INDUCKS is an impressive and tremendously valuable project, even with
it's recent technical difficulties. Is it a required resource for
Disney comics writers? No.
Don Rosa's Duck stories have entertained readers now for nigh onto
seventeen-eighteen years, and he's achieved remarkable things. Are his
stories - Lo$ included - required reading for Disney comics writers? No.
Has any writer established for all other writers the first name of Ms.
Quackfaster and the last name of Glittering Goldie? No.
Has Geoff Blum ever made any sort of policy that has anything to do
with Disney comics? No.
Are Reese's Peanut Butter Cups my favorite candy? Yes!
Just a few things I thought some folks might like to know.
Gary
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Author
Topic: 200308
(787 messages)
Gary Leach
A Few Items
Message 301 -
2003-08-14 at 03:38:40
Eta Beta
DON - Dutchman's mine
Message 302 -
2003-08-14 at 08:30:03
Hi Don!
>I wonder if "Lost Dutchman's
>Mine" is even the title of that story in Europe
No, the original title is actually "La mine de l'Allemand perdu",
meaning "The lost German's mine".
That goes to show, I believe, that Moebius (or rather Charlier)
must have known a good deal more about the legend than they put
in the story.
>I wouldn't expect a European
>reader to recognize the name "Lost Dutchman's Mine"
Why not ? I read the Blueberry story for the first time around
the mid-seventies, and I clearly remember having wondered why
the title was "German's mine" rather than "Dutchman's mine"...
Meaning, I knew the legend already back then, but not to the
finer details yet... can't remember where I'd heard the story
before, though.
Cheers!
Eta Beta
>I wonder if "Lost Dutchman's
>Mine" is even the title of that story in Europe
No, the original title is actually "La mine de l'Allemand perdu",
meaning "The lost German's mine".
That goes to show, I believe, that Moebius (or rather Charlier)
must have known a good deal more about the legend than they put
in the story.
>I wouldn't expect a European
>reader to recognize the name "Lost Dutchman's Mine"
Why not ? I read the Blueberry story for the first time around
the mid-seventies, and I clearly remember having wondered why
the title was "German's mine" rather than "Dutchman's mine"...
Meaning, I knew the legend already back then, but not to the
finer details yet... can't remember where I'd heard the story
before, though.
Cheers!
Eta Beta
Lars Jensen
Picture
Message 303 -
2003-08-14 at 10:45:43
Quoting myself:
> Does anybody here have a picture of obscure Duck Tales character
> Vacation Van Hump? And if so, would that person do me a favor and send
> me a scan?
I haven't gotten any response to this request, but I'm hoping that's
because it has gotten lost in the currently-heavy traffic here on DCML.
So... Vacation Van Hump. Anybody got one?
Lars
> Does anybody here have a picture of obscure Duck Tales character
> Vacation Van Hump? And if so, would that person do me a favor and send
> me a scan?
I haven't gotten any response to this request, but I'm hoping that's
because it has gotten lost in the currently-heavy traffic here on DCML.
So... Vacation Van Hump. Anybody got one?
Lars
Ole R Nielsen
Lost miners
Message 304 -
2003-08-14 at 12:32:46
The correct name of the Lt. Blueberry story is "La Mine de l'Allemand
Perdu", "The Lost German's Mine" - or "The Crazy German's Mine".
Even nitpickier, it is drawn by Jean Giraud under the pseudonym "Gir" - not
Giraud's alter ego, Mo?bius, who didn't really emerge until 1973, the year
after the album release of "La Mine...". So significant differences exist
between the traditional artist Giraud and the unorthodox writer/artist
Mo?bius, that a sharp distinction between the works of the two is usually
made.
--Ole
Perdu", "The Lost German's Mine" - or "The Crazy German's Mine".
Even nitpickier, it is drawn by Jean Giraud under the pseudonym "Gir" - not
Giraud's alter ego, Mo?bius, who didn't really emerge until 1973, the year
after the album release of "La Mine...". So significant differences exist
between the traditional artist Giraud and the unorthodox writer/artist
Mo?bius, that a sharp distinction between the works of the two is usually
made.
--Ole
Gerd Syllwasschy
DCML Digest, Vol 6, Issue 31
Message 305 -
2003-08-14 at 14:06:08
For what it`s worth, here are the names by which the Pete-like character
is called in the Barks stories listed by Rich and Frank:
Donald Duck Finds Pirate Gold (FC 9): Black Pete
The Mummy's Ring (W OS 29-01): no name
Frozen Gold (W OS 62-02): Pete De Fox aka Foxy Pete
The Riddle Of The Red Hat (FC 79): Pete
The Inventors' Contest (W US 28-02): Pierre De Fraud aka Black Pete
Rival Boatmen (W WDC 45-02): J.P. Diamondtubs
The Great Duckburg Frog-Jumping Contest (W WDC 108-02): "Snake Eyes"
McViper
Attic Antics (aka Welcome Guests) (WDC 132): ?
Log Jockey (WDC 267): Black Pierre (renamed "Bully Pierre" in a Gold Key
reprint)
Trombone Trouble and Northwest Mounted are animated cartoons.
Gerd
is called in the Barks stories listed by Rich and Frank:
Donald Duck Finds Pirate Gold (FC 9): Black Pete
The Mummy's Ring (W OS 29-01): no name
Frozen Gold (W OS 62-02): Pete De Fox aka Foxy Pete
The Riddle Of The Red Hat (FC 79): Pete
The Inventors' Contest (W US 28-02): Pierre De Fraud aka Black Pete
Rival Boatmen (W WDC 45-02): J.P. Diamondtubs
The Great Duckburg Frog-Jumping Contest (W WDC 108-02): "Snake Eyes"
McViper
Attic Antics (aka Welcome Guests) (WDC 132): ?
Log Jockey (WDC 267): Black Pierre (renamed "Bully Pierre" in a Gold Key
reprint)
Trombone Trouble and Northwest Mounted are animated cartoons.
Gerd
Gerd Syllwasschy
Pete = Jones?
Message 306 -
2003-08-14 at 14:07:31
Dane:
> And isn't Neighbor Jones, in essense, as about as close to Pete as you can
> get without *being* Pete?
This is an interesting thought. Incidentally, in the 1944 cartoon
"Trombone Trouble" (story director Carl Barks) Pete *was* Donald's
(rather obnoxious) neighbor.
Gerd
> And isn't Neighbor Jones, in essense, as about as close to Pete as you can
> get without *being* Pete?
This is an interesting thought. Incidentally, in the 1944 cartoon
"Trombone Trouble" (story director Carl Barks) Pete *was* Donald's
(rather obnoxious) neighbor.
Gerd
Fabio Blanco
Lost miners
Message 307 -
2003-08-14 at 14:25:15
Thanks to Don Rosa for replay my message...
By the way, Giraud or Moebius is one of the disciples of the late great
Jije, creator of Jerry Spring, and one of the columns of the Spirou's
school.
FABIO
> The correct name of the Lt. Blueberry story is "La Mine de l'Allemand
> Perdu", "The Lost German's Mine" - or "The Crazy German's Mine".
> Even nitpickier, it is drawn by Jean Giraud under the pseudonym "Gir" -
not
> Giraud's alter ego, Mo?bius, who didn't really emerge until 1973, the year
> after the album release of "La Mine...". So significant differences exist
> between the traditional artist Giraud and the unorthodox writer/artist
> Mo?bius, that a sharp distinction between the works of the two is usually
> made.
>
> --Ole
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://stp.ling.uu.se/mailman/listinfo/dcml
>
By the way, Giraud or Moebius is one of the disciples of the late great
Jije, creator of Jerry Spring, and one of the columns of the Spirou's
school.
FABIO
> The correct name of the Lt. Blueberry story is "La Mine de l'Allemand
> Perdu", "The Lost German's Mine" - or "The Crazy German's Mine".
> Even nitpickier, it is drawn by Jean Giraud under the pseudonym "Gir" -
not
> Giraud's alter ego, Mo?bius, who didn't really emerge until 1973, the year
> after the album release of "La Mine...". So significant differences exist
> between the traditional artist Giraud and the unorthodox writer/artist
> Mo?bius, that a sharp distinction between the works of the two is usually
> made.
>
> --Ole
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://stp.ling.uu.se/mailman/listinfo/dcml
>
Luca Boschi
DON - Dutchman's mine
Message 308 -
2003-08-14 at 17:09:19
Hi Don and Eta!
>> I wouldn't expect a European
>> reader to recognize the name "Lost Dutchman's Mine"
>
> Why not ? I read the Blueberry story for the first time around
> the mid-seventies, and I clearly remember having wondered why
> the title was "German's mine" rather than "Dutchman's mine"...
>
> Meaning, I knew the legend already back then, but not to the
> finer details yet... can't remember where I'd heard the story
> before, though.
The reason is that the "dutchman" *was* actually a German, Jacob Waltz, who
personally discovered the mine; so tells the story about him, that is
not-so-popular, in Europe; maybe Gir and Charlier knew one of the many
"corrupted" versions of it or that some stories about the mine were only
lies, so they decided not to use them. For the American people of the XIX
century, guys coming from Germany of from Holland made no difference. The
words "Deutsche = German" and "Dutch = from Holland" has a quite similar
sound.
I know about detailed papers concerning Waltz' life, who was in Phoenix
around 1870-1880. For example, there is a contract between Waltz and a
certain Andrew Starar, signed in 1878, about the mine's care after Waltz'
future death. The remaining stories, like the descriptions related by Sims
Ely in "The Lost Dutchman" 's book, are pure legends. One of them, talks
about Peralta's spanish family, who should have obtained the lands where
this mine is collocated, far in 1748. But according to official documents,
this Peralta family never existed, even if the Peralta's name is quite
common for people living in South-West areas.
Some legends about this issue were conceived and diffonded by the famous
James Addison Reavis, the "Arizona's Baron", who was a crook indeed,
claiming some lands' properties in Arizona and New Mexico. He was condemned
by a federal court in 1896 for his crimes (you can check the Vincent Price's
movie "The Baron of Arizona", or something like this). Anyway the Peralta's
story is told as it were a real fact in a reference book like "History of
Arizona and New Mexico", by Hubert H. Bancroft. Many stories about the
dutchman's mine come from there.
Luca
>> I wouldn't expect a European
>> reader to recognize the name "Lost Dutchman's Mine"
>
> Why not ? I read the Blueberry story for the first time around
> the mid-seventies, and I clearly remember having wondered why
> the title was "German's mine" rather than "Dutchman's mine"...
>
> Meaning, I knew the legend already back then, but not to the
> finer details yet... can't remember where I'd heard the story
> before, though.
The reason is that the "dutchman" *was* actually a German, Jacob Waltz, who
personally discovered the mine; so tells the story about him, that is
not-so-popular, in Europe; maybe Gir and Charlier knew one of the many
"corrupted" versions of it or that some stories about the mine were only
lies, so they decided not to use them. For the American people of the XIX
century, guys coming from Germany of from Holland made no difference. The
words "Deutsche = German" and "Dutch = from Holland" has a quite similar
sound.
I know about detailed papers concerning Waltz' life, who was in Phoenix
around 1870-1880. For example, there is a contract between Waltz and a
certain Andrew Starar, signed in 1878, about the mine's care after Waltz'
future death. The remaining stories, like the descriptions related by Sims
Ely in "The Lost Dutchman" 's book, are pure legends. One of them, talks
about Peralta's spanish family, who should have obtained the lands where
this mine is collocated, far in 1748. But according to official documents,
this Peralta family never existed, even if the Peralta's name is quite
common for people living in South-West areas.
Some legends about this issue were conceived and diffonded by the famous
James Addison Reavis, the "Arizona's Baron", who was a crook indeed,
claiming some lands' properties in Arizona and New Mexico. He was condemned
by a federal court in 1896 for his crimes (you can check the Vincent Price's
movie "The Baron of Arizona", or something like this). Anyway the Peralta's
story is told as it were a real fact in a reference book like "History of
Arizona and New Mexico", by Hubert H. Bancroft. Many stories about the
dutchman's mine come from there.
Luca
Michiel Prior
"Pete"-stories by Tito Faraci [and Scarpa]
Message 309 -
2003-08-14 at 17:38:19
Considering a possible "Life and Times of Pete"-series:
Yes, I'd certainly like to see that!
I'm not very familiar with the Mouse-universe, but I was in Italy
(Napoli) last June and I bought a copy of a book called "Topolino
Noir" which contains ten stories written by Tito Faraci and drawn by
different artists (Cavazzano, Scarpa, Celoni, Mastantonuo and
more). Pete's character as portrayed in these stories in very likeable
and human. It seems like he really cares for his girlfriend Trudy.
The last story, "Topolino e il fiume del tempo", shows how Mickey
and Pete retrieve the sunken wreck of 'Steamboat Willie'. They're
forced to work as a team (I don't know why, my Italian isn't that
good) and they seem to get to like each other. Or rather, Pete seems
anxious to become Mickey's friend and Mickey is rather reluctant.
I really like this story, both for the artwork and the way it's told.
The writer even found an excuse why Mickey didn't wear any shirt at
the time of Steamboat Willie (1928): "It was a very hot summer, so
hot that I only wore shorts." :)
What I'm trying to say: This is probably the way I'd like to see such a
"Life of Pete" being written: tying together various 'facts' given in
classic stories and cartoons and portraying Pete as a rounder
character than the 'evil villain' he used to be. And maybe Tito Faraci
could be the right man on such a job.
I'd even suggest we need an Italian artist to draw it, and rather
Cavazzano, Mastantonuo or Celoni than Scarpa, but that's only my
personal preference, and I'm not familiar with other Italian artists
than those represented in this book. Those first three artists make
drawings with an excellent balance in black and white, while
Scarpa's work needs probably to be coloured to look better.
The characters Scarpa draws display a sort of 'elasticity' and they
'overact' a bit. Not that I don't think he's a good artist, but I'm curious
what his fans like about his work. Maybe we could discuss this a bit?
Another Pete-problem: as there have been stories with Pete (and
Mickey!) for 75 years now, needs there a timeline to be constructed?
Do we want Pete to interact with real historical circumstances?
Also in "Topolino Noir": four stories by Cavazzano and Faraci
featuring ''l'ispettore Manetta'' (detective Casey). I really liked them
and I'd want to see more stories like these. (I guess I should check
out the Dutch pockets-series.) Cavazzano's artwork is great, and in
these stories, Manetta is a rounder character. There's another story
in this book ("Topolino e il genio nell'ombra") by Faraci and Ziche
and here Manetta is just a dimwitted klutz. In Cavazzano's stories,
Manetta is also not very bright, but at least he has self-esteem and
self-confidence, which makes these stories more attractive to me.
Michiel Prior.
P.S. to Gary Leach: Thank you for pointing out those 'few items'.
Yes, I'd certainly like to see that!
I'm not very familiar with the Mouse-universe, but I was in Italy
(Napoli) last June and I bought a copy of a book called "Topolino
Noir" which contains ten stories written by Tito Faraci and drawn by
different artists (Cavazzano, Scarpa, Celoni, Mastantonuo and
more). Pete's character as portrayed in these stories in very likeable
and human. It seems like he really cares for his girlfriend Trudy.
The last story, "Topolino e il fiume del tempo", shows how Mickey
and Pete retrieve the sunken wreck of 'Steamboat Willie'. They're
forced to work as a team (I don't know why, my Italian isn't that
good) and they seem to get to like each other. Or rather, Pete seems
anxious to become Mickey's friend and Mickey is rather reluctant.
I really like this story, both for the artwork and the way it's told.
The writer even found an excuse why Mickey didn't wear any shirt at
the time of Steamboat Willie (1928): "It was a very hot summer, so
hot that I only wore shorts." :)
What I'm trying to say: This is probably the way I'd like to see such a
"Life of Pete" being written: tying together various 'facts' given in
classic stories and cartoons and portraying Pete as a rounder
character than the 'evil villain' he used to be. And maybe Tito Faraci
could be the right man on such a job.
I'd even suggest we need an Italian artist to draw it, and rather
Cavazzano, Mastantonuo or Celoni than Scarpa, but that's only my
personal preference, and I'm not familiar with other Italian artists
than those represented in this book. Those first three artists make
drawings with an excellent balance in black and white, while
Scarpa's work needs probably to be coloured to look better.
The characters Scarpa draws display a sort of 'elasticity' and they
'overact' a bit. Not that I don't think he's a good artist, but I'm curious
what his fans like about his work. Maybe we could discuss this a bit?
Another Pete-problem: as there have been stories with Pete (and
Mickey!) for 75 years now, needs there a timeline to be constructed?
Do we want Pete to interact with real historical circumstances?
Also in "Topolino Noir": four stories by Cavazzano and Faraci
featuring ''l'ispettore Manetta'' (detective Casey). I really liked them
and I'd want to see more stories like these. (I guess I should check
out the Dutch pockets-series.) Cavazzano's artwork is great, and in
these stories, Manetta is a rounder character. There's another story
in this book ("Topolino e il genio nell'ombra") by Faraci and Ziche
and here Manetta is just a dimwitted klutz. In Cavazzano's stories,
Manetta is also not very bright, but at least he has self-esteem and
self-confidence, which makes these stories more attractive to me.
Michiel Prior.
P.S. to Gary Leach: Thank you for pointing out those 'few items'.
Rodrigo Souza
Reconstructing the memory
Message 310 -
2003-08-14 at 19:00:25
The history with Mickey and the "Sleuth" is actually, Mickey and Sir Lock Holmes. Both are walking tolwards Trafalgar and Sir Lock stops to go to Bank of London to Cash his check. Then, Mickey asks him: I thought we were going to Trafalgar.
In the beggining of 90, a series of Disney Comics in English was published here in Brazil and this history was in the first comic of the series.
Professor Nefarius and his gang are casted in this history.
Rodrigo,
Brazil
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
In the beggining of 90, a series of Disney Comics in English was published here in Brazil and this history was in the first comic of the series.
Professor Nefarius and his gang are casted in this history.
Rodrigo,
Brazil
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
Sigvald Grøsfjeld Jr.
"Life of Pete" again!
Message 311 -
2003-08-14 at 19:23:35
Michiel Prior wrote:
> What I'm trying to say: This is probably the
> way I'd like to see such a "Life of Pete"
> being written: tying together various 'facts'
> given in classic stories and cartoons and
> portraying Pete as a rounder character than
> the 'evil villain' he used to be.
If that by any chance means ignoring all the classic tales by Gottfredson
and Murry it would IMO make a "Life of Pete" pretty much nonsense.
> And maybe Tito Faraci could be the right man on
> such a job. I'd even suggest we need an Italian
> artist to draw it.
I am not sure if that would be smart. Marco Rota once tried to write about
Donald's life. Many people, even here at DCML, think that he failed because
he didn't knew enough about Barks' views about the relations in the
Duck-family - facts that were partly revealed in "Race to the South Seas".
Furthermore I think that, even though most often undeserved, Italian Disney
comics has, due to the high output, got an assembly-line mark on it.
I would therefore prefer that a well qualified American, like our friend
David Gerstein, to do such an important job - but that's just my thoughts.
Anyway the most important issue here IMO, is that whoever selected to do a
"Life of Pete" should care as much about the works of Gottfredson and/or
Murry as DR cared for the works of Barks when he did Lo$. Based on such a
secure platform that artist could include other ideas as well.
> Another Pete-problem: as there have been
> stories with Pete (and Mickey!) for 75 years
> now, needs there a timeline to be constructed?
Of course that's needed, have you ever seen a biography without a timeline
in it? Furthermore the strict timeline is the red thread that IMO make Lo$
so superb as it is.
> Do we want Pete to interact with real
> historical circumstances?
I would guess that anyone who loves Lo$ finds it obvious that the real
history should take place around Pete, though unlike $crooge I don't think
he's much involved in historical events.
Sigvald
> What I'm trying to say: This is probably the
> way I'd like to see such a "Life of Pete"
> being written: tying together various 'facts'
> given in classic stories and cartoons and
> portraying Pete as a rounder character than
> the 'evil villain' he used to be.
If that by any chance means ignoring all the classic tales by Gottfredson
and Murry it would IMO make a "Life of Pete" pretty much nonsense.
> And maybe Tito Faraci could be the right man on
> such a job. I'd even suggest we need an Italian
> artist to draw it.
I am not sure if that would be smart. Marco Rota once tried to write about
Donald's life. Many people, even here at DCML, think that he failed because
he didn't knew enough about Barks' views about the relations in the
Duck-family - facts that were partly revealed in "Race to the South Seas".
Furthermore I think that, even though most often undeserved, Italian Disney
comics has, due to the high output, got an assembly-line mark on it.
I would therefore prefer that a well qualified American, like our friend
David Gerstein, to do such an important job - but that's just my thoughts.
Anyway the most important issue here IMO, is that whoever selected to do a
"Life of Pete" should care as much about the works of Gottfredson and/or
Murry as DR cared for the works of Barks when he did Lo$. Based on such a
secure platform that artist could include other ideas as well.
> Another Pete-problem: as there have been
> stories with Pete (and Mickey!) for 75 years
> now, needs there a timeline to be constructed?
Of course that's needed, have you ever seen a biography without a timeline
in it? Furthermore the strict timeline is the red thread that IMO make Lo$
so superb as it is.
> Do we want Pete to interact with real
> historical circumstances?
I would guess that anyone who loves Lo$ finds it obvious that the real
history should take place around Pete, though unlike $crooge I don't think
he's much involved in historical events.
Sigvald
Rodney-selfhelpbikeco
More than one cat?
Message 312 -
2003-08-14 at 20:10:32
Sigvald...
>Obvious there are more than one cat
>villain in Disney's universes.
rodney...
Not so obvious if you ask me, since Barks himself referred to that character as Pete in some of the English stories, and one could suppose that the other stories were Pete in disguise (similar to how Yosemite Sam often has different names in the Warner Bros cartoons, but there's no doubt that it's Sam).
In my opinion (though I understand that this may be impossible) the only way to really know if Barks intended the characters to be the same is to read the stories in the language that they were written in, that way you're sure to read them the way Barks wrote them, not the way that a translator rewrote them.
rodney.
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
>Obvious there are more than one cat
>villain in Disney's universes.
rodney...
Not so obvious if you ask me, since Barks himself referred to that character as Pete in some of the English stories, and one could suppose that the other stories were Pete in disguise (similar to how Yosemite Sam often has different names in the Warner Bros cartoons, but there's no doubt that it's Sam).
In my opinion (though I understand that this may be impossible) the only way to really know if Barks intended the characters to be the same is to read the stories in the language that they were written in, that way you're sure to read them the way Barks wrote them, not the way that a translator rewrote them.
rodney.
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Rich Bellacera
A Pete by any other name would still smell as rotten...
Message 313 -
2003-08-14 at 20:39:14
Thanks for the list of names & pseudonyms for Pete in those Barks stories Gerd.
Peter, Petro, Pedro, Pierre, etc. are all variations of Pete, and the use of names
that are not variations on Pete (Snake Eyes, Maestro Macaroni, etc.) are also
consistent with his character. Almost every Disney authorative reference also
verifies that this is a trait of Pete's, so it would be hard to really discount
any creator intention when using a character who looks and acts like Pete and
attempt to say they are NOT Pete. If Pete is not meant to be the villain, then
there are unlimited possibilities for imagery to draw from.
> in the 1944 cartoon "Trombone Trouble" (story director
> Carl Barks) Pete *was* Donald's (rather obnoxious) neighbor.
As was he in "The New Neighbor" (August 1, 1953) when he and his sheepdog, Muncey,
annoyed Donald to no end.
Also, Gerd said that "Trombone Trouble" & "Northwest Mounted" were cartoons. This
is true, but they were are translated for comics:
W WDC 32-14 2 t -- Trombone Trouble [first published:1943-05]
XFC ALP 4G + i Carl Barks Carl Barks DD Trombone Trouble [appearances:DD,PE]
[first published:2000]
http://stp.ling.uu.se/cgi-bin/starback/dcml/story?XFC+ALP+4H
XFC ALP 4H + i Carl Barks Carl Barks MM Northwest Mounted
[appearances:PE,MM] [first published:2000]
I have no idea about the XFC ALP publications, but if I understand the WDC #32
reference, it was probably a "text" comic with one or two illustrations. I'm not
sure who might have done the art, but it could have been Barks since he is
credited otherwise for the cartoons on both.
Thanks,
Rich Bellacera
(Email removed)
---- Msg sent via CWNet - http://cwnet.com/
Peter, Petro, Pedro, Pierre, etc. are all variations of Pete, and the use of names
that are not variations on Pete (Snake Eyes, Maestro Macaroni, etc.) are also
consistent with his character. Almost every Disney authorative reference also
verifies that this is a trait of Pete's, so it would be hard to really discount
any creator intention when using a character who looks and acts like Pete and
attempt to say they are NOT Pete. If Pete is not meant to be the villain, then
there are unlimited possibilities for imagery to draw from.
> in the 1944 cartoon "Trombone Trouble" (story director
> Carl Barks) Pete *was* Donald's (rather obnoxious) neighbor.
As was he in "The New Neighbor" (August 1, 1953) when he and his sheepdog, Muncey,
annoyed Donald to no end.
Also, Gerd said that "Trombone Trouble" & "Northwest Mounted" were cartoons. This
is true, but they were are translated for comics:
W WDC 32-14 2 t -- Trombone Trouble [first published:1943-05]
XFC ALP 4G + i Carl Barks Carl Barks DD Trombone Trouble [appearances:DD,PE]
[first published:2000]
http://stp.ling.uu.se/cgi-bin/starback/dcml/story?XFC+ALP+4H
XFC ALP 4H + i Carl Barks Carl Barks MM Northwest Mounted
[appearances:PE,MM] [first published:2000]
I have no idea about the XFC ALP publications, but if I understand the WDC #32
reference, it was probably a "text" comic with one or two illustrations. I'm not
sure who might have done the art, but it could have been Barks since he is
credited otherwise for the cartoons on both.
Thanks,
Rich Bellacera
(Email removed)
---- Msg sent via CWNet - http://cwnet.com/
Danehog
Romano Scarpa's Style and Other Coloring Comments
Message 314 -
2003-08-14 at 23:40:17
Michiel Prior wrote:
>The characters Scarpa draws display a sort of 'elasticity' and they
>'overact' a bit. Not that I don't think he's a good artist, but I'm
>curious what his fans like about his work. Maybe we could discuss this
>a bit?
Personally, I'm not a big fan of Scarpa's Duck work. (I've never had a chance
to read any of his Mouse efforts.) In UNCLE SCROOGE #320, for instance ("The
Big Break-in"), the characters just don't have any... *substance* behind them.
I'm sure Scarpa is a perfectly capable artist, as a whole, but there's
something about his Duck style that just doesn't work for me. It's just so...
generic. Still, it could be *much* worse. Perhaps I'm just not "used" to his style
yet. I don't know. Whatever the case, I'm not much of a Scarpa fan. (Can you
tell yet?)
Oddly enough, I don't like the coloring in "The Big Break-in," much like your
thoughts on the particular Mickey story you were reffering to. The coloring
seems much too "light" for his stationary style, giving it an obnoxious look
that almost gives me a headache. I'm sure Scarpa's work looks *much* better in
black-and-white.
On the subject of coloring, I can't stand the US color in "World Wide Witch,"
especially when comparing it to the Dutch version, which I also own. While
the Dutch colorist seemed to take time by coloring everything that is possible,
Susan Daigle-Leach seemingly colored in certain "globs" of art one specific,
boring color. (The blue papers, boxes, and shelves on the opening page, for
example.) This is odd, considering I'm usually a fan of her work.
I enjoyed the story otherwise!
--
Dane
>The characters Scarpa draws display a sort of 'elasticity' and they
>'overact' a bit. Not that I don't think he's a good artist, but I'm
>curious what his fans like about his work. Maybe we could discuss this
>a bit?
Personally, I'm not a big fan of Scarpa's Duck work. (I've never had a chance
to read any of his Mouse efforts.) In UNCLE SCROOGE #320, for instance ("The
Big Break-in"), the characters just don't have any... *substance* behind them.
I'm sure Scarpa is a perfectly capable artist, as a whole, but there's
something about his Duck style that just doesn't work for me. It's just so...
generic. Still, it could be *much* worse. Perhaps I'm just not "used" to his style
yet. I don't know. Whatever the case, I'm not much of a Scarpa fan. (Can you
tell yet?)
Oddly enough, I don't like the coloring in "The Big Break-in," much like your
thoughts on the particular Mickey story you were reffering to. The coloring
seems much too "light" for his stationary style, giving it an obnoxious look
that almost gives me a headache. I'm sure Scarpa's work looks *much* better in
black-and-white.
On the subject of coloring, I can't stand the US color in "World Wide Witch,"
especially when comparing it to the Dutch version, which I also own. While
the Dutch colorist seemed to take time by coloring everything that is possible,
Susan Daigle-Leach seemingly colored in certain "globs" of art one specific,
boring color. (The blue papers, boxes, and shelves on the opening page, for
example.) This is odd, considering I'm usually a fan of her work.
I enjoyed the story otherwise!
--
Dane
Petri Kanninen
Nephews' origin
Message 315 -
2003-08-14 at 23:59:45
Frank Bubacz:
> That must have been the first really interesting post in about a dozen
> digests mainly consisting of flame wars. So can anybody tell me now
> where it was first claimed that it was Taliaferro's idea to add nephews
> to the lonely Donald, and if the source is as trustable as Barks?
Nobody seems to have answered this yet (I might have missed an answer in
the message flood, so sorry if I'm repeating someone). There is an
interview of Floyd Gottfredson in the book Mickey Mouse in Color. I don't
if it's the first claim for Taliaferro, but it's definately a claim. There
Gottfredson says:
"The only thing I know in the Comic Strip Department that was adopted in
the pictures was [Al Taliaferro's] creation of Donald's nephews in the
Donald Duck daily strip. Al's widow, Lucy, called me recently to read me a
memo she had found while cleaning up Al's stuff at home. It was from
someone in the Story Department, thanking Al for having created the
nephews and telling him that they were going to use them in a short and
since he created them, they not only wanted to go on recordas
acknowledging the fact that he had, but also wanted to recognize it with a
check, which they sent him.
[...]
When Al introduced the Duck nephews, he did it emulating the three
nephews in Happy Hooligan that Opper had done."
So a lot of contradictory information going around. Nephews' birth might
remain a mystery until end of times.
--
Petri Kanninen (pkannine at cc.hut.fi)
Aku Ankan taskukirja -tietokanta: http://www.perunamaa.net/taskarit/
"AAUGH! It's a half-hour later than it was half an
hour ago! Run! Run!" -Calvin
> That must have been the first really interesting post in about a dozen
> digests mainly consisting of flame wars. So can anybody tell me now
> where it was first claimed that it was Taliaferro's idea to add nephews
> to the lonely Donald, and if the source is as trustable as Barks?
Nobody seems to have answered this yet (I might have missed an answer in
the message flood, so sorry if I'm repeating someone). There is an
interview of Floyd Gottfredson in the book Mickey Mouse in Color. I don't
if it's the first claim for Taliaferro, but it's definately a claim. There
Gottfredson says:
"The only thing I know in the Comic Strip Department that was adopted in
the pictures was [Al Taliaferro's] creation of Donald's nephews in the
Donald Duck daily strip. Al's widow, Lucy, called me recently to read me a
memo she had found while cleaning up Al's stuff at home. It was from
someone in the Story Department, thanking Al for having created the
nephews and telling him that they were going to use them in a short and
since he created them, they not only wanted to go on recordas
acknowledging the fact that he had, but also wanted to recognize it with a
check, which they sent him.
[...]
When Al introduced the Duck nephews, he did it emulating the three
nephews in Happy Hooligan that Opper had done."
So a lot of contradictory information going around. Nephews' birth might
remain a mystery until end of times.
--
Petri Kanninen (pkannine at cc.hut.fi)
Aku Ankan taskukirja -tietokanta: http://www.perunamaa.net/taskarit/
"AAUGH! It's a half-hour later than it was half an
hour ago! Run! Run!" -Calvin