dani?l just refers to Ebay now and then, to point us to interesting Barks
material that he hasn't seen anywhere else before.
> what happened to critisism on newer artists. Are they simply ignored,
> since they don't fit in the Rosa mainstream or what?!
I don't think it's fair to complain about the contents of a mailing list
that's completely filled by volunteers. If you think something's missing
here, then start a thread about it. If you don't get a reply, then try to
get people on DCML that *do* reply.
> Hey, great rock band you've got there, nice tunes and all, but it's
> nothing like Mozart, so why don't you just pack your gear and
> close the door behind you.
I don't think anyone here told anyone else to "pack his gear", with the
exception of obvious abuse or rudeness. Now tell us all about Pavarotti (or
any Italian), *and* let others have their discussions about Mozart.
Apart from general rules about "netiquette", there are only two basic rules
on DCML: the subject of a mail should be
- about Disney; *and*
- about comics.
(I'll be breaking that rule later today...)
--Harry.
Søren Krarup Olesen
What will the future bring
Message 177 -
2001-04-17 at 20:01:26
HARRY:
> > [...] And how do we buy Carl Barks oils on ebay?!
>
> The last question was not raised here recently, actually.
> Daniël just refers to Ebay now and then, to point us to interesting Barks
> material that he hasn't seen anywhere else before.
Avoiding the issue, are we? ;-) No, you're right. I should have written
"interesting material by Carls Barks on ebay" or something like that,
but that was not my point.
> > what happened to critisism on newer artists. Are they simply ignored,
> > since they don't fit in the Rosa mainstream or what?!
>
> I don't think it's fair to complain about the contents of a mailing list
> that's completely filled by volunteers.
I didn't "complain"... Volunteers are of course free to discuss every
subject they'd like (within the frame of Disney comics). I just wondered
why most of those volunteers (two hundreds members or so) seem to be
mere archaeologists. I perfectly well know, that we do not constitute a
pure panel of highlighted critics and reviewers, still a bit more
keeping in touch with what's "cooking" on the other scenes than that of
the American, is something I miss here--I wouldn't dare or have any
reason to complain about the lack of it, just plain wondering, that's
all.
Perhaps I should add, that this has nothing to do with the "American
style" whatsoever. Younger American artists like Noel van Horn are
never mentioned on this list either--his Goofy being extremely well
drawn BTW.
> If you think something's missing here, then start a thread about it.
> If you don't get a reply, then try to get people on DCML that *do*
> reply.
I certainly would like to do so, but who cares if I find Valerio Held a
genious or likewise. It doesn't have any effect, since no one knows
this guy anyway (except for a few Italians). Similarly, I think that
Antonio Bancells might be one of the worst artists ever, taking into
consideration the emmence influence he has had (and still has) on Egmont
material for decades. Although I probably could write many pages on
why I find this or that artist/writer brilliant or not, no one would
ever care. Tony Bancells has probably drawn more pages than most other
artists (including Don), but this fact stands unconcerned.
There are two possibilities here, either 1) Tony is a heck of a
genious, no reason to comment on his splendid art, or 2) Tony's art is
so terrible, that there is no reason to comment on this IMO utterly
boring art. So, which one is it? Surely, this mailing list won't
disclose the answer.
Could it be, that although pocket books sell quite well in Europe, most
list members feel that this material is not worth mentioning, only for
the reason that Rosa/Barks stories are rarely printed here?
Do pocket books contain stories that are too low, display art so
hideous to the eye and stories so badly written, that using the word
"art" itself is questionable. I think not.
Consider this the beginning of a thread, Harry :-)
Søren
> > [...] And how do we buy Carl Barks oils on ebay?!
>
> The last question was not raised here recently, actually.
> Daniël just refers to Ebay now and then, to point us to interesting Barks
> material that he hasn't seen anywhere else before.
Avoiding the issue, are we? ;-) No, you're right. I should have written
"interesting material by Carls Barks on ebay" or something like that,
but that was not my point.
> > what happened to critisism on newer artists. Are they simply ignored,
> > since they don't fit in the Rosa mainstream or what?!
>
> I don't think it's fair to complain about the contents of a mailing list
> that's completely filled by volunteers.
I didn't "complain"... Volunteers are of course free to discuss every
subject they'd like (within the frame of Disney comics). I just wondered
why most of those volunteers (two hundreds members or so) seem to be
mere archaeologists. I perfectly well know, that we do not constitute a
pure panel of highlighted critics and reviewers, still a bit more
keeping in touch with what's "cooking" on the other scenes than that of
the American, is something I miss here--I wouldn't dare or have any
reason to complain about the lack of it, just plain wondering, that's
all.
Perhaps I should add, that this has nothing to do with the "American
style" whatsoever. Younger American artists like Noel van Horn are
never mentioned on this list either--his Goofy being extremely well
drawn BTW.
> If you think something's missing here, then start a thread about it.
> If you don't get a reply, then try to get people on DCML that *do*
> reply.
I certainly would like to do so, but who cares if I find Valerio Held a
genious or likewise. It doesn't have any effect, since no one knows
this guy anyway (except for a few Italians). Similarly, I think that
Antonio Bancells might be one of the worst artists ever, taking into
consideration the emmence influence he has had (and still has) on Egmont
material for decades. Although I probably could write many pages on
why I find this or that artist/writer brilliant or not, no one would
ever care. Tony Bancells has probably drawn more pages than most other
artists (including Don), but this fact stands unconcerned.
There are two possibilities here, either 1) Tony is a heck of a
genious, no reason to comment on his splendid art, or 2) Tony's art is
so terrible, that there is no reason to comment on this IMO utterly
boring art. So, which one is it? Surely, this mailing list won't
disclose the answer.
Could it be, that although pocket books sell quite well in Europe, most
list members feel that this material is not worth mentioning, only for
the reason that Rosa/Barks stories are rarely printed here?
Do pocket books contain stories that are too low, display art so
hideous to the eye and stories so badly written, that using the word
"art" itself is questionable. I think not.
Consider this the beginning of a thread, Harry :-)
Søren
Fluks, H.W.
Pertwillaby
Message 178 -
2001-04-17 at 20:05:57
[This mail is about Rosa's non-Disney work. *And* it's about needless and
irritating details. People who don't like to read that: sorry. Please skip
to the bottom.]
Kriton wrote:
> I just got my copy of the "Don Rosa Archives" in the mail today
I got mine last week. As an indexer and nitpicker, I can't help making some
comments.
First, a big THANKS to Nils Lid Hjort for making these editions! They look
really nice. And they made up for the bad weather here during Easter (we had
*snow*!).
There have been xeroxes of reprints of these stories circulating in Europe
for some years now. I got mine thanks to ?rjan Berglund, Jakob S?derbaum,
and Don Rosa. Before I threw away these xeroxes, I compared them with the
printed edition. To my surprise, there are some minor differences!
My xeroxes of episodes 67 - 127 are from the RBCC reprint. Episode 66 was
used at the start of part 2 and 3 of the reprint. In part 2, the character
"Freddie" was crossed out. In part 3, Freddie was replaced by a picture of
Gerald Atrix. (Question 1: was that a new drawing for RBCC?)
Episodes 128-133 came from "Don Rosa's Comics and stories #1" (BTW, it would
have been nice to see the covers of these issues in the Norwegian book...).
Two pages, which were only 2/3 filled in the original, were taken together
as one page in the DRCS reprint. With one panel of new art, or so it seems.
("Ah, there's prof. Cistims now...". Question 2: is that really new art? And
why were the original pages only 2/3?)
Another page had a footnote saying "a reference to an earlier "Pertwillaby
Papers" adventure to be reprinted in volume 3." I don't think volume 3 (of
DRCS) ever appeared. The Norwegian book doesn't have the text "to be
reprinted in volume 3", for obvious reasons. I think the *original* strips
don't have such a footnote at all.
And then there's another page, which was composed from 2 original pages.
Again with one panel of new (?) art. ("Vell, gett it OUT, here is our first
stop.". Question 3: why did that happen?)
Summarising, the following Pertwillaby artwork doesn't (seem to) appear in
the Norwegian book:
- partly redrawn episode #66 for RBCC;
- two new panels for DR's Comics and Stories #1;
- cover of DR's C&S #1, illustrating "Sub-zero";
- cover of DR's C&S #2, illustrating "Vortex";
- a (unpublished?) cover illustrating "The Black Knight";
- cover of RBCC #148, "in King Arthur's court!";
- poster-format strip (5 x 4 panels) advertising RBCC 148.
If the above is correct, then my Pertwillaby collection is complete! (I'm
not counting Captain Kentucky here. Though I have the impression that the
Norwegian CK book reprints *everything* except 3 covers of the first reprint
editions.)
DON: can you answer questions #1, #2, and #3?
Now back to Disney comics...
--Harry.
irritating details. People who don't like to read that: sorry. Please skip
to the bottom.]
Kriton wrote:
> I just got my copy of the "Don Rosa Archives" in the mail today
I got mine last week. As an indexer and nitpicker, I can't help making some
comments.
First, a big THANKS to Nils Lid Hjort for making these editions! They look
really nice. And they made up for the bad weather here during Easter (we had
*snow*!).
There have been xeroxes of reprints of these stories circulating in Europe
for some years now. I got mine thanks to ?rjan Berglund, Jakob S?derbaum,
and Don Rosa. Before I threw away these xeroxes, I compared them with the
printed edition. To my surprise, there are some minor differences!
My xeroxes of episodes 67 - 127 are from the RBCC reprint. Episode 66 was
used at the start of part 2 and 3 of the reprint. In part 2, the character
"Freddie" was crossed out. In part 3, Freddie was replaced by a picture of
Gerald Atrix. (Question 1: was that a new drawing for RBCC?)
Episodes 128-133 came from "Don Rosa's Comics and stories #1" (BTW, it would
have been nice to see the covers of these issues in the Norwegian book...).
Two pages, which were only 2/3 filled in the original, were taken together
as one page in the DRCS reprint. With one panel of new art, or so it seems.
("Ah, there's prof. Cistims now...". Question 2: is that really new art? And
why were the original pages only 2/3?)
Another page had a footnote saying "a reference to an earlier "Pertwillaby
Papers" adventure to be reprinted in volume 3." I don't think volume 3 (of
DRCS) ever appeared. The Norwegian book doesn't have the text "to be
reprinted in volume 3", for obvious reasons. I think the *original* strips
don't have such a footnote at all.
And then there's another page, which was composed from 2 original pages.
Again with one panel of new (?) art. ("Vell, gett it OUT, here is our first
stop.". Question 3: why did that happen?)
Summarising, the following Pertwillaby artwork doesn't (seem to) appear in
the Norwegian book:
- partly redrawn episode #66 for RBCC;
- two new panels for DR's Comics and Stories #1;
- cover of DR's C&S #1, illustrating "Sub-zero";
- cover of DR's C&S #2, illustrating "Vortex";
- a (unpublished?) cover illustrating "The Black Knight";
- cover of RBCC #148, "in King Arthur's court!";
- poster-format strip (5 x 4 panels) advertising RBCC 148.
If the above is correct, then my Pertwillaby collection is complete! (I'm
not counting Captain Kentucky here. Though I have the impression that the
Norwegian CK book reprints *everything* except 3 covers of the first reprint
editions.)
DON: can you answer questions #1, #2, and #3?
Now back to Disney comics...
--Harry.
Fluks, H.W.
Barks special tribute books
Message 179 -
2001-04-17 at 20:10:27
Timo:
> I?d like to know what kind of books there were published
> around the globe to
> celebrate Barks' 100th anniversary?
No trace of any special book or activity in Holland...
--Harry.
> I?d like to know what kind of books there were published
> around the globe to
> celebrate Barks' 100th anniversary?
No trace of any special book or activity in Holland...
--Harry.
Fluks, H.W.
470
Message 180 -
2001-04-17 at 20:30:38
Anders:
> In Germany on the other hand Duckburg lies in Germany, which causes
> some problems from time to time.
As I explained in an earlier mail, the German Duckburg (Entenhausen) is
*not* in Germany.
--Harry.
> In Germany on the other hand Duckburg lies in Germany, which causes
> some problems from time to time.
As I explained in an earlier mail, the German Duckburg (Entenhausen) is
*not* in Germany.
--Harry.